Example of Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh format

Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace

This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.

Open Access

Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh — Template for authors

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Your data will always be in your control. Learn more

Get started with a free account

— or sign up using email —

See how it works

Guideline source

Categories	Rank	Trend in last 3 yrs
Earth and Planetary Sciences (all)	#38 of 186	up by 58 ranks
Environmental Science (all)	#52 of 220	up by 58 ranks

Journal quality:

High

Last 4 years overview: 155 Published Papers | 611 Citations

Indexed in: Scopus

Last updated: 04/07/2020

Related journals

Insights

General info

Related Journals

Open Access

Rendiconti Lincei

Springer

Quality:

High

CiteRatio: 2.8

SJR: 0.371

SNIP: 0.625

Open Access

Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk

Taylor and Francis

Quality:

High

CiteRatio: 6.2

SJR: 0.899

SNIP: 1.595

Open Access

Arabian Journal of Geosciences

Springer

Quality:

Good

CiteRatio: 2.1

SJR: 0.415

SNIP: 0.842

Open Access

Geosciences Journal

Springer

Quality:

Good

CiteRatio: 3.2

SJR: 0.468

SNIP: 1.089

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

2.839

54% from 2018

Impact factor for Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh from 2016 - 2019
Year	Value
2019	2.839
2018	1.84
2017	0.87
2016	0.828

Graph view

3.9

39% from 2019

CiteRatio for Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh from 2016 - 2020
Year	Value
2020	3.9
2019	2.8
2018	1.9
2017	1.2
2016	2.2

Graph view

Insights

Impact factor of this journal has increased by 54% in last year.
This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

Insights

CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 39% in last years.
This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.574

46% from 2019

SJR for Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh from 2016 - 2020
Year	Value
2020	0.574
2019	1.067
2018	0.464
2017	0.282
2016	0.42

Graph view

0.957

25% from 2019

SNIP for Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh from 2016 - 2020
Year	Value
2020	0.957
2019	1.272
2018	0.882
2017	0.485
2016	0.423

Graph view

Insights

SJR of this journal has decreased by 46% in last years.
This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

Insights

SNIP of this journal has decreased by 25% in last years.
This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Cambridge University Press

Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh

Earth and Environmental Science Transactions (formerly Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences) is a general earth sciences journal publishing a comprehensive selection of substantial peer-reviewed research papers, reviews and short communications of international standard across the broad spectrum of the Earth and its surface environments. The journal prides itself on the quality of its graphics and photographic reproduction. The Editors are keen to encourage interdisciplinary papers and Transactions also publishes occasional special symposia and invited volumes of specific interest. We are currently in the process of digitising the archive of RSE Publications, and the archive of the Transactions, dating back to 1788, will be available from the back issues link on this site. Read Less

Earth and Planetary Sciences

Last updated on	04 Jul 2020
ISSN	1755-6910
Impact Factor	High - 1.054
Open Access	No
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy	Green
Plagiarism Check	Available via Turnitin
Endnote Style	Download Available
Bibliography Name	unsrt
Citation Type	Numbered [25]
Bibliography Example	G E Blonder, M Tinkham, and T M Klapwijk. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys. Rev. B, 25(7):4515–4532, 1982. 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article • DOI: 10.1017/S0080456800009285 •

VII.—The Anatomy of Follicles Producing Wool-Fibres, with special reference to Keratinization

L. Auber

01 Jan 1952 - Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh

Abstract:

The mammalian hair-fibre, together with the “inner root-sheath” (i.e. the axial layers of the follicle wall), grows upward by a proximal addition of cells. Changes in the inner root-sheath are responsible for the final shape and surface sculpture of the fibre. At its distal limit the inner root-sheath disintegrates owing to t... The mammalian hair-fibre, together with the “inner root-sheath” (i.e. the axial layers of the follicle wall), grows upward by a proximal addition of cells. Changes in the inner root-sheath are responsible for the final shape and surface sculpture of the fibre. At its distal limit the inner root-sheath disintegrates owing to the effect of a de-keratinizing chemical agent.A bent, undulated, or “crimped” fibre is due to a differentiated progress of the changes leading to keratinization of the “fibre cortex”. The cells which give rise to a “medulla” are different chemically and less compressible than cortical cells. read more

