Example of Social Science Computer Review format
Recent searches

Example of Social Science Computer Review format Example of Social Science Computer Review format Example of Social Science Computer Review format Example of Social Science Computer Review format Example of Social Science Computer Review format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Social Science Computer Review format Example of Social Science Computer Review format Example of Social Science Computer Review format Example of Social Science Computer Review format Example of Social Science Computer Review format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Social Science Computer Review — Template for authors

Publisher: SAGE
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Social Sciences (all) #4 of 260 up up by 6 ranks
Law #12 of 722 up up by 3 ranks
Library and Information Sciences #14 of 235 up up by 2 ranks
Computer Science Applications #97 of 693 down down by 1 rank
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 183 Published Papers | 1323 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 04/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 9.5
SJR: 1.35
SNIP: 1.744
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

American Chemical Society

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.4
SJR: 1.24
SNIP: 1.295
open access Open Access

Inderscience Publishers

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 2.0
SJR: 0.368
SNIP: 0.652
open access Open Access

Emerald Publishing

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.6
SJR: 0.624
SNIP: 1.09

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

2.696

8% from 2018

Impact factor for Social Science Computer Review from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 2.696
2018 2.922
2017 3.253
2016 2.293
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

7.2

7% from 2019

CiteRatio for Social Science Computer Review from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 7.2
2019 6.7
2018 6.3
2017 5.0
2016 4.5
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has decreased by 8% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 7% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

1.3

8% from 2019

SJR for Social Science Computer Review from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.3
2019 1.42
2018 1.421
2017 1.229
2016 1.215
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

2.036

3% from 2019

SNIP for Social Science Computer Review from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.036
2019 2.108
2018 1.869
2017 1.489
2016 1.382
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 8% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 3% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.
Social Science Computer Review

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

SAGE

Social Science Computer Review

Unique Scope Social Science Computer Review is an interdisciplinary journal covering social science instructional and research applications of computing, as well as societal impacts of informational technology. Topics included: artificial intelligence, business, computational ...... Read More

Social Sciences

i
Last updated on
04 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
0894-4393
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.62
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
SageV
i
Citation Type
Numbered (Superscripted)
25
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder GE, Tinkham M and Klapwijk TM. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys. Rev. B 1982; 25(7): 4515–4532. URL 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/089443930101900307
The Impacts of Emoticons on Message Interpretation in Computer-Mediated Communication:
Joseph B. Walther1, Kyle P. D’Addario1

Abstract:

Emoticons are graphic representations of facial expressions that many e-mail users embed in their messages. These symbols are widely known and commonly recognized among computer-mediated communication (CMC) users, and they are described by most observers as substituting for the nonverbal cues that are missing from CMC in comp... Emoticons are graphic representations of facial expressions that many e-mail users embed in their messages. These symbols are widely known and commonly recognized among computer-mediated communication (CMC) users, and they are described by most observers as substituting for the nonverbal cues that are missing from CMC in comparison to face-to-face communication. Their empirical impacts, however, are undocumented. An experiment sought to determine the effects of three common emoticons on message interpretations. Hypotheses drawn from literature on nonverbal communication reflect several plausible relationships between emoticons and verbal messages. The results indicate that emoticons’ contributions were outweighed by verbal content, but a negativity effect appeared such that any negative message aspect—verbal or graphic—shifts message interpretation in the direction of the negative element. read more read less

Topics:

Interpersonal communication (59%)59% related to the paper, Computer-mediated communication (53%)53% related to the paper, Affect (linguistics) (52%)52% related to the paper, Electronic mail (52%)52% related to the paper, Nonverbal communication (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
692 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/089443939100900106
An Algorithm for Fast Recovery of Sparse Causal Graphs
Peter Spirtes1, Clark Glymour1

Abstract:

Previous asymptotically correct algorithms for recovering causal structure from sample probabilities have been limited even in sparse causal graphs to a few variables. We describe an asymptotically... Previous asymptotically correct algorithms for recovering causal structure from sample probabilities have been limited even in sparse causal graphs to a few variables. We describe an asymptotically... read more read less

Topics:

Dense graph (56%)56% related to the paper, Hopcroft–Karp algorithm (55%)55% related to the paper, Causal structure (54%)54% related to the paper, Independent set (53%)53% related to the paper, Graph theory (53%)53% related to the paper
602 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/089443930101900202
Web surveys: perceptions of burden
Scott Crawford, Mick P. Couper1, Mark J. Lamias1

Abstract:

