Example of BMJ Open Respiratory Research format
Recent searches

Example of BMJ Open Respiratory Research format Example of BMJ Open Respiratory Research format Example of BMJ Open Respiratory Research format Example of BMJ Open Respiratory Research format Example of BMJ Open Respiratory Research format Example of BMJ Open Respiratory Research format Example of BMJ Open Respiratory Research format Example of BMJ Open Respiratory Research format Example of BMJ Open Respiratory Research format Example of BMJ Open Respiratory Research format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of BMJ Open Respiratory Research format Example of BMJ Open Respiratory Research format Example of BMJ Open Respiratory Research format Example of BMJ Open Respiratory Research format Example of BMJ Open Respiratory Research format Example of BMJ Open Respiratory Research format Example of BMJ Open Respiratory Research format Example of BMJ Open Respiratory Research format Example of BMJ Open Respiratory Research format Example of BMJ Open Respiratory Research format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

BMJ Open Respiratory Research — Template for authors

Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine #47 of 133 -
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
Good
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 303 Published Papers | 1218 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 17/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

IOP Publishing

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.4
SJR: 0.967
SNIP: 1.105
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 7.4
SJR: 0.979
SNIP: 1.483
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.8
SJR: 1.174
SNIP: 1.449
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.6
SJR: 1.846
SNIP: 1.501

Journal Performance & Insights

CiteRatio

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

4.0

3% from 2019

CiteRatio for BMJ Open Respiratory Research from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 4.0
2019 3.9
2018 3.6
2017 3.8
2016 2.9
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.581

21% from 2019

SJR for BMJ Open Respiratory Research from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.581
2019 1.309
2018 1.302
2017 1.188
2016 1.141
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.443

48% from 2019

SNIP for BMJ Open Respiratory Research from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.443
2019 0.976
2018 1.123
2017 1.084
2016 1.209
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 3% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 21% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 48% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

BMJ Open Respiratory Research

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

BMJ Publishing Group

BMJ Open Respiratory Research

BMJ Open Respiratory Research is an online-only, peer-reviewed open access respiratory and critical care medicine journal, dedicated to publishing high quality medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas of respiratory and critical care medicine. The journal pu...... Read More

Medicine

i
Last updated on
17 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
2052-4439
i
Acceptance Rate
67%
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
unsrt
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder GE, Tinkham M, Klapwijk TM. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting micro-constrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and su-percurrent conversion. Phys. Rev. B. 1982;25(7):4515–4532. Available from: 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1136/BMJRESP-2019-000420
Guidelines on the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome

Abstract:

The Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine and Intensive Care Society Guideline Development Group have used GRADE methodology to make the following recommendations for the management of adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The British Thoracic Society supports the recommendations in this guideline. Wher... The Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine and Intensive Care Society Guideline Development Group have used GRADE methodology to make the following recommendations for the management of adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The British Thoracic Society supports the recommendations in this guideline. Where mechanical ventilation is required, the use of low tidal volumes (<6 ml/kg ideal body weight) and airway pressures (plateau pressure <30 cmH2O) was recommended. For patients with moderate/severe ARDS (PF ratio<20 kPa), prone positioning was recommended for at least 12 hours per day. By contrast, high frequency oscillation was not recommended and it was suggested that inhaled nitric oxide is not used. The use of a conservative fluid management strategy was suggested for all patients, whereas mechanical ventilation with high positive end-expiratory pressure and the use of the neuromuscular blocking agent cisatracurium for 48 hours was suggested for patients with ARDS with ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen (PF) ratios less than or equal to 27 and 20 kPa, respectively. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was suggested as an adjunct to protective mechanical ventilation for patients with very severe ARDS. In the absence of adequate evidence, research recommendations were made for the use of corticosteroids and extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal. read more read less

Topics:

