Example of Journal of Communication Inquiry format
Recent searches

Sign up
Sign Up

Discover

Papers
Authors
Institutions
Topics
Journals
Conferences
Questions

Write

For Publishers

Papers
Authors
Institutions
Topics
Journals
Conferences
Questions
TEMPLATES
Journals Gallery

40,000+ journal templates to choose from for your next paper
PRICING & OFFERS
Pricing

Flexible pricing plans that caters to everyone’s needs
SERVICES
Plagiarism check

Detect plagiarism early. Powered by Turnitin.
Journal Submission

Get accepted in top journals.
ABOUT
For Publishers

Streamline publishing process with automated workflows
Client Stories

Read what our clients have yielded with our products and services
XML CONVERTERS
Convert from Word

Word file to JATS XML, PMC XML, DOAJ XML and more
Convert from PDF

PDF file to SciELO XML, CrossRef XML and more
Convert from JATS XML

JATS XML to Redalyc XML, DataCite XML and more
FEATURES
JATS XML

Adhere to standard of all global publishing bodies
PubMed XML

Compliance for medical journals in PubMed database
SciELO XML

Generate standardized XML for SciELO indexed journals
Example of Journal of Communication Inquiry format Example of Journal of Communication Inquiry format Example of Journal of Communication Inquiry format Example of Journal of Communication Inquiry format Example of Journal of Communication Inquiry format Example of Journal of Communication Inquiry format Example of Journal of Communication Inquiry format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
SciSpace / Formats / SAGE / Journal of Communication Inquiry
Look Inside
Example of Journal of Communication Inquiry format Example of Journal of Communication Inquiry format Example of Journal of Communication Inquiry format Example of Journal of Communication Inquiry format Example of Journal of Communication Inquiry format Example of Journal of Communication Inquiry format Example of Journal of Communication Inquiry format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access
Go to publisher

Journal of Communication Inquiry — Template for authors

Publisher: SAGE
Guideline source
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Cultural Studies #165 of 1037 up up by 57 ranks
Communication #179 of 426 down down by 19 ranks
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) #161 of 306 up up by 27 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 77 Published Papers | 96 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 22/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Crime, Media, Culture

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.3
SJR: 0.91
SNIP: 1.65
Indexed in: Scopus Last updated: 16/07/2020
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Games and Culture

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.0
SJR: 0.739
SNIP: 1.757
Indexed in: Scopus Last updated: 09/06/2020
open access Open Access

Middle East Journal of Culture and Communication

Brill

Quality:  
Good
CiteRatio: 0.5
SJR: 0.167
SNIP: 0.443
Indexed in: Scopus Last updated: 21/06/2020
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Ethnography

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 2.0
SJR: 0.453
SNIP: 1.276
Indexed in: Scopus Last updated: 05/07/2020

Journal Performance & Insights

CiteRatio

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

1.2

33% from 2019

CiteRatio for Journal of Communication Inquiry from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.2
2019 0.9
2018 0.8
2017 0.8
2016 1.0
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.477

34% from 2019

SJR for Journal of Communication Inquiry from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.477
2019 0.357
2018 0.198
2017 0.303
2016 0.313
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.87

4% from 2019

SNIP for Journal of Communication Inquiry from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.87
2019 0.906
2018 0.379
2017 0.796
2016 0.62
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 33% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 34% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 4% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Journal of Communication Inquiry

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

SAGE

Journal of Communication Inquiry

Approved by publishing and review experts on SciSpace, this template is built as per for Journal of Communication Inquiry formatting guidelines as mentioned in SAGE author instructions. The current version was created on 21 Jul 2020 and has been used by 944 authors to write and format their manuscripts to this journal.

