Example of European Company and Financial Law Review format
Recent searches

Example of European Company and Financial Law Review format Example of European Company and Financial Law Review format Example of European Company and Financial Law Review format Example of European Company and Financial Law Review format Example of European Company and Financial Law Review format Example of European Company and Financial Law Review format Example of European Company and Financial Law Review format Example of European Company and Financial Law Review format Example of European Company and Financial Law Review format Example of European Company and Financial Law Review format Example of European Company and Financial Law Review format Example of European Company and Financial Law Review format Example of European Company and Financial Law Review format Example of European Company and Financial Law Review format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of European Company and Financial Law Review format Example of European Company and Financial Law Review format Example of European Company and Financial Law Review format Example of European Company and Financial Law Review format Example of European Company and Financial Law Review format Example of European Company and Financial Law Review format Example of European Company and Financial Law Review format Example of European Company and Financial Law Review format Example of European Company and Financial Law Review format Example of European Company and Financial Law Review format Example of European Company and Financial Law Review format Example of European Company and Financial Law Review format Example of European Company and Financial Law Review format Example of European Company and Financial Law Review format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.

European Company and Financial Law Review — Template for authors

Publisher: De Gruyter
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Law #335 of 722 up up by 60 ranks
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous) #98 of 159 down down by 18 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
Good
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 97 Published Papers | 87 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 25/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.3
SJR: 2.156
SNIP: 2.402
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 1.9
SJR: 0.297
SNIP: 1.707
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 1.7
SJR: 0.483
SNIP: 1.338
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.2
SJR: 0.921
SNIP: 2.219

Journal Performance & Insights

CiteRatio

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.9

13% from 2019

CiteRatio for European Company and Financial Law Review from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.9
2019 0.8
2018 0.3
2017 0.4
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.279

23% from 2019

SJR for European Company and Financial Law Review from 2017 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.279
2019 0.362
2018 0.262
2017 0.258
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.471

54% from 2019

SNIP for European Company and Financial Law Review from 2017 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.471
2019 1.014
2018 0.154
2017 0.265
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 13% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 23% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 54% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

European Company and Financial Law Review

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

De Gruyter

European Company and Financial Law Review

Approved by publishing and review experts on SciSpace, this template is built as per for European Company and Financial Law Review formatting guidelines as mentioned in De Gruyter author instructions. The current version was created on and has been used by 928 authors to write and format their manuscripts to this journal.

Law

i
Last updated on
25 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
1613-2548
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Yellow faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
C. W. J. Beenakker. Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett., 97(6):067007, 2006.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1515/ECFR.2006.019
The Effectiveness of Corporate Governance in One-Tier and Two-Tier Board Systems – Evidence from the UK and Germany –

Abstract:

Germany and the UK are paradigms of systems in which the control of managing directors of companies either lies in the hand of a separate supervisory board (two-tier system) or is an additional task of the board itself (one-tier system). This paper provides for an empirical test of the effectiveness of both systems of corpora... Germany and the UK are paradigms of systems in which the control of managing directors of companies either lies in the hand of a separate supervisory board (two-tier system) or is an additional task of the board itself (one-tier system). This paper provides for an empirical test of the effectiveness of both systems of corporate governance. The analysis of the financial performance and board turnover of the largest companies listed on the stock exchanges in Frankfurt and London over a total of 400 financial years establishes that both systems are effective means of control. Yet the analysis also demonstrates that it is not possible to assign superiority to either of them. Therefore, the often raised question as to whether one of the two systems will finally prevail and whether there will be ultimate convergence of both systems, has to be answered in the negative. As the discussion of the strengths and weaknesses will show, however, there is still scope for improvements in each of the two board models. read more read less

Topics:

Corporate governance (59%)59% related to the paper, Stock exchange (52%)52% related to the paper, Empirical research (51%)51% related to the paper, Strengths and weaknesses (50%)50% related to the paper
154 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1515/ECFR.2004.1.2.135
Board Models in Europe. Recent Developments of Internal Corporate Governance Structures in Germany, the United Kingdom, France, and Italy

