Example of Performance Evaluation format
Recent searches

Example of Performance Evaluation format Example of Performance Evaluation format Example of Performance Evaluation format Example of Performance Evaluation format Example of Performance Evaluation format Example of Performance Evaluation format Example of Performance Evaluation format Example of Performance Evaluation format Example of Performance Evaluation format Example of Performance Evaluation format Example of Performance Evaluation format Example of Performance Evaluation format Example of Performance Evaluation format Example of Performance Evaluation format Example of Performance Evaluation format Example of Performance Evaluation format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Performance Evaluation format Example of Performance Evaluation format Example of Performance Evaluation format Example of Performance Evaluation format Example of Performance Evaluation format Example of Performance Evaluation format Example of Performance Evaluation format Example of Performance Evaluation format Example of Performance Evaluation format Example of Performance Evaluation format Example of Performance Evaluation format Example of Performance Evaluation format Example of Performance Evaluation format Example of Performance Evaluation format Example of Performance Evaluation format Example of Performance Evaluation format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Performance Evaluation — Template for authors

Publisher: Elsevier
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Modeling and Simulation #120 of 290 down down by 46 ranks
Computer Networks and Communications #148 of 334 down down by 53 ranks
Hardware and Architecture #85 of 157 down down by 24 ranks
Software #218 of 389 down down by 52 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
Good
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 161 Published Papers | 487 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 11/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

IEEE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 10.8
SJR: 1.075
SNIP: 2.756
open access Open Access

Frontiers Media

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.2
SJR: 0.427
SNIP: 1.319
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.0
SJR: 0.445
SNIP: 1.076
open access Open Access

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 8.6
SJR: 0.781
SNIP: 1.681

Journal Performance & Insights

CiteRatio

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

3.0

3% from 2019

CiteRatio for Performance Evaluation from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 3.0
2019 2.9
2018 3.1
2017 2.9
2016 3.4
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.424

26% from 2019

SJR for Performance Evaluation from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.424
2019 0.573
2018 0.517
2017 0.459
2016 0.529
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.248

6% from 2019

SNIP for Performance Evaluation from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.248
2019 1.325
2018 1.401
2017 1.226
2016 1.295
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 3% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 26% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 6% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Performance Evaluation

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Elsevier

Performance Evaluation

The major aims of Performance Evaluation are to: (1) collect and disseminate information relative to performance aspects, and in particular to the topics described below; (2) promote interdisciplinary flow of technical information among researchers and professionals; and (3) s...... Read More

Modelling and Simulation

Computer Networks and Communications

Hardware and Architecture

Software

Mathematics

i
Last updated on
11 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
0166-5316
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.835
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
elsarticle-num
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
G. E. Blonder, M. Tinkham, T. M. Klapwijk, Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion, Phys. Rev. B 25 (7) (1982) 4515–4532. URL 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1016/0166-5316(82)90024-4
On the complexity of fixed-priority scheduling of periodic, real-time tasks
Joseph Y.-T. Leung1, Jennifer Whitehead2
01 Dec 1982 - Performance Evaluation

Abstract:

We consider the complexity of determining whether a set of periodic, real-time tasks can be scheduled on m ⩾ 1 identical processors with respect to fixed-priority scheduling. It is shown that the problem is NP-hard in all but one special case. The complexity of optimal fixed-priority scheduling algorithm is also discussed. We consider the complexity of determining whether a set of periodic, real-time tasks can be scheduled on m ⩾ 1 identical processors with respect to fixed-priority scheduling. It is shown that the problem is NP-hard in all but one special case. The complexity of optimal fixed-priority scheduling algorithm is also discussed. read more read less

Topics:

Deadline-monotonic scheduling (70%)70% related to the paper, Dynamic priority scheduling (68%)68% related to the paper, Earliest deadline first scheduling (68%)68% related to the paper, Rate-monotonic scheduling (67%)67% related to the paper, Fair-share scheduling (67%)67% related to the paper
1,199 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1016/0166-5316(93)90035-S
The Markov-modulated Poisson process (MMPP) cookbook
01 Sep 1993 - Performance Evaluation

