Example of International Journal for Quality in Health Care format
Recent searches

Example of International Journal for Quality in Health Care format Example of International Journal for Quality in Health Care format Example of International Journal for Quality in Health Care format Example of International Journal for Quality in Health Care format Example of International Journal for Quality in Health Care format Example of International Journal for Quality in Health Care format Example of International Journal for Quality in Health Care format Example of International Journal for Quality in Health Care format Example of International Journal for Quality in Health Care format Example of International Journal for Quality in Health Care format Example of International Journal for Quality in Health Care format Example of International Journal for Quality in Health Care format Example of International Journal for Quality in Health Care format Example of International Journal for Quality in Health Care format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of International Journal for Quality in Health Care format Example of International Journal for Quality in Health Care format Example of International Journal for Quality in Health Care format Example of International Journal for Quality in Health Care format Example of International Journal for Quality in Health Care format Example of International Journal for Quality in Health Care format Example of International Journal for Quality in Health Care format Example of International Journal for Quality in Health Care format Example of International Journal for Quality in Health Care format Example of International Journal for Quality in Health Care format Example of International Journal for Quality in Health Care format Example of International Journal for Quality in Health Care format Example of International Journal for Quality in Health Care format Example of International Journal for Quality in Health Care format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

International Journal for Quality in Health Care — Template for authors

Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Health Policy #72 of 242 down down by 38 ranks
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health #185 of 526 down down by 91 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
Good
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 499 Published Papers | 1696 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 16/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.5
SJR: 0.909
SNIP: 1.357
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.0
SNIP: 1.464
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.1
SJR: 1.472
SNIP: 2.009
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.6
SJR: 1.367
SNIP: 1.702

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

1.957

7% from 2018

Impact factor for International Journal for Quality in Health Care from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 1.957
2018 1.829
2017 2.554
2016 2.342
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

3.4

3% from 2019

CiteRatio for International Journal for Quality in Health Care from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 3.4
2019 3.3
2018 3.4
2017 3.8
2016 4.4
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 7% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 3% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.769

26% from 2019

SJR for International Journal for Quality in Health Care from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.769
2019 1.034
2018 1.003
2017 1.348
2016 1.446
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.095

21% from 2019

SNIP for International Journal for Quality in Health Care from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.095
2019 1.386
2018 1.1
2017 1.531
2016 1.756
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 26% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 21% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

International Journal for Quality in Health Care

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Oxford University Press

International Journal for Quality in Health Care

The International Journal for Quality in Health Care (IJQHC) is a leading international peer-reviewed scholarly journal addressing research, policy, and implementation related to the quality of health care and health outcomes for populations and patients worldwide. The journal...... Read More

Medicine

i
Last updated on
15 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
1353-4505
i
Impact Factor
High - 2.342
i
Acceptance Rate
Not provided
i
Frequency
8 issues per year
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
unsrt
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder GE, Tinkham M, Klapwijk TM. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent con-version. Phys Rev B. 1982;25(7):4515–4532. Available from: 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1093/INTQHC/MZM042
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups
Allison Tong1, Allison Tong2, Peter Sainsbury1, Peter Sainsbury3, Jonathan C. Craig1, Jonathan C. Craig2

Abstract:

Background. Qualitative research explores complex phenomena encountered by clinicians, health care providers, policy makers and consumers. Although partial checklists are available, no consolidated reporting framework exists for any type of qualitative design. Objective. To develop a checklist for explicit and comprehensive r... Background. Qualitative research explores complex phenomena encountered by clinicians, health care providers, policy makers and consumers. Although partial checklists are available, no consolidated reporting framework exists for any type of qualitative design. Objective. To develop a checklist for explicit and comprehensive reporting of qualitative studies (indepth interviews and focus groups). Methods. We performed a comprehensive search in Cochrane and Campbell Protocols, Medline, CINAHL, systematic reviews of qualitative studies, author or reviewer guidelines of major medical journals and reference lists of relevant publications for existing checklists used to assess qualitative studies. Seventy-six items from 22 checklists were compiled into a comprehensive list. All items were grouped into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting. Duplicate items and those that were ambiguous, too broadly defined and impractical to assess were removed. Results. Items most frequently included in the checklists related to sampling method, setting for data collection, method of data collection, respondent validation of findings, method of recording data, description of the derivation of themes and inclusion of supporting quotations. We grouped all items into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting. Conclusions. The criteria included in COREQ, a 32-item checklist, can help researchers to report important aspects of the research team, study methods, context of the study, findings, analysis and interpretations. read more read less

Topics:

Systematic review (55%)55% related to the paper, Research design (54%)54% related to the paper, Checklist (52%)52% related to the paper, Qualitative research (52%)52% related to the paper
18,169 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1093/INTQHC/MZG031
Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research.

