Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format
Recent searches

Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access ISSN: 22105697 e-ISSN: 22105700

International Journal for the Study of Skepticism — Template for authors

Publisher: Brill
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Philosophy #314 of 644 down down by 31 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
Good
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 63 Published Papers | 20 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 19/06/2020
Insights & related journals
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Journal Performance & Insights

  • CiteRatio
  • SJR
  • SNIP

CiteRatio is a measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

0.3

40% from 2019

CiteRatio for International Journal for the Study of Skepticism from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.3
2019 0.5
2018 0.4
2017 0.3
2016 0.3
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has decreased by 40% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

0.129

80% from 2019

SJR for International Journal for the Study of Skepticism from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.129
2019 0.653
2018 0.181
2017 0.161
2016 0.281
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 80% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.297

68% from 2019

SNIP for International Journal for the Study of Skepticism from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.297
2019 0.936
2018 0.581
2017 0.536
2016 0.679
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 68% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Related Journals

open access Open Access ISSN: 13537903 e-ISSN: 14699419
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

CiteRatio: 0.9 | SJR: 0.302 | SNIP: 0.743
open access Open Access ISSN: 9515089 e-ISSN: 1465394X
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

CiteRatio: 1.8 | SJR: 0.699 | SNIP: 1.341
open access Open Access ISSN: 17511321 e-ISSN: 1751133X

Taylor and Francis

CiteRatio: 1.4 | SJR: 0.388 | SNIP: 1.091
open access Open Access ISSN: 14767430 e-ISSN: 15725138

Taylor and Francis

CiteRatio: 1.2 | SJR: 0.288 | SNIP: 0.637

International Journal for the Study of Skepticism

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Brill

International Journal for the Study of Skepticism

Approved by publishing and review experts on SciSpace, this template is built as per for International Journal for the Study of Skepticism formatting guidelines as mentioned in Brill author instructions. The current version was created on 19 Jun 2020 and has been used by 775 authors to write and format their manuscripts to this journal.

Philosophy

Arts and Humanities

i
Last updated on
19 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
2210-5697
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Yellow faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
plainnat
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al., 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
G. E. Blonder, M. Tinkham, and T. M. Klapwijk. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys. Rev. B, 25(7):4515– 4532, 1982. URL 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1163/22105700-00704002
On Extended Rationality

Abstract:

The discussion highlights the need to distinguish between perceptions and the experiences implicated by perceptions, noting that Coliva’s framework makes perception irrelevant to justified belief, except for being the contingent means by which we are furnished with experiences that are the real source of justified belief. It ... The discussion highlights the need to distinguish between perceptions and the experiences implicated by perceptions, noting that Coliva’s framework makes perception irrelevant to justified belief, except for being the contingent means by which we are furnished with experiences that are the real source of justified belief. It then addresses two issues concerning the problem of cognitive locality. The problem concerns what enables us rationally to suppose that our perceptual experiences mostly put us in touch with reality. The issues addressed are: (1) whether, assuming that there is a problem of cognitive locality, Coliva’s Moderate position adequately addresses it; and (2) whether Coliva gives us enough to make sense of the claim, central to the Moderate position, that certain background presuppositions are constitutive of empirical rationality. read more read less

Topics:

Rationality (55%)55% related to the paper, Locality (51%)51% related to the paper
58 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1163/22105700-00603003
The Animal in Epistemology : Wittgenstein's Enactivist Solution to the Problem of Regress
Danièle Moyal-Sharrock1

Abstract:

This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in International Journal for the Study of Skepticism following peer review. Subject to embargo, embargo end date: 23 May 2017. The version of record [ (October 2016) 6 (2-3): 97-119. First published online October, 2016] is available online a... This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in International Journal for the Study of Skepticism following peer review. Subject to embargo, embargo end date: 23 May 2017. The version of record [ (October 2016) 6 (2-3): 97-119. First published online October, 2016] is available online at doi: 10.1163/22105700-00603003 read more read less

Topics:

Epistemology of Wikipedia (69%)69% related to the paper, Skepticism (59%)59% related to the paper, Problem of the criterion (59%)59% related to the paper, Certainty (56%)56% related to the paper, Subject (philosophy) (54%)54% related to the paper
View PDF
28 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1163/221057011X588037
Pyrrhonian Skepticism Meets Speech-Act Theory
John Turri1

Abstract:

This paper applies speech-act theory to craft a new response to Pyrrhonian skepticism and diagnose its appeal. Carefully distinguishing between different levels of language-use and noting their interrelations can help us identify a subtle mistake in a key Pyrrhonian argument. This paper applies speech-act theory to craft a new response to Pyrrhonian skepticism and diagnose its appeal. Carefully distinguishing between different levels of language-use and noting their interrelations can help us identify a subtle mistake in a key Pyrrhonian argument. read more read less

Topics:

Skepticism (56%)56% related to the paper, Pyrrhonism (54%)54% related to the paper, Mistake (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
15 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1163/22105700-02021082
McDowellian Neo-Mooreanism?
Genia Schönbaumsfeld1

Abstract:

In a series of recent articles, Duncan Pritchard argues for a “neo-Moorean” interpretation of John McDowell’s anti-sceptical strategy. Pritchard introduces a distinction between “favouring” and “discriminating” epistemic grounds in order to show that, within the radical sceptical context, an absence of “discriminating” episte... In a series of recent articles, Duncan Pritchard argues for a “neo-Moorean” interpretation of John McDowell’s anti-sceptical strategy. Pritchard introduces a distinction between “favouring” and “discriminating” epistemic grounds in order to show that, within the radical sceptical context, an absence of “discriminating” epistemic grounds allowing one to distinguish brain-in-a-vat from non-brain-in-a-vat scenarios does not preclude possessing knowledge of the denials of sceptical hypotheses. I argue that Pritchard’s account fails. First, the distinction between “favouring” and “discriminating” epistemic grounds only works for “mules-disguised-as zebras” examples, but breaks down in the radical sceptical case. Second, McDowellian disjunctivism neutralizes the radical sceptical threat, but does not refute it. Third, the “highest common factor” conception is itself responsible for generating the sceptical problem and once this is undermined by McDowellian disjunctivism, scepticism no longer stands in need of direct refutation. I conclude by showing that one can either be a McDowellian disjunctivist or a neo-Moorean, but not both. read more read less

Topics:

Disjunctivism (57%)57% related to the paper
15 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1163/22105700-03021116
A Sceptic Looks at Art (but not Very Closely): Sextus Empiricus on Music
Richard Bett1

Abstract:

The paper examines Sextus Empiricus’ Against the Musicians (M 6), one of the least studied portions of Sextus’ surviving work, against the background of the more general question why he has so little to say on questions that for us would fall under aesthetics. The structure and goals of the book are considered, along with som... The paper examines Sextus Empiricus’ Against the Musicians (M 6), one of the least studied portions of Sextus’ surviving work, against the background of the more general question why he has so little to say on questions that for us would fall under aesthetics. The structure and goals of the book are considered, along with some puzzles about the consistency of his aims. Each of the two main parts is then analyzed separately, including a comparison between the first part and Philodemus’ On Music. Sextus’ apparent lack of interest in aesthetics is explained primarily by his quite general tendency to focus on foundational questions, of which the second part of M 6 is a notable instance; another, connected factor is the common ancient habit (illustrated in the first part of M 6) of treating aesthetic questions in conjunction with ethical or political ones. read more read less

Topics:

Sextus (62%)62% related to the paper, Skepticism (54%)54% related to the paper
15 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for International Journal for the Study of Skepticism.

It automatically formats your research paper to Brill formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format uses plainnat citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

Absolutely not! With our tool, you can freely write without having to focus on LaTeX. You can write your entire paper as per the International Journal for the Study of Skepticism guidelines and autoformat it.

Yes. The template is fully compliant as per the guidelines of this journal. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. Also, if there's any update in the journal format guidelines, we take care of it and include that in our algorithm.

Sure. We support all the top citation styles like APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, Chicago style, etc. For example, in case of this journal, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, it will automatically update your article as per the International Journal for the Study of Skepticism citation style.

You can avail our Free Trial for 7 days. I'm sure you'll find our features very helpful. Plus, it's quite inexpensive.

Yup. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word doc and click on auto-format. You'll have a publish-ready paper that you can download at the end.

A matter of seconds. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves a load of your time in writing and formating your manuscript.

One little Google search can get you the Word template for any journal. However, why do you need a Word template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace, autoformat it as per International Journal for the Study of Skepticism's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Try us out!.

Absolutely! You can do it using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, you can always contact our support team.

SciSpace is an online tool for now. We'll soon release a desktop version. You can also request (or upvote) any feature that you think might be helpful for you and the research community in the feature request section once you sign-up with us.

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it up and running within a matter of 3 working days. You can find the request box in the Journal Gallery on the right sidebar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for?".

After you have written and autoformatted your paper, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx and LaTeX.

To be honest, the answer is NO. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of those factors the review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, Eigenfactor, etc. You must assess all the factors and then take the final call.

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We have extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help our researchers understand the access level of this journal. The following table indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

Our journal submission experts are skilled in submitting papers to various international journals.

After uploading your paper on SciSpace, you would see a button to request a journal submission service for International Journal for the Study of Skepticism.

Each submission service is completed within 4 - 5 working days.

Yes. SciSpace provides this functionality.

After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or .bib file.

SciSpace would allow download of your references in International Journal for the Study of Skepticism Endnote style, according to brill guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to International Journal for the Study of Skepticism formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template