Example of Biomass and Bioenergy format
Recent searches

Example of Biomass and Bioenergy format Example of Biomass and Bioenergy format Example of Biomass and Bioenergy format Example of Biomass and Bioenergy format Example of Biomass and Bioenergy format Example of Biomass and Bioenergy format Example of Biomass and Bioenergy format Example of Biomass and Bioenergy format Example of Biomass and Bioenergy format Example of Biomass and Bioenergy format Example of Biomass and Bioenergy format Example of Biomass and Bioenergy format Example of Biomass and Bioenergy format Example of Biomass and Bioenergy format Example of Biomass and Bioenergy format Example of Biomass and Bioenergy format Example of Biomass and Bioenergy format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Biomass and Bioenergy format Example of Biomass and Bioenergy format Example of Biomass and Bioenergy format Example of Biomass and Bioenergy format Example of Biomass and Bioenergy format Example of Biomass and Bioenergy format Example of Biomass and Bioenergy format Example of Biomass and Bioenergy format Example of Biomass and Bioenergy format Example of Biomass and Bioenergy format Example of Biomass and Bioenergy format Example of Biomass and Bioenergy format Example of Biomass and Bioenergy format Example of Biomass and Bioenergy format Example of Biomass and Bioenergy format Example of Biomass and Bioenergy format Example of Biomass and Bioenergy format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Biomass and Bioenergy — Template for authors

Publisher: Elsevier
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Forestry #9 of 142 down down by 7 ranks
Agronomy and Crop Science #26 of 347 down down by 17 ranks
Waste Management and Disposal #22 of 108 down down by 12 ranks
Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment #49 of 195 down down by 23 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 1224 Published Papers | 8261 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 21/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Wiley

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 10.5
SJR: 1.378
SNIP: 1.376
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.9
SJR: 0.532
SNIP: 0.835
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 7.2
SJR: 1.313
SNIP: 1.925
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 14.8
SJR: 2.489
SNIP: 2.073

Journal Performance & Insights

CiteRatio

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

6.7

2% from 2019

CiteRatio for Biomass and Bioenergy from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 6.7
2019 6.6
2018 6.5
2017 7.1
2016 6.4
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.037

7% from 2019

SJR for Biomass and Bioenergy from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.037
2019 1.11
2018 1.072
2017 1.235
2016 1.198
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.386

2% from 2019

SNIP for Biomass and Bioenergy from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.386
2019 1.415
2018 1.275
2017 1.449
2016 1.411
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 2% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 7% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 2% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.
Biomass and Bioenergy

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Elsevier

Biomass and Bioenergy

Biomass & Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers and short communications, review articles and case studies on biological resources, chemical and biological processes, and biomass products for new renewable sources of energy and materials. Th...... Read More

Forestry

Agronomy and Crop Science

Waste Management and Disposal

Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Agricultural and Biological Sciences

i
Last updated on
21 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
0961-9534
i
Impact Factor
Very High - 3.219
i
Acceptance Rate
Not provided
i
Frequency
Not provided
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
elsarticle-num
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
G. E. Blonder, M. Tinkham, T. M. Klapwijk, Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion, Phys. Rev. B 25 (7) (1982) 4515–4532. URL 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2011.01.048
Review of fast pyrolysis of biomass and product upgrading
Anthony V. Bridgwater1
01 Mar 2012 - Biomass & Bioenergy

Abstract:

This paper provides an updated review on fast pyrolysis of biomass for production of a liquid usually referred to as bio-oil. The technology of fast pyrolysis is described including the major reaction systems. The primary liquid product is characterised by reference to the many properties that impact on its use. These propert... This paper provides an updated review on fast pyrolysis of biomass for production of a liquid usually referred to as bio-oil. The technology of fast pyrolysis is described including the major reaction systems. The primary liquid product is characterised by reference to the many properties that impact on its use. These properties have caused increasingly extensive research to be undertaken to address properties that need modification and this area is reviewed in terms of physical, catalytic and chemical upgrading. Of particular note is the increasing diversity of methods and catalysts and particularly the complexity and sophistication of multi-functional catalyst systems. It is also important to see more companies involved in this technology area and increased take-up of evolving upgrading processes. © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. read more read less
3,727 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2003.08.002
Global potential bioethanol production from wasted crops and crop residues
Seungdo Kim1, Bruce E. Dale1
01 Apr 2004 - Biomass & Bioenergy

Abstract:

