Example of Chemical Geology format
Recent searches

Example of Chemical Geology format Example of Chemical Geology format Example of Chemical Geology format Example of Chemical Geology format Example of Chemical Geology format Example of Chemical Geology format Example of Chemical Geology format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Chemical Geology format Example of Chemical Geology format Example of Chemical Geology format Example of Chemical Geology format Example of Chemical Geology format Example of Chemical Geology format Example of Chemical Geology format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Chemical Geology — Template for authors

Publisher: Elsevier
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Geology #25 of 251 down down by 8 ranks
Geochemistry and Petrology #25 of 128 down down by 10 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 1562 Published Papers | 10074 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 26/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.1
SJR: 0.759
SNIP: 1.506
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 7.4
SJR: 2.358
SNIP: 1.589
open access Open Access

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.6
SJR: 1.236
SNIP: 1.573
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.7
SJR: 1.413
SNIP: 1.638

Journal Performance & Insights

CiteRatio

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

6.4

7% from 2019

CiteRatio for Chemical Geology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 6.4
2019 6.0
2018 6.1
2017 6.1
2016 6.4
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.54

3% from 2019

SJR for Chemical Geology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.54
2019 1.499
2018 1.624
2017 1.755
2016 1.838
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.365

2% from 2019

SNIP for Chemical Geology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.365
2019 1.391
2018 1.384
2017 1.384
2016 1.382
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 7% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 3% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 2% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Chemical Geology

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Elsevier

Chemical Geology

Chemical Geology (including Isotope Geoscience) is an international journal that publishes original research papers on the isotopic and elemental geochemistry and geochronology of the Earth. The Journal is concerned with chemical processes in igneous, metamorphic, and sediment...... Read More

Geology

Geochemistry and Petrology

Earth and Planetary Sciences

i
Last updated on
26 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
0009-2541
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.658
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
elsarticle-num
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
G. E. Blonder, M. Tinkham, T. M. Klapwijk, Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion, Phys. Rev. B 25 (7) (1982) 4515–4532. URL 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1016/0009-2541(94)00140-4
The composition of the Earth
William F. McDonough1, Shen-Su Sun1
01 Mar 1995 - Chemical Geology

Abstract:

Compositional models of the Earth are critically dependent on three main sources of information: the seismic profile of the Earth and its interpretation, comparisons between primitive meteorites and the solar nebula composition, and chemical and petrological models of peridotite-basalt melting relationships. Whereas a family ... Compositional models of the Earth are critically dependent on three main sources of information: the seismic profile of the Earth and its interpretation, comparisons between primitive meteorites and the solar nebula composition, and chemical and petrological models of peridotite-basalt melting relationships. Whereas a family of compositional models for the Earth are permissible based on these methods, the model that is most consistent with the seismological and geodynamic structure of the Earth comprises an upper and lower mantle of similar composition, an FeNi core having between 5% and 15% of a low-atomic-weight element, and a mantle which, when compared to CI carbonaceous chondrites, is depleted in Mg and Si relative to the refractory lithophile elements. The absolute and relative abundances of the refractory elements in carbonaceous, ordinary, and enstatite chondritic meteorites are compared. The bulk composition of an average CI carbonaceous chondrite is defined from previous compilations and from the refractory element compositions of different groups of chondrites. The absolute uncertainties in their refractory element compositions are evaluated by comparing ratios of these elements. These data are then used to evaluate existing models of the composition of the Silicate Earth. The systematic behavior of major and trace elements during differentiation of the mantle is used to constrain the Silicate Earth composition. Seemingly fertile peridotites have experienced a previous melting event that must be accounted for when developing these models. The approach taken here avoids unnecessary assumptions inherent in several existing models, and results in an internally consistent Silicate Earth composition having chondritic proportions of the refractory lithophile elements at ∼ 2.75 times that in CI carbonaceous chondrites. Element ratios in peridotites, komatiites, basalts and various crustal rocks are used to assess the abundances of both non-lithophile and non-refractory elements in the Silicate Earth. These data provide insights into the accretion processes of the Earth, the chemical evolution of the Earth's mantle, the effect of core formation, and indicate negligible exchange between the core and mantle throughout the geologic record (the last 3.5 Ga). The composition of the Earth's core is poorly constrained beyond its major constituents (i.e. an FeNi alloy). Density contrasts between the inner and outer core boundary are used to suggest the presence (∼ 10 ± 5%) of a light element or a combination of elements (e.g., O, S, Si) in the outer core. The core is the dominant repository of siderophile elements in the Earth. The limits of our understanding of the core's composition (including the light-element component) depend on models of core formation and the class of chondritic meteorites we have chosen when constructing models of the bulk Earth's composition. The Earth has a bulk Fe Al of ∼ 20 ± 2, established by assuming that the Earth's budget of Al is stored entirely within the Silicate Earth and Fe is partitioned between the Silicate Earth (∼ 14%) and the core (∼ 86%). Chondritic meteorites display a range of Fe Al ratios, with many having a value close to 20. A comparison of the bulk composition of the Earth and chondritic meteorites reveals both similarities and differences, with the Earth being more strongly depleted in the more volatile elements. There is no group of meteorites that has a bulk composition matching that of the Earth's. read more read less

