Example of History of Science format
Recent searches

Example of History of Science format Example of History of Science format Example of History of Science format Example of History of Science format Example of History of Science format Example of History of Science format Example of History of Science format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of History of Science format Example of History of Science format Example of History of Science format Example of History of Science format Example of History of Science format Example of History of Science format Example of History of Science format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

History of Science — Template for authors

Publisher: SAGE
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
History #144 of 1328 down down by 30 ranks
History and Philosophy of Science #50 of 166 down down by 4 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 79 Published Papers | 86 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 08/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 1.4
SJR: 0.269
SNIP: 1.095
open access Open Access

Brill

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 0.7
SJR: 0.158
SNIP: 1.169
open access Open Access

Brill

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 0.7
SJR: 0.158
SNIP: 0.568
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Brill

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 0.5
SJR: 0.187
SNIP: 1.14

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

1.0

34% from 2018

Impact factor for History of Science from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 1.0
2018 0.744
2017 0.795
2016 0.641
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.1

15% from 2019

CiteRatio for History of Science from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.1
2019 1.3
2018 1.1
2017 1.2
2016 1.2
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 34% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has decreased by 15% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.147

54% from 2019

SJR for History of Science from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.147
2019 0.317
2018 0.263
2017 0.18
2016 0.303
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.825

37% from 2019

SNIP for History of Science from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.825
2019 1.315
2018 1.021
2017 1.325
2016 1.516
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 54% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 37% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

History of Science

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

SAGE

History of Science

History of Science is devoted to the history of science, medicine and technology from earliest times to the present day. Articles discussing methodology, and reviews of the current state of knowledge and possibilities for future research, are especially welcome.... Read More

History

History and Philosophy of Science

Arts and Humanities

i
Last updated on
08 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
0073-2753
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.415
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
SageV
i
Citation Type
Numbered (Superscripted)
25
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder GE, Tinkham M and Klapwijk TM. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys. Rev. B 1982; 25(7): 4515–4532. URL 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/007327538202000301
History of Science and its Sociological Reconstructions
Steven Shapin1
01 Sep 1982 - History of Science

Abstract:

One can either debate the possibility of the historical sociology of scientific knowledge or one can do it. Ludwik Fleck took the latter course of action. In Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache Fleck’s overriding concern was with the interpretation of a particular episode in the history of science, an... One can either debate the possibility of the historical sociology of scientific knowledge or one can do it. Ludwik Fleck took the latter course of action. In Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache Fleck’s overriding concern was with the interpretation of a particular episode in the history of science, and his focus never strayed from the empirical materials pertinent to that task. His more general theoretical statements always arose out of and referred to the historical particulars and circumstances of that episode. Thus, one way of characterizing Fleck’s book is to regard it as the work of a practising scientist, intimately familiar with the genesis and career of the Wassermann test: and this would not be an incorrect characterization. Another way of appreciating his accomplishment would be to see it as a piece of empirical history, providing a concrete exemplification of the sociology of scientific knowledge. The only wholly misguided approach to Fleck’s work would be to distill his theorizing out of the empirical concerns in which it was grounded. read more read less

Topics:

Historical sociology (53%)53% related to the paper, Sociology of scientific knowledge (53%)53% related to the paper, Philosophy of science (51%)51% related to the paper, Exemplification (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
380 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/007327537601400301
The Emergence of a Visual Language for Geological Science 1760—1840:
Martin Rudwick1
01 Sep 1976 - History of Science

Topics:

Visual language (56%)56% related to the paper, History of geology (51%)51% related to the paper, History of science (51%)51% related to the paper
361 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/007327539403200301
Separate Spheres and Public Places: Reflections on the History of Science Popularization and Science in Popular Culture:
Roger Cooter1, Stephen Pumfrey2
01 Sep 1994 - History of Science

Abstract:

L'A. demontre qu'il faudrait reconsiderer la negligence des etudes historiques de la science populaire et de la popularisation en fonction de l'hegemonie de la science elle-meme L'A. demontre qu'il faudrait reconsiderer la negligence des etudes historiques de la science populaire et de la popularisation en fonction de l'hegemonie de la science elle-meme read more read less