Abstract:

Survey research is sometimes regarded as an easy research approach. However, as with any other research approach and method, it is easy to conduct a survey of poor quality rather than one of high quality and real value. This paper provides a checklist of good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. Its purpo... Survey research is sometimes regarded as an easy research approach. However, as with any other research approach and method, it is easy to conduct a survey of poor quality rather than one of high quality and real value. This paper provides a checklist of good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. Its purpose is to assist the novice researcher to produce survey work to a high standard, meaning a standard at which the results will be regarded as credible. The paper first provides an overview of the approach and then guides the reader step-by-step through the processes of data collection, data analysis, and reporting. It is not intended to provide a manual of how to conduct a survey, but rather to identify common pitfalls and oversights to be avoided by researchers if their work is to be valid and credible. read more read less

Topics:

Survey methodology (56%)56% related to the paper, Survey data collection (55%)55% related to the paper, Data collection (50%)50% related to the paper
1,897 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1093/INTQHC/MZG081
Defining and classifying clinical indicators for quality improvement
Jan Mainz1

Abstract:

Objective. This paper provides a brief review of deWnitions, characteristics, and categories of clinical indicators for quality improvement in health care. Analysis. Clinical indicators assess particular health structures, processes, and outcomes. They can be rate- or mean-based, providing a quantitative basis for quality imp... Objective. This paper provides a brief review of deWnitions, characteristics, and categories of clinical indicators for quality improvement in health care. Analysis. Clinical indicators assess particular health structures, processes, and outcomes. They can be rate- or mean-based, providing a quantitative basis for quality improvement, or sentinel, identifying incidents of care that trigger further investigation. They can assess aspects of the structure, process, or outcome of health care. Furthermore, indicators can be generic measures that are relevant for most patients or disease-speciWc, expressing the quality of care for patients with speciWc diagnoses. Conclusions. Monitoring health care quality is impossible without the use of clinical indicators. They create the basis for quality improvement and prioritization in the health care system. To ensure that reliable and valid clinical indicators are used, they must be designed, deWned, and implemented with scientiWc rigour. read more read less

Topics:

Health care quality (66%)66% related to the paper, Health care (61%)61% related to the paper, Quality management (56%)56% related to the paper, Quality assurance (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
897 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1093/INTQHC/MZH030
Determinants of innovation within health care organizations: Literature review and Delphi study

Abstract:

Purpose. When introducing innovations to health care, it is important to gain insight into determinants that may facilitate or impede the introduction, in order to design an appropriate strategy for introducing the innovation. To obtain an overview of determinants of innovations in health care organizations, we carried out a ... Purpose. When introducing innovations to health care, it is important to gain insight into determinants that may facilitate or impede the introduction, in order to design an appropriate strategy for introducing the innovation. To obtain an overview of determinants of innovations in health care organizations, we carried out a literature review and a Delphi study. The Delphi study was intended to achieve consensus among a group of implementation experts on determinants identified from the literature review. Data sources. We searched 11 databases for articles published between 1990 and 2000. The keywords varied according to the specific database. We also searched for free text. Forty-four implementation experts (implementation researchers, programme managers, and implementation consultants/advisors) participated in the Delphi study. Study selection. The following studies were selected: (i) studies describing innovation processes, and determinants thereof, in health care organizations; (ii) studies where the aim of the innovations was to change the behaviour of health professionals; (iii) studies where the health care organizations provided direct patient care; and (iv) studies where only empirical studies were included. Data extraction. Two researchers independently selected the abstracts and analysed the articles. The determinants were divided into four categories: characteristics of the environment, characteristics of the organization, characteristics of the user (health professional), and characteristics of the innovation. When analysing the determinants, a distinction was made between systematically designed and non-systematically designed studies. In a systematic study, a determinant analysis was performed and the innovation strategy was adapted to these determinants. Furthermore, the determinants were associated with the degree of implementation, and both users and non-users of the innovation were asked about possible determinants. In the Delphi study, consensus was defined as agreement among 75% of the experts on both the influence of a determinant and the direction towards which that influence tended (i.e. facilitating, impeding, or neutral). Results. From the initial 2239 abstracts, 57 studies were retrieved and 49 determinants were identified that affected (impeded or facilitated) the innovation process. The experts identified one other determinant. Seventeen studies had a more-or-less systematic design; the others did not. After three rounds, consensus was reached on the influence of 49 out of 50 determinants. Conclusion. The results of the literature review matched those found in the Delphi study, and 50 potentially relevant determinants of innovation processes were identified. Many of the innovation studies had several methodological flaws, such as not adjusting innovation strategies to relevant determinants of the innovation process, or that data on determinants were gathered only from non-users. Furthermore, the degree of implementation was evaluated in several ways, which made comparison difficult. © International Society for Quality in Health Care and Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved. read more read less

