Example of Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair format
Recent searches

Example of Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair format Example of Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair format Example of Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair format Example of Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair format Example of Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair format Example of Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair format Example of Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair format Example of Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair format Example of Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair format Example of Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair format Example of Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair format Example of Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair format Example of Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair format Example of Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair format Example of Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair format Example of Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair format Example of Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair format Example of Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair format Example of Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair format Example of Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair format Example of Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access ISSN: 15459683
recommended Recommended

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair — Template for authors

Publisher: SAGE
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Rehabilitation #2 of 118 down down by 1 rank
Neurology (clinical) #54 of 343 down down by 26 ranks
Neurology #28 of 156 down down by 12 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 345 Published Papers | 2352 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 04/07/2020
Insights & related journals
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Journal Performance & Insights

  • Impact Factor
  • CiteRatio
  • SJR
  • SNIP

Impact factor determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

3.982

6% from 2018

Impact factor for Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 3.982
2018 3.757
2017 4.711
2016 4.107
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 6% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

CiteRatio is a measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

6.8

15% from 2019

CiteRatio for Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 6.8
2019 8.0
2018 9.3
2017 8.6
2016 9.1
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has decreased by 15% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

1.651

11% from 2019

SJR for Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.651
2019 1.853
2018 1.916
2017 2.265
2016 2.031
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 11% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

1.671

5% from 2019

SNIP for Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.671
2019 1.758
2018 1.692
2017 1.799
2016 1.745
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 5% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Related Journals

open access Open Access ISSN: 9642633 e-ISSN: 13652788

Wiley

CiteRatio: 3.5 | SJR: 0.941 | SNIP: 1.24
open access Open Access ISSN: 23297018 e-ISSN: 23297026

Taylor and Francis

CiteRatio: 1.8 | SJR: 0.268 | SNIP: 0.464
open access Open Access ISSN: 13524585 e-ISSN: 14770970
recommended Recommended

SAGE

CiteRatio: 9.5 | SJR: 1.729 | SNIP: 1.739
open access Open Access ISSN: 17562856 e-ISSN: 17562864

SAGE

CiteRatio: 7.3 | SJR: 1.684 | SNIP: 1.763

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

SAGE

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

The Journal will consider for publication original articles and reviews on both basic science and clinical research relevant to recovery from neural injury. Examples of appropriate topics include cortical remodeling, mechanisms of sprouting and regeneration, the development of...... Read More

Rehabilitation

Clinical Neurology

Medicine

i
Last updated on
04 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
1545-9683
i
Impact Factor
High - 2.167
i
Acceptance Rate
20%
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
SageV
i
Citation Type
Numbered (Superscripted)
25
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder GE, Tinkham M and Klapwijk TM. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys. Rev. B 1982; 25(7): 4515–4532. URL 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/1545968307305457
Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review
Gert Kwakkel1, Boudewijn J. Kollen, Hermano Igo Krebs2

Abstract:

Objective. The aim of the study was to present a systematic review of studies that investigate the effects of robot-assisted therapy on motor and functional recovery in patients with stroke. Method... Objective. The aim of the study was to present a systematic review of studies that investigate the effects of robot-assisted therapy on motor and functional recovery in patients with stroke. Method... read more read less

Topics:

Stroke (52%)52% related to the paper
View PDF
1,282 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/154596802401105171
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke: A Critical Review of Its Measurement Properties
David J. Gladstone1, Cynthia J. Danells2, Sandra E. Black1

Abstract:

Measurement of recovery after stroke is becoming increasingly important with the advent of new treatment options under investigation in stroke rehabilitation research. The Fugl-Meyer scale was developed as the first quantitative evaluative instrument for measuring sensorimotor stroke recovery, based on Twitchell and Brunnstro... Measurement of recovery after stroke is becoming increasingly important with the advent of new treatment options under investigation in stroke rehabilitation research. The Fugl-Meyer scale was developed as the first quantitative evaluative instrument for measuring sensorimotor stroke recovery, based on Twitchell and Brunnstrom’s concept of sequential stages of motor return in the hemiplegic stroke patient. The Fugl-Meyer is a well-designed, feasible and efficient clinical examination method that has been tested widely in the stroke population. Its primary value is the 100-point motor domain, which has received the most extensive evaluation. Excellent interrater and intrarater reliability and construct validity have been demonstrated, and preliminary evidence suggests that the Fugl-Meyer assessment is responsive to change. Limitations of the motor domain include a ceiling effect, omission of some potentially relevant items, and weighting of the arm more than the leg. Further study should test performance o... read more read less

Topics:

Stroke recovery (52%)52% related to the paper, Population (52%)52% related to the paper, Stroke (51%)51% related to the paper
1,240 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/1545968308328727
What Do Motor “Recovery” and “Compensation” Mean in Patients Following Stroke?
Mindy F. Levin1, Jeffrey A. Kleim2, Steven L. Wolf3

Abstract:

There is a lack of consistency among researchers and clinicians in the use of terminology that describes changes in motor ability following neurological injury Specifically, the terms and definitions of motor compensation and motor recovery have been used in different ways, which is a potential barrier to interdisciplinary co... There is a lack of consistency among researchers and clinicians in the use of terminology that describes changes in motor ability following neurological injury Specifically, the terms and definitions of motor compensation and motor recovery have been used in different ways, which is a potential barrier to interdisciplinary communication This Point of View describes the problem and offers a solution in the form of definitions of compensation and recovery at the neuronal, motor performance, and functional levels within the framework of the International Classification of Functioning model read more read less
View PDF
652 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/1545968308326632
Multicenter randomized clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of the Lokomat in subacute stroke.

