Example of Annual Review of Applied Linguistics format
Recent searches

Example of Annual Review of Applied Linguistics format Example of Annual Review of Applied Linguistics format Example of Annual Review of Applied Linguistics format Example of Annual Review of Applied Linguistics format Example of Annual Review of Applied Linguistics format Example of Annual Review of Applied Linguistics format Example of Annual Review of Applied Linguistics format Example of Annual Review of Applied Linguistics format Example of Annual Review of Applied Linguistics format Example of Annual Review of Applied Linguistics format Example of Annual Review of Applied Linguistics format Example of Annual Review of Applied Linguistics format Example of Annual Review of Applied Linguistics format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Annual Review of Applied Linguistics format Example of Annual Review of Applied Linguistics format Example of Annual Review of Applied Linguistics format Example of Annual Review of Applied Linguistics format Example of Annual Review of Applied Linguistics format Example of Annual Review of Applied Linguistics format Example of Annual Review of Applied Linguistics format Example of Annual Review of Applied Linguistics format Example of Annual Review of Applied Linguistics format Example of Annual Review of Applied Linguistics format Example of Annual Review of Applied Linguistics format Example of Annual Review of Applied Linguistics format Example of Annual Review of Applied Linguistics format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Annual Review of Applied Linguistics — Template for authors

Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Language and Linguistics #39 of 879 down down by 29 ranks
Linguistics and Language #43 of 935 down down by 31 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 52 Published Papers | 204 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 12/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.1
SJR: 0.832
SNIP: 1.154
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.5
SJR: 1.614
SNIP: 2.163
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.8
SJR: 1.269
SNIP: 1.936
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.3
SJR: 0.947
SNIP: 1.603

Journal Performance & Insights

CiteRatio

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

3.9

24% from 2019

CiteRatio for Annual Review of Applied Linguistics from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 3.9
2019 5.1
2018 8.8
2017 5.4
2016 3.1
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.87

6% from 2019

SJR for Annual Review of Applied Linguistics from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.87
2019 1.979
2018 3.272
2017 3.223
2016 1.304
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

2.07

23% from 2019

SNIP for Annual Review of Applied Linguistics from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.07
2019 2.704
2018 4.027
2017 2.728
2016 1.844
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has decreased by 24% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 6% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 23% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Annual Review of Applied Linguistics

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Cambridge University Press

Annual Review of Applied Linguistics

Annual Review of Applied Linguistics reviews research in key areas in the broad field of applied linguistics. Each issue is thematic, covering the topic by means of critical summaries, overviews and bibliographic citations. Every fourth or fifth issue surveys applied linguisti...... Read More

i
Last updated on
12 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
0267-1905
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.866
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
unsrt
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
G E Blonder, M Tinkham, and T M Klapwijk. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys. Rev. B, 25(7):4515–4532, 1982. 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1017/S0267190505000061
Language learning strategy instruction: current issues and research

Abstract:

This chapter begins with definitions and an overview of methods used to identify learners' strategies, then summarizes what we have learned from the large number of descriptive studies of strategies reported by language learners. Research on language learning strategies has a history of only about thirty years, and much of th... This chapter begins with definitions and an overview of methods used to identify learners' strategies, then summarizes what we have learned from the large number of descriptive studies of strategies reported by language learners. Research on language learning strategies has a history of only about thirty years, and much of this history has been sporadic. The 1980s and early 1990s were a period of substantial research on language learning strategies, much of it descriptive. This period was followed by an apparent loss of interest in language learning strategies, judging by limited reported research and few related conference presentations. Recently, however, a number of new investigations have reinvigorated the field. The focus of the chapter is on the evolution of research on language learning strategy intervention studies, the issues that have emerged from this research, and metacognitive models that can be useful in the language classroom. The discussion concludes by setting out directions for future research. read more read less

Topics:

Language learning strategies (74%)74% related to the paper, Comprehension approach (63%)63% related to the paper, Language pedagogy (62%)62% related to the paper, Language assessment (62%)62% related to the paper, Language industry (61%)61% related to the paper
View PDF
660 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1017/S0267190511000092
Content-and-Language Integrated Learning: From Practice to Principles?