Abstract:

The struggle for efficient internal management control is the centre of the corporate governance debate in Europe since the incorporation of the Dutch Verenigde Oostindische Compagnie in 1602. Recent developments in Europe illustrate a trend towards specialised rules for listed companies and indicate growing convergence of in... The struggle for efficient internal management control is the centre of the corporate governance debate in Europe since the incorporation of the Dutch Verenigde Oostindische Compagnie in 1602. Recent developments in Europe illustrate a trend towards specialised rules for listed companies and indicate growing convergence of internal control mechanisms independent of board structure. The revised Combined Code in the United Kingdom and also the French revised Principles of Corporate Governance, both of 2003, strengthen the presence of independent directors on one-tier boards in Europe. Another systemic break-through for the two-tier board model is the growing tendency to separate the positions of CEO and board chairman. For the German two-tier structure, the strengthening of the strategic role of the supervisory board (Aufsichtsrat) by the new German Corporate Governance Code of 2002 means an attempt to incorporate a key advantage of the one-tier model. Similarly, the control duties of the Italian internal auditing committee (collegio sindacale) were extended by the Testo Unico of 1998 and bring the Italian second board closer to the German supervisory board. The common trend to stricter standards of independence is challenged in Germany by its rigid concept of co-determination and, to a lesser extent, by the more fl exible model of labour participation in France. Director’s duties and liabilities and also derivative actions are a focus of the reform debate in Germany since 1998 and are currently under review in the United Kingdom. After the Enron debacle the interplay between internal control devices and independent external auditing has become a major focus of interest in all countries considered. Driven by Anglo-Saxon codes of conduct audit committees today serve as a common denominator for good corporate governance. Though formal convergence is strong company organs in each country take on their own specifi c garment. Path dependent system development especially depends on shareholder structures and banking systems. The trend to greater structural fl exibility on board level is strongly triggered by the introduction of a threefold board model choice under the French Loi Nouvelle Regulations Economique of 2001 and under the Italian Vietti-Reform that is in force since January 2004. read more read less

Topics:

Comply or explain (64%)64% related to the paper, Corporate governance (62%)62% related to the paper, Internal audit (59%)59% related to the paper, Audit committee (57%)57% related to the paper, Audit (52%)52% related to the paper
View PDF
57 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1515/ECFR-2018-0021
Crypto-Securities Regulation: ICOs, Token Sales and Cryptocurrencies under EU Financial Law

Abstract:

Cryptocurrencies, such as bitcoin and ethereum, have not only risen to public attention as novel means of payments, but also as facilitators of initial coin offerings (ICOs, also called token sales). In these entirely online-mediated offerings, entrepreneurs sell tokens registered on a blockchain in exchange for cryptocoins. ... Cryptocurrencies, such as bitcoin and ethereum, have not only risen to public attention as novel means of payments, but also as facilitators of initial coin offerings (ICOs, also called token sales). In these entirely online-mediated offerings, entrepreneurs sell tokens registered on a blockchain in exchange for cryptocoins. Buyers receive tokens that can be understood as cryptographically-secured coupons which embody a bundle of rights and obligations. In July 2017, the SEC released an investigative report that highlighted that such tokens can be subject to the full scope of US securities regulation. It is unclear, however, to what extent EU securities regulation is applicable to ICOs and, particularly, whether issuers have to publish and register a prospectus in order to avoid criminal and civil prospectus liability in the EU. In conceptual terms, this depends on whether tokens are considered “securities” under the EU prospectus regulation regime. Against this background, this paper develops a nuanced approach that distinguishes between three archetypes of tokens: currency, investment, and utility tokens. It analyzes the differential implications of each of these types, and their hybrid forms, for EU securities regulation, and develops policy proposals for their regulation. read more read less

Topics:

Prospectus (58%)58% related to the paper, Issuer (54%)54% related to the paper, Commercial law (51%)51% related to the paper, Cryptocurrency (51%)51% related to the paper
46 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1515/ECFR-2015-0307
New EU Directive on the Disclosure of Non-Financial Information (CSR)

