Example of Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review format
Recent searches

Example of Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review format Example of Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review format Example of Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review format Example of Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review format Example of Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review format Example of Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review format Example of Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review format Example of Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review format Example of Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review format Example of Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review format Example of Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review format Example of Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review format Example of Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review format Example of Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review format Example of Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review format Example of Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review format Example of Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review format Example of Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review format Example of Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review format Example of Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review format Example of Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review format Example of Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review format Example of Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review format Example of Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review format Example of Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review format Example of Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review format Example of Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review format Example of Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review format Example of Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review format Example of Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review format Example of Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review — Template for authors

Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Economic Geology #7 of 38 up up by 1 rank
Mechanical Engineering #111 of 596 up up by 34 ranks
Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology #38 of 195 up up by 4 ranks
Chemistry (all) #97 of 398 up up by 38 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 161 Published Papers | 821 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 11/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.7
SJR: 1.092
SNIP: 2.014
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

American Chemical Society

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 19.3
SJR: 4.853
SNIP: 2.079
open access Open Access

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.1
SJR: 0.759
SNIP: 1.506

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

2.785

72% from 2018

Impact factor for Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 2.785
2018 1.615
2017 2.117
2016 1.219
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

5.1

16% from 2019

CiteRatio for Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 5.1
2019 4.4
2018 3.2
2017 3.0
2016 2.6
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 72% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 16% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.686

6% from 2019

SJR for Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.686
2019 0.731
2018 0.415
2017 0.766
2016 0.61
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.835

6% from 2019

SNIP for Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.835
2019 1.946
2018 1.068
2017 1.674
2016 1.047
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 6% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 6% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Taylor and Francis

Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review

Approved by publishing and review experts on SciSpace, this template is built as per for Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review formatting guidelines as mentioned in Taylor and Francis author instructions. The current version was created on 11 Jul 2020 and has been used by 374 authors to write and format their manuscripts to this journal.

Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Mechanical Engineering

Economic Geology

General Chemistry

Earth and Planetary Sciences

i
Last updated on
11 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
0882-7508
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.038
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
Taylor and Francis Custom Citation
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder GE, Tinkham M, Klapwijk TM. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys Rev B. 1982; 25(7):4515–4532. Available from: 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/08827508908952646
The Effect of Bubble Size on Fine Particle Flotation
Roe-Hoan Yoon1, Gerald H. Luttrell1

Abstract:

Expressions for the probability of collision (Pc) and adhesion (Pa) have been derived for fine particle flotation by calculating the trajectory of particles as they flow past a bubble in streamline How. Three different flow regimes have been considered in the present work, i.e., Stokes, potential and intermediate. For the int... Expressions for the probability of collision (Pc) and adhesion (Pa) have been derived for fine particle flotation by calculating the trajectory of particles as they flow past a bubble in streamline How. Three different flow regimes have been considered in the present work, i.e., Stokes, potential and intermediate. For the intermediate flow conditions in which most flotation operations are carried out, the particle trajectories have been determined using an empirical stream function derived in the present work. For the case of a very hydrophobic coal sample, the values of the probability of collection (P) determined experimentally have been found to be in close agreement with the theoretically predicted Pc values over a range of bubble and particle sizes The expression for Pa has been derived by determining the time it takes for a particle to slide along the surface of a bubble after collision. It has been assumed that the bubble-particte adhesion occurs when the sliding time is equal to or exceed... read more read less

Topics:

Bubble (57%)57% related to the paper, Particle (53%)53% related to the paper, Stream function (51%)51% related to the paper
451 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/08827500008914177
Pressure Acid Leaching of Nickel Laterites: A Review
B. I. Whittington1, David M. Muir1

Abstract:

A review of the literature over the past 30 years on the processing of nickel laterites by high temperature acid leaching has been carried out to provide a better understanding of the mineralogy, leaching process chemistry and effect of operating conditions on nickel recovery, residue properties and scaling. Particular attent... A review of the literature over the past 30 years on the processing of nickel laterites by high temperature acid leaching has been carried out to provide a better understanding of the mineralogy, leaching process chemistry and effect of operating conditions on nickel recovery, residue properties and scaling. Particular attention is paid to the leaching experience of the commercial Moa Bay plant and to the recently reported testwork and flowsheets associated with the three Western Australia lalerite plants that will be operating in 1999. It is shown that laterites can vary significantly in their mineralogy according to location, climate and depth, and that the main host minerals for nickel and cobalt can be either goethite (iron oxide) or nontronite (clay) or manganese oxides. The mechanism of leaching involves acid dissolution of the host mineral lattice followed by hydrolysis and precipitation (transformation) of a variety of insoluble oxides and sulphates of iron, aluminium and silica under the... read more read less

Topics:

Leaching (metallurgy) (59%)59% related to the paper, Nickel (53%)53% related to the paper, Nontronite (53%)53% related to the paper, Iron oxide (51%)51% related to the paper
204 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/08827500802498199
Utilization of alumina red mud for synthesis of inorganic polymeric materials
Dimitrios D. Dimas1, Ioanna Giannopoulou1, Dimitrios Panias1

Abstract:

Red mud is a residue coming from the metallurgical treatment of bauxite with the Bayer process. Million of tons of red mud are produced annually worldwide and disposed of on land, degrading vast areas. Therefore, red mud utilization is a first-priority issue for any alumina plant. In the present work, the potential use of red... Red mud is a residue coming from the metallurgical treatment of bauxite with the Bayer process. Million of tons of red mud are produced annually worldwide and disposed of on land, degrading vast areas. Therefore, red mud utilization is a first-priority issue for any alumina plant. In the present work, the potential use of red mud for synthesis of inorganic polymeric materials through geopolymerization process was studied. The main focus was the production of inorganic polymeric materials that could be used in the construction sector as artificial structural elements such as massive bricks. The geopolymerization process involves a chemical reaction between red mud and alkali metal silicate solution under highly alkaline conditions. The product of this reaction is an amorphous to semi-crystalline polymeric structure, which binds the individual particles of red mud transforming the initial granular material to a compact and strong one. The effect of main synthesis parameters—like solid-to-liquid ratio, caust... read more read less

Topics:

Red mud (74%)74% related to the paper, Bayer process (55%)55% related to the paper
182 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/08827508908952644
Hydrodynamics of Bubble-Mineral Particle Collisions

Abstract:

This chapter surveys the hydrodynamic interactions between particles and bubbles in flotation. Some new approximate equations are given for collision efficiency. It is shown that collision processes of particles with bubbles are less effective than sliding processes because of their short duration and the strong deformation o... This chapter surveys the hydrodynamic interactions between particles and bubbles in flotation. Some new approximate equations are given for collision efficiency. It is shown that collision processes of particles with bubbles are less effective than sliding processes because of their short duration and the strong deformation of the bubble at the collision point. Methods are suggested to estimate collision and sliding times. During contact between a particle and a bubble, the just forming thin liquid film must drain off and rupture. Therefore, possible ways of calculating film drainage time are discussed. Furthermore, possible experimental methods to determine these quantities are briefly described and recent experimental results presented. read more read less

Topics:

Bubble (54%)54% related to the paper, Collision (51%)51% related to the paper, Particle (51%)51% related to the paper
172 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review.

It automatically formats your research paper to Taylor and Francis formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review format uses Taylor and Francis Custom Citation citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review citation style.

4. Can I use the Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review.

7. Where can I find the template for the Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template