Example of Journal of Medical Ethics format
Recent searches

Example of Journal of Medical Ethics format Example of Journal of Medical Ethics format Example of Journal of Medical Ethics format Example of Journal of Medical Ethics format Example of Journal of Medical Ethics format Example of Journal of Medical Ethics format Example of Journal of Medical Ethics format Example of Journal of Medical Ethics format Example of Journal of Medical Ethics format Example of Journal of Medical Ethics format Example of Journal of Medical Ethics format Example of Journal of Medical Ethics format Example of Journal of Medical Ethics format Example of Journal of Medical Ethics format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Journal of Medical Ethics format Example of Journal of Medical Ethics format Example of Journal of Medical Ethics format Example of Journal of Medical Ethics format Example of Journal of Medical Ethics format Example of Journal of Medical Ethics format Example of Journal of Medical Ethics format Example of Journal of Medical Ethics format Example of Journal of Medical Ethics format Example of Journal of Medical Ethics format Example of Journal of Medical Ethics format Example of Journal of Medical Ethics format Example of Journal of Medical Ethics format Example of Journal of Medical Ethics format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access ISSN: 3066800 e-ISSN: 14734257
recommended Recommended

Journal of Medical Ethics — Template for authors

Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Issues, Ethics and Legal Aspects #4 of 37 -
Health (social science) #45 of 293 down down by 4 ranks
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) #51 of 306 up up by 8 ranks
Health Policy #48 of 242 up up by 2 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 599 Published Papers | 2385 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 04/06/2020
Insights & related journals
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Journal Performance & Insights

  • Impact Factor
  • CiteRatio
  • SJR
  • SNIP

Impact factor determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

2.021

8% from 2018

Impact factor for Journal of Medical Ethics from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 2.021
2018 2.195
2017 1.889
2016 1.529
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has decreased by 8% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

CiteRatio is a measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

4.0

11% from 2019

CiteRatio for Journal of Medical Ethics from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 4.0
2019 3.6
2018 3.7
2017 3.4
2016 3.4
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 11% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

0.768

9% from 2019

SJR for Journal of Medical Ethics from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.768
2019 0.846
2018 1.005
2017 0.618
2016 0.653
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 9% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

1.428

16% from 2019

SNIP for Journal of Medical Ethics from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.428
2019 1.231
2018 1.212
2017 0.927
2016 0.983
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 16% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Related Journals

open access Open Access e-ISSN: 14726939
recommended Recommended

Springer

CiteRatio: 4.1 | SJR: 1.075 | SNIP: 1.869
open access Open Access ISSN: 10653058 e-ISSN: 15733394

Springer

CiteRatio: 3.3 | SJR: 0.537 | SNIP: 1.583
open access Open Access ISSN: 9562737 e-ISSN: 15728498

Springer

CiteRatio: 2.9 | SJR: 0.434 | SNIP: 1.051
open access Open Access ISSN: 13533452 e-ISSN: 14715546
recommended Recommended

Springer

CiteRatio: 5.0 | SJR: 0.73 | SNIP: 1.863
Journal of Medical Ethics

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

BMJ Publishing Group

Journal of Medical Ethics

Journal of Medical Ethics is a leading international journal that reflects the whole field of medical ethics. The journal seeks to promote ethical reflection and conduct in scientific research and medical practice. It features original articles on ethical aspects of health car...... Read More

Health(social science)

Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Health Policy

Social Sciences

i
Last updated on
04 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
0306-6800
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.207
i
Acceptance Rate
33%
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
unsrt
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
C. W. J. Beenakker. Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett., 97(6):067007, 2006.

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1136/JME.28.5.332-A
Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th edn.