The global annual potential bioethanol production from the major crops, corn, barley, oat, rice, wheat, sorghum, and sugar cane, is estimated. To avoid conflicts between human food use and industrial use of crops, only the wasted crop, which is defined as crop lost in distribution, is considered as feedstock. Lignocellulosic ... The global annual potential bioethanol production from the major crops, corn, barley, oat, rice, wheat, sorghum, and sugar cane, is estimated. To avoid conflicts between human food use and industrial use of crops, only the wasted crop, which is defined as crop lost in distribution, is considered as feedstock. Lignocellulosic biomass such as crop residues and sugar cane bagasse are included in feedstock for producing bioethanol as well. There are about 73.9 Tg of dry wasted crops in the world that could potentially produce 49.1 GL year −1 of bioethanol. About 1.5 Pg year −1 of dry lignocellulosic biomass from these seven crops is also available for conversion to bioethanol. Lignocellulosic biomass could produce up to 442 GL year −1 of bioethanol. Thus, the total potential bioethanol production from crop residues and wasted crops is 491 GL year −1 , about 16 times higher than the current world ethanol production. The potential bioethanol production could replace 353 GL of gasoline (32% of the global gasoline consumption) when bioethanol is used in E85 fuel for a midsize passenger vehicle. Furthermore, lignin-rich fermentation residue, which is the coproduct of bioethanol made from crop residues and sugar cane bagasse, can potentially generate both 458 TWh of electricity (about 3.6% of world electricity production) and 2.6 EJ of steam. Asia is the largest potential producer of bioethanol from crop residues and wasted crops, and could produce up to 291 GL year −1 of bioethanol. Rice straw, wheat straw, and corn stover are the most favorable bioethanol feedstocks in Asia. The next highest potential region is Europe ( 69.2 GL of bioethanol), in which most bioethanol comes from wheat straw. Corn stover is the main feedstock in North America, from which about 38.4 GL year −1 of bioethanol can potentially be produced. Globally rice straw can produce 205 GL of bioethanol, which is the largest amount from single biomass feedstock. The next highest potential feedstock is wheat straw, which can produce 104 GL of bioethanol. This paper is intended to give some perspective on the size of the bioethanol feedstock resource, globally and by region, and to summarize relevant data that we believe others will find useful, for example, those who are interested in producing biobased products such as lactic acid, rather than ethanol, from crops and wastes. The paper does not attempt to indicate how much, if any, of this waste material could actually be converted to bioethanol. read more read less

Topics:

Energy crop (66%)66% related to the paper, Biofuel (54%)54% related to the paper, Lignocellulosic biomass (54%)54% related to the paper, Crop residue (52%)52% related to the paper, Bioenergy (52%)52% related to the paper
1,811 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2004.09.002
Ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass: techno-economic performance in short-, middle- and long-term
Carlo N. Hamelinck1, Geertje Van Hooijdonk1, André Faaij1
01 Apr 2005 - Biomass & Bioenergy

Abstract:

The state of the art of hydrolysis-fermentation technologies to produce ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass, as well as developing technologies, is evaluated. Promising conversion concepts for the short-, middle- and long-term are defined. Their technical performance was analysed, and results were used for economic evaluatio... The state of the art of hydrolysis-fermentation technologies to produce ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass, as well as developing technologies, is evaluated. Promising conversion concepts for the short-, middle- and long-term are defined. Their technical performance was analysed, and results were used for economic evaluations. The current available technology, which is based on dilute acid hydrolysis, has about 35% efficiency (HHV) from biomass to ethanol. The overall efficiency, with electricity co-produced from the not fermentable lignin, is about 60%. Improvements in pre-treatment and advances in biotechnology, especially through process combinations can bring the ethanol efficiency to 48% and the overall process efficiency to 68%. We estimate current investment costs at 2.1 k€/kW HHV (at 400 MW HHV input, i.e. a nominal 2000 tonne dry/day input). A future technology in a 5 times larger plant (2 GW HHV ) could have investments of 900 k€/kW HHV . A combined effect of higher hydrolysis-fermentation efficiency, lower specific capital investments, increase of scale and cheaper biomass feedstock costs (from 3 to 2 €/GJ HHV ), could bring the ethanol production costs from 22 €/GJ HHV in the next 5 years, to 13 €/GJ over the 10–15 year time scale, and down to 8.7 €/GJ in 20 or more years. read more read less

Topics:

Lignocellulosic biomass (52%)52% related to the paper, Biofuel (51%)51% related to the paper, Biomass (51%)51% related to the paper, Ethanol fuel (50%)50% related to the paper
1,683 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00102-2
A review of the primary measures for tar elimination in biomass gasification processes
L Lopamudra Devi1, KJ Krzysztof Ptasinski1, Fjjg Frans Janssen1
01 Feb 2003 - Biomass & Bioenergy

Abstract:

Tar formation is one of the major problems to deal with during biomass gasification. Tar condenses at reduced temperature, thus blocking and fouling process equipments such as engines and turbines. Considerable efforts have been directed on tar removal from fuel gas. Tar removal technologies can broadly be divided into two ap... Tar formation is one of the major problems to deal with during biomass gasification. Tar condenses at reduced temperature, thus blocking and fouling process equipments such as engines and turbines. Considerable efforts have been directed on tar removal from fuel gas. Tar removal technologies can broadly be divided into two approaches; hot gas cleaning after the gasifier (secondary methods), and treatments inside the gasifier (primary methods). Although secondary methods are proven to be effective, treatments inside the gasifier are gaining much attention as these may eliminate the need for downstream cleanup. In primary treatment, the gasifier is optimized to produce a fuel gas with minimum tar concentration. The different approaches of primary treatment are (a) proper selection of operating parameters, (b) use of bed additive/catalyst, and (c) gasifier modifications. The operating parameters such as temperature, gasifying agent, equivalence ratio, residence time, etc. play an important role in formation and decomposition of tar. There is a potential of using some active bed additives such as dolomite, olivine, char, etc. inside the gasifier. Ni-based catalyst are reported to be very effective not only for tar reduction, but also for decreasing the amount of nitrogenous compounds such as ammonia. Also, reactor modification can improve the quality of the product gas. The concepts of two-stage gasification and secondary air injection in the gasifier are of prime importance. Some aspects of primary methods and the research and development in this area are reviewed and cited in the present paper. read more read less