Cultural Studies

Communication

Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Social Sciences

i
Last updated on
21 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
0196-8599
i
Impact Factor
Low - 0.498
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
SageV
i
Citation Type
Numbered (Superscripted)
25
i
Bibliography Example
 Blonder GE, Tinkham M and Klapwijk TM. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys. Rev. B 1982; 25(7): 4515–4532. URL 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article • DOI: 10.1177/019685990202600308 •
Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication:
Donald Matheson
01 Jul 2002 - Journal of Communication Inquiry

Abstract:

but the threat they bring to artistic culture. From his opening mockery of the literary establishment’s tendency to theorize the world in terms of desire or gender to his disapproval of those who venerate art while denying its validity in the same breath, Jonathan Dollimore has created an easily understood, albeit at times to... but the threat they bring to artistic culture. From his opening mockery of the literary establishment’s tendency to theorize the world in terms of desire or gender to his disapproval of those who venerate art while denying its validity in the same breath, Jonathan Dollimore has created an easily understood, albeit at times too theoretical, synthesis of the literary and the experiential in Sex, Literature and Censorship. His arguments on critical theory do not necessarily reject the concept of theory; rather, he argues that critical theorists should strive to understand the contradictions within our lives and our literature and explore the daemonic power of the subjects that offend our sense of tradition. read more read less
1,318 Citations
Journal Article • DOI: 10.1177/019685998601000202 •
Gramsci's Relevance for the Study of Race and Ethnicity
Stuart Hall
01 Jun 1986 - Journal of Communication Inquiry

Abstract:

The aim of this collection of essays1 is to facilitate ‘a more sophisticated examination of the hitherto poorly elucidated phenomen of racism and to examine the adequacy of the theoretical formulations, paradigms and interpretive schemes in the social and human sciences…with respect to intolerance and racism and in relation t... The aim of this collection of essays1 is to facilitate ‘a more sophisticated examination of the hitherto poorly elucidated phenomen of racism and to examine the adequacy of the theoretical formulations, paradigms and interpretive schemes in the social and human sciences…with respect to intolerance and racism and in relation to the complexity of problems they pose.’ This general rubric enables me to situate more precisely the kind of contribution which a study of Gramsci’s work can make to the larger enterprise. In my view, Gramsci’s work does not offer a general social science which can be applied to the analysis of social phenomena across a wide comparative range of historical societies. His potential contribution is more limited. It remains, for all that, of seminal importance. His work is, precisely, of a ‘sophisticating’ kind. He works, broadly, within the marxist paradigm. However, he has extensively revised, renovated and sophisticated many aspects of that theoretical framework to make it more relevant to contemporary social relations in the twentieth century. His work therefore has a direct bearing on the question of the ‘adequacy’ of existing social theories, since it is precisely in the direction of ‘complexifying existing theories and problems’ that his most important theoretical contribution is to be found. These points require further clarification before a substantive resume and assessment of Gramsci’s theoretical contribution can be offered. read more read less

Topics:

Social theory (55%)55% related to the paper
1,193 Citations
Journal Article • DOI: 10.1177/019685998601000204 •
On Postmodernism and Articulation An Interview with Stuart Hall
Lawrence Grossberg
01 Jun 1986 - Journal of Communication Inquiry

Abstract:

ion? Hall: I think they are quite heroic, in the new book, to say that until one can express these new positions in the form of a rigorously articulated general theory, one is still too bogged down in the pragmatics of local examples, conjunctural analysis, and so on. I don’t operate well at that level, but I don’t want to de... ion? Hall: I think they are quite heroic, in the new book, to say that until one can express these new positions in the form of a rigorously articulated general theory, one is still too bogged down in the pragmatics of local examples, conjunctural analysis, and so on. I don’t operate well at that level, but I don’t want to deny the importance of what is sometimes called &dquo;theoretical practice,&dquo; It is not an autonomous practice, as some Althussereans have tried to talk about it, but it does have its own dynamic. At many important points, Capual is operating precisely at that level; it is a necessary level of abstraction. So the project itself is not wrong. But in carrying it out, they do tend to slip from the requirement to recognize the constraints of existing historical formations. While they are very responsible-whether you agree with them or not-about recognizing that their position does have political consequences, when they come down to particular political conjunctures, they don’t reintegrate other levels of determination into the analysis. Instead, they take the abstractions which have been developed and elaborated, in a very rigorous and conceptual way at a high philosophical level, and insert them into the here and now. You don’t see them adding, adding, adding, the different levels of determination; you see them producing the concrete philosophically, and somewhere in there is, I think, the kind of analytic slippage I am talking about That’s not to say that it’s theoretically impossible to develop a more adequate set of political positions within their theoretical framework, but somehow, the route they have taken allows them to avoid the pressure of doing so. The structuring force, the lines of tendency stemming from the implantation of capital, for example, simply disappears. Question: Two other terms becoming common in cultural theory are &dquo;postmarxism&dquo; and &dquo;poststructuralism.&dquo; Both have, at various times, been used to describe your work. Can you describe your relation to these categories? Hall: I am a &dquo;post-marxist&dquo; only in the sense that I recognize the necessity to move beyond orthodox marxism, beyond the notion of marxism guaranteed by the laws of history. But I still operate somewhere within what I understand to be the discursive limits of a marxist position. And I feel the same way about structuralism. My work is neither a refusal nor an apologia of Althusser’s position. I refuse certain of those positions, but Althusser certainly has had an enormous influence on my thinking, in many positive ways that I continue to acknowledge, even after he has gone out of fashion. So &dquo;post&dquo; means, for me, 59 going on thinking on the ground of a set of established problems, a problematic. It doesn’t mean deserting that terrain but rather, using it as one’s reference point. So I am, only in that sense, a post-marxist and a poststructuralist, because those are the two discourses I feel most constantly engaged with. They are central to my formation and I don’t believe in the endless, trendy recycling of one fashionable theorist after another, as if you can wear new theories like tee-shirts. Question: It is clear that cultural studies is enjoying a new measure of success in the United States. I wonder how you feel about these recent successes to institutionalize and codify cultural studies. Hall: I would like to perhaps make a distinction between the two terms that you use. I am in favor of institutionalization because one needs to go through the organizational moment-the long march through the institutions---to get people together, to build some kind of collective intellectual project. But codification makes my hackles rise, even about the things I have been involved in. People talk about &dquo;the Birmingham school&dquo; (The Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies at the University of Birmingham--ed.) and all I can hear are the arguments we used to have in Birmingham that we never were one school; there may have been four or five but we were never able to unify it all, nor did we want to create that kind of orthodoxy. Now let me say something, perhaps controversial, about the American appropriation of all that was going on at Birmingham, and cultural studies in general, for I see some interesting presences and absences. For instance, I fmd it interesting that formal semiotics here rapidly became a sort of alternative interpretive methodology, whereas I don’t think anybody in England ever really believed in it as a complete method. When we took on semiotics, we were taking on a methodological requiremenl you had to show why and how you could say that that is what the meaning of any cultural form or practice is. That is the semiotic imperative: to demonstrate that what you were calling &dquo;the meaning&dquo; is textually constituted. But as a formal or elaborated methodology, that was not what semiotics was for us. In America, taking on semiotics seemed to entail taking on the entire ideological baggage of structuralism. Similarly, I notice there is now a very rapid assimilation of the Althusserean moment into literary studies but without its marxist connotations. And I notice the same thing about Gramsci’s work. Suddenly, I see Gramsci quoted everywhere. Even more troubling, I see Gramscian concepts directly substituted for some of the very things we went to Gramsci to avoid. People talk about &dquo;hegemony&dquo; for instance as the equivalent of ideological domination. I have tried to fight against that interpretation of &dquo;hegemony&dquo; for twenty years. Sometimes, I hear a similar kind of easy appropriation when people start talking about cultural studies. I see it establishing itself quite rapidly on the foundations of existing academic departments, existing intellectual divisions, and disciplinary curricula. It becomes a kind of &dquo;received knowledge,&dquo; instead of having a real critical and deconstructive edge to it. But I don’t know what you do about that; I don’t know how you refuse success. I think that in America, cultural studies is sometimes used as just one more paradigm. You know, there are fifteen around, so this time I will say that I have a cultural studies approach... I understand why that happens because, in a sense, there is a perspective there, despite its eclecticism and relative openness. It has always been trying to integrate itself into a perspective. That’s inevitable whenever you try to get people to do research collectively because they have to collaborate while trying to answer specific questions. So there is a thrust toward codification inevitably, as the project develops and generates work. Let me put it this way: you have to be sure about a position in order to teach a class, but you have to be open-ended 60 enough to know that you are going to change your mind by the time you teach it next week. As a strategy, that means holding enough ground to be able to think a position but always putting it in a way which has a horizon toward open-ended theorization. Maintaining that is absolutely essential for cultural studies, at least if it is to remain a critical and deconstructive project. I mean that it is always selfreflectively deconstructing itself; it is always operating on the progressive/regressive movement of the need to go on theorizing. I am not interested in Theory, I am interested in going on theorizing. And that also means that cultural studies has to be open to external influences, for example, to the rise of new social movements, to psychoanalysis, to feminism, to cultural differences. Such influences are likely to have, and must be allowed to have, a strong impact on the content, the modes of thought and the theoretical problematics being used. In that sense, cultural studies cannot possibly thrive by isolating itself in academic terms from those external influences. So in all those ways I think there are good reasons, not just personal predilections, for saying that it must remain open-ended. It is theorizing in the postmodern context, if you like, in the sense that it does not believe in the finality of a finished theoretical paradigm. Editor’s Note: This article is drawn from interview sessions with Hall conducted by S. Elizabeth Bird, Marilyn Smith, Patrack O’Brien and Kuan-Hsing Chen (on postmodernism) at the University of lowa School of Journalism and Mass Comnsunication in September, 1985, and by Cary Nelson, Lawrence Grossberg and others (on articulation) at the University of Illinois Unit for Criticism and Interpretive Theory in August, 1985. Transcriptions were made by Kuan-Hsing Chen and Michael Greer. read more read less

