Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format
Recent searches

Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format Example of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

International Journal for the Study of Skepticism — Template for authors

Publisher: Brill
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Philosophy #314 of 644 down down by 31 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
Good
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 63 Published Papers | 20 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 19/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 0.9
SJR: 0.302
SNIP: 0.743
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 1.8
SJR: 0.699
SNIP: 1.341
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 1.4
SJR: 0.388
SNIP: 1.091
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 1.2
SJR: 0.288
SNIP: 0.637

Journal Performance & Insights

CiteRatio

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.3

40% from 2019

CiteRatio for International Journal for the Study of Skepticism from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.3
2019 0.5
2018 0.4
2017 0.3
2016 0.3
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.129

80% from 2019

SJR for International Journal for the Study of Skepticism from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.129
2019 0.653
2018 0.181
2017 0.161
2016 0.281
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.297

68% from 2019

SNIP for International Journal for the Study of Skepticism from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.297
2019 0.936
2018 0.581
2017 0.536
2016 0.679
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has decreased by 40% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 80% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 68% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

International Journal for the Study of Skepticism

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Brill

International Journal for the Study of Skepticism

Approved by publishing and review experts on SciSpace, this template is built as per for International Journal for the Study of Skepticism formatting guidelines as mentioned in Brill author instructions. The current version was created on 19 Jun 2020 and has been used by 775 authors to write and format their manuscripts to this journal.

Philosophy

Arts and Humanities

i
Last updated on
19 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
2210-5697
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Yellow faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
plainnat
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al., 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
G. E. Blonder, M. Tinkham, and T. M. Klapwijk. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys. Rev. B, 25(7):4515– 4532, 1982. URL 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1163/22105700-00704002
On Extended Rationality

Abstract:

The discussion highlights the need to distinguish between perceptions and the experiences implicated by perceptions, noting that Coliva’s framework makes perception irrelevant to justified belief, except for being the contingent means by which we are furnished with experiences that are the real source of justified belief. It ... The discussion highlights the need to distinguish between perceptions and the experiences implicated by perceptions, noting that Coliva’s framework makes perception irrelevant to justified belief, except for being the contingent means by which we are furnished with experiences that are the real source of justified belief. It then addresses two issues concerning the problem of cognitive locality. The problem concerns what enables us rationally to suppose that our perceptual experiences mostly put us in touch with reality. The issues addressed are: (1) whether, assuming that there is a problem of cognitive locality, Coliva’s Moderate position adequately addresses it; and (2) whether Coliva gives us enough to make sense of the claim, central to the Moderate position, that certain background presuppositions are constitutive of empirical rationality. read more read less

Topics:

Rationality (55%)55% related to the paper, Locality (51%)51% related to the paper
80 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1163/22105700-00603003
The Animal in Epistemology : Wittgenstein's Enactivist Solution to the Problem of Regress
Danièle Moyal-Sharrock1

Abstract:

This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in International Journal for the Study of Skepticism following peer review. Subject to embargo, embargo end date: 23 May 2017. The version of record [ (October 2016) 6 (2-3): 97-119. First published online October, 2016] is available online a... This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in International Journal for the Study of Skepticism following peer review. Subject to embargo, embargo end date: 23 May 2017. The version of record [ (October 2016) 6 (2-3): 97-119. First published online October, 2016] is available online at doi: 10.1163/22105700-00603003 read more read less

Topics:

Epistemology of Wikipedia (69%)69% related to the paper, Skepticism (59%)59% related to the paper, Problem of the criterion (59%)59% related to the paper, Certainty (56%)56% related to the paper, Subject (philosophy) (54%)54% related to the paper
View PDF
36 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1163/22105700-00603010
After the Spade Turns: Disagreement, First Principles and Epistemic Contractarianism
Michael P. Lynch1

Abstract:

Reasons, Wittgenstein warned, come to an end; we hit bedrock; the spade is turned. Long philosophical tradition, not to mention common sense, agrees. You can’t justify everything. In this paper, I examine a case where it is not only especially compelling that reasons run out—it is especially troubling. The case is when there ... Reasons, Wittgenstein warned, come to an end; we hit bedrock; the spade is turned. Long philosophical tradition, not to mention common sense, agrees. You can’t justify everything. In this paper, I examine a case where it is not only especially compelling that reasons run out—it is especially troubling. The case is when there is disagreement over explicitly epistemic first principles. Epistemic first principles are principles that announce that basic methods for acquiring beliefs are reliable. Where we disagree over such principles, we face the alarming prospect of being unable to defend them without relying on the very methods whose reliability is in question. I then explore, however briefly, what options remain in such situations for still engaging in what we might call rational persuasion. I suggest our prospects depend on whether we can make sense of giving objective practical reasons for our epistemic first principles. read more read less

