Example of Current Pediatric Reviews format
Recent searches

Example of Current Pediatric Reviews format Example of Current Pediatric Reviews format Example of Current Pediatric Reviews format Example of Current Pediatric Reviews format Example of Current Pediatric Reviews format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Current Pediatric Reviews format Example of Current Pediatric Reviews format Example of Current Pediatric Reviews format Example of Current Pediatric Reviews format Example of Current Pediatric Reviews format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access ISSN: 15733963

Current Pediatric Reviews — Template for authors

Publisher: Bentham Science
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Medicine (all) #187 of 793 down down by None rank
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 129 Published Papers | 381 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 21/06/2020
Insights & related journals
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Journal Performance & Insights

  • CiteRatio
  • SJR
  • SNIP

CiteRatio is a measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

3.0

43% from 2019

CiteRatio for Current Pediatric Reviews from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 3.0
2019 2.1
2018 1.8
2017 1.9
2016 1.0
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 43% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

0.736

106% from 2019

SJR for Current Pediatric Reviews from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.736
2019 0.357
2018 0.216
2017 0.383
2016 0.279
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 106% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.89

12% from 2019

SNIP for Current Pediatric Reviews from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.89
2019 0.798
2018 0.384
2017 0.684
2016 0.327
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 12% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Related Journals

open access Open Access ISSN: 13561820 e-ISSN: 14699567

Taylor and Francis

CiteRatio: 2.8 | SJR: 0.806 | SNIP: 1.28
open access Open Access e-ISSN: 21971714

Springer

CiteRatio: 3.1 | SJR: 0.859 | SNIP: 1.433
open access Open Access ISSN: 14745151

SAGE

CiteRatio: 4.5 | SJR: 0.914 | SNIP: 1.191
open access Open Access ISSN: 20474873 e-ISSN: 20474881
recommended Recommended

SAGE

CiteRatio: 8.6 | SJR: 1.669 | SNIP: 1.889

Current Pediatric Reviews

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Bentham Science

Current Pediatric Reviews

Approved by publishing and review experts on SciSpace, this template is built as per for Current Pediatric Reviews formatting guidelines as mentioned in Bentham Science author instructions. The current version was created on 20 Jun 2020 and has been used by 732 authors to write and format their manuscripts to this journal.

Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Medicine

i
Last updated on
20 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
1573-3963
i
Impact Factor
Low - 0.159
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Yellow faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
Vancouver
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder, G E, Tinkham, M, & Klapwijk, T M. Transition from metallic to tunnel- ing regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys. Rev. B. 2013;87(10):100510.

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.2174/157339612802139389
Lung Ultrasound in the Critically Ill Neonate.

Abstract:

Critical ultrasound is a new tool for first-line physicians, including neonate intensivists. The consideration of the lung as one major target allows to redefine the priorities. Simple machines work better than up-to-date ones. We use a microconvex probe. Ten standardized signs allow a majority of uses: the bat sign (pleural ... Critical ultrasound is a new tool for first-line physicians, including neonate intensivists. The consideration of the lung as one major target allows to redefine the priorities. Simple machines work better than up-to-date ones. We use a microconvex probe. Ten standardized signs allow a majority of uses: the bat sign (pleural line), lung sliding and the A-line (normal lung surface), the quad sign and sinusoid sign indicating pleural effusion regardless its echogenicity, the tissue-like sign and fractal sign indicating lung consolidation, the B-line artifact and lung rockets (indicating interstitial syndrome), abolished lung sliding with the stratosphere sign, suggesting pneumothorax, and the lung point, indicating pneumothorax. Other signs are used for more sophisticated applications (distinguishing atelectasis from pneumonia for instance...). All these disorders were assessed in the adult using CT as gold standard with sensitivity and specificity ranging from 90 to 100%, allowing to consider ultrasound as a reasonable bedside gold standard in the critically ill. The same signs are found, with no difference in the critically ill neonate. Fast protocols such as the BLUE-protocol are available, allowing immediate diagnosis of acute respiratory failure using seven standardized profiles. Pulmonary edema e.g. yields anterior lung rockets associated with lung sliding, making the B-profile. The FALLS-protocol, inserted in a Limited Investigation including a simple model of heart and vessels, assesses acute circulatory failure using lung artifacts. Interventional ultrasound (mainly, thoracocenthesis) provides maximal safety. Referrals to CT can be postponed. CEURF proposes personnalized bedside trainings since 1990. Lung ultrasound opens physicians to a visual medicine. read more read less