Web surveys appear to be attaining lower response rates than equivalent mail surveys. One reason may be that there is currently little information on effective strategies for increasing response to Internet-based surveys. Web users are becoming more impatient with high-burden Web interactions. The authors examined the decisio... Web surveys appear to be attaining lower response rates than equivalent mail surveys. One reason may be that there is currently little information on effective strategies for increasing response to Internet-based surveys. Web users are becoming more impatient with high-burden Web interactions. The authors examined the decision to respond to a Web survey by embedding a series of experiments in a survey of students at the University of Michigan. A sample of over 4,500 students was sent an e-mail invitation to participate in a Web survey on affirmative action policies. Methodological experiments included using a progress indicator, automating password entry, varying the timing of reminder notices to nonrespondents, and using a prenotification report of the anticipated survey length. Each of these experiments was designed to vary the burden (perceived or real) of the survey request. Results of these experiments are presented. read more read less

Topics:

Survey data collection (61%)61% related to the paper, Survey methodology (58%)58% related to the paper, The Internet (51%)51% related to the paper
596 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/089443930101900401
Understanding Internet usage: a social-cognitive approach to uses and gratifications
Robert LaRose1, Dana Mastro2, Matthew S. Eastin3

Abstract:

Several studies have applied uses and gratifications to explain Internet usage. Like Bandura’s social-cognitive theory, the uses and gratifications framework explains media use in terms of expected positive outcomes, or gratifications. However, previous uses and gratifications research accounted for little variance in Interne... Several studies have applied uses and gratifications to explain Internet usage. Like Bandura’s social-cognitive theory, the uses and gratifications framework explains media use in terms of expected positive outcomes, or gratifications. However, previous uses and gratifications research accounted for little variance in Internet behavior, although there were conflicting results. This research identifies new variables from social-cognitive theory that might further explain Internet usage and resolve inconsistencies in prior research. Measures of self-efficacy and self-disparagement were developed for the domain of Internet behavior. Internet addiction was interpreted as a deficient self-regulation within the social-cognitive framework. Finally, the negative outcomes of online behavior were analyzed for their impact on Internet usage. In a survey of 171 college students, the social-cognitive model explained 60% of the available variance in Internet usage using multiple regression analysis, a significant impro... read more read less

Topics:

The Internet (60%)60% related to the paper, Social cognitive theory (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
510 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/0894439309335162
The Revolution Will be Networked
Weiwu Zhang1, Thomas J. Johnson1, Trent Seltzer1, Shannon L. Bichard1

Abstract:

Social networking is a phenomenon of interest to many scholars. While most of the recent research on social networking sites has focused on user characteristics, very few studies have examined their roles in engaging people in the democratic process. This paper relies on a telephone survey of Southwest residents to examine th... Social networking is a phenomenon of interest to many scholars. While most of the recent research on social networking sites has focused on user characteristics, very few studies have examined their roles in engaging people in the democratic process. This paper relies on a telephone survey of Southwest residents to examine the extent to which reliance on social networking sites such as Facebook, MySpace and YouTube has engaged citizens in civic and political activities. More specifically, this study looks at the extent to which social networking sites influence political attitudes and democratic participation after controlling for demographic variables and the role of interpersonal political discussion in stimulating citizen participation. The findings indicate that reliance on social networking sites is significantly related to increased civic participation, but not political participation. Interpersonal discussion fosters both civic participation and political activity. Implications of the results for democratic governance will be discussed. read more read less

Topics:

Social network (56%)56% related to the paper, Politics (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
436 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Social Science Computer Review.

It automatically formats your research paper to SAGE formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Social Science Computer Review format uses SageV citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Social Science Computer Review in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Social Science Computer Review guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Social Science Computer Review guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Social Science Computer Review guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Social Science Computer Review?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Social Science Computer Review citation style.

4. Can I use the Social Science Computer Review templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Social Science Computer Review.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Social Science Computer Review that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Social Science Computer Review that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Social Science Computer Review?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Social Science Computer Review.

7. Where can I find the template for the Social Science Computer Review?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Social Science Computer Review's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Social Science Computer Review's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Social Science Computer Review an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Social Science Computer Review is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Social Science Computer Review?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Social Science Computer Review?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Social Science Computer Review?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Social Science Computer Review, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Social Science Computer Review's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Social Science Computer Review?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Social Science Computer Review. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Social Science Computer Review?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Social Science Computer Review are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Social Science Computer Review?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Social Science Computer Review's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Social Science Computer Review in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Social Science Computer Review Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Social Science Computer Review formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template