Example of Biophysical Reviews format
SciSpace - Your AI assistant to discover and understand research papers | Product Hunt
Recent searches

Example of Biophysical Reviews format Example of Biophysical Reviews format Example of Biophysical Reviews format Example of Biophysical Reviews format Example of Biophysical Reviews format Example of Biophysical Reviews format Example of Biophysical Reviews format Example of Biophysical Reviews format Example of Biophysical Reviews format Example of Biophysical Reviews format Example of Biophysical Reviews format Example of Biophysical Reviews format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Biophysical Reviews format Example of Biophysical Reviews format Example of Biophysical Reviews format Example of Biophysical Reviews format Example of Biophysical Reviews format Example of Biophysical Reviews format Example of Biophysical Reviews format Example of Biophysical Reviews format Example of Biophysical Reviews format Example of Biophysical Reviews format Example of Biophysical Reviews format Example of Biophysical Reviews format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Biophysical Reviews — Template for authors

Publisher: Springer
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Biophysics #7 of 131 up up by 61 ranks
Structural Biology #5 of 48 up up by 30 ranks
Molecular Biology #55 of 382 up up by 233 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 363 Published Papers | 3474 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 18/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 8.5
SJR: 3.189
SNIP: 1.342
open access Open Access

IOP Publishing

Quality:  
Good
CiteRatio: 4.1
SJR: 1.137
SNIP: 0.625
open access Open Access

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.1
SJR: 1.908
SNIP: 1.897
open access Open Access

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.5
SJR: 0.998
SNIP: 0.777

Journal Performance & Insights

CiteRatio

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

9.6

39% from 2019

CiteRatio for Biophysical Reviews from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 9.6
2019 6.9
2018 3.6
2017 2.8
2016 3.0
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.766

2% from 2019

SJR for Biophysical Reviews from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.766
2019 1.811
2018 1.517
2017 0.822
2016 0.772
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.645

23% from 2019

SNIP for Biophysical Reviews from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.645
2019 1.335
2018 1.123
2017 0.559
2016 0.69
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 39% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 2% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 23% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.
Biophysical Reviews

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Springer

Biophysical Reviews

Biophysical Reviews publishes short and critical reviews from key figures in the field. Authors are encouraged to discuss with the Editor the possibility of contributing a review. Biophysical Reviews covers the entire field of biophysics, generally defined as the science of de...... Read More

Biophysics

Structural Biology

Molecular Biology

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

i
Last updated on
18 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
1867-2450
i
Impact Factor
Medium - 0.837
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
SPBASIC
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al, 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker CWJ (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 97(6):067,007, URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S12551-016-0218-6
Dynamic light scattering: a practical guide and applications in biomedical sciences.
Jörg Stetefeld1, Sean A. McKenna1, Trushar R. Patel2, Trushar R. Patel3
06 Oct 2016 - Biophysical Reviews

Abstract:

Dynamic light scattering (DLS), also known as photon correlation spectroscopy (PCS), is a very powerful tool for studying the diffusion behaviour of macromolecules in solution. The diffusion coefficient, and hence the hydrodynamic radii calculated from it, depends on the size and shape of macromolecules. In this review, we pr... Dynamic light scattering (DLS), also known as photon correlation spectroscopy (PCS), is a very powerful tool for studying the diffusion behaviour of macromolecules in solution. The diffusion coefficient, and hence the hydrodynamic radii calculated from it, depends on the size and shape of macromolecules. In this review, we provide evidence of the usefulness of DLS to study the homogeneity of proteins, nucleic acids, and complexes of protein–protein or protein–nucleic acid preparations, as well as to study protein–small molecule interactions. Further, we provide examples of DLS’s application both as a complementary method to analytical ultracentrifugation studies and as a screening tool to validate solution scattering models using determined hydrodynamic radii. read more read less

Topics:

Dynamic light scattering (59%)59% related to the paper, Biological small-angle scattering (56%)56% related to the paper, Light scattering (52%)52% related to the paper
View PDF
610 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S12551-016-0247-1
Software for molecular docking: a review
Nataraj Sekhar Pagadala1, Khajamohiddin Syed2, Jack A. Tuszynski3, Jack A. Tuszynski1
16 Jan 2017 - Biophysical Reviews

Abstract:

Molecular docking methodology explores the behavior of small molecules in the binding site of a target protein. As more protein structures are determined experimentally using X-ray crystallography or nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, molecular docking is increasingly used as a tool in drug discovery. Docking agai... Molecular docking methodology explores the behavior of small molecules in the binding site of a target protein. As more protein structures are determined experimentally using X-ray crystallography or nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, molecular docking is increasingly used as a tool in drug discovery. Docking against homology-modeled targets also becomes possible for proteins whose structures are not known. With the docking strategies, the druggability of the compounds and their specificity against a particular target can be calculated for further lead optimization processes. Molecular docking programs perform a search algorithm in which the conformation of the ligand is evaluated recursively until the convergence to the minimum energy is reached. Finally, an affinity scoring function, ΔG [U total in kcal/mol], is employed to rank the candidate poses as the sum of the electrostatic and van der Waals energies. The driving forces for these specific interactions in biological systems aim toward complementarities between the shape and electrostatics of the binding site surfaces and the ligand or substrate. read more read less

