Example of Current Microbiology format
Recent searches

Example of Current Microbiology format Example of Current Microbiology format Example of Current Microbiology format Example of Current Microbiology format Example of Current Microbiology format Example of Current Microbiology format Example of Current Microbiology format Example of Current Microbiology format Example of Current Microbiology format Example of Current Microbiology format Example of Current Microbiology format Example of Current Microbiology format Example of Current Microbiology format Example of Current Microbiology format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Current Microbiology format Example of Current Microbiology format Example of Current Microbiology format Example of Current Microbiology format Example of Current Microbiology format Example of Current Microbiology format Example of Current Microbiology format Example of Current Microbiology format Example of Current Microbiology format Example of Current Microbiology format Example of Current Microbiology format Example of Current Microbiology format Example of Current Microbiology format Example of Current Microbiology format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Current Microbiology — Template for authors

Publisher: Springer
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology #66 of 113 down down by 12 ranks
Microbiology #107 of 150 down down by 13 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
Medium
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 1045 Published Papers | 2851 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 01/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 13.6
SJR: 2.192
SNIP: 2.516
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Oxford University Press

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.3
SJR: 1.377
SNIP: 1.049
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Nature

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 28.2
SJR: 7.305
SNIP: 3.41
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.0
SJR: 0.744
SNIP: 1.25

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

1.746

9% from 2018

Impact factor for Current Microbiology from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 1.746
2018 1.595
2017 1.373
2016 1.322
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

2.7

13% from 2019

CiteRatio for Current Microbiology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.7
2019 3.1
2018 2.6
2017 2.7
2016 2.8
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 9% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has decreased by 13% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.578

1% from 2019

SJR for Current Microbiology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.578
2019 0.585
2018 0.54
2017 0.562
2016 0.627
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.771

11% from 2019

SNIP for Current Microbiology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.771
2019 0.696
2018 0.636
2017 0.599
2016 0.656
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 1% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 11% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Current Microbiology

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Springer

Current Microbiology

Current Microbiology offers a means of rapid publication of timely new information dealing with all aspects of microbial cells including prokaryotes and eukaryotes and, where appropriate, viruses. The topics included are general, medical, and applied microbiology and virology ...... Read More

Medicine

i
Last updated on
30 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
0343-8651
i
Impact Factor
Medium - 0.823
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
SPBASIC
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al, 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker CWJ (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 97(6):067,007, URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/BF02602439
An adhesive factor found in strains of Escherichia coli belonging to the traditional infantile enteropathogenic serotypes
01 Mar 1979 - Current Microbiology

Abstract:

Escherichia coli strains isolated from outbreaks of diarrheal disease were tested for the presence of adhesive factors. Fifty-one of these strains belonged to traditional infantile entero-pathogenic serotypes (EPEC) and 17 belonged to other serotypes. None of these strains were enterotoxigenic and none possessed colonization ... Escherichia coli strains isolated from outbreaks of diarrheal disease were tested for the presence of adhesive factors. Fifty-one of these strains belonged to traditional infantile entero-pathogenic serotypes (EPEC) and 17 belonged to other serotypes. None of these strains were enterotoxigenic and none possessed colonization factors CFA/I or CFA/II, which have been described among strains of enterotoxigenicE. coli (ETEC). EnterotoxigenicE. coli strains from patients with diarrhea and strains which were neither EPEC nor ETEC from subjects without diarrhea were also examined. By means of a tissue culture technique using HEp-2 cells, a new adhesive factor was found to occur with greater frequency in EPEC strains. The adhesive factor was found less frequently in the other groups ofE. coli studied. It was distinct from type 1 pili and was not inhibited by the presence ofD-mannose. read more read less

Topics:

Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (55%)55% related to the paper, Escherichia coli (53%)53% related to the paper, Diffusely Adherent Escherichia coli (51%)51% related to the paper
623 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S00284-008-9276-8
A rapid and easy method for the detection of microbial cellulases on agar plates using gram's iodine
Ramesh Chand Kasana1, Richa Salwan1, Hena Dhar1, Som Dutt1, Arvind Gulati1
23 Sep 2008 - Current Microbiology

Abstract:

Screening for cellulase-producing microorganisms is routinely done on carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) plates. The culture plates are flooded either with 1% hexadecyltrimethyl ammonium bromide or with 0.1% Congo red followed by 1 M NaCl. In both cases, it takes a minimum of 30 to 40 minutes to obtain the zone of hydrolysis after ... Screening for cellulase-producing microorganisms is routinely done on carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) plates. The culture plates are flooded either with 1% hexadecyltrimethyl ammonium bromide or with 0.1% Congo red followed by 1 M NaCl. In both cases, it takes a minimum of 30 to 40 minutes to obtain the zone of hydrolysis after flooding, and the hydrolyzed area is not sharply discernible. An improved method is reported herein for the detection of extracellular cellulase production by microorganisms by way of plate assay. In this method, CMC plates were flooded with Gram’s iodine instead of the reagents just mentioned. Gram’s iodine formed a bluish-black complex with cellulose but not with hydrolyzed cellulose, giving a sharp and distinct zone around the cellulase-producing microbial colonies within 3 to 5 minutes. The new method is rapid and efficient; therefore, it can be easily performed for screening large numbers of microbial cultures of both bacteria and fungi. This is the first report on the use of Gram’s iodine for the detection of cellulase production by microorganisms using plate assay. read more read less