238 Citations

Book Chapter • DOI: 10.1130/0-8137-2315-9.171 •

Lachlan Fold Belt granitoids: products of three-component mixing

William J. Collins¹ •

01 Jan 1996 - Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh

Abstract:

The paradox of Lachlan Fold Belt (LFB) granitoids is that although contrasted chemical types (S- and I-types) imply melting of distinct crustal sources, the simple Ndâ€“Srâ€“Pbâ€“O isotopic arrays indicate a continuum, suggesting mixing of magmatic components. The paradox is resolved by the recognition that the previously inf... The paradox of Lachlan Fold Belt (LFB) granitoids is that although contrasted chemical types (S- and I-types) imply melting of distinct crustal sources, the simple Ndâ€“Srâ€“Pbâ€“O isotopic arrays indicate a continuum, suggesting mixing of magmatic components. The paradox is resolved by the recognition that the previously inferred, isotopically primitive end-member is itself a crust-mantle mix, so that three general source components, mantle, lower crust and middle crust, comprise the granitoids. Based on Nd isotopic evidence, mantle-derived basaltic magmas melted and mixed with Neoproterozoic-Cambrian, arc-backarc-type material to produce primitive I-type, parental granitoid magmas in the lowerâ€“middle crust. Ordovician metasediment, locally underthrust to mid-crustal levels, was remobilised under the elevated geotherms and is most clearly recognised as diatexite in the Cooma complex, but it also exists as gneissic enclaves in S-type granites. The diatexite mixed with the hybrid I-type magmas to produce the parental S-type magmas. Unique parent magma compositions of individual granite suites reflect variations within any or all of the three major source components, or between the mixing proportions. For example, chemical tie-lines between Cooma diatexite and mafic I-type Jindabyne suite magma encompass almost all mafic S-type granites of the vast Bullenbalong supersuite, consistently in the proportion Jindabyne: Cooma, 30:70. The modelling shows that LFB S-type magmas are heavily contaminated I-type magmas, produced by large-scale mixing of hot I-type material with lower temperature diatexite in the middle crust. The model implies a genetic link between migmatite and pluton-scale, crustally derived (S-type) granites.Given the chemical and isotopic contrasts of the crustally derived source components, and their typically unequal proportions in the magmas, it is not surprising that the LFB granitoids are so distinctive and have been categorised as S- and I-type. The sublinear chemical trends of the granitoid suites are considered to be secondary effects associated with crystal fractionation of unique parental magmas that were formed by three-component mixing. The model obviates the necessity for multiple underplating events and Proterozoic continental basement, in accordance with the observed tectonostratigraphy of the Lachlan Fold Belt. read more

Topics:

Underplating (53%)53% related to the paper, Mafic (51%)51% related to the paper, Migmatite (51%)51% related to the paper

230 Citations

Journal Article • DOI: 10.1017/S0263593300006544 •

Status of thermobarometry in granitic batholiths

J. Lawford Anderson¹ •

01 Jan 1996 - Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh

Abstract:

Most granitic batholiths contain plutons which are composed of low-variance mineral assemblages amenable to quantification of the P– conditions that characterise emplacement. Some mineral thermometers, such as those based on two feldspars or two Fe–Ti oxides, commonly undergo subsolidus re-equilibration. Others are more robus... Most granitic batholiths contain plutons which are composed of low-variance mineral assemblages amenable to quantification of the P– conditions that characterise emplacement. Some mineral thermometers, such as those based on two feldspars or two Fe–Ti oxides, commonly undergo subsolidus re-equilibration. Others are more robust, including hornblende–plagioclase, hornblende–clinopyroxene, pyroxene–ilmenite, pyroxene–biotite, garnet–hornblende, muscovite-biotite and garnet–biotite. The quality of their calibration is variable and a major challenge resides in the large range of liquidus to solidus crystallisation temperatures that are incompletely preserved in mineral profiles. Further, the addition of components that affect Kd relations between non-ideal solutions remains inadequately understood. Estimation of solidus and near-solidus conditions derived from exchange thermometry often yield results >700°C and above that expected for crystallisation in the presence of an H2O-rich volatile phase. These results suggest that the assumption of crystallisation on an H2O-saturated solidus may not be an accurate characterisation of some granitic rocks.Vapour undersaturation and volatile phase composition dramatically affect solidus temperatures. Equilibria including hypersthene–biotite–sanidine–quartz, fayalite–sanidine–biotite, and annite–sanidine–magnetite (ASM) allow estimation of Estimates by the latter assemblage, however, are highly dependent on . Oxygen fugacity varies widely (from two or more log units below the QFM buffer to a few log units below the HM buffer) and can have a strong affect on mafic phase composition. Ilmenite–magnetite, quartz–ulvospinel–ilmenite–fayalite (QUILF), annite–sanidine–magnetite, biotite–almandine–muscovite–magnetite (BAMM), and titanite–magnetite–quartz (TMQ) are equilibria providing a basis for the calculation of .Granite barometry plays a critical part in constraining tectonic history. Metaluminous granites offer a range of barometers including ferrosilite–fayalite–quartz, garnet–plagioclase–hornblende–quartz and Al-in-hornblende. The latter barometer remains at the developmental stage, but has potential when the effects of temperature are considered. Likewise, peraluminous granites often contain mineral assemblages that enable pressure determinations, including garnet–biotite–muscovite–plagioclase and muscovite–biotite–alkali–feldspar–quartz. Limiting pressures can be obtained from the presence of magmatic epidote and, for low-Ca pegmatites or aplites, the presence of subsolvus versus hypersolvus alkali feldspars.As with all barometers, the influence of temperature, , and choice of activity model are critical factors. Foremost is the fact that batholiths are not static features. Mineral compositions imperfectly record conditions acquired during ascent and over a range of temperature and pressure and great care must be taken in properly quantifying intensive parameters. read more

Topics:

Solidus (57%)57% related to the paper, Subsolvus (54%)54% related to the paper, Mineral redox buffer (51%)51% related to the paper,

View PDF

227 Citations

Journal Article • DOI: 10.1017/S1755691009016120 •

The sanukitoid series: magmatism at the Archaean–Proterozoic transition

Hervé Martin¹, Jean-François Moyen², •

01 Mar 2009 - Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh

Abstract:

A specific type of granitoid, referred to as sanukitoid (Shirey & Hanson 1984), was emplaced mainly across the Archaean–Proterozoic transition. The major and trace element composition of sanukitoids is intermediate between typical Archaean TTG and modern arc granitoids. However, among sanukitoids, two groups can be distinguis... A specific type of granitoid, referred to as sanukitoid (Shirey & Hanson 1984), was emplaced mainly across the Archaean–Proterozoic transition. The major and trace element composition of sanukitoids is intermediate between typical Archaean TTG and modern arc granitoids. However, among sanukitoids, two groups can be distinguished on the basis of the Ti content of the less differentiated rocks of the suite: high- and low-Ti sanukitoids. Melting experiments and petrogenetic modelling show that they may have formed by either (1) melting of mantle peridotite previously metasomatised by felsic melts of TTG composition, or (2) by reaction between TTG melts and mantle peridotite (assimilation). Rocks of the sanukitoid suite were emplaced at the Archaean–Proterozoic boundary, possibly marking the time when TTG-dominated granitoid magmatism changed to a more modern-style, arc-dominated magmatism. Consequently, the intermediate character of sanukitoids is not only compositional but chronological. The succession of granitoid magmatism with time is integrated in a plate tectonic model where it is linked to the thermal evolution of subduction zones, reflecting the progressive cooling of Earth: (1) the Archaean Earth’s heat production was high enough to allow the production of large amounts of TTG granitoids formed by partial melting of recycled basaltic crust (‘slab melting’); (2) at the end of the Archaean, due to the progressive cooling of the Earth, the extent of slab melting was reduced, resulting in lower melt:rock ratios. In such conditions the slab melts can be strongly contaminated by assimilation of mantle peridotite, thus giving rise to low-Ti sanukitoids. It is also possible that the slab melts were totally consumed in reactions with mantle peridotite, subsequent melting of this ‘melt-metasomatised mantle’ producing the high-Ti sanukitoid magmas; (3) after 2·5 Ga, Earth heat production was too low to allow slab melting, except in relatively rare geodynamic circumstances, and most modern arc magmas are produced by melting of the mantle wedge peridotite metasomatised by fluids from dehydration of the subducted slab. Of course, such changes did not take place exactly at the same time all over the world. The Archaean mechanisms coexisted with new processes over a relatively long time period, even if they were subordinate to the more modern processes. read more

