Example of Biblical Interpretation format
Recent searches

Example of Biblical Interpretation format Example of Biblical Interpretation format Example of Biblical Interpretation format Example of Biblical Interpretation format Example of Biblical Interpretation format Example of Biblical Interpretation format Example of Biblical Interpretation format Example of Biblical Interpretation format Example of Biblical Interpretation format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Biblical Interpretation format Example of Biblical Interpretation format Example of Biblical Interpretation format Example of Biblical Interpretation format Example of Biblical Interpretation format Example of Biblical Interpretation format Example of Biblical Interpretation format Example of Biblical Interpretation format Example of Biblical Interpretation format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Biblical Interpretation — Template for authors

Publisher: Brill
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Religious Studies #223 of 491 down down by 25 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
Good
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 111 Published Papers | 30 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 16/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 2.4
SJR: 0.438
SNIP: 1.449
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 0.9
SJR: 0.302
SNIP: 0.743
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 1.7
SJR: 0.627
SNIP: 1.583
open access Open Access

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 0.8
SJR: 0.218
SNIP: 1.323

Journal Performance & Insights

CiteRatio

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.3

25% from 2019

CiteRatio for Biblical Interpretation from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.3
2019 0.4
2018 0.4
2017 0.3
2016 0.2
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.144

16% from 2019

SJR for Biblical Interpretation from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.144
2019 0.171
2018 0.15
2017 0.102
2016 0.26
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.624

42% from 2019

SNIP for Biblical Interpretation from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.624
2019 1.078
2018 0.974
2017 0.647
2016 0.112
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has decreased by 25% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 16% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 42% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Biblical Interpretation

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Brill

Biblical Interpretation

This innovative and highly acclaimed journal accommodates articles on various aspects of current biblical criticism. Articles published either give a practical demonstration of how a particular approach may be instructively applied to a biblical text or texts, or make a produc...... Read More

Religious studies

Arts and Humanities

i
Last updated on
15 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
0927-2569
i
Impact Factor
Medium - 0.51
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Yellow faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
plainnat
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al., 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
G. E. Blonder, M. Tinkham, and T. M. Klapwijk. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys. Rev. B, 25(7):4515– 4532, 1982. URL 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1163/156851599X00074
Returning To China: Biblical Interpretation in Postcolonial Hong Kong
Archie C.C. Lee1
01 Jan 1999 - Biblical Interpretation

Abstract:

The paper aims to construct a new framework for biblical studies from the context of postcolonial Hong Kong. While present biblical scholarship has largely depended on historical-critical exegesis, biblical scholars of Asia have begun to conceive a different approach to the Bible, because of not only a new context of reading,... The paper aims to construct a new framework for biblical studies from the context of postcolonial Hong Kong. While present biblical scholarship has largely depended on historical-critical exegesis, biblical scholars of Asia have begun to conceive a different approach to the Bible, because of not only a new context of reading, but also a radically different cultural-political location of the reader. This location, as it is now being formulated, is a reading between East and West, between the dominant interpretation and scholarship of the formerly colonial and Western cultures and the newly arising consciousness of emerging postcolonial identities in the histories and cultures of Asia. After about some 150 years of British colonial rule, the identity of being a people of Hong Kong is highly hybridised. It is a hybrid identity of being cultural Chinese and yet pragmatically British, both a strong sense of identification with China and an unexplainable fear of being national Chinese. Such location of a reader transforms one's understanding of a biblical text such as Isaiah 56-66 and sheds a new light on the meaning of the return in some of its major passages. read more read less

Topics:

Biblical studies (62%)62% related to the paper, Scholarship (51%)51% related to the paper, Colonialism (51%)51% related to the paper, Identity (social science) (50%)50% related to the paper
42 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1163/156851595X00177
Heterosexism and the Interpretation of Romans 1:18-32
01 Jan 1995 - Biblical Interpretation

Abstract:

This article, concentrating on two articles by Richard Hays, critiques recent interpretations of Rom. 1:18-32. Modern interpreters, influenced more by particularly modern forms of heterosexism and its construction of homosexuality, desire, and "nature" than by a straightforward historical-critical reading of Paul's letter, po... This article, concentrating on two articles by Richard Hays, critiques recent interpretations of Rom. 1:18-32. Modern interpreters, influenced more by particularly modern forms of heterosexism and its construction of homosexuality, desire, and "nature" than by a straightforward historical-critical reading of Paul's letter, portray Paul as referring to the "Fall" of Genesis 1-3 in Romans 1. Paul, it is assumed, takes homosexuality to be a sign of "humanity's fallen state." These interpreters, therefore, inscribe homosexual desire into universal fallen humanity in a way that Paul does not do. For one thing, Paul is referring not to the Fall in Romans 1 but to the invention of idolatry and polytheism by the Gentiles; homosexual intercourse is therefore not a symptom of "the Fall" but of Gentile polytheism. For another, Paul is not giving an etiology of homosexual desire, which for him as for most ancients was not different from heterosexual desire, but an etiology of homosexual intercourse. Furthermore, modern scholars misconstrue Paul's references to "nature" and acts "contrary to nature" because they import into Paul's discourse particularly modern notions of "natural" and "unnatural" not available in the ancient world. Heterosexist scholars interpret Paul the way they do not because they are simply and objectively "reading the text," as they claim, but because of their implication in homophobia, a particularly modern ideological system that constructs desire, "nature," and sexuality in particular ways. read more read less