Mechanical ventilation (59%)59% related to the paper, ARDS (58%)58% related to the paper, Intensive care (56%)56% related to the paper, Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (56%)56% related to the paper, Plateau pressure (54%)54% related to the paper
View PDF
303 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1136/BMJRESP-2017-000234
Effect of a machine learning-based severe sepsis prediction algorithm on patient survival and hospital length of stay: a randomised clinical trial.
David Shimabukuro1, Christopher Barton1, Mitchell D. Feldman1, Samson Mataraso, Ritankar Das

Abstract:

Introduction Several methods have been developed to electronically monitor patients for severe sepsis, but few provide predictive capabilities to enable early intervention; furthermore, no severe sepsis prediction systems have been previously validated in a randomised study. We tested the use of a machine learning-based sever... Introduction Several methods have been developed to electronically monitor patients for severe sepsis, but few provide predictive capabilities to enable early intervention; furthermore, no severe sepsis prediction systems have been previously validated in a randomised study. We tested the use of a machine learning-based severe sepsis prediction system for reductions in average length of stay and in-hospital mortality rate. Methods We conducted a randomised controlled clinical trial at two medical-surgical intensive care units at the University of California, San Francisco Medical Center, evaluating the primary outcome of average length of stay, and secondary outcome of in-hospital mortality rate from December 2016 to February 2017. Adult patients (18+) admitted to participating units were eligible for this factorial, open-label study. Enrolled patients were assigned to a trial arm by a random allocation sequence. In the control group, only the current severe sepsis detector was used; in the experimental group, the machine learning algorithm (MLA) was also used. On receiving an alert, the care team evaluated the patient and initiated the severe sepsis bundle, if appropriate. Although participants were randomly assigned to a trial arm, group assignments were automatically revealed for any patients who received MLA alerts. Results Outcomes from 75 patients in the control and 67 patients in the experimental group were analysed. Average length of stay decreased from 13.0 days in the control to 10.3 days in the experimental group (p=0.042). In-hospital mortality decreased by 12.4 percentage points when using the MLA (p=0.018), a relative reduction of 58.0%. No adverse events were reported during this trial. Conclusion The MLA was associated with improved patient outcomes. This is the first randomised controlled trial of a sepsis surveillance system to demonstrate statistically significant differences in length of stay and in-hospital mortality. Trial registration NCT03015454. read more read less

Topics:

Intensive care (55%)55% related to the paper, Randomized controlled trial (54%)54% related to the paper, Clinical trial (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
225 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1136/BMJRESP-2017-000242
British Thoracic Society Guideline for the management of non-tuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (NTM-PD)

Abstract:

The full guideline for the management of non-tuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease is published in Thorax. The following is a summary of the recommendations and good practice points. The sections referred to in the summary refer to the full guideline. The full guideline for the management of non-tuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease is published in Thorax. The following is a summary of the recommendations and good practice points. The sections referred to in the summary refer to the full guideline. read more read less

Topics:

Guideline (65%)65% related to the paper
View PDF
206 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1136/BMJRESP-2017-000212
Design of the PF-ILD trial: A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase III trial of nintedanib in patients with progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease

Abstract:

600 patients aged ≥18 years will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to nintedanib or placebo. Patients with diagnosis of IPF will be excluded. The study population will be enriched with two-thirds having a usual interstitial pneumonia-like pattern on HRCT. The primary endpoint is the annual rate of decline in forced vital capacity ... 600 patients aged ≥18 years will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to nintedanib or placebo. Patients with diagnosis of IPF will be excluded. The study population will be enriched with two-thirds having a usual interstitial pneumonia-like pattern on HRCT. The primary endpoint is the annual rate of decline in forced vital capacity over 52 weeks. The main secondary endpoints are the absolute change from baseline in King’s Brief Interstitial Lung Disease Questionnaire total score, time to first acute interstitial lung disease exacerbation or death and time to all-cause mortality over 52 weeks. Ethics and dissemination The trial is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, the International Conference on Harmonisation Tripartite Guideline for Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and Japanese GCP regulations. Trial registration number NCT02999178. read more read less

Topics:

Clinical endpoint (54%)54% related to the paper, Interstitial lung disease (53%)53% related to the paper, Nintedanib (52%)52% related to the paper, Exacerbation (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
145 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1136/BMJRESP-2020-000730
Classification of aerosol-generating procedures: a rapid systematic review.