Topics:

Sanukitoid (65%)65% related to the paper, Mantle wedge (59%)59% related to the paper, Peridotite (58%)58% related to the paper,

201 Citations

Journal Article • DOI: 10.1017/S0080456800012795 •

Structure of coarse grained braided stream alluvium

B. J. Bluck

01 Jan 1979 - Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh

Abstract:

Grain size characteristics of the sediment and the flow stage characteristics of the river are the two most important factors influencing sedimentation in the channel zone. Climate is important in its influence on floodplain (overbank) sediment.Supra-bar platform (upper) parts of mature bars from a wide range of climatic cond... Grain size characteristics of the sediment and the flow stage characteristics of the river are the two most important factors influencing sedimentation in the channel zone. Climate is important in its influence on floodplain (overbank) sediment.Supra-bar platform (upper) parts of mature bars from a wide range of climatic conditions consistently show a sequence in the development of contained sedimentary structures which is related to the flow stage. At high stage, in rivers where the bed materials are quite mobile, the bar form is not thought to be present: the form develops on the falling stage, and the bar is dissected on the lowest stage. The various bar forms have a related diagnostic structure which determined from the nature and distribution of the stratification types, and the manner of their deposition on the falling flow stage. The exposed (supra-platform) parts of lateral bars have a side and longitudinally filled inner channel which comprises fine sediment. Medial bars have converging cross-strata in sands which are overlain partly by gravels in an upward coarsening sequence.Lateral migration of the channel zone, brought about by the preferential bar accretions to one side, results in building of a lithosome, the facies structure of which is partly determined by the nature of the bar accretions. As the channel migrates the abandoned bars may be covered with fine sediments so as to build up an upward fining sequence. The nature of the fine overbank part of the braided stream cycle is as complex as the coarse lower, so that a highly variable vertical sequence of lithological types is likely to be constructed.Upward fining cycles are also built by some fine braided streams but they are the product of a single flood rather than lateral channel migration. Braided stream deposits are distinguishable from those of small, coarse meandering stream deposits by the presence of inner accretionary banks in the latter, and inner channels in the former. read more

Topics:

Overbank (59%)59% related to the paper, Alluvium (50%)50% related to the paper

175 Citations

Also popular among researchers

“

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds

Choose a template

Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates

Import a MS-Word file or start fresh

It takes only few seconds to import

View and edit your final output

SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines

Submit directly or Download

Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh.

It automatically formats your research paper to Cambridge University Press formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh format uses unsrt citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh citation style.

4. Can I use the Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh.

7. Where can I find the template for the Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh?

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour	Archiving policy
Green	Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue	Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow	Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White	Archiving not formally supported

FYI:

Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh are:.

S. No.	Citation Style Type
1.	Author Year
2.	Numbered
3.	Numbered (Superscripted)
4.	Author Year (Cited Pages)
5.	Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh?

16. Can I download Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

“

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

”

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user

Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh — Template for authors

Related Journals

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

2.839

3.9

Insights

Insights

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

0.574

0.957

Insights

Insights

Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh

Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh

Top papers written in this journal

Abstract:

Abstract:

Topics:

Abstract:

Topics:

Abstract:

Topics:

Abstract:

Topics:

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

Freedom from formatting guidelines

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Frequently asked questions

Fast and reliable, built for complaince.

No word template required

Verifed journal formats

Trusted by academicians

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.