Topics:

History of science (52%)52% related to the paper, Separate spheres (52%)52% related to the paper, Popular culture (51%)51% related to the paper
351 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/007327539203000401
Discipline and Bounding: The History and Sociology of Science as Seen through the Externalism-Internalism Debate
Steven Shapin1
01 Dec 1992 - History of Science

Abstract:

From the beginning of the Second World War to the ending of the Cold War no problematic so deeply shaped the academic history and sociology of science than that inscribed in talk of 'internalism' and 'externalism'. Insofar as empirical work was deemed relevant to developing an overall appreciation of the nature of science, it... From the beginning of the Second World War to the ending of the Cold War no problematic so deeply shaped the academic history and sociology of science than that inscribed in talk of 'internalism' and 'externalism'. Insofar as empirical work was deemed relevant to developing an overall appreciation of the nature of science, its dynamics and its relations with social and cultural environments, that relevance was locally achieved by gestures at opposed 'internalist' and 'externalist' theories, orientations, domains, and accompanying historiographic baggage. Students were initiated into the history and sociology of science by being told about these genres and the present state of play. Graduates' early orientation to their fields was achieved through affiliation with one or other genre and camp of practitioners. Reviews of the state of the history and sociology of science were seemingly obligated to use 'internalism' and 'externalism' as expository structures. Nowadays, however, historians of science commonly tell each other and their students that their discipline has transcended, outgrown or resolved those debates, and that it is a sign of the maturity of the field that references to the 'internal' and the 'external' have become less common or at least less unselfconscious. When uttered at all, the terms are likely to be surrounded by quotes, air-quotes or tones of voice. If in the 1960s the central problematic of the academic discipline known as the history of science was pointed to by reference to the 'internal' and the 'external', by the late 1980s such usages increasingly betrayed the amateur, the neophyte, the outsider, or the out of touch. Within a generation the discourse of 'internalism' and 'externalism' seems to have passed from the commonplace to the gauche. I want to suggest that this trajectory never transmitted the appropriate intermediate stages. I do not think that the theories indicated by 'externalism' and 'internalism' were ever properly defined or described. I do not think that the virtues of any defensible and coherent construals of these theories were ever properly considered and assessed. I do not think that talk of external and internal (hereafter eli) 'factors' was ever properly associated with the respective theories, nor that such talk was adequately defended in terms of relevant read more read less

Topics:

Internalism and externalism (73%)73% related to the paper, Externalism (62%)62% related to the paper, Philosophy of science (56%)56% related to the paper, Sociology of scientific knowledge (53%)53% related to the paper, History of science (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
282 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/007327537901700202
Quantitative measures of communication in science: a critical review.
David Edge1
01 Jun 1979 - History of Science

Abstract:

ed, usually colloquial, frequently incomplete, and often vague. The communicator here is not seeking to report a finished scientific work. He often knows, in fact, that the person with whom he is communicating needs only a minimal communication of an idea to understand fully its meaning and importance for their common subject... ed, usually colloquial, frequently incomplete, and often vague. The communicator here is not seeking to report a finished scientific work. He often knows, in fact, that the person with whom he is communicating needs only a minimal communication of an idea to understand fully its meaning and importance for their common subject of research. The recipient embodies integrated knowledge; therefore, the message need not, in itself, be integrated. 49 One is tempted to say that formal communication in science is 'the tip of the iceberg', were it not for two facts: (a) the 'tip' is very large, extensive and important; and (b) there is every indication that the 'tip' is radically dijjerent in kind from what is 'below the waterline'. (Perhaps 'the soft underbelly of science' might be a more appropriate metaphor I) The difference is signalled in Garvey and Griffith's very next sentence: "Such loose communication cannot, of course, be tolerated in the journal literature of science where a more universal audience exists."50 Formal 'communications' in science represent a process of assimilation: of "separating scientific fact from conjecture", 51 and of "the transformation of research findings into scientific knowledge". 53 The object of a formal research paper is to persuade and convince the appropriate audience that the results presented should be accepted as valid knowledge: the form and style of argumentation is determined by that institutionalized goal, and the paper is assembled, and its list of references compiled, with that end in view.P It is an 'after the event' view, re-ordered and re-presented in accordance with established canons of proper practice; referees and editors ensure that certain decencies (including adequate referencing) are observed. It is not at all surprizing that Garvey and Griffith, comparing final published papers with their antecedent technical reports, found that "the corresponding journal articles were typically better written and better related to other work in the same subject areas". 54 'Communication', as it is usually understood, appears to be a relatively minor role of formal 'communications': While 'current' journal reading is relevant to the dissemination of research findings, it seems to be a minor portion of the use to which journals are put. For example, it amounted to only about one-third of the journal reading of one group ofextremely active psychologists.55 ... it was quite clear in 1962 that the journal article in psychology. was no longer the medium for disseminating current scientific findings to researchers active on the research front. 56 . What, then, is its 'use' ? Since most citations are given to research papers, how can these be assumed to reflect an influence? Gaston claims that "The QUANTITATIVE MEASURES OF COMMUNICATION 115 scientific community must wait until every aspect of the research is published before it can use the results to guide new research or correct an earlier perspective".57 Is this true? As we have seen, Cole seems to equate 'use' with 'citation' -that is, with the process of public 'assimilation' in the formal literature. And even Garvey and Griffith seem to define 'science' so that the formal 'tip' characterizes the whole: they note that, on average, some two or three years after publication, an article ... is cited by another author. Here the scientific information in the article is built upon, evaluated in the light of new information, and linked to new information which has been generated since its publication ... analysis, evaluation and synthesis have been proceeding ever since the work first appeared in the journal literature, in a process so central to science as to be virtually indistinguishable from it. 58 It is my contention, as I said earlier, that the tendency to characterize 'science' in terms of this formal process, and to employ methods designed to analyze the formal literature, "obscures key features" of scientific research. I t diverts attention from "the soft underbelly" : worse, it proposes that the informal should be understood in terms of insights gained by the study of the formal. I submit that this is to reverse the priorities of explanatory logic. Explanations of scientists' behaviour in the informal domain should surely be extended so as to include within their scope the formal aspects-including the relatively trivial behaviour of adding citations to papers. But, quite apart from this 'logical' point, it is simply my judgment that illumination is more likely to accrue from this contrary strategy. To claim that co-citation methods can locate actively interacting groups and specialty boundaries is not to claim that such features can only, or most economically, be discovered in this way-nor that these methods uncover (or point to) sufficient, or sufficiently accurate, detailed andrelevant, information on the groups and specialties. To refer back to the 'gas laws' analogy, and the claim that scholars must await the establishment ofnumerical patterns before they can know what 'problems' they have to solve, my response is to suggest that the everyday, detailed behaviour of scientists in the conduct of their research provides an abundance of problems of much more obvious importance than any correlations contained in a computer printout. Whenever a scientist (or a research group) decides to develop a new technique, or to pursue a fresh and unexpected phenomenon, or to adopt a perhaps unfashionable theoretical approach, there is a (sociological or historical) problem: each decision brings together 'cognitive' (intellectual, technical, cultural) and 'social and historical' factors: one task of the historian (or sociologist) of science is to explicate such decisions, and to explore the 'grounding' of their rationality. 59 In relation to this task (or, read more read less
267 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for History of Science.

It automatically formats your research paper to SAGE formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

History of Science format uses SageV citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write History of Science in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the History of Science guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the History of Science guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the History of Science guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in History of Science?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the History of Science citation style.

4. Can I use the History of Science templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for History of Science.

5. Can I use a manuscript in History of Science that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper History of Science that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in History of Science?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in History of Science.

7. Where can I find the template for the History of Science?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per History of Science's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the History of Science's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. History of Science an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's History of Science is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like History of Science?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like History of Science?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using History of Science?

After writing your paper autoformatting in History of Science, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is History of Science's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for History of Science?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for History of Science. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In History of Science?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for History of Science are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the History of Science?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per History of Science's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download History of Science in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in History of Science Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to History of Science formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template