Example of Social Issues and Policy Review format
Recent searches

Example of Social Issues and Policy Review format Example of Social Issues and Policy Review format Example of Social Issues and Policy Review format Example of Social Issues and Policy Review format Example of Social Issues and Policy Review format Example of Social Issues and Policy Review format Example of Social Issues and Policy Review format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Social Issues and Policy Review format Example of Social Issues and Policy Review format Example of Social Issues and Policy Review format Example of Social Issues and Policy Review format Example of Social Issues and Policy Review format Example of Social Issues and Policy Review format Example of Social Issues and Policy Review format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Social Issues and Policy Review — Template for authors

Publisher: Wiley
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Sociology and Political Science #1 of 1269 up up by 1 rank
Social Sciences (miscellaneous) #2 of 334 -
Social Psychology #3 of 289 up up by 1 rank
Applied Psychology #3 of 227 down down by 1 rank
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 34 Published Papers | 580 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 12/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.2
SJR: 1.638
SNIP: 1.76
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.4
SJR: 0.509
SNIP: 0.713
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
Good
CiteRatio: 0.6
SJR: 0.235
SNIP: 0.884
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.3
SJR: 1.446
SNIP: 1.572

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

8.938

2% from 2018

Impact factor for Social Issues and Policy Review from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 8.938
2018 8.733
2017 6.143
2016 5.714
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

17.1

7% from 2019

CiteRatio for Social Issues and Policy Review from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 17.1
2019 16.0
2018 14.2
2017 12.0
2016 8.0
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 2% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 7% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

3.798

6% from 2019

SJR for Social Issues and Policy Review from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 3.798
2019 4.061
2018 3.919
2017 2.748
2016 2.464
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

4.619

14% from 2019

SNIP for Social Issues and Policy Review from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 4.619
2019 5.369
2018 4.272
2017 3.426
2016 2.806
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 6% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 14% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Social Issues and Policy Review

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Wiley

Social Issues and Policy Review

The mission of Social Issues and Policy Review (SIPR) is to provide state of the art and timely theoretical and empirical reviews of topics and programs of research that are directly relevant to understanding and addressing social issues and public policy. SIPR, like other rev...... Read More

Social Sciences

i
Last updated on
12 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
1751-2395
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.163
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Yellow faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
apa
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker, C.W.J. (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene.Phys. Rev. Lett., 97 (6), 067 007. URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007.

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/SIPR.12033
Do Social Network Sites Enhance or Undermine Subjective Well‐Being? A Critical Review
Philippe Verduyn1, Philippe Verduyn2, Oscar Ybarra3, Maxime Résibois1, John Jonides3, Ethan Kross3

Abstract:

Social network sites are ubiquitous and now constitute a common tool people use to interact with one another in daily life. Here we review the consequences of interacting with social network sites for subjective well-being—that is, how people feel moment-to-moment and how satisfied they are with their lives. We begin by clari... Social network sites are ubiquitous and now constitute a common tool people use to interact with one another in daily life. Here we review the consequences of interacting with social network sites for subjective well-being—that is, how people feel moment-to-moment and how satisfied they are with their lives. We begin by clarifying the constructs that we focus on in this review: social network sites and subjective well-being. Next, we review the literature that explains how these constructs are related. This research reveals: (a) negative relationships between passively using social network sites and subjective well-being, and (b) positive relationships between actively using social network sites and subjective well-being, with the former relationship being more robust than the latter. Specifically, passively using social network sites provokes social comparisons and envy, which have negative downstream consequences for subjective well-being. In contrast, when active usage of social network sites predicts subjective well-being, it seems to do so by creating social capital and stimulating feelings of social connectedness. We conclude by discussing the policy implications of this work. read more read less

Topics:

Social network (64%)64% related to the paper, Social inhibition (56%)56% related to the paper, Social comparison theory (55%)55% related to the paper, Social connectedness (54%)54% related to the paper, Well-being (53%)53% related to the paper
View PDF
539 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/SIPR.12022
Norm Perception as a Vehicle for Social Change
Margaret Tankard1, Elizabeth Levy Paluck1

Abstract:

How can we change social norms, the standards describing typical or desirable behavior? Because individuals’ perceptions of norms guide their personal behavior, influencing these perceptions is one way to create social change. And yet individuals do not form perceptions of typical or desirable behavior in an unbiased manner. ... How can we change social norms, the standards describing typical or desirable behavior? Because individuals’ perceptions of norms guide their personal behavior, influencing these perceptions is one way to create social change. And yet individuals do not form perceptions of typical or desirable behavior in an unbiased manner. Individuals attend to select sources of normative information, and their resulting perceptions rarely match actual rates of behavior in their environment. Thus, changing social norms requires an understanding of how individuals perceive norms in the first place. We describe three sources of information that people use to understand norms—individual behavior, summary information about a group, and institutional signals. Social change interventions have used each source to influence perceived norms and behaviors, including recycling, intimate-partner violence, and peer harassment. We discuss conditions under which influence over perceived norms is likely to be stronger, based on the source of the normative information and individuals’ relationship to the source. Finally, we point to future research and suggest when it is most appropriate to use a norm change strategy in the interest of behavior and social change. read more read less

Topics:

Conformity (66%)66% related to the paper, Norm (social) (65%)65% related to the paper, Social norms approach (65%)65% related to the paper, Social change (58%)58% related to the paper, Normative (57%)57% related to the paper
401 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1751-2409.2008.00009.X
Volunteerism: Social Issues Perspectives and Social Policy Implications
Mark Snyder1, Allen M. Omoto2

Abstract:

This analytic review focuses on theory and research on volunteerism. First, we define volunteerism as freely chosen helping activities that extend over time and that are often performed through organizations and on behalf of receptive causes or individuals. Next, we link these definitional features to the Volunteer Process Mo... This analytic review focuses on theory and research on volunteerism. First, we define volunteerism as freely chosen helping activities that extend over time and that are often performed through organizations and on behalf of receptive causes or individuals. Next, we link these definitional features to the Volunteer Process Model, which depicts volunteerism as a process with three sequential and interactive stages (antecedents, experiences, and consequences) and at multiple levels of analysis. Then, we use this model to organize the empirical literature on volunteerism and selected work on social movements. Finally, we discuss implications for social policy issues relevant to individuals, organizations, communities, and societies. read more read less

Topics:

Social movement (50%)50% related to the paper
333 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1751-2409.2009.01013.X
Using Empathy to Improve Intergroup Attitudes and Relations
C. Daniel Batson1, Nadia Y. Ahmad1

Abstract:

Recently, social psychologists have given considerable attention to the possibility that empathy can be used to improve intergroup attitudes and relations. For this possibility to bear practical fruit, it is important to know what is meant by empathy because different researchers use the term to refer to different psychologic... Recently, social psychologists have given considerable attention to the possibility that empathy can be used to improve intergroup attitudes and relations. For this possibility to bear practical fruit, it is important to know what is meant by empathy because different researchers use the term to refer to different psychological states. It is also important to understand how each of these empathy states might affect intergroup relations by reviewing theory and research on the psychological processes involved, and it is important to consider the limitations of each form of empathy as a source of improved intergroup relations. Finally, it is important to consider the role of different empathy states in existing programs designed to improve intergroup relations, whether in protracted political conflicts, in educational settings, or via media. In this article, we pursue each of these goals. read more read less

Topics:

Simulation theory of empathy (69%)69% related to the paper, Empathy (66%)66% related to the paper
319 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Social Issues and Policy Review.

It automatically formats your research paper to Wiley formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Social Issues and Policy Review format uses apa citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Social Issues and Policy Review in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Social Issues and Policy Review guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Social Issues and Policy Review guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Social Issues and Policy Review guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Social Issues and Policy Review?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Social Issues and Policy Review citation style.

4. Can I use the Social Issues and Policy Review templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Social Issues and Policy Review.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Social Issues and Policy Review that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Social Issues and Policy Review that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Social Issues and Policy Review?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Social Issues and Policy Review.

7. Where can I find the template for the Social Issues and Policy Review?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Social Issues and Policy Review's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Social Issues and Policy Review's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Social Issues and Policy Review an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Social Issues and Policy Review is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Social Issues and Policy Review?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Social Issues and Policy Review?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Social Issues and Policy Review?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Social Issues and Policy Review, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Social Issues and Policy Review's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Social Issues and Policy Review?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Social Issues and Policy Review. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Social Issues and Policy Review?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Social Issues and Policy Review are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Social Issues and Policy Review?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Social Issues and Policy Review's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Social Issues and Policy Review in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Social Issues and Policy Review Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Social Issues and Policy Review formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template