Topics:

Delphi method (57%)57% related to the paper, Health care (55%)55% related to the paper, Health services research (54%)54% related to the paper
View PDF
684 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1093/INTQHC/11.3.187
Evidence of self-report bias in assessing adherence to guidelines.
Alyce S. Adams1, Stephen B. Soumerai, Jonathan Lomas, Dennis Ross-Degnan

Abstract:

Objective : To assess trends in the use of self-report measures in research on adherence to practice guidelines since 1980, and to determine the impact of response bias on the validity of self-reports as measures of quality of care. Methods : We conducted a MEDLINE search using defined search terms for the period 1980 to 199... Objective : To assess trends in the use of self-report measures in research on adherence to practice guidelines since 1980, and to determine the impact of response bias on the validity of self-reports as measures of quality of care. Methods : We conducted a MEDLINE search using defined search terms for the period 1980 to 1996. Included studies evaluated the adherence of (e.g. medical records), we compared self-reported and objective adherence rates (measured as per cent adherence). Evidence or response bias was defined as self-reported adherence significantly exceeding the objective measure at the 5% level. Results : We identified 326 studies of guideline adherence. The use of self-report measures of adherence increased from 18% of studies in 1980 to 41% of studies in 1985. Of the 10 studies that used both self-report and objective measurers, eight supported the existence of response bias in all self-reported measures. In 87% of 37 comparisons, self-reported adherence rates exceeded the objective rates, resulting in a median over-estimation of adherence of 27% (absolute difference). Conclusions : Although self-reports may provide information regarding clinicians' knowledge of guideline recommendations, they are subject to bias and should not be used as the sole measure of guideline adherence. Key words : clinical competence, physician practice patterns, practice guidelines, process assessment, quality assurance, quality of care measurement read more read less

Topics:

Guideline (53%)53% related to the paper
644 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for International Journal for Quality in Health Care.

It automatically formats your research paper to Oxford University Press formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

International Journal for Quality in Health Care format uses unsrt citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write International Journal for Quality in Health Care in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the International Journal for Quality in Health Care guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the International Journal for Quality in Health Care guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the International Journal for Quality in Health Care guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in International Journal for Quality in Health Care?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the International Journal for Quality in Health Care citation style.

4. Can I use the International Journal for Quality in Health Care templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for International Journal for Quality in Health Care.

5. Can I use a manuscript in International Journal for Quality in Health Care that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper International Journal for Quality in Health Care that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in International Journal for Quality in Health Care?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in International Journal for Quality in Health Care.

7. Where can I find the template for the International Journal for Quality in Health Care?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per International Journal for Quality in Health Care's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the International Journal for Quality in Health Care's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. International Journal for Quality in Health Care an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's International Journal for Quality in Health Care is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like International Journal for Quality in Health Care?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like International Journal for Quality in Health Care?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using International Journal for Quality in Health Care?

After writing your paper autoformatting in International Journal for Quality in Health Care, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is International Journal for Quality in Health Care's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for International Journal for Quality in Health Care?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for International Journal for Quality in Health Care. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In International Journal for Quality in Health Care?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for International Journal for Quality in Health Care are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the International Journal for Quality in Health Care?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per International Journal for Quality in Health Care's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download International Journal for Quality in Health Care in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in International Journal for Quality in Health Care Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to International Journal for Quality in Health Care formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template