Abstract:

The Principles of Biomedical Ethics by Beauchamp and Childress is a classic in the field of medical ethics. The first edition was published in 1979 and “unleashed” the four principles of respect for autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, and justice on the newly emerging field. These principles were argued to be mid-level pr... The Principles of Biomedical Ethics by Beauchamp and Childress is a classic in the field of medical ethics. The first edition was published in 1979 and “unleashed” the four principles of respect for autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, and justice on the newly emerging field. These principles were argued to be mid-level principles mediating between high-level moral theory and low-level common morality, and they immediately became very popular in writings about medical ethics. Over the years Beauchamp and Childress have developed this approach and vigorously defended it against the various criticisms that have been raised. The 5th edition of this book is, as all the … read more read less

Topics:

Medical ethics (61%)61% related to the paper, Normative ethics (59%)59% related to the paper, Beneficence (52%)52% related to the paper, Bioethics (52%)52% related to the paper, Morality (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
1,661 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1136/JME.20.2.123
International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects

Abstract:

served and the difficulty for this reviewer is to understand how this contract is to be developed. By and large, it must be through the individual to do otherwise must be, as Hamilton points out, to change the medical ethic. Several of the participants share these doubts. Dr McWhinney, for example, points out that we must not... served and the difficulty for this reviewer is to understand how this contract is to be developed. By and large, it must be through the individual to do otherwise must be, as Hamilton points out, to change the medical ethic. Several of the participants share these doubts. Dr McWhinney, for example, points out that we must not make too much of a distinction between clinical and population competency for the latter will be applied through the former. Put another way by Sir Douglas Black: 'The ideal curriculum should recognise that population problems are aggregations of individual problems'. Moreover, while doctors must know about and understand the effect of the environment, both natural and manmade, on the distribution of ill-health, the resolution of such problems is not within the power of the medical school whose essential function, as Inui puts it, is to educate physicians. How we are educating them is another matter. It may well be that the 'humanitarian dimensions' of doctoring are being sacrificed to the rote of science and it is certain that the undergraduate medical curriculum is too crowded. Perhaps we should avoid the concept of the five or sixyear undergraduate training programme and think more in terms of a ten-year graduate curriculum. In any event, the sweeping re-orientation suggested throughout the book is probably unattainable. The major difficulty is that the majority of, at least UK, hospitals are not community-based and the graduates go out to serve disparate populations not excluding those of developing countries whose needs may be completely different. The paper by Marmot and Zwi, 'A model exercise in public health', demonstrates this only too well. Several contributors come from medical schools which claim that population-based education of the type envisaged can be achieved but one suspects that Newcastle, NSW, for example, is, by reason of geography, the classic community-based medical school. In fact, the contributions from discussants are, in many ways, more readable than the primary papers insofar as they bring us back from Utopia to Camberwell. This is a very seriously written book which is, incidentally, beautifully edited and well produced. In so far as medical ethics are founded in the medical school, it has an interest for readers of this journal but it takes a long time to make a relatively narrow point. It is essentially for educationists and community physicians who will follow the discussions with interest and benefit. read more read less
View PDF
1,260 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1136/JME.10.3.124
Quality of life in cancer patients--an hypothesis.

Abstract:

Quality of life is a difficult concept to define and to measure. An hypothesis is proposed which suggests that the quality of life measures the difference, or the gap, at a particular period of time between the hopes and expectations of the individual and that individual's present experiences. Quality of life can only be desc... Quality of life is a difficult concept to define and to measure. An hypothesis is proposed which suggests that the quality of life measures the difference, or the gap, at a particular period of time between the hopes and expectations of the individual and that individual's present experiences. Quality of life can only be described by the individual, and must take into account many aspects of life. The approach is goal-orientated, and one of task analysis. The hypothesis is developed in a diagramatic way, and several methods of testing the hypothesis suggested. read more read less
View PDF
1,037 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1136/JME.12.3.165
Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy

Abstract:

Conclusions and Recommendations, are particularly interesting in view of the controversies aroused by the Warnock Report. Many of the recommendations contained here are similar to Warnock's (for example, concerning the legitimacy of AID children, the need for a licensing authority to supervise the work ofAID and IVF centres, ... Conclusions and Recommendations, are particularly interesting in view of the controversies aroused by the Warnock Report. Many of the recommendations contained here are similar to Warnock's (for example, concerning the legitimacy of AID children, the need for a licensing authority to supervise the work ofAID and IVF centres, etc), but others are at odds with the corresponding Warnock recommendations. In general, the authors place higher value on the family as an institution than did the Warnock Committee and display a much livelier awareness of the possible social dangers of the new techniques. One weakness of the book is that since its authors are approaching these topics from the standpoint of social scientists, their recommendations for legislative action which surely must be based on properly ethical considerations, not merely sociological ones seem devoid of any satisfactory rational support. For example, they concede that experimentation on human embryos is an objectionable practice, since 'the material acting as the subject of the experimentation is a human being at the beginning of its individual development' (p 178); but the practical recommendation which they make concerning this practice is disappointingly feeble: read more read less
View PDF
948 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1136/JME.7.1.45
Illness as Metaphor

Abstract:

considers the role of nurses and thinks that because they are an essential part of health care, they are accountable for their activities and not merely answerable to some higher authority. That means that they must adopt a critical attitude to others involved in health care and should address their minds to issues rather tha... considers the role of nurses and thinks that because they are an essential part of health care, they are accountable for their activities and not merely answerable to some higher authority. That means that they must adopt a critical attitude to others involved in health care and should address their minds to issues rather than accept the views of others. The final contribution, by David Roy, states that philosophers have a responsibility to the public to develop a system of values which will serve as a guide in dealing with these biomedical issues. He feels that universal ethical standards should be developed by reference to the nature of things rather than man whose nature is subject to radical change. These essays are ofa high standard and they point emphatically to the need for an interdisciplinary approach to the issues with which they seek to grapple. They should appeal to the lay and the profession alike, but the lay person may at times wonder where he has got to, when he finds one view convincingly presented, only to find it attacked in the immediately following pages. Perhaps he should not be discouraged by this, in that none of the essayists claims that the issues have simple solutions. It is hoped that these essays and others like them will be used by students of medicine, law and philosophy to their certain advantage. D J CUSINE read more read less

Topics:

Metaphor (58%)58% related to the paper
View PDF
584 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Journal of Medical Ethics.

It automatically formats your research paper to BMJ Publishing Group formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Journal of Medical Ethics format uses unsrt citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

Absolutely not! With our tool, you can freely write without having to focus on LaTeX. You can write your entire paper as per the Journal of Medical Ethics guidelines and autoformat it.

Yes. The template is fully compliant as per the guidelines of this journal. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. Also, if there's any update in the journal format guidelines, we take care of it and include that in our algorithm.

Sure. We support all the top citation styles like APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, Chicago style, etc. For example, in case of this journal, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, it will automatically update your article as per the Journal of Medical Ethics citation style.

You can avail our Free Trial for 7 days. I'm sure you'll find our features very helpful. Plus, it's quite inexpensive.

Yup. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word doc and click on auto-format. You'll have a publish-ready paper that you can download at the end.

A matter of seconds. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves a load of your time in writing and formating your manuscript.

One little Google search can get you the Word template for any journal. However, why do you need a Word template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace, autoformat it as per Journal of Medical Ethics's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Try us out!.

Absolutely! You can do it using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, you can always contact our support team.

SciSpace is an online tool for now. We'll soon release a desktop version. You can also request (or upvote) any feature that you think might be helpful for you and the research community in the feature request section once you sign-up with us.

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it up and running within a matter of 3 working days. You can find the request box in the Journal Gallery on the right sidebar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for?".

After you have written and autoformatted your paper, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx and LaTeX.

To be honest, the answer is NO. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of those factors the review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, Eigenfactor, etc. You must assess all the factors and then take the final call.

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We have extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help our researchers understand the access level of this journal. The following table indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

Our journal submission experts are skilled in submitting papers to various international journals.

After uploading your paper on SciSpace, you would see a button to request a journal submission service for Journal of Medical Ethics.

Each submission service is completed within 4 - 5 working days.

Yes. SciSpace provides this functionality.

After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or .bib file.

SciSpace would allow download of your references in Journal of Medical Ethics Endnote style, according to bmj-publishing-group guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Journal of Medical Ethics formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template