Topics:

Cellulase (54%)54% related to the paper, Agar plate (51%)51% related to the paper
576 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/BF02602840
Pseudomonas siderophores: A mechanism explaining disease-suppressive soils
Joseph W. Kloepper1, John Leong2, Martin Teintze2, Milton N. Schroth1
01 Sep 1980 - Current Microbiology

Abstract:

The addition of either fluorescentPseudomonas strain B10, isolated from a take-all suppressive soil, or its siderophore, pseudobactin, to bothFusarium-wilt and take-all conducive soils inoculated withFusarium oxysporum f. sp.lini orGaeumannomyces graminis var.tritici, respectively, rendered them disease suppressive. Our findi... The addition of either fluorescentPseudomonas strain B10, isolated from a take-all suppressive soil, or its siderophore, pseudobactin, to bothFusarium-wilt and take-all conducive soils inoculated withFusarium oxysporum f. sp.lini orGaeumannomyces graminis var.tritici, respectively, rendered them disease suppressive. Our findings suggest that disease suppressiveness is caused in part by microbial siderophores which efficiently complex iron(III) in soils, making it unavailable to pathogens, thus inhibiting their growth. Amendment of exogenous iron(III) to disease-suppressive soils converted them to conductive soils presumably by repressing siderophore production. read more read less

Topics:

Siderophore (56%)56% related to the paper
554 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S00284-005-0020-3
Isolation of commensal bacteria from umbilical cord blood of healthy neonates born by cesarean section.
20 Sep 2005 - Current Microbiology

Abstract:

In a previous study, lactic acid bacteria were isolated from meconium obtained from healthy neonates born by cesarean section. Such a finding suggested that term fetuses are not completely sterile, and that a mother-to-child efflux of commensal bacteria may exist. Therefore, presence of such bacteria in umbilical cord blood o... In a previous study, lactic acid bacteria were isolated from meconium obtained from healthy neonates born by cesarean section. Such a finding suggested that term fetuses are not completely sterile, and that a mother-to-child efflux of commensal bacteria may exist. Therefore, presence of such bacteria in umbilical cord blood of healthy neonates born by elective cesarean section was investigated. The blood samples were submitted to an enrichment step and then inoculated onto agar plates. All the identified isolates belonged to the genus Enterococcus, Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, or Propionibacterium. Later, a group of pregnant mice were orally inoculated with a genetically labeled E. faecium strain previously isolated from breast milk of a healthy woman. The labeled strain could be isolated and polymerase chain reaction detected from the amniotic fluid of the inoculated animals. In contrast, it could not be detected in the samples obtained from a noninoculated control group. read more read less

Topics:

Umbilical cord (51%)51% related to the paper, Streptococcus (50%)50% related to the paper
488 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S002840010259
An efficient method for qualitative screening of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria.
Sangeeta Mehta1, Chandra Shekhar Nautiyal1
01 Jan 2001 - Current Microbiology

Abstract:

An efficient protocol was developed for qualitative screening of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria, based upon visual observation. Our results indicate that, by using our formulation containing bromophenol blue, it is possible to quickly screen on a qualitative basis the phosphate-solubilizing bacteria. Qualitative analysis of ... An efficient protocol was developed for qualitative screening of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria, based upon visual observation. Our results indicate that, by using our formulation containing bromophenol blue, it is possible to quickly screen on a qualitative basis the phosphate-solubilizing bacteria. Qualitative analysis of the phosphate solubilized by various groups correlated well with grouping based upon quantitative analysis of bacteria isolated from soil, effect of carbon, nitrogen, salts, and phosphate solubilization-defective transposon mutants. However, unlike quantitative analysis methods that involve time-consuming biochemical procedures, the time for screening phosphate-solubilizing bacteria is significantly reduced by using our simple protocol. Therefore, it is envisaged that usage of this formulation based upon qualitative analysis will be salutary for the quick screening of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria. Our results indicate that the formulation can also be used as a quality control test for expeditiously screening the commercial bioinoculant preparations, based on phosphate solubilizers. read more read less

Topics:

Phosphate solubilizing bacteria (52%)52% related to the paper
467 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Current Microbiology.

It automatically formats your research paper to Springer formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Current Microbiology format uses SPBASIC citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Current Microbiology in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Current Microbiology guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Current Microbiology guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Current Microbiology guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Current Microbiology?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Current Microbiology citation style.

4. Can I use the Current Microbiology templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Current Microbiology.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Current Microbiology that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Current Microbiology that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Current Microbiology?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Current Microbiology.

7. Where can I find the template for the Current Microbiology?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Current Microbiology's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Current Microbiology's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Current Microbiology an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Current Microbiology is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Current Microbiology?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Current Microbiology?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Current Microbiology?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Current Microbiology, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Current Microbiology's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Current Microbiology?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Current Microbiology. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Current Microbiology?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Current Microbiology are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Current Microbiology?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Current Microbiology's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Current Microbiology in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Current Microbiology Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Current Microbiology formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template