Abstract:

This article surveys recent work on content-and-language integrated learning (CLIL). Related to both content-based instruction and immersion education by virtue of its dual focus on language and content, CLIL is here understood as an educational model for contexts where the classroom provides the only site for learners’ inter... This article surveys recent work on content-and-language integrated learning (CLIL). Related to both content-based instruction and immersion education by virtue of its dual focus on language and content, CLIL is here understood as an educational model for contexts where the classroom provides the only site for learners’ interaction in the target language. That is, CLIL is about either foreign languages or lingua francas. The discussion foregrounds a prototypical CLIL context (Europe) but also refers to work done elsewhere. The first part of the discussion focuses on policy issues, describing how CLIL practice operates in a tension between grassroots decisions and higher order policymaking, an area where European multi- and plurilingual policies and the strong impact of English as a lingua franca play a particularly interesting role. The latter is, of course, of definite relevance also in other parts of the world. The second part of the article synthesizes research on learning outcomes in CLIL. Here, the absence of standardized content testing means that the main focus is on language-learning outcomes. The third section deals with classroom-based CLIL research and participants’ use of their language resources for learning and teaching, including such diverse perspectives as discourse pragmatics, speech acts, academic language functions, and genre. The final part of the article discusses theoretical underpinnings of CLIL, delineating their current state of elaboration as applied linguistic research in the area is gaining momentum. read more read less

Topics:

Content and language integrated learning (62%)62% related to the paper, English as a lingua franca (58%)58% related to the paper, Foreign language (55%)55% related to the paper, Lingua franca (53%)53% related to the paper, Pragmatics (50%)50% related to the paper
642 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1017/S0267190514000191
Identity and a Model of Investment in Applied Linguistics
Ron Darvin1, Bonny Norton1

Abstract:

This article locates Norton's foundational work on identity and investment within the social turn of applied linguistics. It discusses its historical impetus and theoretical anchors, and it illustrates how these ideas have been taken up in recent scholarship. In response to the demands of the new world order, spurred by techn... This article locates Norton's foundational work on identity and investment within the social turn of applied linguistics. It discusses its historical impetus and theoretical anchors, and it illustrates how these ideas have been taken up in recent scholarship. In response to the demands of the new world order, spurred by technology and characterized by mobility, it proposes a comprehensive model of investment, which occurs at the intersection of identity, ideology, and capital. The model recognizes that the spaces in which language acquisition and socialization take place have become increasingly deterritorialized and unbounded, and the systemic patterns of control more invisible. This calls for new questions, analyses, and theories of identity. The model addresses the needs of learners who navigate their way through online and offline contexts and perform identities that have become more fluid and complex. As such, it proposes a more comprehensive and critical examination of the relationship between identity, investment, and language learning. Drawing on two case studies of a female language learner in rural Uganda and a male language learner in urban Canada, the model illustrates how structure and agency, operating across time and space, can accord or refuse learners the power to speak. read more read less

Topics:

Identity (social science) (58%)58% related to the paper, Applied linguistics (56%)56% related to the paper, Language acquisition (52%)52% related to the paper, Online and offline (51%)51% related to the paper, Structure and agency (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
534 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1017/S0267190510000085
Qualitative Interviews in Applied Linguistics: From Research Instrument to Social Practice

Abstract:

Interviews have been used for decades in empirical inquiry across the social sciences as one or the primary means of generating data. In applied linguistics, interview research has increased dramatically in recent years, particularly in qualitative studies that aim to investigate participants’ identities, experiences, beliefs... Interviews have been used for decades in empirical inquiry across the social sciences as one or the primary means of generating data. In applied linguistics, interview research has increased dramatically in recent years, particularly in qualitative studies that aim to investigate participants’ identities, experiences, beliefs, and orientations toward a range of phenomena. However, despite the proliferation of interview research in qualitative applied linguistics, it has become equally apparent that there is a profound inconsistency in how the interview has been and continues to be theorized in the field. This article critically reviews a selection of applied linguistics research from the past 5 years that uses interviews in case study, ethnographic, narrative, (auto)biographical, and related qualitative frameworks, focusing in particular on the ideologies of language, communication, and the interview, or the communicable cartographies of interviewing, that are evident in them. By contrasting what is referred to as an interview as research instrument perspective with a research interview as social practice orientation, the article argues for greater reflexivity about the interview methods that qualitative applied linguists use in their studies, the status ascribed to interview data, and how those data are analyzed and represented. read more read less

Topics:

Interview (65%)65% related to the paper, Applied linguistics (60%)60% related to the paper, Qualitative research (55%)55% related to the paper, Social practice (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
394 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1017/S0267190510000048
Language Socialization into Academic Discourse Communities

Abstract:

Although much has been written about academic discourse from diverse theoretical perspectives over the past two decades, and especially about English academic discourse, research on socialization into academic discourse or literacies in one's first or subsequently learned languages or into new discourse communities has receiv... Although much has been written about academic discourse from diverse theoretical perspectives over the past two decades, and especially about English academic discourse, research on socialization into academic discourse or literacies in one's first or subsequently learned languages or into new discourse communities has received far less attention. Academic discourse socialization is a dynamic, socially situated process that in contemporary contexts is often multimodal, multilingual, and highly intertextual as well. The process is characterized by variable amounts of modeling, feedback, and uptake; different levels of investment and agency on the part of learners; by the negotiation of power and identities; and, often, important personal transformations for at least some participants. However, the consequences and outcomes of academic discourse socialization are also quite unpredictable, both in the shorter term and longer term. In this review I provide a brief historical overview of research on language socialization into academic communities and describe, in turn, developments in research on socialization into oral, written, and online discourse and the social practices associated with each mode. I highlight issues of conformity or reproduction to local norms and practices versus resistance and contestation of these. Next, studies of socialization into academic publication and into particular textual identities are reviewed. I conclude with a short discussion of race, culture, gender, and academic discourse socialization, pointing out how social positioning by oneself and others can affect participants’ engagement and performance in their various learning communities. read more read less

Topics:

Academic discourse socialization (80%)80% related to the paper, Civil discourse (65%)65% related to the paper, Discourse community (59%)59% related to the paper, Socialization (58%)58% related to the paper, Conformity (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
358 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

It automatically formats your research paper to Cambridge University Press formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Annual Review of Applied Linguistics format uses unsrt citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Annual Review of Applied Linguistics in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Annual Review of Applied Linguistics guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Annual Review of Applied Linguistics guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Annual Review of Applied Linguistics guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Annual Review of Applied Linguistics?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Annual Review of Applied Linguistics citation style.

4. Can I use the Annual Review of Applied Linguistics templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Annual Review of Applied Linguistics that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Annual Review of Applied Linguistics that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Annual Review of Applied Linguistics?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

7. Where can I find the template for the Annual Review of Applied Linguistics?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Annual Review of Applied Linguistics's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Annual Review of Applied Linguistics's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Annual Review of Applied Linguistics is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Annual Review of Applied Linguistics?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Annual Review of Applied Linguistics?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Annual Review of Applied Linguistics?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Annual Review of Applied Linguistics's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Annual Review of Applied Linguistics?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Annual Review of Applied Linguistics?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Annual Review of Applied Linguistics are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Annual Review of Applied Linguistics?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Annual Review of Applied Linguistics's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Annual Review of Applied Linguistics in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Annual Review of Applied Linguistics Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Annual Review of Applied Linguistics formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template