Abstract:

In the context of covid-19, aerosol generating procedures have been highlighted as requiring a higher grade of personal protective equipment. We investigated how official guidance documents and academic publications have classified procedures in terms of whether or not they are aerosol-generating. We performed a rapid systema... In the context of covid-19, aerosol generating procedures have been highlighted as requiring a higher grade of personal protective equipment. We investigated how official guidance documents and academic publications have classified procedures in terms of whether or not they are aerosol-generating. We performed a rapid systematic review using preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses standards. Guidelines, policy documents and academic papers published in english or french offering guidance on aerosol-generating procedures were eligible. We systematically searched two medical databases (medline, cochrane central) and one public search engine (google) in march and april 2020. Data on how each procedure was classified by each source were extracted. We determined the level of agreement across different guidelines for each procedure group, in terms of its classification as aerosol generating, possibly aerosol-generating, or nonaerosol-generating. 128 documents met our inclusion criteria; they contained 1248 mentions of procedures that we categorised into 39 procedure groups. Procedures classified as aerosol-generating or possibly aerosol-generating by ≥90% of documents included autopsy, surgery/postmortem procedures with high-speed devices, intubation and extubation procedures, bronchoscopy, sputum induction, manual ventilation, airway suctioning, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, tracheostomy and tracheostomy procedures, non-invasive ventilation, high-flow oxygen therapy, breaking closed ventilation systems, nebulised or aerosol therapy, and high frequency oscillatory ventilation. Disagreements existed between sources on some procedure groups, including oral and dental procedures, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, thoracic surgery and procedures, and nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabbing. There is sufficient evidence of agreement across different international guidelines to classify certain procedure groups as aerosol generating. However, some clinically relevant procedures received surprisingly little mention in our source documents. To reduce dissent on the remainder, we recommend that (a) clinicians define procedures more clearly and specifically, breaking them down into their constituent components where possible; (b) researchers undertake further studies of aerosolisation during these procedures; and (c) guideline-making and policy-making bodies address a wider range of procedures. read more read less
View PDF
134 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for BMJ Open Respiratory Research.

It automatically formats your research paper to BMJ Publishing Group formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

BMJ Open Respiratory Research format uses unsrt citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write BMJ Open Respiratory Research in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the BMJ Open Respiratory Research guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the BMJ Open Respiratory Research guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the BMJ Open Respiratory Research guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in BMJ Open Respiratory Research?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the BMJ Open Respiratory Research citation style.

4. Can I use the BMJ Open Respiratory Research templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for BMJ Open Respiratory Research.

5. Can I use a manuscript in BMJ Open Respiratory Research that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper BMJ Open Respiratory Research that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in BMJ Open Respiratory Research?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in BMJ Open Respiratory Research.

7. Where can I find the template for the BMJ Open Respiratory Research?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per BMJ Open Respiratory Research's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the BMJ Open Respiratory Research's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. BMJ Open Respiratory Research an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's BMJ Open Respiratory Research is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like BMJ Open Respiratory Research?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like BMJ Open Respiratory Research?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using BMJ Open Respiratory Research?

After writing your paper autoformatting in BMJ Open Respiratory Research, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is BMJ Open Respiratory Research's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for BMJ Open Respiratory Research?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for BMJ Open Respiratory Research. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In BMJ Open Respiratory Research?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for BMJ Open Respiratory Research are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the BMJ Open Respiratory Research?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per BMJ Open Respiratory Research's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download BMJ Open Respiratory Research in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in BMJ Open Respiratory Research Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to BMJ Open Respiratory Research formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template