Topics:

Tar (64%)64% related to the paper, Char (56%)56% related to the paper, Wood gas generator (54%)54% related to the paper, Fuel gas (51%)51% related to the paper
1,352 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1016/S0961-9534(03)00030-8
The development and current status of perennial rhizomatous grasses as energy crops in the US and Europe
Iris Lewandowski1, J. M. O. Scurlock2, Eva Lindvall3, Myrsini Christou
01 Oct 2003 - Biomass & Bioenergy

Abstract:

Perennial grasses display many beneficial attributes as energy crops, and there has been increasing interest in their use in the US and Europe since the mid-1980s. In the US, the Herbaceous Energy Crops Research Program (HECP), funded by the US Department of Energy (DOE), was established in 1984. After evaluating 35 potential... Perennial grasses display many beneficial attributes as energy crops, and there has been increasing interest in their use in the US and Europe since the mid-1980s. In the US, the Herbaceous Energy Crops Research Program (HECP), funded by the US Department of Energy (DOE), was established in 1984. After evaluating 35 potential herbaceous crops of which 18 were perennial grasses it was concluded that switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) was the native perennial grass which showed the greatest potential. In 1991, the DOE's Bioenergy Feedstock Development Program (BFDP), which evolved from the HECP, decided to focus research on a “model” crop system and to concentrate research resources on switchgrass, in order to rapidly attain its maximal output as a biomass crop. In Europe, about 20 perennial grasses have been tested and four perennial rhizomatous grasses (PRG), namely miscanthus (Miscanthus spp.), reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea), giant reed (Arundo donax) and switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) were chosen for more extensive research programs. Reed canarygrass and giant reed are grasses with the C3 photosynthetic pathway, and are native to Europe. Miscanthus, which originated in Southeast Asia, and switchgrass, native to North America, are both C4 grasses. These four grasses differ in their ecological/climatic demands, their yield potentials, biomass characteristics and crop management requirements. Efficient production of bioenergy from such perennial grasses requires the choice of the most appropriate grass species for the given ecological/climatic conditions. In temperate and warm regions, C4 grasses outyield C3 grasses due to their more efficient photosynthetic pathway. However, the further north perennial grasses are planted, the more likely cool season grasses are to yield more than warm season grasses. Low winter temperatures and short vegetation periods are major limits to the growth of C4 grasses in northern Europe. With increasing temperatures towards central and southern Europe, the productivity of C4 grasses and therefore their biomass yields and competitiveness increase. Since breeding of and research on perennial rhizomatous grasses (PRG) is comparatively recent, there is still a significant need for further development. Some of the given limitations, like insufficient biomass quality or the need for adaption to certain ecological/climatic zones, may be overcome by breeding varieties especially for biomass production. Furthermore, sure and cost-effective establishment methods for some of the grasses, and effective crop production and harvest methods, have yet to be developed. This review summarizes the experience with selecting perennial grasses for bioenergy production in both the US and Europe, and gives an overview of the characteristics and requirements of the four most investigated perennial rhizomatous grasses; switchgrass, miscanthus, reed canarygrass and giant reed. read more read less

Topics:

Ornamental grass (64%)64% related to the paper, Energy crop (61%)61% related to the paper, Panicum virgatum (59%)59% related to the paper, Perennial plant (56%)56% related to the paper, Arundo donax (56%)56% related to the paper
1,318 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Biomass and Bioenergy.

It automatically formats your research paper to Elsevier formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Biomass and Bioenergy format uses elsarticle-num citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Biomass and Bioenergy in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Biomass and Bioenergy guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Biomass and Bioenergy guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Biomass and Bioenergy guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Biomass and Bioenergy?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Biomass and Bioenergy citation style.

4. Can I use the Biomass and Bioenergy templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Biomass and Bioenergy.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Biomass and Bioenergy that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Biomass and Bioenergy that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Biomass and Bioenergy?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Biomass and Bioenergy.

7. Where can I find the template for the Biomass and Bioenergy?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Biomass and Bioenergy's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Biomass and Bioenergy's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Biomass and Bioenergy an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Biomass and Bioenergy is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Biomass and Bioenergy?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Biomass and Bioenergy?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Biomass and Bioenergy?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Biomass and Bioenergy, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Biomass and Bioenergy's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Biomass and Bioenergy?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Biomass and Bioenergy. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Biomass and Bioenergy?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Biomass and Bioenergy are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Biomass and Bioenergy?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Biomass and Bioenergy's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Biomass and Bioenergy in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Biomass and Bioenergy Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Biomass and Bioenergy formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template