Topics:

Atelectasis (58%)58% related to the paper, Pneumothorax (56%)56% related to the paper, Pleural effusion (54%)54% related to the paper, Pneumonia (51%)51% related to the paper, Lung (51%)51% related to the paper
91 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.2174/157339608783565770
The Fragile X Family of Disorders: A Model for Autism and Targeted Treatments
Randi J Hagerman, Susan M. Rivera1, Susan M. Rivera2, Paul J. Hagerman1

Abstract:

CGG-repeat expansion mutations of the fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) gene are the leading known cause of autism and autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Full mutation expansions (>200 CGG repeats) of the gene are gen- erally silenced, resulting in absence of the FMR1 protein and fragile X syndrome. By contrast, smaller exp... CGG-repeat expansion mutations of the fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) gene are the leading known cause of autism and autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Full mutation expansions (>200 CGG repeats) of the gene are gen- erally silenced, resulting in absence of the FMR1 protein and fragile X syndrome. By contrast, smaller expansions in the premutation range (55-200 CGG repeats) result in excess gene activity and RNA toxicity, which is responsible for the neurodegenerative disorder, fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS), and likely additional cases of devel- opmental delay and autism. Thus, the FMR1 gene is causative of a common (autism) phenotype via two entirely different pathogenic mechanisms, RNA toxicity and gene silencing. The study of this gene and its pathogenic mechanisms there- fore represents a paradigm for understanding gene-brain relationships and the means by which diverse genetic mecha- nisms can give rise to a common behavioral phenotype. read more read less

Topics:

FMR1 (68%)68% related to the paper, Fragile X syndrome (66%)66% related to the paper, Heritability of autism (65%)65% related to the paper, Autism (59%)59% related to the paper
View PDF
89 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.2174/1573396313666170815100214
The Neurological Sequelae of Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia: Definitions, Diagnosis and Treatment of the Kernicterus Spectrum Disorders (KSDs).
Jean-Baptiste Le Pichon1, Sean M. Riordan2, Jon F. Watchko3, Steven M. Shapiro1

Abstract:

Background Despite its lengthy history, the study of jaundice, hyperbilirubinemia and kernicterus suffers from a lack of clarity and consistency in the key terms used to describe both the clinical and pathophysiological nature of these conditions. For example, the term Bilirubin-induced Neurological Dysfunction (BIND) has bee... Background Despite its lengthy history, the study of jaundice, hyperbilirubinemia and kernicterus suffers from a lack of clarity and consistency in the key terms used to describe both the clinical and pathophysiological nature of these conditions. For example, the term Bilirubin-induced Neurological Dysfunction (BIND) has been used to refer to all neurological sequelae caused by exposure to high levels of bilirubin, to only mild neurological sequelae, or to scoring systems that quantitate the progressive stages of Acute Bilirubin Encephalopathy (ABE). Objective We seek to clarify and simplify terminology by introducing, defining, and proposing new terms and diagnostic criteria for kernicterus. Methods We propose a systematic nomenclature based on pathophysiological and clinical criteria, presenting a logical argument for each term. Acknowledging observations that kernicterus is symptomatically broad and diverse, we propose the use of the overarching term Kernicterus Spectrum Disorders (KSDs) to encompass all the neurological sequelae of bilirubin neurotoxicity including Acute Bilirubin Neurotoxicity (ABE). We further suggest subclassification of KSDs based on the principal disabling features of kernicterus (motor, auditory). Finally, we suggest the term subtle KSD to designate a child with a history of significant bilirubin neurotoxicity with mild or subtle developmental delays. Results and conclusion We conclude with a brief description of the limited treatments currently available for KSD, thereby underscoring the importance of further research. We believe that adopting a systematic nomenclature for the spectrum of clinical consequences of hyperbilirubinemia will help unify the field and promote more effective research in both prevention and treatment of KSDs. read more read less

Topics:

Kernicterus (64%)64% related to the paper, Jaundice (50%)50% related to the paper
76 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.2174/1573396311666151026110148
Safe Infant Sleep Interventions: What is the Evidence for Successful Behavior Change?
Rachel Y. Moon1, Fern R. Hauck, Eve R. Colson

Abstract:

Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and other sleep-related infant deaths, such as accidental suffocation and strangulation in bed and ill-defined deaths, account for >4000 deaths annually in the USA. Evidence-based recommendations for reducing the risk of sleep-related deaths have been published, but some caregivers resist a... Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and other sleep-related infant deaths, such as accidental suffocation and strangulation in bed and ill-defined deaths, account for >4000 deaths annually in the USA. Evidence-based recommendations for reducing the risk of sleep-related deaths have been published, but some caregivers resist adoption of these recommendations. Multiple interventions to change infant sleep-related practices of parents and professionals have been implemented. In this review, we will discuss illustrative examples of safe infant sleep interventions and evidence of their effectiveness. Facilitators of and barriers to change, as well as the limitations of the data currently available for these interventions, will be considered. read more read less

Topics:

Sudden infant death syndrome (63%)63% related to the paper, Infant mortality (56%)56% related to the paper, Behavior change (53%)53% related to the paper, Psychological intervention (51%)51% related to the paper, Poison control (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
76 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.2174/221155281120100005
Intracranial Non-traumatic Aneurysms in Children and Adolescents
Angelika Sorteberg1, Daniel Dahlberg1

Abstract:

An intracranial aneurysm in a child or adolescent is a rare, but potentially devastating condition. As little as approximately 1200 cases are reported between 1939 and 2011, with many of the reports presenting diverting results. There is consensus, though, in that pediatric aneurysms represent a pathophysiological entity diff... An intracranial aneurysm in a child or adolescent is a rare, but potentially devastating condition. As little as approximately 1200 cases are reported between 1939 and 2011, with many of the reports presenting diverting results. There is consensus, though, in that pediatric aneurysms represent a pathophysiological entity different from their adult counterparts. In children, there is a male predominance. About two-thirds of pediatric intracranial aneurysms become symptomatic with hemorrhage and the rate of re-hemorrhage is higher than in adults. The rate of hemorrhage from an intracranial aneurysm peaks in girls around menarche. The most common aneurysm site in children is the internal carotid artery, in particular at its terminal ending. Aneurysms in the posterior circulation are more common in children than adults. Children more often develop giant aneurysms, and may become symptomatic from the mass effect of the aneurysm (tumorlike symptoms). The more complex nature of pediatric aneurysms poses a larger challenge to treatment alongside with higher demands to the durability of treatment. Outcome and mortality are similar in children and adults, but long-term outcome in the pediatric population is influenced by the high rate of aneurysm recurrences and de novo formation of intracranial aneurysms. This urges the need for life-long follow-up and screening protocols. read more read less

Topics:

Aneurysm (64%)64% related to the paper, Subarachnoid hemorrhage (51%)51% related to the paper
57 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Current Pediatric Reviews.

It automatically formats your research paper to Bentham Science formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Current Pediatric Reviews format uses Vancouver citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Current Pediatric Reviews in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Current Pediatric Reviews guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Current Pediatric Reviews guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Current Pediatric Reviews guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Current Pediatric Reviews?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Current Pediatric Reviews citation style.

4. Can I use the Current Pediatric Reviews templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Current Pediatric Reviews.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Current Pediatric Reviews that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Current Pediatric Reviews that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Current Pediatric Reviews?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Current Pediatric Reviews.

7. Where can I find the template for the Current Pediatric Reviews?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Current Pediatric Reviews's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Current Pediatric Reviews's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Current Pediatric Reviews an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Current Pediatric Reviews is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Current Pediatric Reviews?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Current Pediatric Reviews?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Current Pediatric Reviews?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Current Pediatric Reviews, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Current Pediatric Reviews's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Current Pediatric Reviews?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Current Pediatric Reviews. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Current Pediatric Reviews?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Current Pediatric Reviews are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Current Pediatric Reviews?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Current Pediatric Reviews's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Current Pediatric Reviews in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Current Pediatric Reviews Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Current Pediatric Reviews formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template