Abstract:

Objective. To compare the efficacy of robotic-assisted gait training with the Lokomat to conventional gait training in individuals with subacute stroke. Methods. A total of 63 participants <6 months poststroke with an initial walking speed between 0.1 to 0.6 m/s completed the multicenter, randomized clinical trial. All partic... Objective. To compare the efficacy of robotic-assisted gait training with the Lokomat to conventional gait training in individuals with subacute stroke. Methods. A total of 63 participants <6 months poststroke with an initial walking speed between 0.1 to 0.6 m/s completed the multicenter, randomized clinical trial. All participants received twenty-four 1-hour sessions of either Lokomat or conventional gait training. Outcome measures were evaluated prior to training, after 12 and 24 sessions, and at a 3-month follow-up exam. Self-selected overground walking speed and distance walked in 6 minutes were the primary outcome measures, whereas secondary outcome measures included balance, mobility and function, cadence and symmetry, level of disability, and quality of life measures. Results. Participants who received conventional gait training experienced significantly greater gains in walking speed (P = .002) and distance (P = .03) than those trained on the Lokomat. These differences were maintained at the 3-mon... read more read less

Topics:

Gait training (65%)65% related to the paper, Preferred walking speed (55%)55% related to the paper, Gait (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
524 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/1545968312440745
Getting neurorehabilitation right: what can be learned from animal models?
John W. Krakauer1, S. Thomas Carmichael2, Dale Corbett3, George F. Wittenberg4

Abstract:

Animal models suggest that a month of heightened plasticity occurs in the brain after stroke, accompanied by most of the recovery from impairment. This period of peri-infarct and remote plasticity is associated with changes in excitatory/inhibitory balance and the spatial extent and activation of cortical maps and structural ... Animal models suggest that a month of heightened plasticity occurs in the brain after stroke, accompanied by most of the recovery from impairment. This period of peri-infarct and remote plasticity is associated with changes in excitatory/inhibitory balance and the spatial extent and activation of cortical maps and structural remodeling. The best time for experience and training to improve outcome is unclear. In animal models, very early ( 30 days) is much less effective both in terms of outcome and morphological changes associated with plasticity. In clinical practice, rehabilitation after disabling stroke involves a relatively brief period of inpatient therapy that does not come close to matching intensity levels investigated in animal models and includes the training of compensatory strategies that have minimal impact on impairment. Current rehabilitation treatments have a disappointingly modest effect on impairment early or late after stroke. Translation from animal models will require the following: (1) substantial increases in the intensity and dosage of treatments offered in the first month after stroke with an emphasis on impairment; (2) combinational approaches such as noninvasive brain stimulation with robotics, based on current understanding of motor learning and brain plasticity; and (3) research that emphasizes mechanistic phase II studies over premature phase III clinical trials. read more read less

Topics:

Brain stimulation (56%)56% related to the paper, Neurorehabilitation (52%)52% related to the paper, Stroke (52%)52% related to the paper
View PDF
398 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair.

It automatically formats your research paper to SAGE formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair format uses SageV citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

Absolutely not! With our tool, you can freely write without having to focus on LaTeX. You can write your entire paper as per the Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair guidelines and autoformat it.

Yes. The template is fully compliant as per the guidelines of this journal. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. Also, if there's any update in the journal format guidelines, we take care of it and include that in our algorithm.

Sure. We support all the top citation styles like APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, Chicago style, etc. For example, in case of this journal, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, it will automatically update your article as per the Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair citation style.

You can avail our Free Trial for 7 days. I'm sure you'll find our features very helpful. Plus, it's quite inexpensive.

Yup. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word doc and click on auto-format. You'll have a publish-ready paper that you can download at the end.

A matter of seconds. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves a load of your time in writing and formating your manuscript.

One little Google search can get you the Word template for any journal. However, why do you need a Word template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace, autoformat it as per Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Try us out!.

Absolutely! You can do it using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, you can always contact our support team.

SciSpace is an online tool for now. We'll soon release a desktop version. You can also request (or upvote) any feature that you think might be helpful for you and the research community in the feature request section once you sign-up with us.

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it up and running within a matter of 3 working days. You can find the request box in the Journal Gallery on the right sidebar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for?".

After you have written and autoformatted your paper, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx and LaTeX.

To be honest, the answer is NO. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of those factors the review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, Eigenfactor, etc. You must assess all the factors and then take the final call.

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We have extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help our researchers understand the access level of this journal. The following table indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

Our journal submission experts are skilled in submitting papers to various international journals.

After uploading your paper on SciSpace, you would see a button to request a journal submission service for Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair.

Each submission service is completed within 4 - 5 working days.

Yes. SciSpace provides this functionality.

After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or .bib file.

SciSpace would allow download of your references in Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair Endnote style, according to sage guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template