Topics:

Rationality (50%)50% related to the paper, Persuasion (50%)50% related to the paper
21 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1163/22105700-02021082
McDowellian Neo-Mooreanism?
Genia Schönbaumsfeld1

Abstract:

In a series of recent articles, Duncan Pritchard argues for a “neo-Moorean” interpretation of John McDowell’s anti-sceptical strategy. Pritchard introduces a distinction between “favouring” and “discriminating” epistemic grounds in order to show that, within the radical sceptical context, an absence of “discriminating” episte... In a series of recent articles, Duncan Pritchard argues for a “neo-Moorean” interpretation of John McDowell’s anti-sceptical strategy. Pritchard introduces a distinction between “favouring” and “discriminating” epistemic grounds in order to show that, within the radical sceptical context, an absence of “discriminating” epistemic grounds allowing one to distinguish brain-in-a-vat from non-brain-in-a-vat scenarios does not preclude possessing knowledge of the denials of sceptical hypotheses. I argue that Pritchard’s account fails. First, the distinction between “favouring” and “discriminating” epistemic grounds only works for “mules-disguised-as zebras” examples, but breaks down in the radical sceptical case. Second, McDowellian disjunctivism neutralizes the radical sceptical threat, but does not refute it. Third, the “highest common factor” conception is itself responsible for generating the sceptical problem and once this is undermined by McDowellian disjunctivism, scepticism no longer stands in need of direct refutation. I conclude by showing that one can either be a McDowellian disjunctivist or a neo-Moorean, but not both. read more read less

Topics:

Disjunctivism (57%)57% related to the paper
17 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1163/221057011X588037
Pyrrhonian Skepticism Meets Speech-Act Theory
John Turri1

Abstract:

This paper applies speech-act theory to craft a new response to Pyrrhonian skepticism and diagnose its appeal. Carefully distinguishing between different levels of language-use and noting their interrelations can help us identify a subtle mistake in a key Pyrrhonian argument. This paper applies speech-act theory to craft a new response to Pyrrhonian skepticism and diagnose its appeal. Carefully distinguishing between different levels of language-use and noting their interrelations can help us identify a subtle mistake in a key Pyrrhonian argument. read more read less

Topics:

Skepticism (56%)56% related to the paper, Pyrrhonism (54%)54% related to the paper, Mistake (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
15 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for International Journal for the Study of Skepticism.

It automatically formats your research paper to Brill formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

International Journal for the Study of Skepticism format uses plainnat citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write International Journal for the Study of Skepticism in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the International Journal for the Study of Skepticism guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the International Journal for the Study of Skepticism guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the International Journal for the Study of Skepticism guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in International Journal for the Study of Skepticism?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the International Journal for the Study of Skepticism citation style.

4. Can I use the International Journal for the Study of Skepticism templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for International Journal for the Study of Skepticism.

5. Can I use a manuscript in International Journal for the Study of Skepticism that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper International Journal for the Study of Skepticism that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in International Journal for the Study of Skepticism?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in International Journal for the Study of Skepticism.

7. Where can I find the template for the International Journal for the Study of Skepticism?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per International Journal for the Study of Skepticism's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the International Journal for the Study of Skepticism's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. International Journal for the Study of Skepticism an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's International Journal for the Study of Skepticism is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like International Journal for the Study of Skepticism?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like International Journal for the Study of Skepticism?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using International Journal for the Study of Skepticism?

After writing your paper autoformatting in International Journal for the Study of Skepticism, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is International Journal for the Study of Skepticism's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for International Journal for the Study of Skepticism?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for International Journal for the Study of Skepticism. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In International Journal for the Study of Skepticism?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for International Journal for the Study of Skepticism are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the International Journal for the Study of Skepticism?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per International Journal for the Study of Skepticism's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download International Journal for the Study of Skepticism in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in International Journal for the Study of Skepticism Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to International Journal for the Study of Skepticism formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template