Example of Theoretical Linguistics format
Recent searches

Example of Theoretical Linguistics format Example of Theoretical Linguistics format Example of Theoretical Linguistics format Example of Theoretical Linguistics format Example of Theoretical Linguistics format Example of Theoretical Linguistics format Example of Theoretical Linguistics format Example of Theoretical Linguistics format Example of Theoretical Linguistics format Example of Theoretical Linguistics format Example of Theoretical Linguistics format Example of Theoretical Linguistics format Example of Theoretical Linguistics format Example of Theoretical Linguistics format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Theoretical Linguistics format Example of Theoretical Linguistics format Example of Theoretical Linguistics format Example of Theoretical Linguistics format Example of Theoretical Linguistics format Example of Theoretical Linguistics format Example of Theoretical Linguistics format Example of Theoretical Linguistics format Example of Theoretical Linguistics format Example of Theoretical Linguistics format Example of Theoretical Linguistics format Example of Theoretical Linguistics format Example of Theoretical Linguistics format Example of Theoretical Linguistics format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Theoretical Linguistics — Template for authors

Publisher: De Gruyter
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Language and Linguistics #264 of 879 down down by 181 ranks
Linguistics and Language #295 of 935 down down by 206 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
Good
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 55 Published Papers | 48 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 03/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.1
SJR: 0.832
SNIP: 1.154
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.5
SJR: 1.614
SNIP: 2.163
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.8
SJR: 1.269
SNIP: 1.936
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.3
SJR: 0.947
SNIP: 1.603

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

5.75

28% from 2018

Impact factor for Theoretical Linguistics from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 5.75
2018 4.5
2017 2.0
2016 0.864
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.9

55% from 2019

CiteRatio for Theoretical Linguistics from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.9
2019 2.0
2018 1.9
2017 2.2
2016 2.3
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 28% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has decreased by 55% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.321

1% from 2019

SJR for Theoretical Linguistics from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.321
2019 0.324
2018 0.233
2017 0.457
2016 0.549
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.01

27% from 2019

SNIP for Theoretical Linguistics from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.01
2019 0.795
2018 0.349
2017 1.445
2016 1.016
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 1% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 27% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Theoretical Linguistics

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

De Gruyter

Theoretical Linguistics

Theoretical Linguistics is an open peer review journal. Each issue contains one long target article about a topic of general linguistic interest, together with several shorter reactions, comments and reflections on it. With this format, the journal aims to stimulate discussion...... Read More

Linguistics and Semiotics

i
Last updated on
03 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
0301-4428
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.46
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Yellow faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
unsrt
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
C. W. J. Beenakker. Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett., 97(6):067007, 2006.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1515/THLI.1974.1.1-3.181
Presupposition and linguistic context
01 Jan 1974 - Theoretical Linguistics

Abstract:

According to a pragmatic view, the presuppositions of a sentence detrmine the class of contexts in which the sentence could be felicitously uttered. Complex sentences present a difficult problem in this framework. No simple \"projection method\" has been found by which we could compute their presuppositions from those of thei... According to a pragmatic view, the presuppositions of a sentence detrmine the class of contexts in which the sentence could be felicitously uttered. Complex sentences present a difficult problem in this framework. No simple \"projection method\" has been found by which we could compute their presuppositions from those of their constituent clauses. This paper presents a way to eliminate the projection problem. A recursive definition of \"satisfaction of presuppositions\" is proposed that makes it unnecessary to have any explicit method for assigning presuppositions to compound sentences. A theory of presuppositions becomes a theory of contraints on successive contexts in a fully explicit discourse. read more read less

Topics:

Presupposition (64%)64% related to the paper, Theoretical linguistics (62%)62% related to the paper, Philosophy of language (54%)54% related to the paper
590 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1515/TL.2007.011
The expressive dimension
19 Oct 2007 - Theoretical Linguistics

Abstract:

Expressives like damn and bastard have, when uttered, an immediate and powerful impact on the context. They are performative, often destructively so. They are revealing of the perspective from which the utterance is made, and they can have a dramatic impact on how current and future utterances are perceived. This, despite the... Expressives like damn and bastard have, when uttered, an immediate and powerful impact on the context. They are performative, often destructively so. They are revealing of the perspective from which the utterance is made, and they can have a dramatic impact on how current and future utterances are perceived. This, despite the fact that speakers are invariably hard-pressed to articulate what they mean. I develop a general theory of these volatile, indispensable meanings. The theory is built around a class of expressive indices. These determine the expressive setting of the context of interpretation. Expressives morphemes act on that context, actively changing its expressive setting. The theory is multidimensional in the sense that descriptives and expressives are fundamentally di erent but receive a unified logical treatment. read more read less

Topics:

Performative utterance (52%)52% related to the paper, Context (language use) (51%)51% related to the paper, Utterance (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
532 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1515/THLI.2005.31.1-2.1
Cyclic Linearization of Syntactic Structure
20 May 2005 - Theoretical Linguistics

Abstract:

This paper proposes an architecture for the mapping between syntax and phonology — in particular, that aspect of phonology that determines ordering. In Fox and Pesetsky (in prep.), we will argue that this architecture, when combined with a general theory of syntactic domains ("phases"), provides a new understanding of a varie... This paper proposes an architecture for the mapping between syntax and phonology — in particular, that aspect of phonology that determines ordering. In Fox and Pesetsky (in prep.), we will argue that this architecture, when combined with a general theory of syntactic domains ("phases"), provides a new understanding of a variety of phenomena that have received diverse accounts in the literature. This shorter paper focuses on two processes, both drawn from Scandinavian: the familiar process of Object Shift and the less well-known process of Quantifier Movement. We will argue that constraints on these operations can be seen as instances of the same property of grammar that explains the fact that movement is local and successive cyclic. We begin by sketching a model in which locality and successive cyclicity are consequences of the architecture that we propose, rather than specific facts about movement itself. We next present our proposal in somewhat greater detail, and show how it can account for a wide range of apparent limitations on movement — in particular, superficially contradictory restrictions on Object Shift and Quantifier Movement. The restrictions on Object Shift include those grouped under the rubric of Holmberg's Generalization, which Quantifier Movement does not seem to obey. We will argue that Quantifier Movement instead obeys a near mirror-image of Holmberg's Generalization (an "Inverse Holmberg Effect"), but that both Holmberg's Generalization and its mirror image are expected if our proposed architecture is correct. Our discussion will be for the most part informal, but we will conclude by offering a more formal implementation of our proposals. This implementation will belong to a family of read more read less

Topics:

Locality (55%)55% related to the paper, Quantifier (linguistics) (53%)53% related to the paper, Property (philosophy) (50%)50% related to the paper, Syntax (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
474 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1515/TL-2013-0009
Heritage languages and their speakers: Opportunities and challenges for linguistics
Elabbas Benmamoun, Silvina Montrul, Maria Polinsky1
20 Nov 2013 - Theoretical Linguistics

Abstract:

In this paper, we bring to the attention of the linguistic community re- cent research on heritage languages. Shifting linguistic attention from the model of a monolingual speaker to the model of a multilingual speaker is important for the advancement of our understanding of the language faculty. Native speaker competence is ... In this paper, we bring to the attention of the linguistic community re- cent research on heritage languages. Shifting linguistic attention from the model of a monolingual speaker to the model of a multilingual speaker is important for the advancement of our understanding of the language faculty. Native speaker competence is typically the result of normal first language acquisition in an envi- ronment where the native language is dominant in various contexts, and learners have extensive and continuous exposure to it and opportunities to use it. Heritage speakers present a different case: they are bilingual speakers of an ethnic or im- migrant minority language, whose first language often does not reach native-like attainment in adulthood. We propose a set of connections between heritage lan- guage studies and theory construction, underscoring the potential that this popu - lation offers for linguistic research. We examine several important grammatical phenomena from the standpoint of their representation in heritage languages, including case, aspect, and other interface phenomena. We discuss how the questions raised by data from heritage speakers could fruitfully shed light on cur - rent debates about how language works and how it is acquired under different conditions. We end with a consideration of the potential competing factors that shape a heritage language system in adulthood. read more read less

Topics:

Heritage language (74%)74% related to the paper, First language (61%)61% related to the paper, Minority language (60%)60% related to the paper, Developmental linguistics (59%)59% related to the paper, Theoretical linguistics (54%)54% related to the paper
View PDF
442 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1515/THLI.28.3.229
The Theta System - an Overview
20 Oct 2003 - Theoretical Linguistics

Abstract:

This paper presents an overview of a larger project in progress on the concepts interface. In part, it is based on the findings in Reinhart (2000), where several of the problems are discussed in greater detail. However, many aspects of the system have been further developed, or changed, since that manuscript. The general p... This paper presents an overview of a larger project in progress on the concepts interface. In part, it is based on the findings in Reinhart (2000), where several of the problems are discussed in greater detail. However, many aspects of the system have been further developed, or changed, since that manuscript. The general picture I assume is that the Theta system (what has been labeled in Chomsky's Principles and Parameters framework 'Theta theory') is the system enabling the interface between the systems of concepts and the computational system (syntax) and, indirectly (via the syntactic representations), with the semantic inference systems. read more read less

Topics:

Theta role (61%)61% related to the paper, Principles and parameters (54%)54% related to the paper, Syntax (50%)50% related to the paper
328 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Theoretical Linguistics.

It automatically formats your research paper to De Gruyter formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Theoretical Linguistics format uses unsrt citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Theoretical Linguistics in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Theoretical Linguistics guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Theoretical Linguistics guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Theoretical Linguistics guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Theoretical Linguistics?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Theoretical Linguistics citation style.

4. Can I use the Theoretical Linguistics templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Theoretical Linguistics.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Theoretical Linguistics that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Theoretical Linguistics that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Theoretical Linguistics?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Theoretical Linguistics.

7. Where can I find the template for the Theoretical Linguistics?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Theoretical Linguistics's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Theoretical Linguistics's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Theoretical Linguistics an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Theoretical Linguistics is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Theoretical Linguistics?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Theoretical Linguistics?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Theoretical Linguistics?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Theoretical Linguistics, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Theoretical Linguistics's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Theoretical Linguistics?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Theoretical Linguistics. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Theoretical Linguistics?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Theoretical Linguistics are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Theoretical Linguistics?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Theoretical Linguistics's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Theoretical Linguistics in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Theoretical Linguistics Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Theoretical Linguistics formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template