Topics:

Structure of the Earth (64%)64% related to the paper, Primitive mantle (64%)64% related to the paper, Outer core (62%)62% related to the paper, Chondrite (62%)62% related to the paper, Planetary differentiation (60%)60% related to the paper
9,413 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1016/0009-2541(77)90057-2
Geochemical discrimination of different magma series and their differentiation products using immobile elements
John A. Winchester1, Peter A. Floyd1
01 Jan 1977 - Chemical Geology

Abstract:

The abundance and distribution of selected minor and trace elements (Ti, Zr, Y, Nb, Ce, Ga and Sc) in fresh volcanic rocks can be used to classify the differentiation products of subalkaline and alkaline magma series in a similar manner to methods using normative or major-element indices. A number of variation diagrams may be... The abundance and distribution of selected minor and trace elements (Ti, Zr, Y, Nb, Ce, Ga and Sc) in fresh volcanic rocks can be used to classify the differentiation products of subalkaline and alkaline magma series in a similar manner to methods using normative or major-element indices. A number of variation diagrams may be used to distinguish common volcanic rock types in terms of the above elements. As these elements are immobile during post-consolidation alteration and metamorphic processes, this method of rock-type classification may, when applied to metavolcanic rocks, prove more reliable than the commonly used methods that utilize major elements, some of which are known to be mobile. read more read less

Topics:

Volcanic rock (58%)58% related to the paper, Magma (53%)53% related to the paper
View PDF
4,126 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1016/J.CHEMGEO.2004.06.017
The application of laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry to in situ U–Pb zircon geochronology
Simon E. Jackson1, Norman J. Pearson1, William L. Griffin1, William L. Griffin2, Elena Belousova1
08 Nov 2004 - Chemical Geology

Abstract:

This paper reports new developments in in situ U–Pb zircon geochronology using 266 and 213 nm laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS). Standard spot ablation (spot diameters 40–80 μm) was employed, with no sampling strategies employed specifically to minimise elemental fractionation. Instead... This paper reports new developments in in situ U–Pb zircon geochronology using 266 and 213 nm laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS). Standard spot ablation (spot diameters 40–80 μm) was employed, with no sampling strategies employed specifically to minimise elemental fractionation. Instead, He ablation gas and carefully replicated ablation conditions were employed to maintain constant ablation-related elemental fractionation of Pb and U between analyses. Combining these strategies with calibration on a new zircon standard (GJ-1) allows elemental fractionation and instrumental mass bias to be corrected efficiently, and accurate 206Pb/238U and 207Pb/235U ratios to be measured with short-term precision (2 r.s.d.) of 1.9% and 3.0%, respectively. Long-term precision (2 r.s.d.) of the technique (266 nm ablation), based on 355 analyses of the 91500 zircon (1065 Ma) standard over more than a year, was 3.8%, 4.0% and 1.4% for the 206Pb/238U, 207Pb/235U and 207Pb/206Pb ratios, respectively. Long-term precision (2 r.s.d.) for the 206Pb/238U, 207Pb/235U and 207Pb/206Pb ratios of the Mud Tank zircon (732 Ma) was 3.9%, 4.1% and 1.7%, respectively (359 analyses). Selective integration of time-resolved signals was used to minimise the effect of Pb loss and common Pb enrichments on the measured ages. The precision and accuracy of our data compare very favourably with those obtained using more involved procedures to correct or minimise ablation- and ICP-MS-induced biases. 213 nm laser ablation produced comparable precision to 266 nm ablation using generally smaller spot sizes (40–50 vs. 60–80 μm), and offered significant advantages in terms of ablation duration and stability, particularly for small zircons (<60 μm). For the 91500 zircon, but not the Mud Tank zircon, 213 nm ablation also produced significantly older and more accurate Pb/U ages. This suggests that shorter wavelength ablation may have reduced a matrix-dependent elemental fractionation difference between sample and standard. The accuracy and precision of the technique for young zircons are demonstrated by analysis of three zircon populations ranging in age from 417 to 7 Ma. In each case, the zircons have yielded concordant ages or common Pb discordia which give concordia intercept ages that are in agreement with independently determined ages for the same samples. Application of Tera–Wasserburg diagrams [Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 14 (1972) 281] was found to be the most useful approach to handling common Pb contributions that were not removed by selective integration of signals. read more read less

Topics:

Zircon (51%)51% related to the paper
3,489 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1016/S0009-2541(02)00195-X
Correction of common lead in U-Pb analyses that do not report 204Pb
Tom Andersen1
16 Dec 2002 - Chemical Geology

Abstract:

The presence of common lead contamination in zircons used for U–Pb geochronology is a potentially serious source of error. Traditionally, common lead is measured by analysis of 204Pb, and the isotopic composition of lead corrected accordingly. Some analytical methods (e.g. LAM-ICPMS) do not report 204Pb. Correction methods ar... The presence of common lead contamination in zircons used for U–Pb geochronology is a potentially serious source of error. Traditionally, common lead is measured by analysis of 204Pb, and the isotopic composition of lead corrected accordingly. Some analytical methods (e.g. LAM-ICPMS) do not report 204Pb. Correction methods are available for such analyses, but these assume that the only source of discordance in a zircon is the presence of common lead. Using such a correction on a lead analysis that contains a discordance component caused by lead loss will invariably lead to overcorrection, and hence to a meaningless, young age. By assuming that the observed 206Pb/238U, 207Pb/235U and 208Pb/232Th ratios of a discordant zircon can be accounted for by a combination of lead loss at a defined time, and the presence of common lead of known composition, a correction method can be designed that neither uses 204Pb nor assumes concordance. The method proposed here involves a numeric solution to a set of equations relating the content of radiogenic lead in a zircon or other U/Th-enriched mineral to its total lead content, the amount of common lead present, the age of initial crystallization, the age of lead loss and the amount of lead lost in that process. An estimate for the age of lead loss is needed, but in the absence of prior knowledge of this age, the recalculation procedure can be set up in such a way that the bias in initial age caused by a systematic error in the age of lead loss is minimized. Despite this limitation, the method will give less bias in the corrected ages than alternative correction methods. read more read less
3,072 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1016/J.CHEMGEO.2007.11.005
Plesovice zircon : A new natural reference material for U-Pb and Hf isotopic microanalysis
30 Mar 2008 - Chemical Geology

Abstract:

Matrix-matched calibration by natural zircon standards and analysis of natural materials as a reference are the principle methods for achieving accurate results in inicrobeam U-Pb dating and Hf isotopic analysis. We describe a new potential zircon reference material for laser ablation ICP-MS that was extracted from a potassic... Matrix-matched calibration by natural zircon standards and analysis of natural materials as a reference are the principle methods for achieving accurate results in inicrobeam U-Pb dating and Hf isotopic analysis. We describe a new potential zircon reference material for laser ablation ICP-MS that was extracted from a potassic granulite facies rock collected in the southern part of the Bohemian Massif (Plesovice, Czech Republic). Data from different techniques (ID-TIMS, SIMS and LA ICP-MS) and several laboratories suggest that this zircon has a concordant U-Pb age with a weighted mean Pb-206/U-238 date of 337.13 +/- 0.37 Ma (ID-TIMS, 95% confidence limits, including tracer calibration uncertainty) and U-Pb age homogeneity on the scale used in LA ICP-MS dating. Inhomogeneities in trace element composition due to primary growth zoning prevent its use as a calibration standard for trace element analysis. The content of U varies from 465 ppm in pristine parts of the grains to similar to 3000 ppm in actinide-rich sectors that correspond to pyramidal faces with a high degree of metamictization (present in ca. 30% of the grains). These domains are easily recognized from high intensities on BSE images and should be avoided during the analysis. Hf isotopic composition of the Plesovice zircon (>0.9 wt.% Hf) is homogenous within and between the grains with a mean Hf-176/Hf-177 value of 0.282492 +/- 0.000013 (2SD). The age and Hf isotopic homogeneity of the Plesovice zircon together with its relatively high U and Pb contents make it an ideal calibration and reference material for laser ablation ICP-MS measurements, especially when using low laser energies and/or small diameters of laser beam required for improved spatial resolution. read more read less

Topics:

Zircon (58%)58% related to the paper, Metamictization (54%)54% related to the paper
2,880 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Chemical Geology.

It automatically formats your research paper to Elsevier formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Chemical Geology format uses elsarticle-num citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Chemical Geology in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Chemical Geology guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Chemical Geology guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Chemical Geology guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Chemical Geology?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Chemical Geology citation style.

4. Can I use the Chemical Geology templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Chemical Geology.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Chemical Geology that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Chemical Geology that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Chemical Geology?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Chemical Geology.

7. Where can I find the template for the Chemical Geology?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Chemical Geology's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Chemical Geology's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Chemical Geology an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Chemical Geology is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Chemical Geology?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Chemical Geology?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Chemical Geology?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Chemical Geology, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Chemical Geology's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Chemical Geology?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Chemical Geology. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Chemical Geology?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Chemical Geology are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Chemical Geology?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Chemical Geology's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Chemical Geology in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Chemical Geology Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Chemical Geology formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template