Topics:

Articulation (phonetics) (67%)67% related to the paper
1,032 Citations
Journal Article • DOI: 10.1177/019685998601000203 •
The Problem of Ideology-Marxism without Guarantees:
Stuart Hall1 •
Open University1
01 Jun 1986 - Journal of Communication Inquiry

Abstract:

In the past two or three decades, marxist theory has been going through a remarkable, but lop-sided and uneven revival. On the one hand, it has come once again to provide the principal pole of opposition to &dquo;bourgeois&dquo; social thought. On the other hand, many young intellectuals have passed through the revival and, a... In the past two or three decades, marxist theory has been going through a remarkable, but lop-sided and uneven revival. On the one hand, it has come once again to provide the principal pole of opposition to &dquo;bourgeois&dquo; social thought. On the other hand, many young intellectuals have passed through the revival and, after a heady and rapid apprenticeship, gone right out the other side again. They have &dquo;settled their accounts&dquo; with marxism and moved on to fresh intellectual read more read less

Topics:

Ideology (57%)57% related to the paper
951 Citations
Journal Article • DOI: 10.1177/0196859906287770 •
All the News That's Fit to Sell: How the Market Transforms Information Into News:
Jennifer Rauch1 •
Long Island University1
01 Jul 2006 - Journal of Communication Inquiry
483 Citations
Author Pic
“

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Journal of Communication Inquiry.

It automatically formats your research paper to SAGE formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Journal of Communication Inquiry format uses SageV citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Journal of Communication Inquiry in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Journal of Communication Inquiry guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Journal of Communication Inquiry guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Journal of Communication Inquiry guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Journal of Communication Inquiry?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Journal of Communication Inquiry citation style.

4. Can I use the Journal of Communication Inquiry templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Journal of Communication Inquiry.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Journal of Communication Inquiry that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Journal of Communication Inquiry that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Journal of Communication Inquiry?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Journal of Communication Inquiry.

7. Where can I find the template for the Journal of Communication Inquiry?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Journal of Communication Inquiry's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Journal of Communication Inquiry's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Journal of Communication Inquiry an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Journal of Communication Inquiry is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Journal of Communication Inquiry?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Journal of Communication Inquiry?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Journal of Communication Inquiry?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Journal of Communication Inquiry, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Journal of Communication Inquiry's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Journal of Communication Inquiry?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Journal of Communication Inquiry. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Journal of Communication Inquiry?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Journal of Communication Inquiry are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Journal of Communication Inquiry?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Journal of Communication Inquiry's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Journal of Communication Inquiry in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Journal of Communication Inquiry Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Use auto-formatting template

with Journal of Communication Inquiry format applied

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Journal of Communication Inquiry formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

“

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

”
Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template