Example of Administrative Science Quarterly format
Recent searches

Example of Administrative Science Quarterly format Example of Administrative Science Quarterly format Example of Administrative Science Quarterly format Example of Administrative Science Quarterly format Example of Administrative Science Quarterly format Example of Administrative Science Quarterly format Example of Administrative Science Quarterly format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Administrative Science Quarterly format Example of Administrative Science Quarterly format Example of Administrative Science Quarterly format Example of Administrative Science Quarterly format Example of Administrative Science Quarterly format Example of Administrative Science Quarterly format Example of Administrative Science Quarterly format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Administrative Science Quarterly — Template for authors

Publisher: SAGE
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Sociology and Political Science #2 of 1269 up up by 3 ranks
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) #1 of 306 -
Public Administration #1 of 165 -
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 102 Published Papers | 1561 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 05/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.2
SJR: 0.798
SNIP: 1.518
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 8.1
SJR: 2.557
SNIP: 3.354
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.2
SJR: 1.165
SNIP: 2.018
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.3
SJR: 1.447
SNIP: 1.944

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

8.391

5% from 2018

Impact factor for Administrative Science Quarterly from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 8.391
2018 8.024
2017 5.878
2016 4.929
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

15.3

17% from 2019

CiteRatio for Administrative Science Quarterly from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 15.3
2019 13.1
2018 12.1
2017 10.6
2016 9.8
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 5% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 17% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

15.098

31% from 2019

SJR for Administrative Science Quarterly from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 15.098
2019 11.493
2018 13.521
2017 10.187
2016 11.093
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

5.389

20% from 2019

SNIP for Administrative Science Quarterly from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 5.389
2019 4.503
2018 3.436
2017 3.379
2016 3.305
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 31% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 20% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.
Administrative Science Quarterly

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

SAGE

Administrative Science Quarterly

ASQ has been at the cutting edge of organizational studies since the field began. This top-tier journal regularly publishes the best theoretical and empirical papers based on dissertations and on the evolving and new work of more established scholars, as well as interdisciplin...... Read More

Arts and Humanities

i
Last updated on
05 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
0001-8392
i
Impact Factor
Very High - 3.211
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
SageV
i
Citation Type
Numbered (Superscripted)
25
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder GE, Tinkham M and Klapwijk TM. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys. Rev. B 1982; 25(7): 4515–4532. URL 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.2307/2393553
Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation
Wesley M. Cohen1, Daniel A. Levinthal2

Abstract:

In this paper, we argue that the ability of a firm to recognize the value of new, external information, assimilate it, and apply it to commercial ends is critical to its innovative capabilities. We label this capability a firm's absorptive capacity and suggest that it is largely a function of the firm's level of prior related... In this paper, we argue that the ability of a firm to recognize the value of new, external information, assimilate it, and apply it to commercial ends is critical to its innovative capabilities. We label this capability a firm's absorptive capacity and suggest that it is largely a function of the firm's level of prior related knowledge. The discussion focuses first on the cognitive basis for an individual's absorptive capacity including, in particular, prior related knowledge and diversity of background. We then characterize the factors that influence absorptive capacity at the organizational level, how an organization's absorptive capacity differs from that of its individual members, and the role of diversity of expertise within an organization. We argue that the development of absorptive capacity, and, in turn, innovative performance are history- or path-dependent and argue how lack of investment in an area of expertise early on may foreclose the future development of a technical capability in that area. We formulate a model of firm investment in research and development (R&D), in which R&D contributes to a firm's absorptive capacity, and test predictions relating a firm's investment in R&D to the knowledge underlying technical change within an industry. Discussion focuses on the implications of absorptive capacity for the analysis of other related innovative activities, including basic research, the adoption and diffusion of innovations, and decisions to participate in cooperative R&D ventures. ** read more read less

Topics:

Absorptive capacity (83%)83% related to the paper, R&D intensity (62%)62% related to the paper, Knowledge-based theory of the firm (60%)60% related to the paper, Dynamic capabilities (53%)53% related to the paper, Knowledge transfer (52%)52% related to the paper
View PDF
31,623 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.2307/2393644
Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition.

Abstract:

The study analyzes the social structure of competition. It addresses the consequences of voids in relational and resource networks. Competitive behavior can be understood in terms of player access to \"holes\" in the social structure of the competitive arena. Those \"structural holes\" are network gaps between players which c... The study analyzes the social structure of competition. It addresses the consequences of voids in relational and resource networks. Competitive behavior can be understood in terms of player access to \"holes\" in the social structure of the competitive arena. Those \"structural holes\" are network gaps between players which create entrepreneurial opportunities for information access, timing, referrals, and for control. A player brings capital to the competitive arena and walks away with profit determined by the rate of return where the capital was invested. The rate of return is keyed to the social structure of the competitive arena. Each player brings three kinds of capital to the competitive arena: financial capital, such as money and investments; human capital, such as his or her natural qualities and skills; and social capital, i.e. networks of other players. Social capital is the final determinant of competitive success. Something about the structure of a player's network (his or her relations with other players, such as colleagues, friends, and clients), and the location of the player's network in the structure of the arena defines the player's chances of getting higher rates of return. These chances are enhanced by two kinds of network benefits for those who can exploit structural holes: information and control. Opportunities for success are many, but it is information that plays a central role in seizing them; structural holes determine who knows about opportunities, what they know, and who gets to participate. Structural holes also generate control benefits, giving certain players an advantage in negotiating their relationships. Following sociological theory, a player who derives benefit from structural holes by brokering relationships between other conflicted players is called tertius gaudens. The essential tension in tertius strategies is not hostility of participants, but rather uncertainty; no one has absolute authority in the relationship under negotiation. The findings of empirical research indicate that structural holes are advantageous to suppliers and customers, but not to producers in their negotiated transactions, because suppliers and customers benefit from competition among producers. The information and control benefits of structural holes are advantageous to managers, and the managers who develop those benefits are an asset to the firm employing them. Managers with networks rich in structural holes often reach promotion faster. Hole effects are most evident for managers operating on a social frontier, i.e. in places where two social worlds meet. Social frontiers involve continual negotiations of the expectations of the manager and those of the people across the frontier, and thus more entrepreneurial skill is required. The most serious frontier is the political boundary between top leadership and the rest of the firm. To move up the corporate ladder, a manager has to transform his or her frame of reference from that of an employee protected by the firm, to that of a leader responsible for the firm. The findings also indicate that women and entry-rank men tend to be promoted earlier because they build hierarchical networks around a strategic partner who helps them break into higher ranks. Although the reported differences between the manager networks have clear implications for promotions, there are no differences among managers in their tendencies to have one network rather than another, which is especially striking with respect to the sex and rank differences that are observed to be important in distinguishing network effects. Structural holes provide a theoretical connection between micro and macro levels of sociological analysis. The structural hole argument extends other theories, such as personality theory, interface theory of markets and population ecology, and resource dependence and transaction cost theory read more read less

Topics:

Competition (economics) (55%)55% related to the paper, Structural holes (54%)54% related to the paper
12,103 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.2307/2392498
Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign

Topics:

Job Decision Latitude (79%)79% related to the paper, Job analysis (73%)73% related to the paper, Job attitude (73%)73% related to the paper, Job demands-resources model (71%)71% related to the paper, Job performance (69%)69% related to the paper
10,664 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.2307/2393808
Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness

Abstract:

This chapter aims to develop one of perhaps multiple specifications of embeddedness, a concept that has been used to refer broadly to the contingent nature of economic action with respect to cognition, social structure, institutions, and culture. Research on embeddedness is an exciting area in sociology and economics because ... This chapter aims to develop one of perhaps multiple specifications of embeddedness, a concept that has been used to refer broadly to the contingent nature of economic action with respect to cognition, social structure, institutions, and culture. Research on embeddedness is an exciting area in sociology and economics because it advances understanding of how social structure affects economic life. The chapter addresses propositions about the operation and outcomes of interfirm networks that are guided implicitly by ceteris paribus assumptions. While economies of time due to embeddedness have obvious benefits for the individual firm, they also have important implications for allocative efficiency and the determination of prices. Under the conditions, social processes that increase integration combine with resource dependency problems to increase the vulnerability of networked organizations. The level of investment in an economy promotes positive changes in productivity, standards of living, mobility, and wealth generation. read more read less

Topics:

Embeddedness (60%)60% related to the paper, Structural holes (53%)53% related to the paper, Ceteris paribus (52%)52% related to the paper, Allocative efficiency (52%)52% related to the paper
9,137 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Administrative Science Quarterly.

It automatically formats your research paper to SAGE formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Administrative Science Quarterly format uses SageV citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Administrative Science Quarterly in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Administrative Science Quarterly guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Administrative Science Quarterly guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Administrative Science Quarterly guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Administrative Science Quarterly?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Administrative Science Quarterly citation style.

4. Can I use the Administrative Science Quarterly templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Administrative Science Quarterly.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Administrative Science Quarterly that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Administrative Science Quarterly that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Administrative Science Quarterly?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Administrative Science Quarterly.

7. Where can I find the template for the Administrative Science Quarterly?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Administrative Science Quarterly's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Administrative Science Quarterly's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Administrative Science Quarterly an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Administrative Science Quarterly is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Administrative Science Quarterly?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Administrative Science Quarterly?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Administrative Science Quarterly?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Administrative Science Quarterly, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Administrative Science Quarterly's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Administrative Science Quarterly?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Administrative Science Quarterly. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Administrative Science Quarterly?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Administrative Science Quarterly are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Administrative Science Quarterly?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Administrative Science Quarterly's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Administrative Science Quarterly in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Administrative Science Quarterly Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Administrative Science Quarterly formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template