Topics:

Searching the conformational space for docking (74%)74% related to the paper, Protein–ligand docking (68%)68% related to the paper, Lead Finder (66%)66% related to the paper, Scoring functions for docking (64%)64% related to the paper, Docking (molecular) (63%)63% related to the paper
493 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S12551-018-0419-2
Ionic liquids: a brief history
Tom Welton1
26 Apr 2018 - Biophysical Reviews

Abstract:

There is no doubt that ionic liquids have become a major subject of study for modern chemistry. We have become used to ever more publications in the field each year, although there is some evidence that this is beginning to plateau at approximately 3500 papers each year. They have been the subject of several major reviews and... There is no doubt that ionic liquids have become a major subject of study for modern chemistry. We have become used to ever more publications in the field each year, although there is some evidence that this is beginning to plateau at approximately 3500 papers each year. They have been the subject of several major reviews and books, dealing with different applications and aspects of their behaviours. In this article, I will show a little of how interest in ionic liquids grew and developed. read more read less
View PDF
336 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S12551-009-0026-3
Using Situs for the integration of multi-resolution structures
Willy Wriggers1, Willy Wriggers2
08 Jan 2010 - Biophysical Reviews

Abstract:

Situs is a modular and widely used software package for the integration of biophysical data across the spatial resolution scales. It has been developed over the last decade with a focus on bridging the resolution gap between atomic structures, coarse-grained models, and volumetric data from low-resolution biophysical origins,... Situs is a modular and widely used software package for the integration of biophysical data across the spatial resolution scales. It has been developed over the last decade with a focus on bridging the resolution gap between atomic structures, coarse-grained models, and volumetric data from low-resolution biophysical origins, such as electron microscopy, tomography, or small-angle scattering. Structural models can be created and refined with various flexible and rigid body docking strategies. The software consists of multiple, stand-alone programs for the format conversion, analysis, visualization, manipulation, and assembly of 3D data sets. The programs have been ported to numerous platforms in both serial and shared memory parallel architectures and can be combined in various ways for specific modeling applications. The modular design facilitates the updating of individual programs and the development of novel application workflows. This review provides an overview of the Situs package as it exists today with an emphasis on functionality and workflows supported by version 2.5. read more read less

Topics:

Modular design (51%)51% related to the paper, Software (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
226 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S12551-013-0130-2
Receptor–ligand molecular docking
Isabella A. Guedes, Camila S. de Magalhães1, Laurent E. Dardenne
01 Mar 2014 - Biophysical Reviews

Abstract:

Docking methodology aims to predict the experimental binding modes and affinities of small molecules within the binding site of particular receptor targets and is currently used as a standard computational tool in drug design for lead compound optimisation and in virtual screening studies to find novel biologically active mol... Docking methodology aims to predict the experimental binding modes and affinities of small molecules within the binding site of particular receptor targets and is currently used as a standard computational tool in drug design for lead compound optimisation and in virtual screening studies to find novel biologically active molecules. The basic tools of a docking methodology include a search algorithm and an energy scoring function for generating and evaluating ligand poses. In this review, we present the search algorithms and scoring functions most commonly used in current molecular docking methods that focus on protein–ligand applications. We summarise the main topics and recent computational and methodological advances in protein–ligand docking. Protein flexibility, multiple ligand binding modes and the free-energy landscape profile for binding affinity prediction are important and interconnected challenges to be overcome by further methodological developments in the docking field. read more read less

Topics:

Protein–ligand docking (77%)77% related to the paper, Lead Finder (66%)66% related to the paper, Scoring functions for docking (65%)65% related to the paper, Docking (molecular) (61%)61% related to the paper, Virtual screening (60%)60% related to the paper
197 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Biophysical Reviews.

It automatically formats your research paper to Springer formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Biophysical Reviews format uses SPBASIC citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Biophysical Reviews in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Biophysical Reviews guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Biophysical Reviews guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Biophysical Reviews guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Biophysical Reviews?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Biophysical Reviews citation style.

4. Can I use the Biophysical Reviews templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Biophysical Reviews.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Biophysical Reviews that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Biophysical Reviews that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Biophysical Reviews?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Biophysical Reviews.

7. Where can I find the template for the Biophysical Reviews?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Biophysical Reviews's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Biophysical Reviews's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Biophysical Reviews an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Biophysical Reviews is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Biophysical Reviews?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Biophysical Reviews?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Biophysical Reviews?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Biophysical Reviews, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Biophysical Reviews's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Biophysical Reviews?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Biophysical Reviews. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Biophysical Reviews?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Biophysical Reviews are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Biophysical Reviews?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Biophysical Reviews's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Biophysical Reviews in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Biophysical Reviews Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Biophysical Reviews formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template