Abstract:

In October 2014 the EU adopted new rules on the disclosure of non-financial information, otherwise known as corporate social responsibility (CSR) information. The new requirements bring the CSR disclosure regulation in the EU in line with the current best practices and constitute a huge step forward compared to the existing r... In October 2014 the EU adopted new rules on the disclosure of non-financial information, otherwise known as corporate social responsibility (CSR) information. The new requirements bring the CSR disclosure regulation in the EU in line with the current best practices and constitute a huge step forward compared to the existing rules on the disclosure of non-financial information.This article analyses the likely impact of the amended Accounting Directive; its scope of application, what should be disclosed and how the directive should be enforced. In doing so, the article compares the new requirements to current best practices and experiences, especially using the experiences with mandatory CSR reporting in Denmark and the experiences with corporate governance reporting in the EU. Based on these experiences the article also makes predictions of whether the new requirements are likely to increase the quantity of the non-financial information disclosed and the consistency and comparability of the reports. read more read less

Topics:

Corporate governance (55%)55% related to the paper, Corporate social responsibility (54%)54% related to the paper, Directive (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
37 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1515/ECFR.2009.440
The Global Financial Crisis and the Disclosure Paradigm in European Financial Regulation: The Case for Reform

Abstract:

The global financial crisis has exposed the many limits of disclosure as an effective regulatory tool in the context of financial markets. Most of the risks that led to the creation of the 2008 catastrophe were often fully disclosed but the markets failed to understand what was disclosed and appreciate the implications. The r... The global financial crisis has exposed the many limits of disclosure as an effective regulatory tool in the context of financial markets. Most of the risks that led to the creation of the 2008 catastrophe were often fully disclosed but the markets failed to understand what was disclosed and appreciate the implications. The reasons for this failure were product complexity and the impact of sociopsychological factors such as bounded rationality, strategic trade behaviour (herding), and cognitive biases. Yet much of European Financial Regulation is based on the disclosure paradigm to remedy market failure and prevent abuse. Therefore, the EU needs to devise strategies that make disclosure work under actual (not hypothetical) market conditions. It is argued that only through the use of experiments, as a complement to empirical studies, EU policy-makers will be able to measure the actual impact of disclosure on investor protection. A conclusion that may be drawn from past studies is that default options in a variety of financial contracts are a better alternative to disclosure for retail investors with low levels of financial sophistication. If future studies confirm this finding, then the EU should consider whether an independent EU financial products committee is a better investor protection strategy than increased disclosure in the case of unsophisticated investors. read more read less

Topics:

Financial regulation (61%)61% related to the paper, Financial crisis (56%)56% related to the paper, Financial market (55%)55% related to the paper, Financial services (54%)54% related to the paper, Market failure (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
33 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for European Company and Financial Law Review.

It automatically formats your research paper to De Gruyter formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write European Company and Financial Law Review in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the European Company and Financial Law Review guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the European Company and Financial Law Review guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the European Company and Financial Law Review guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in European Company and Financial Law Review?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the European Company and Financial Law Review citation style.

4. Can I use the European Company and Financial Law Review templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for European Company and Financial Law Review.

5. Can I use a manuscript in European Company and Financial Law Review that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper European Company and Financial Law Review that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in European Company and Financial Law Review?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in European Company and Financial Law Review.

7. Where can I find the template for the European Company and Financial Law Review?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per European Company and Financial Law Review's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the European Company and Financial Law Review's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. European Company and Financial Law Review an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's European Company and Financial Law Review is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like European Company and Financial Law Review?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like European Company and Financial Law Review?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using European Company and Financial Law Review?

After writing your paper autoformatting in European Company and Financial Law Review, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is European Company and Financial Law Review's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for European Company and Financial Law Review?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for European Company and Financial Law Review. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In European Company and Financial Law Review?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for European Company and Financial Law Review are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the European Company and Financial Law Review?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per European Company and Financial Law Review's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download European Company and Financial Law Review in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in European Company and Financial Law Review Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to European Company and Financial Law Review formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template