Example of Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences format
Recent searches

Example of Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences format Example of Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences format Example of Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences format Example of Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences format Example of Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences format Example of Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences format Example of Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences format Example of Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences format Example of Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences format Example of Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences format Example of Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences format Example of Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences format Example of Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences format Example of Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences format Example of Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences format Example of Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences format Example of Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences format Example of Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences format Example of Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences format Example of Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences format Example of Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences format Example of Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences format Example of Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences format Example of Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences format Example of Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences format Example of Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences format Example of Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences format Example of Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences format Example of Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences format Example of Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences format Example of Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences format Example of Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences format Example of Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences format Example of Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences format Example of Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences — Template for authors

Publisher: Springer
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Anthropology #26 of 411 up up by 2 ranks
Archeology (arts and humanities) #19 of 295 down down by 4 ranks
Archeology #18 of 273 down down by 4 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 915 Published Papers | 2996 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 10/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Wiley

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.9
SJR: 1.63
SNIP: 2.079
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 2.5
SJR: 0.526
SNIP: 1.132
open access Open Access

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 1.5
SJR: 0.412
SNIP: 0.953
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 0.8
SJR: 0.548
SNIP: 0.749

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

2.063

4% from 2018

Impact factor for Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 2.063
2018 1.978
2017 2.414
2016 1.844
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

3.3

27% from 2019

CiteRatio for Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 3.3
2019 2.6
2018 3.1
2017 2.8
2016 2.7
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 4% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 27% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.925

19% from 2019

SJR for Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.925
2019 0.78
2018 0.931
2017 1.052
2016 0.897
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.087

3% from 2019

SNIP for Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.087
2019 1.125
2018 1.062
2017 1.023
2016 0.878
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 19% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 3% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Springer

Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences

Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences aims to publish articles covering the full spectrum of natural scientific methods, which are now a fundamental part of modern archaeological research, with the emphasis on the archaeological contexts and the questions being studied. ...... Read More

Archaeology

Anthropology

Social Sciences

i
Last updated on
10 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
1866-9557
i
Impact Factor
Medium - 0.748
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
SPBASIC
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al, 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker CWJ (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 97(6):067,007, URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S12520-010-0035-Y
Consilience of genetics and archaeobotany in the entangled history of rice

Abstract:

Major leaps forward in understanding rice both in genetics and archaeology have taken place in the past decade or so—with the publication of full draft genomes for indica and japonica rice, on the one hand, and with the spread of systematic flotation and increased recovery of archaeological spikelet bases and other rice remai... Major leaps forward in understanding rice both in genetics and archaeology have taken place in the past decade or so—with the publication of full draft genomes for indica and japonica rice, on the one hand, and with the spread of systematic flotation and increased recovery of archaeological spikelet bases and other rice remains on early sites in China, India and Southeast Asia. This paper will sketch a framework that coherently integrates the evidence from these burgeoning fields. This framework implies a reticulate framework in the phylogeny of early cultivated rice, with multiple starts of cultivation (two is perhaps not enough) but with the key consolidations of adaptations that must have been spread through hybridisation and therefore long-distance cultural contacts. Archaeobotanical evidence allows us to document the gradual evolutionary process of domestication through rice spikelet bases and grain size change. Separate trends in grain size change can be identified in India and China. The earliest centre of rice domestication was in the Yangtze basin of China, but a largely separate trajectory into rice cultivation can be traced in the Ganges plains of India. Intriguingly, contact-induced hybridisation is indicated for the early development of indica in northern India, ca. 2000 BC. An updated synthesis of the interwoven patterns of the spread of various rice varieties throughout Asia and to Madagascar can be suggested in which rice reached most of its historical range of important cultivation by the Iron Age. read more read less

Topics:

Domestication (52%)52% related to the paper, Paleoethnobotany (51%)51% related to the paper
279 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S12520-009-0008-1
Bedding, hearths, and site maintenance in the Middle Stone Age of Sibudu Cave, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

Abstract:

Micromorphological analysis of sediments from the Middle Stone Age site of Sibudu Cave, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, provides a high-resolution sequence and evidence of site formation processes of predominantly anthropogenic deposits. This methodology allows for a detailed interpretation of individual anthropogenic activi- ti... Micromorphological analysis of sediments from the Middle Stone Age site of Sibudu Cave, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, provides a high-resolution sequence and evidence of site formation processes of predominantly anthropogenic deposits. This methodology allows for a detailed interpretation of individual anthropogenic activi- ties, including the construction of hearths and bedding and the maintenance of occupational surfaces through the sweep out of hearths and the repeated burning of bedding. This analysis also provides a context for evaluating other studies at the site relating to magnetic susceptibility, paleobotany, paleozoology, anthracology, and studies of ochre. read more read less

Topics:

Middle Stone Age (60%)60% related to the paper, Howiesons Poort (55%)55% related to the paper, Anthracology (52%)52% related to the paper, Cave (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
250 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S12520-012-0102-7
Macronutrient-based model for dietary carbon routing in bone collagen and bioapatite
Ricardo J. Fernandes1, Marie-Josée Nadeau1, Pieter Meiert Grootes1

Abstract:

Carbon stable isotope ratios (δ 13 C), measured in human bone collagen (δ 13 Ccollagen) and bioapatite (δ 13 Cbioapatite),
230 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S12520-009-0003-6
Establishing collagen quality criteria for sulphur isotope analysis of archaeological bone collagen
Olaf Nehlich1, Michael P. Richards1

Abstract:

Sulphur isotope measurements of bone collagen from archaeological sites are beginning to be applied more often, yet there are no clear criteria to assess the quality of the collagen and therefore the validity of the sulphur isotope values. We provide elemental data from different methods (DNA sequences, amino acid sequences a... Sulphur isotope measurements of bone collagen from archaeological sites are beginning to be applied more often, yet there are no clear criteria to assess the quality of the collagen and therefore the validity of the sulphur isotope values. We provide elemental data from different methods (DNA sequences, amino acid sequences and mass spectrometric measurements) which are used to establish a reliable system of quality criteria for sulphur isotope analyses of bone collagen. The difference in the amount of sulphur from fish and mammalian collagen type I led to the suggestion to use different criteria to assess the in vivo character of the collagen between these two categories. For establishing quality ranges, the bone collagen of 140 modern animals were analysed. The amount of sulphur in fish and mammalian bone collagen is 0.63 ± 0.08% and 0.28 ± 0.07%, respectively. Based on these results we define for mammalian bone collagen an atomic C:S ratio of 600 ± 300 and an atomic N:S ratio of 200 ± 100, and for fish bone an atomic C:S ratio of 175 ± 50 and an atomic N:S ratio of 60 ± 20. These quality criteria were then applied to 305 specimens from different archaeological contexts. read more read less
View PDF
208 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S12520-009-0011-6
Metal provenancing using isotopes and the Oxford archaeological lead isotope database (OXALID)
Zofia A. Stos-Gale, N. H. Gale1

Abstract:

This paper reviews the research into the methodology of lead isotope provenance studies carried out at the University of Oxford between 1975 and 2002, at first in the Department of Geology (Geological Age and Isotope Research Laboratory), later in the Isotrace Laboratory based in the Department of Nuclear Physics, and eventua... This paper reviews the research into the methodology of lead isotope provenance studies carried out at the University of Oxford between 1975 and 2002, at first in the Department of Geology (Geological Age and Isotope Research Laboratory), later in the Isotrace Laboratory based in the Department of Nuclear Physics, and eventually part of the Research Laboratory of Archaeology and the History of Art. These 27 years of intensive work, funded initially by the Stiftung Volkswagenwerk, and later from numerous UK Government and Charitable funds and finally by the Institute of Aegean Prehistory laid the foundations of the lead isotope provenance methodology and resulted in a large database of analytical isotope and elemental results. In spite of the efforts of the authors, this database is still not comprehensively published or easily accessible in a digital format by all researchers interested in using this method for their projects. The possibilities of advancing this situation are discussed. The authors discuss in detail the basic restrictions and advantages of using the lead isotope compositions of ores in mineral deposits for finding the origin of the raw materials used for making ancient artefacts. Methods for the scientific interpretation of the data are discussed, including attempts to use statistical methods. The methodology of creating the Oxford lead isotope database (OXALID) is outlined and a summary is given of the lead isotope resource provided by OXALID. read more read less
View PDF
192 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences.

It automatically formats your research paper to Springer formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences format uses SPBASIC citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences citation style.

4. Can I use the Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences.

7. Where can I find the template for the Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template