Example of GCB Bioenergy format
Recent searches

Example of GCB Bioenergy format Example of GCB Bioenergy format Example of GCB Bioenergy format Example of GCB Bioenergy format Example of GCB Bioenergy format Example of GCB Bioenergy format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of GCB Bioenergy format Example of GCB Bioenergy format Example of GCB Bioenergy format Example of GCB Bioenergy format Example of GCB Bioenergy format Example of GCB Bioenergy format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

GCB Bioenergy — Template for authors

Publisher: Wiley
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Forestry #1 of 142 -
Agronomy and Crop Science #2 of 347 up up by 2 ranks
Waste Management and Disposal #10 of 108 down down by 5 ranks
Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment #25 of 195 down down by 9 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 349 Published Papers | 3666 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 11/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.7
SJR: 1.037
SNIP: 1.386
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.9
SJR: 0.532
SNIP: 0.835
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 7.2
SJR: 1.313
SNIP: 1.925
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 14.8
SJR: 2.489
SNIP: 2.073

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

5.316

10% from 2018

Impact factor for GCB Bioenergy from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 5.316
2018 4.849
2017 5.415
2016 4.655
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

10.5

2% from 2019

CiteRatio for GCB Bioenergy from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 10.5
2019 10.7
2018 10.9
2017 8.9
2016 8.9
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 10% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has decreased by 2% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

1.378

24% from 2019

SJR for GCB Bioenergy from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.378
2019 1.81
2018 1.9
2017 1.816
2016 1.775
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.376

24% from 2019

SNIP for GCB Bioenergy from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.376
2019 1.805
2018 1.56
2017 1.544
2016 1.553
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 24% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 24% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

GCB Bioenergy

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Wiley

GCB Bioenergy

First to know the nature of bioenergy GCB Bioenergy exists to promote understanding of the interface between biological sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. All aspects of current and potential biofuel production, from forestry, crop prod...... Read More

Forestry

Agronomy and Crop Science

Waste Management and Disposal

Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Agricultural and Biological Sciences

i
Last updated on
11 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
1757-1693
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.582
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
apa
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al, 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder GE, Tinkham M, Klapwijk TM (1982) Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys. Rev. B 25(7), 4515–4532

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/GCBB.12037
Biochar and its effects on plant productivity and nutrient cycling: a meta‐analysis
Lori A. Biederman1, W. Stanley Harpole1
01 Mar 2013 - Gcb Bioenergy

Abstract:

Biochar is a carbon-rich coproduct resulting from pyrolyzing biomass. When applied to the soil it resists decomposition, effectively sequestering the applied carbon and mitigating anthropogenic CO2 emissions. Other promoted benefits of biochar application to soil include increased plant productivity and reduced nutrient leach... Biochar is a carbon-rich coproduct resulting from pyrolyzing biomass. When applied to the soil it resists decomposition, effectively sequestering the applied carbon and mitigating anthropogenic CO2 emissions. Other promoted benefits of biochar application to soil include increased plant productivity and reduced nutrient leaching. However, the effects of biochar are variable and it remains unclear if recent enthusiasm can be justified. We evaluate ecosystem responses to biochar application with a meta-analysis of 371 independent studies culled from 114 published manuscripts. We find that despite variability introduced by soil and climate, the addition of biochar to soils resulted, on average, in increased aboveground productivity, crop yield, soil microbial biomass, rhizobia nodulation, plant K tissue concentration, soil phosphorus (P), soil potassium (K), total soil nitrogen (N), and total soil carbon (C) compared with control conditions. Soil pH also tended to increase, becoming less acidic, following the addition of biochar. Variables that showed no significant mean response to biochar included belowground productivity, the ratio of aboveground : belowground biomass, mycorrhizal colonization of roots, plant tissue N, and soil P concentration, and soil inorganic N. Additional analyses found no detectable relationship between the amount of biochar added and aboveground productivity. Our results provide the first quantitative review of the effects of biochar on multiple ecosystem functions and the central tendencies suggest that biochar holds promise in being a win-win-win solution to energy, carbon storage, and ecosystem function. However, biochar's impacts on a fourth component, the downstream nontarget environments, remain unknown and present a critical research gap. read more read less

Topics:

Biochar (77%)77% related to the paper, Slash-and-char (71%)71% related to the paper, Soil organic matter (62%)62% related to the paper, Soil fertility (61%)61% related to the paper, Soil conditioner (60%)60% related to the paper
View PDF
1,245 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/GCBB.12266
Biochar stability in soil: meta-analysis of decomposition and priming effects
Jinyang Wang1, Jinyang Wang2, Zhengqin Xiong2, Yakov Kuzyakov1, Yakov Kuzyakov3
01 May 2016 - Gcb Bioenergy

Abstract:

The stability and decomposition of biochar are fundamental to understand its persistence in soil, its contribution to carbon (C) sequestration, and thus its role in the global C cycle. Our current knowledge about the degradability of biochar, however, is limited. Using 128 observations of biochar-derived CO2 from 24 studies w... The stability and decomposition of biochar are fundamental to understand its persistence in soil, its contribution to carbon (C) sequestration, and thus its role in the global C cycle. Our current knowledge about the degradability of biochar, however, is limited. Using 128 observations of biochar-derived CO2 from 24 studies with stable (13C) and radioactive (14C) carbon isotopes, we meta-analyzed the biochar decomposition in soil and estimated its mean residence time (MRT). The decomposed amount of biochar increased logarithmically with experimental duration, and the decomposition rate decreased with time. The biochar decomposition rate varied significantly with experimental duration, feedstock, pyrolysis temperature, and soil clay content. The MRTs of labile and recalcitrant biochar C pools were estimated to be about 108 days and 556 years with pool sizes of 3% and 97%, respectively. These results show that only a small part of biochar is bioavailable and that the remaining 97% contribute directly to long-term C sequestration in soil. The second database (116 observations from 21 studies) was used to evaluate the priming effects after biochar addition. Biochar slightly retarded the mineralization of soil organic matter (SOM; overall mean: −3.8%, 95% CI = −8.1–0.8%) compared to the soil without biochar addition. Significant negative priming was common for studies with a duration shorter than half a year (−8.6%), crop-derived biochar (−20.3%), fast pyrolysis (−18.9%), the lowest pyrolysis temperature (−18.5%), and small application amounts (−11.9%). In contrast, biochar addition to sandy soils strongly stimulated SOM mineralization by 20.8%. This indicates that biochar stimulates microbial activities especially in soils with low fertility. Furthermore, abiotic and biotic processes, as well as the characteristics of biochar and soils, affecting biochar decomposition are discussed. We conclude that biochar can persist in soils on a centennial scale and that it has a positive effect on SOM dynamics and thus on C sequestration. read more read less

Topics:

Biochar (77%)77% related to the paper, Soil organic matter (55%)55% related to the paper, Mineralization (soil science) (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
654 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/GCBB.12018
Production and characterization of slow pyrolysis biochar: influence of feedstock type and pyrolysis conditions
Frederik Ronsse1, Sven van Hecke1, Dane Dickinson1, Wolter Prins1
01 Mar 2013 - Gcb Bioenergy

Abstract:

Biochar was produced by fixed-bed slow pyrolysis from various feedstock biomasses under a range of process conditions. Feedstocks used were pine wood, wheat straw, green waste and dried algae. Process conditions varied were the highest treatment temperature (HTT) and residence time. The produced chars were characterized by pr... Biochar was produced by fixed-bed slow pyrolysis from various feedstock biomasses under a range of process conditions. Feedstocks used were pine wood, wheat straw, green waste and dried algae. Process conditions varied were the highest treatment temperature (HTT) and residence time. The produced chars were characterized by proximate analysis, CHN-elemental analysis, pH in solution, bomb calorimetry for higher heating value, N2 adsorption for BET surface area and two biological degradation assays (oxygen demand, carbon mineralization in soil). In proximate analysis, it was found that the fixed carbon content (expressed in wt% of dry and ash-free biochar) in the biochar samples strongly depended on the intensity of the thermal treatment (i.e. higher temperatures and longer residence times in the pyrolysis process). The actual yield in fixed carbon (i.e. the biochar fixed carbon content expressed as wt% of the dry and ash-free original feedstock biomass weight) was practically insensitive to the highest treatment temperature or residence time. The pH in solution, higher heating value and BET surface positively correlated with pyrolysis temperature. Finally, soil incubation tests showed that the addition of biochar to the soil initially marginally reduced the C-mineralization rate compared against the control soil samples, for which a possible explanation could be that the soil microbial community needs to adapt to the new conditions. This effect was more pronounced when adding chars with high fixed carbon content (resulting from more severe thermal treatment), as chars with low fixed carbon content (produced through mild thermal treatment) had a larger amount of volatile, more easily biodegradable, carbon compounds. read more read less

Topics:

Biochar (70%)70% related to the paper, Pyrolysis (58%)58% related to the paper, Compounds of carbon (53%)53% related to the paper, Carbon (53%)53% related to the paper, Heat of combustion (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
635 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/GCBB.12205
Bioenergy and climate change mitigation: an assessment.
01 Sep 2015 - Gcb Bioenergy

Abstract:

Bioenergy deployment offers significant potential for climate change mitigation, but also carries considerable risks. In this review, we bring together perspectives of various communities involved in the research and regulation of bioenergy deployment in the context of climate change mitigation: Land-use and energy experts, l... Bioenergy deployment offers significant potential for climate change mitigation, but also carries considerable risks. In this review, we bring together perspectives of various communities involved in the research and regulation of bioenergy deployment in the context of climate change mitigation: Land-use and energy experts, land-use and integrated assessment modelers, human geographers, ecosystem researchers, climate scientists and two different strands of life-cycle assessment experts. We summarize technological options, outline the state-of-the-art knowledge on various climate effects, provide an update on estimates of technical resource potential and comprehensively identify sustainability effects. Cellulosic feedstocks, increased end-use efficiency, improved land carbon-stock management and residue use, and, when fully developed, BECCS appear as the most promising options, depending on development costs, implementation, learning, and risk management. Combined heat and power, efficient biomass cookstoves and small-scale power generation for rural areas can help to promote energy access and sustainable development, along with reduced emissions. We estimate the sustainable technical potential as up to 100EJ: high agreement; 100-300EJ: medium agreement; above 300EJ: low agreement. Stabilization scenarios indicate that bioenergy may supply from 10 to 245EJyr(-1) to global primary energy supply by 2050. Models indicate that, if technological and governance preconditions are met, large-scale deployment (>200EJ), together with BECCS, could help to keep global warming below 2 degrees degrees of preindustrial levels; but such high deployment of land-intensive bioenergy feedstocks could also lead to detrimental climate effects, negatively impact ecosystems, biodiversity and livelihoods. The integration of bioenergy systems into agriculture and forest landscapes can improve land and water use efficiency and help address concerns about environmental impacts. We conclude that the high variability in pathways, uncertainties in technological development and ambiguity in political decision render forecasts on deployment levels and climate effects very difficult. However, uncertainty about projections should not preclude pursuing beneficial bioenergy options. read more read less

Topics:

Bio-energy with carbon capture and storage (58%)58% related to the paper, Climate change mitigation (58%)58% related to the paper, Sustainability (55%)55% related to the paper, Global warming (54%)54% related to the paper, Sustainable development (53%)53% related to the paper
View PDF
550 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1757-1707.2011.01102.X
CO2 emissions from biomass combustion for bioenergy: atmospheric decay and contribution to global warming
01 Oct 2011 - Gcb Bioenergy

Abstract:

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from biomass combustion are traditionally assumed climate neutral if the bioenergy system is carbon (C) flux neutral, i.e. the CO2 released from biofuel combustion approximately equals the amount of CO2 sequestered in biomass. This convention, widely adopted in life cycle assessment (LCA) studie... Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from biomass combustion are traditionally assumed climate neutral if the bioenergy system is carbon (C) flux neutral, i.e. the CO2 released from biofuel combustion approximately equals the amount of CO2 sequestered in biomass. This convention, widely adopted in life cycle assessment (LCA) studies of bioenergy systems, underestimates the climate impact of bioenergy. Besides CO2 emissions from permanent C losses, CO2 emissions from C flux neutral systems (that is from temporary C losses) also contribute to climate change: before being captured by biomass regrowth, CO2 molecules spend time in the atmosphere and contribute to global warming. In this paper, a method to estimate the climate impact of CO2 emissions from biomass combustion is proposed. Our method uses CO2 impulse response functions (IRF) from C cycle models in the elaboration of atmospheric decay functions for biomass-derived CO2 emissions. Their contributions to global warming are then quantified with a unit-based index, the GWPbio. Since this index is expressed as a function of the rotation period of the biomass, our results can be applied to CO2 emissions from combustion of all the different biomass species, from annual row crops to slower growing boreal forest. read more read less

Topics:

Biomass (59%)59% related to the paper, Global warming (58%)58% related to the paper, Carbon sequestration (55%)55% related to the paper, Bioenergy (54%)54% related to the paper, Biofuel (54%)54% related to the paper
View PDF
522 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for GCB Bioenergy.

It automatically formats your research paper to Wiley formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

GCB Bioenergy format uses apa citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write GCB Bioenergy in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the GCB Bioenergy guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the GCB Bioenergy guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the GCB Bioenergy guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in GCB Bioenergy?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the GCB Bioenergy citation style.

4. Can I use the GCB Bioenergy templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for GCB Bioenergy.

5. Can I use a manuscript in GCB Bioenergy that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper GCB Bioenergy that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in GCB Bioenergy?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in GCB Bioenergy.

7. Where can I find the template for the GCB Bioenergy?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per GCB Bioenergy's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the GCB Bioenergy's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. GCB Bioenergy an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's GCB Bioenergy is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like GCB Bioenergy?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like GCB Bioenergy?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using GCB Bioenergy?

After writing your paper autoformatting in GCB Bioenergy, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is GCB Bioenergy's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for GCB Bioenergy?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for GCB Bioenergy. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In GCB Bioenergy?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for GCB Bioenergy are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the GCB Bioenergy?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per GCB Bioenergy's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download GCB Bioenergy in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in GCB Bioenergy Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to GCB Bioenergy formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template