Example of Health Psychology Review format
Recent searches

Example of Health Psychology Review format Example of Health Psychology Review format Example of Health Psychology Review format Example of Health Psychology Review format Example of Health Psychology Review format Example of Health Psychology Review format Example of Health Psychology Review format Example of Health Psychology Review format Example of Health Psychology Review format Example of Health Psychology Review format Example of Health Psychology Review format Example of Health Psychology Review format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Health Psychology Review format Example of Health Psychology Review format Example of Health Psychology Review format Example of Health Psychology Review format Example of Health Psychology Review format Example of Health Psychology Review format Example of Health Psychology Review format Example of Health Psychology Review format Example of Health Psychology Review format Example of Health Psychology Review format Example of Health Psychology Review format Example of Health Psychology Review format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Health Psychology Review — Template for authors

Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Clinical Psychology #4 of 283 down down by 1 rank
Psychiatry and Mental Health #15 of 502 down down by 4 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 89 Published Papers | 980 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 14/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.7
SJR: 0.858
SNIP: 1.482
open access Open Access

Cambridge University Press

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.4
SJR: 1.074
SNIP: 1.257
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.6
SJR: 1.395
SNIP: 1.291
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.3
SJR: 1.568
SNIP: 1.655

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

3.705

59% from 2018

Impact factor for Health Psychology Review from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 3.705
2018 9.07
2017 8.597
2016 7.241
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

11.0

40% from 2019

CiteRatio for Health Psychology Review from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 11.0
2019 18.3
2018 18.0
2017 13.2
2016 11.9
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has decreased by 59% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has decreased by 40% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

2.328

29% from 2019

SJR for Health Psychology Review from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.328
2019 3.259
2018 4.898
2017 3.488
2016 2.824
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

3.079

28% from 2019

SNIP for Health Psychology Review from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 3.079
2019 4.253
2018 4.128
2017 3.373
2016 2.736
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 29% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 28% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Health Psychology Review

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Taylor and Francis

Health Psychology Review

Health Psychology Review (HPR) is a landmark publication – the first review journal in the important and growing discipline of health psychology. This new international forum, edited by a highly respected team, provides a leading environment for review, theory, and conceptual ...... Read More

Psychology

i
Last updated on
13 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
1743-7199
i
Impact Factor
High - 2.419
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
Taylor and Francis Custom Citation
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder GE, Tinkham M, Klapwijk TM. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys Rev B. 1982; 25(7):4515–4532. Available from: 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2010.510659
Evaluating the contribution of interpretative phenomenological analysis
Jonathan A. Smith1
01 Mar 2011 - Health Psychology Review

Abstract:

This paper presents the results of a review of studies employing interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) obtained from three of the major databases: web of science, medline and psychinfo. Between 1996 and 2008, 293 papers presenting empirical IPA studies were published. Trends over time are presented. This is followed ... This paper presents the results of a review of studies employing interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) obtained from three of the major databases: web of science, medline and psychinfo. Between 1996 and 2008, 293 papers presenting empirical IPA studies were published. Trends over time are presented. This is followed by a categorisation of the content area of that corpus. The biggest specific area of research within IPA is illness experience, it forming the subject of nearly a quarter of the corpus. The paper then describes a guide for evaluating IPA research which is used to assess the illness experience papers. Detailed summaries are provided of the papers rated as good. These summaries describe the substantive findings as well as the markers of high quality. The paper finishes with a summary of core features of high-quality IPA work. read more read less

Topics:

Interpretative phenomenological analysis (57%)57% related to the paper
1,295 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2013.869710
Time to retire the theory of planned behaviour
Falko F. Sniehotta1, Justin Presseau1, Vera Araujo-Soares1
02 Jan 2014 - Health Psychology Review

Abstract:

It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn't matter how smart you are. If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong. (Richard P. Feynman)The Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB; Ajzen... It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn't matter how smart you are. If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong. (Richard P. Feynman)The Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB; Ajzen... read more read less

Topics:

