Example of Current Radiology Reports format
Recent searches

Example of Current Radiology Reports format Example of Current Radiology Reports format Example of Current Radiology Reports format Example of Current Radiology Reports format Example of Current Radiology Reports format Example of Current Radiology Reports format Example of Current Radiology Reports format Example of Current Radiology Reports format Example of Current Radiology Reports format Example of Current Radiology Reports format Example of Current Radiology Reports format Example of Current Radiology Reports format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Current Radiology Reports format Example of Current Radiology Reports format Example of Current Radiology Reports format Example of Current Radiology Reports format Example of Current Radiology Reports format Example of Current Radiology Reports format Example of Current Radiology Reports format Example of Current Radiology Reports format Example of Current Radiology Reports format Example of Current Radiology Reports format Example of Current Radiology Reports format Example of Current Radiology Reports format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Current Radiology Reports — Template for authors

Publisher: Springer
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging #208 of 288 down down by 54 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
Medium
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 170 Published Papers | 225 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 28/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.5
SJR: 1.72
SNIP: 1.405
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Hindawi

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 7.9
SJR: 0.626
SNIP: 3.203
open access Open Access

SPIE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.7
SJR: 0.779
SNIP: 1.165
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 9.3
SJR: 2.628
SNIP: 2.366

Journal Performance & Insights

CiteRatio

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

1.3

30% from 2019

CiteRatio for Current Radiology Reports from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.3
2019 1.0
2018 0.7
2017 2.1
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.291

30% from 2019

SJR for Current Radiology Reports from 2018 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.291
2019 0.224
2018 0.281
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.461

58% from 2019

SNIP for Current Radiology Reports from 2017 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.461
2019 0.292
2018 0.25
2017 0.195
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 30% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 30% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 58% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Current Radiology Reports

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Springer

Current Radiology Reports

Approved by publishing and review experts on SciSpace, this template is built as per for Current Radiology Reports formatting guidelines as mentioned in Springer author instructions. The current version was created on and has been used by 934 authors to write and format their manuscripts to this journal.

i
Last updated on
28 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
1606-8610
i
Open Access
Hybrid
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
White faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al, 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker CWJ (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 97(6):067,007, URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S40134-013-0010-3
Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (CEST) Imaging: Description of Technique and Potential Clinical Applications
Feliks Kogan1, Hari Hariharan1, Ravinder Reddy1

Abstract:

Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) is a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast enhancement technique that enables indirect detection of metabolites with exchangeable protons. Endogenous metabolites with exchangeable protons including many endogenous proteins with amide protons, glycosaminoglycans (GAG), glycogen,... Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) is a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast enhancement technique that enables indirect detection of metabolites with exchangeable protons. Endogenous metabolites with exchangeable protons including many endogenous proteins with amide protons, glycosaminoglycans (GAG), glycogen, myo-inositol (MI), glutamate (Glu), creatine (Cr) and several others have been identified as potential in vivo endogenous CEST agents. These endogenous CEST agents can be exploited as non-invasive and non-ionizing biomarkers of disease diagnosis and treatment monitoring. This review focuses on the recent technical developments in endogenous in vivo CEST MRI from various metabolites as well as their potential clinical applications. The basic underlying principles of CEST, its potential limitations and new techniques to mitigate them are discussed. read more read less
View PDF
115 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S40134-012-0003-7
Recent Advances in CT Image Reconstruction
Jiang Hsieh1, Brian E. Nett1, Zhou Yu1, Ken D. Sauer2, Jean-Baptiste Thibault1, Charles A. Bouman3

Abstract:

Over the past two decades, rapid system and hardware development of x-ray computed tomography (CT) technologies has been accompanied by equally exciting advances in image reconstruction algorithms. The algorithmic development can generally be classified into three major areas: analytical reconstruction, model-based iterative ... Over the past two decades, rapid system and hardware development of x-ray computed tomography (CT) technologies has been accompanied by equally exciting advances in image reconstruction algorithms. The algorithmic development can generally be classified into three major areas: analytical reconstruction, model-based iterative reconstruction, and application-specific reconstruction. Given the limited scope of this chapter, it is nearly impossible to cover every important development in this field; it is equally difficult to provide sufficient breadth and depth on each selected topic. As a compromise, we have decided, for a selected few topics, to provide sufficient high-level technical descriptions and to discuss their advantages and applications. read more read less

Topics:

Iterative reconstruction (57%)57% related to the paper
View PDF
110 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S40134-012-0006-4
State of the Art of CT Detectors and Sources: A Literature Review

Abstract:

The three CT components with the greatest impact on image quality are the X-ray source, detection system and reconstruction algorithms. In this paper, we focus on the first two. We describe the state-of-the-art of CT detection systems, their calibrations, software corrections and common performance metrics. The components of ... The three CT components with the greatest impact on image quality are the X-ray source, detection system and reconstruction algorithms. In this paper, we focus on the first two. We describe the state-of-the-art of CT detection systems, their calibrations, software corrections and common performance metrics. The components of CT detection systems, such as scintillator materials, photodiodes, data acquisition electronics and anti-scatter grids, are discussed. Their impact on CT image quality, their most important characteristics, as well as emerging future technology trends for each, are reviewed. The use of detection for multi-energy CT imaging is described. An overview of current CT X-ray sources, their evolution to support major trends in CT imaging and future trends is provided. read more read less
View PDF
63 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S40134-015-0097-9
Dual-Energy CT: What the Neuroradiologist Should Know
Alida A. Postma1, Marco Das1, Annika A. R. Stadler1, Joachim E. Wildberger1

Abstract:

Because of the different attenuations of tissues at different energy levels, dual-energy CT offers tissue differentiation and characterization, reduction of artifacts, and remodeling of contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), hereby creating new opportunities and insights in CT imaging. The applications... Because of the different attenuations of tissues at different energy levels, dual-energy CT offers tissue differentiation and characterization, reduction of artifacts, and remodeling of contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), hereby creating new opportunities and insights in CT imaging. The applications for dual-energy imaging in neuroradiology are various and still expanding. Automated bone removal is used in CT angiography and CT venography of the intracranial vessels. Monoenergetic reconstructions can be used in patients with or without metal implants in the brain and spine to reduce artifacts, improve CNR and SNR, or to improve iodine conspicuity. Differentiation of iodine and hemorrhage is used in high-density lesions, after intra-arterial recanalization in stroke patients or after administration of contrast media. Detection of underlying (vascular and non-vascular) pathology and spot sign can be used in patients presenting with (acute) intracranial hemorrhage. read more read less

Topics:

Neuroradiology (57%)57% related to the paper, Angiography (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
60 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S40134-013-0016-X
PET/CT in Oncology: Current Status and Perspectives
Johannes Czernin1, Martin Allen-Auerbach1, David Nathanson1, Ken Herrmann1

Abstract:

The discovery of the Warburg effect in the early twentieth century followed by the development of the fluorinated glucose analogue 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) and the invention of positron emission tomographs laid the foundation of clinical PET/CT. This review discusses the challenges and obstacles in clinical adoption o... The discovery of the Warburg effect in the early twentieth century followed by the development of the fluorinated glucose analogue 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) and the invention of positron emission tomographs laid the foundation of clinical PET/CT. This review discusses the challenges and obstacles in clinical adoption of this technique. We then discuss advances in instrumentation, including the critically important introduction of PET/CT and current PET/CT protocols. Moreover, we provide evidence for the clinical utility of PET/CT for patient management and its potential impact on patient outcome, and address its cost and cost-effectiveness. Although this review largely focuses on 18F-FDG imaging, we also discuss a variety of additional molecular imaging approaches that can be used for cancer phenotyping with PET. Throughout this review we emphasize the critical contributions of CT to the strength of PET/CT. read more read less

Topics:

PET-CT (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
52 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Current Radiology Reports.

It automatically formats your research paper to Springer formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Current Radiology Reports in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Current Radiology Reports guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Current Radiology Reports guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Current Radiology Reports guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Current Radiology Reports?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Current Radiology Reports citation style.

4. Can I use the Current Radiology Reports templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Current Radiology Reports.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Current Radiology Reports that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Current Radiology Reports that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Current Radiology Reports?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Current Radiology Reports.

7. Where can I find the template for the Current Radiology Reports?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Current Radiology Reports's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Current Radiology Reports's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Current Radiology Reports an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Current Radiology Reports is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Current Radiology Reports?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Current Radiology Reports?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Current Radiology Reports?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Current Radiology Reports, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Current Radiology Reports's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Current Radiology Reports?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Current Radiology Reports. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Current Radiology Reports?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Current Radiology Reports are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Current Radiology Reports?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Current Radiology Reports's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Current Radiology Reports in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Current Radiology Reports Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Current Radiology Reports formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template