Abstract:

Point processes whose arrival rates vary randomly over time arise in many applications of interest, notably in communications modeling. The Markov-modulated Poisson process has been extensively used for modeling these processes, because it qualitatively models the time-varying arrival rate and captures some of the important c... Point processes whose arrival rates vary randomly over time arise in many applications of interest, notably in communications modeling. The Markov-modulated Poisson process has been extensively used for modeling these processes, because it qualitatively models the time-varying arrival rate and captures some of the important correlations between the interarrival times while still remaining analytically tractable. The purpose of this paper is to collect a number of useful results about Markov-modulated Poisson processes and queues with Markov-modulated input. It is intended for non-experts or for people who are familiar with the basic concepts and algorithms, but would like a summary of recent developments. Derivations and proofs have been intentionally omitted. They can be found in the publications listed at the end of each section. Many of the results and some of the text have been taken directly from the references, and the reader is encouraged to consult the relevant references for more detailed information. read more read less

Topics:

Phase-type distribution (53%)53% related to the paper, Markov process (51%)51% related to the paper, Poisson distribution (50%)50% related to the paper, Point process (50%)50% related to the paper
836 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1016/J.PEVA.2005.07.018
The message delay in mobile ad hoc networks
Robin Groenevelt1, Philippe Nain2, Ger Koole3
01 Oct 2005 - Performance Evaluation

Abstract:

A stochastic model is introduced that accurately models the message delay in mobile ad hoc networks where nodes relay messages and the networks are sparsely populated. The model has only two input parameters: the number of nodes and the parameter of an exponential distribution which describes the time until two random mobiles... A stochastic model is introduced that accurately models the message delay in mobile ad hoc networks where nodes relay messages and the networks are sparsely populated. The model has only two input parameters: the number of nodes and the parameter of an exponential distribution which describes the time until two random mobiles come within communication range of one another. Closed-form expressions are obtained for the Laplace-Stieltjes transform of the message delay, defined as the time needed to transfer a message between a source and a destination. From this we derive both a closed-form expression and an asymptotic approximation (as a function of the number of nodes) of the expected message delay. As an additional result, the probability distribution function is obtained for the number of copies of the message at the time the message is delivered. These calculations are carried out for two protocols: the two-hop multicopy and the unrestricted multicopy protocols. It is shown that despite its simplicity, the model accurately predicts the message delay for both relay strategies for a number of mobility models (the random waypoint, random direction and the random walker mobility models). read more read less

Topics:

Mobility model (57%)57% related to the paper, Optimized Link State Routing Protocol (55%)55% related to the paper, Mobile ad hoc network (54%)54% related to the paper, Exponential distribution (51%)51% related to the paper, Probability density function (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
603 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Performance Evaluation.

It automatically formats your research paper to Elsevier formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Performance Evaluation format uses elsarticle-num citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Performance Evaluation in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Performance Evaluation guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Performance Evaluation guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Performance Evaluation guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Performance Evaluation?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Performance Evaluation citation style.

4. Can I use the Performance Evaluation templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Performance Evaluation.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Performance Evaluation that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Performance Evaluation that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Performance Evaluation?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Performance Evaluation.

7. Where can I find the template for the Performance Evaluation?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Performance Evaluation's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Performance Evaluation's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Performance Evaluation an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Performance Evaluation is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Performance Evaluation?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Performance Evaluation?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Performance Evaluation?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Performance Evaluation, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Performance Evaluation's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Performance Evaluation?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Performance Evaluation. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Performance Evaluation?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Performance Evaluation are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Performance Evaluation?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Performance Evaluation's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Performance Evaluation in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Performance Evaluation Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Performance Evaluation formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template