Theory of planned behavior (60%)60% related to the paper, Psychological Theory (53%)53% related to the paper
View PDF
1,077 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2014.941722
Theories of behaviour and behaviour change across the social and behavioural sciences: a scoping review
Rachel Davis1, Rona Campbell2, Zoe Hildon1, Laura Hobbs1, Susan Michie1
07 Aug 2015 - Health Psychology Review

Abstract:

Interventions to change health-related behaviours typically have modest effects and may be more effective if grounded in appropriate theory. Most theories applied to public health interventions tend to emphasise individual capabilities and motivation, with limited reference to context and social factors. Intervention effectiv... Interventions to change health-related behaviours typically have modest effects and may be more effective if grounded in appropriate theory. Most theories applied to public health interventions tend to emphasise individual capabilities and motivation, with limited reference to context and social factors. Intervention effectiveness may be increased by drawing on a wider range of theories incorporating social, cultural and economic factors that influence behaviour. The primary aim of this paper is to identify theories of behaviour and behaviour change of potential relevance to public health interventions across four scientific disciplines: psychology, sociology, anthropology and economics. We report in detail the methodology of our scoping review used to identify these theories including which involved a systematic search of electronic databases, consultation with a multidisciplinary advisory group, web searching, searching of reference lists and hand searching of key behavioural science journals. Of secondary interest we developed a list of agreed criteria for judging the quality of the theories. We identified 82 theories and 9 criteria for assessing theory quality. The potential relevance of this wide-ranging number of theories to public health interventions and the ease and usefulness of evaluating the theories in terms of the quality criteria are however yet to be determined. read more read less

Topics:

Behavioural sciences (56%)56% related to the paper, Behavior change (55%)55% related to the paper
View PDF
863 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2016.1151372
Theoretical explanations for maintenance of behaviour change: a systematic review of behaviour theories
Dominika Kwasnicka1, Stephan U Dombrowski2, Martin White3, Falko F. Sniehotta1
07 Mar 2016 - Health Psychology Review

Abstract:

Background: Behaviour change interventions are effective in supporting individuals in achieving temporary behaviour change. Behaviour change maintenance, however, is rarely attained. The aim of this review was to identify and synthesise current theoretical explanations for behaviour change maintenance to inform future researc... Background: Behaviour change interventions are effective in supporting individuals in achieving temporary behaviour change. Behaviour change maintenance, however, is rarely attained. The aim of this review was to identify and synthesise current theoretical explanations for behaviour change maintenance to inform future research and practice.Methods: Potentially relevant theories were identified through systematic searches of electronic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO). In addition, an existing database of 80 theories was searched, and 25 theory experts were consulted. Theories were included if they formulated hypotheses about behaviour change maintenance. Included theories were synthesised thematically to ascertain overarching explanations for behaviour change maintenance. Initial theoretical themes were cross-validated.Findings: One hundred and seventeen behaviour theories were identified, of which 100 met the inclusion criteria. Five overarching, interconnected themes representing theor... read more read less
View PDF
748 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Health Psychology Review.

It automatically formats your research paper to Taylor and Francis formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Health Psychology Review format uses Taylor and Francis Custom Citation citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Health Psychology Review in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Health Psychology Review guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Health Psychology Review guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Health Psychology Review guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Health Psychology Review?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Health Psychology Review citation style.

4. Can I use the Health Psychology Review templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Health Psychology Review.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Health Psychology Review that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Health Psychology Review that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Health Psychology Review?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Health Psychology Review.

7. Where can I find the template for the Health Psychology Review?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Health Psychology Review's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Health Psychology Review's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Health Psychology Review an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Health Psychology Review is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Health Psychology Review?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Health Psychology Review?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Health Psychology Review?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Health Psychology Review, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Health Psychology Review's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Health Psychology Review?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Health Psychology Review. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Health Psychology Review?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Health Psychology Review are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Health Psychology Review?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Health Psychology Review's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Health Psychology Review in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Health Psychology Review Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Health Psychology Review formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template