Example of American Journal of Evaluation format
Recent searches

Example of American Journal of Evaluation format Example of American Journal of Evaluation format Example of American Journal of Evaluation format Example of American Journal of Evaluation format Example of American Journal of Evaluation format Example of American Journal of Evaluation format Example of American Journal of Evaluation format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of American Journal of Evaluation format Example of American Journal of Evaluation format Example of American Journal of Evaluation format Example of American Journal of Evaluation format Example of American Journal of Evaluation format Example of American Journal of Evaluation format Example of American Journal of Evaluation format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

American Journal of Evaluation — Template for authors

Publisher: SAGE
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Sociology and Political Science #205 of 1269 down down by 6 ranks
Education #248 of 1319 down down by 57 ranks
Health (social science) #77 of 293 down down by 6 ranks
Social Psychology #90 of 289 up up by 8 ranks
Business and International Management #127 of 399 down down by 55 ranks
Strategy and Management #159 of 440 down down by 57 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 133 Published Papers | 411 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 23/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.2
SJR: 0.696
SNIP: 1.336
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 7.0
SJR: 3.135
SNIP: 1.612
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.2
SJR: 1.165
SNIP: 2.018
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.2
SJR: 0.819
SNIP: 1.674

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

1.41

5% from 2018

Impact factor for American Journal of Evaluation from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 1.41
2018 1.492
2017 1.339
2016 1.356
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

3.1

11% from 2019

CiteRatio for American Journal of Evaluation from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 3.1
2019 2.8
2018 2.6
2017 2.7
2016 2.1
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has decreased by 5% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 11% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.964

16% from 2019

SJR for American Journal of Evaluation from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.964
2019 0.834
2018 1.04
2017 0.646
2016 0.666
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.77

4% from 2019

SNIP for American Journal of Evaluation from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.77
2019 1.853
2018 1.754
2017 1.798
2016 1.403
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 16% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 4% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.
American Journal of Evaluation

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

SAGE

American Journal of Evaluation

The American Journal of Evaluation (AJE) explores decisions and challenges related to conceptualizing, designing and conducting evaluations. Four times/year it offers original, peer-reviewed, articles about the methods, theory, ethics, politics, and practice of evaluation. AJE...... Read More

Sociology and Political Science

Business and International Management

Education

Health(social science)

Strategy and Management

Social Psychology

Social Sciences

i
Last updated on
23 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
1098-2140
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.382
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
SageV
i
Citation Type
Numbered (Superscripted)
25
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder GE, Tinkham M and Klapwijk TM. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys. Rev. B 1982; 25(7): 4515–4532. URL 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/1098214005283748
A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data
David R. Thomas1

Abstract:

A general inductive approach for analysis of qualitative evaluation data is described. The purposes for using an inductive approach are to (a) condense raw textual data into a brief, summary format; (b) establish clear links between the evaluation or research objectives and the summary findings derived from the raw data; and ... A general inductive approach for analysis of qualitative evaluation data is described. The purposes for using an inductive approach are to (a) condense raw textual data into a brief, summary format; (b) establish clear links between the evaluation or research objectives and the summary findings derived from the raw data; and (c) develop a framework of the underlying structure of expe- riences or processes that are evident in the raw data. The general inductive approach provides an easily used and systematic set of procedures for analyzing qualitative data that can produce reliable and valid findings. Although the general inductive approach is not as strong as some other analytic strategies for theory or model development, it does provide a simple, straightforward approach for deriving findings in the context of focused evaluation questions. Many evaluators are likely to find using a general inductive approach less complicated than using other approaches to qualitative data analysis. read more read less

Topics:

Experimental data (55%)55% related to the paper, Qualitative reasoning (55%)55% related to the paper, Raw data (54%)54% related to the paper
View PDF
8,199 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/109821400302400303
Fidelity Criteria: Development, Measurement, and Validation.
Carol T. Mowbray1, Mark C. Holter, Gregory B. Teague, Deborah Bybee

Abstract:

Fidelity may be defined as the extent to which delivery of an intervention adheres to the protocol or program model originally developed. Fidelity measurement has increasing significance for evaluation, treatment effectiveness research, and service administration. Yet few published studies using fidelity criteria provide deta... Fidelity may be defined as the extent to which delivery of an intervention adheres to the protocol or program model originally developed. Fidelity measurement has increasing significance for evaluation, treatment effectiveness research, and service administration. Yet few published studies using fidelity criteria provide details on the construction of a valid fidelity index. The purpose of this review article is to outline steps in the development, measurement, and validation of fidelity criteria, providing examples from health and education literatures. We further identify important issues in conducting each step. Finally, we raise questions about the dynamic nature of fidelity criteria, appropriate validation and statistical analysis methods, the inclusion of structure and process criteria in fidelity assessment, and the role of program theory in deciding on the balance between adaptation versus exact replication of model programs. Further attention to the use and refinement of fidelity criteria is important to evaluation practice. read more read less

Topics:

Fidelity (63%)63% related to the paper
View PDF
795 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/1098214010371972
Unpacking Black Boxes: Mechanisms and Theory Building in Evaluation:
Brad Astbury1, Frans L. Leeuw2

Abstract:

There is growing interest in the concept of ‘‘mechanism’’ across many areas of the social sciences. In the field of program and policy evaluation, a number of scholars have also emphasized the importance of causal mechanisms for explaining how and why programs work. However, there appears to be some ambiguity about the meanin... There is growing interest in the concept of ‘‘mechanism’’ across many areas of the social sciences. In the field of program and policy evaluation, a number of scholars have also emphasized the importance of causal mechanisms for explaining how and why programs work. However, there appears to be some ambiguity about the meaning and uses of mechanism-based thinking in both the social science and evaluation literature. In this article we attempt to clarify what is meant by mechanisms in the context of program evaluation by identifying three main characteristics of mechanisms and outlining a possible typology of mechanisms. A number of theoretical and practical implications for evaluators are also discussed, along with some precautions to consider when investigating mechanisms that might plausibly account for program outcomes. read more read less

Topics:

Program evaluation (54%)54% related to the paper, Mechanism (sociology) (51%)51% related to the paper
692 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/1098214005278752
Is Sustainability Possible? A Review and Commentary on Empirical Studies of Program Sustainability:

Abstract:

An important final step in the life cycles of programs and their evaluation involves assessing new programs’ or innovations’ sustainability. This review and synthesis of 19 empirical studies of the sustainability of American and Canadian health-related programs examines the extent of sustainability achieved and summarizes fac... An important final step in the life cycles of programs and their evaluation involves assessing new programs’ or innovations’ sustainability. This review and synthesis of 19 empirical studies of the sustainability of American and Canadian health-related programs examines the extent of sustainability achieved and summarizes factors contributing to greater sustainability. Three definitions for measuring sustainability were examined: continued program activities (18 studies), continued measured benefits or outcomes for new clients (2 studies), and maintained community capacity (6 studies). Methods of studying sustainability were also assessed. In 14 of 17 studies covering the continuation of program activities, at least 60% of sites reported sustaining at least one program component. Although these studies’ methods had substantial limitations, cross-study analysis showed consistent support for five important factors influencing the extent of sustainability: (a) A program can be modified over time, (b) a “cham... read more read less

Topics:

Sustainability organizations (71%)71% related to the paper, Sustainability (56%)56% related to the paper, Program evaluation (53%)53% related to the paper
View PDF
615 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for American Journal of Evaluation.

It automatically formats your research paper to SAGE formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

American Journal of Evaluation format uses SageV citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write American Journal of Evaluation in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the American Journal of Evaluation guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the American Journal of Evaluation guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the American Journal of Evaluation guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in American Journal of Evaluation?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the American Journal of Evaluation citation style.

4. Can I use the American Journal of Evaluation templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for American Journal of Evaluation.

5. Can I use a manuscript in American Journal of Evaluation that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper American Journal of Evaluation that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in American Journal of Evaluation?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in American Journal of Evaluation.

7. Where can I find the template for the American Journal of Evaluation?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per American Journal of Evaluation's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the American Journal of Evaluation's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. American Journal of Evaluation an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's American Journal of Evaluation is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like American Journal of Evaluation?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like American Journal of Evaluation?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using American Journal of Evaluation?

After writing your paper autoformatting in American Journal of Evaluation, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is American Journal of Evaluation's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for American Journal of Evaluation?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for American Journal of Evaluation. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In American Journal of Evaluation?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for American Journal of Evaluation are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the American Journal of Evaluation?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per American Journal of Evaluation's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download American Journal of Evaluation in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in American Journal of Evaluation Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to American Journal of Evaluation formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template