Topics:

Political sociology (59%)59% related to the paper, Heterosexism (53%)53% related to the paper, Idolatry (51%)51% related to the paper, Fall of man (51%)51% related to the paper
39 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1163/156851594X00088
Two Mission Commands
01 Jan 1994 - Biblical Interpretation

Topics:

Biblical studies (59%)59% related to the paper
37 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1163/156851594X00204
The System and the Speaking Subject in the Hebrew Bible: Reading for Divine Abjection
Timothy K. Beal1
01 Jan 1994 - Biblical Interpretation

Abstract:

What appears to be self-evident in biblical studies — what "can be assumed" — may in fact be quite problematic Invariably and unquestionably, scholars of Micah 1:8-9 identify its speaker as the prophet rather than YHWH Yet when one tugs at a few loose threads, that supposedly self-evident reading unravels After problematizing... What appears to be self-evident in biblical studies — what "can be assumed" — may in fact be quite problematic Invariably and unquestionably, scholars of Micah 1:8-9 identify its speaker as the prophet rather than YHWH Yet when one tugs at a few loose threads, that supposedly self-evident reading unravels After problematizing that identification, this paper argues for reading YHWH as the profoundly unstable speaking subject of this abjectionable dirge As such, the divine subject of this prophetic discourse is rendered entirely ambivalent, sweeping through and among the people with all the rage and all the grief of absolute disorientation Understood thus, the book of Micah opens with a theophany of, in Julia Kristeva's terms, a "subject on trial," brought about by the "fracture of a symbolic code which can no longer 'hold' its (speaking) subjects" (1986a:30) This reading, which draws inspiration from Kristeva's theories of textuality and the construction of the speaking subject in discourse, is placed in intertextual tension with Kristeva's own reading of the biblical God in The Powers of Horror (1982), which, ironically, depicts that divine subject as the stable, univocal Guarantor of patriarchal order Thus this paper is intended to problematize Kristeva's reading of the divine subject of biblical discourse, even while it depends heavily on her theoretical work to evolve a new reading of the text read more read less

Topics:

Hebrew Bible (55%)55% related to the paper, Biblical studies (54%)54% related to the paper, Reading (process) (53%)53% related to the paper, Subject (philosophy) (53%)53% related to the paper, Textuality (50%)50% related to the paper
37 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1163/156851599X00065
Out of Mind, Out of Voice: Slave-Girls and Prophetic Daughters in Luke-Acts
F. Scott Spencer1
01 Jan 1999 - Biblical Interpretation

Abstract:

The promise in Acts 2 (disclosed in Peter's programmatic citation of Joel at Pentecost) that women in general and female slaves in particular will become Spirit-inspired prophets is never fully realized and is even resisted to some degree within the wider Lukan narrative. An examination of three cases involving direct speech ... The promise in Acts 2 (disclosed in Peter's programmatic citation of Joel at Pentecost) that women in general and female slaves in particular will become Spirit-inspired prophets is never fully realized and is even resisted to some degree within the wider Lukan narrative. An examination of three cases involving direct speech by slave-girls (paidiskai) in Luke-Acts, set within diverse literary and social contexts (Lk. 22.54-62; Acts 12.12-17; 16.16-18), uncovers a consistent pattern of truthful proclamation on the part of each slave-girl followed, however, by some form of repudiation-even stigmatization-of her and her message. Despite its more inclusive and receptive ideals, ultimately Luke-Acts more mirrors than challenges conventional first-century Mediterranean society in its suppression of lower-class female voices. read more read less
35 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Biblical Interpretation.

It automatically formats your research paper to Brill formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Biblical Interpretation format uses plainnat citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Biblical Interpretation in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Biblical Interpretation guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Biblical Interpretation guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Biblical Interpretation guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Biblical Interpretation?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Biblical Interpretation citation style.

4. Can I use the Biblical Interpretation templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Biblical Interpretation.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Biblical Interpretation that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Biblical Interpretation that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Biblical Interpretation?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Biblical Interpretation.

7. Where can I find the template for the Biblical Interpretation?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Biblical Interpretation's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Biblical Interpretation's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Biblical Interpretation an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Biblical Interpretation is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Biblical Interpretation?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Biblical Interpretation?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Biblical Interpretation?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Biblical Interpretation, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Biblical Interpretation's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Biblical Interpretation?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Biblical Interpretation. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Biblical Interpretation?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Biblical Interpretation are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Biblical Interpretation?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Biblical Interpretation's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Biblical Interpretation in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Biblical Interpretation Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Biblical Interpretation formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template