Example of Estuaries and Coasts format
Recent searches

Example of Estuaries and Coasts format Example of Estuaries and Coasts format Example of Estuaries and Coasts format Example of Estuaries and Coasts format Example of Estuaries and Coasts format Example of Estuaries and Coasts format Example of Estuaries and Coasts format Example of Estuaries and Coasts format Example of Estuaries and Coasts format Example of Estuaries and Coasts format Example of Estuaries and Coasts format Example of Estuaries and Coasts format Example of Estuaries and Coasts format Example of Estuaries and Coasts format Example of Estuaries and Coasts format Example of Estuaries and Coasts format Example of Estuaries and Coasts format Example of Estuaries and Coasts format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Estuaries and Coasts format Example of Estuaries and Coasts format Example of Estuaries and Coasts format Example of Estuaries and Coasts format Example of Estuaries and Coasts format Example of Estuaries and Coasts format Example of Estuaries and Coasts format Example of Estuaries and Coasts format Example of Estuaries and Coasts format Example of Estuaries and Coasts format Example of Estuaries and Coasts format Example of Estuaries and Coasts format Example of Estuaries and Coasts format Example of Estuaries and Coasts format Example of Estuaries and Coasts format Example of Estuaries and Coasts format Example of Estuaries and Coasts format Example of Estuaries and Coasts format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Estuaries and Coasts — Template for authors

Publisher: Springer
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Aquatic Science #38 of 224 down down by 13 ranks
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics #110 of 647 down down by 14 ranks
Ecology #70 of 400 down down by 17 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 595 Published Papers | 2716 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 13/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Oxford University Press

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.9
SJR: 0.87
SNIP: 0.911
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.0
SJR: 0.881
SNIP: 0.986
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Wiley

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.4
SJR: 0.982
SNIP: 1.057
open access Open Access

Wiley

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.9
SJR: 0.667
SNIP: 0.937

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

2.319

14% from 2018

Impact factor for Estuaries and Coasts from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 2.319
2018 2.686
2017 2.421
2016 2.182
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

4.6

5% from 2019

CiteRatio for Estuaries and Coasts from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 4.6
2019 4.4
2018 4.2
2017 4.7
2016 4.2
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has decreased by 14% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 5% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.944

3% from 2019

SJR for Estuaries and Coasts from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.944
2019 0.969
2018 1.056
2017 1.187
2016 1.076
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.144

9% from 2019

SNIP for Estuaries and Coasts from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.144
2019 1.048
2018 1.15
2017 1.2
2016 1.057
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 3% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 9% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Estuaries and Coasts

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Springer

Estuaries and Coasts

Approved by publishing and review experts on SciSpace, this template is built as per for Estuaries and Coasts formatting guidelines as mentioned in Springer author instructions. The current version was created on and has been used by 927 authors to write and format their manuscripts to this journal.

i
Last updated on
13 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
1559-2723
i
Open Access
Hybrid
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al, 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker CWJ (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 97(6):067,007, URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S12237-013-9594-3
Is Ocean Acidification an Open-Ocean Syndrome? Understanding Anthropogenic Impacts on Seawater pH
01 Mar 2013 - Estuaries and Coasts

Abstract:

Ocean acidification due to anthropogenic CO2 emissions is a dominant driver of long-term changes in pH in the open ocean, raising concern for the future of calcifying organisms, many of which are present in coastal habitats. However, changes in pH in coastal ecosystems result from a multitude of drivers, including impacts fro... Ocean acidification due to anthropogenic CO2 emissions is a dominant driver of long-term changes in pH in the open ocean, raising concern for the future of calcifying organisms, many of which are present in coastal habitats. However, changes in pH in coastal ecosystems result from a multitude of drivers, including impacts from watershed pro- cesses, nutrient inputs, and changes in ecosystem structure and metabolism. Interaction between ocean acidification due to anthropogenic CO2 emissions and the dynamic regional to local drivers of coastal ecosystems have resulted in complex regulation of pH in coastal waters. Changes in the watershed can, for example, lead to changes in alkalinity and CO2 fluxes that, together with metabolic processes and oceanic dynamics, yield high-magnitude decadal changes of up to 0.5 units in coastal pH. Metabolism results in strong diel to seasonal fluctuations in pH, with characteristic ranges of 0.3 pH units, with metabolically intense habitats exceeding this range on a daily basis. The intense variability and multiple, complex controls on pH implies that the concept of ocean acidification due to anthropogenic CO2 emissions cannot be transposed to coastal ecosystems directly. Furthermore, in coastal ecosys- tems, the detection of trends towards acidification is not trivial and the attribution of these changes to anthropogenic CO2 emissions is even more problematic. Coastal ecosystems may show acidification or basification, depending on the balance betweenthe invasionof coastal waters byanthropogenic CO2, watershed export of alkalinity, organic matter and CO2 ,a nd changes in the balance between primary production, respira- tion and calcification rates in response to changes in nutrient inputs and losses of ecosystem components. Hence, we contend that ocean acidification from anthropogenic CO2 is largely an open-ocean syndrome and that a concept of anthro- pogenic impacts on marine pH, which is applicable across the entire ocean, from coastal to open-ocean environments, provides a superior framework to consider the multiple components of the anthropogenic perturbation of marine pH trajectories. The concept of anthropogenic impacts on seawater pH acknowledges that a regional focus is neces- sary to predict future trajectories in the pH of coastal waters and points at opportunities to manage these trajec- tories locally to conserve coastal organisms vulnerable to ocean acidification. read more read less

Topics:

Ocean acidification (60%)60% related to the paper
View PDF
575 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S12237-008-9111-2
Return to Neverland: Shifting baselines affect eutrophication restoration targets
Carlos M. Duarte1, Daniel J. Conley2, Jacob Carstensen3, María Sánchez-Camacho1
01 Jan 2009 - Estuaries and Coasts

Abstract:

The implicit assumption of many scientific and regulatory frameworks that ecosystems impacted by human pressures may be reverted to their original condition by suppressing the pressure was tested using coastal eutrophication. The response to nutrient abatement of four thoroughly studied coastal ecosystems that received increa... The implicit assumption of many scientific and regulatory frameworks that ecosystems impacted by human pressures may be reverted to their original condition by suppressing the pressure was tested using coastal eutrophication. The response to nutrient abatement of four thoroughly studied coastal ecosystems that received increased nutrient inputs between the 1970s and the 1980s showed that the trajectories of these ecosystems were not directly reversible. All four ecosystems displayed convoluted trajectories that failed to return to the reference status upon nutrient reduction. This failure is proposed to result from the broad changes in environmental conditions, all affecting ecosystem dynamics, that occurred over the 30 years spanning from the onset of eutrophication to the reduction of nutrient levels. Understanding ecosystem response to multiple shifting baselines is essential to set reliable targets for restoration efforts. read more read less

Topics:

Restoration ecology (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
544 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S12237-011-9386-6
Seasonal and Annual Fluxes of Nutrients and Organic Matter from Large Rivers to the Arctic Ocean and Surrounding Seas
01 Mar 2012 - Estuaries and Coasts

Abstract:

River inputs of nutrients and organic matter impact the biogeochemistry of arctic estuaries and the Arctic Ocean as a whole, yet there is considerable uncertainty about the magnitude of fluvial fluxes at the pan-Arctic scale. Samples from the six largest arctic rivers, with a combined watershed area of 11.3 × 106 km2, have re... River inputs of nutrients and organic matter impact the biogeochemistry of arctic estuaries and the Arctic Ocean as a whole, yet there is considerable uncertainty about the magnitude of fluvial fluxes at the pan-Arctic scale. Samples from the six largest arctic rivers, with a combined watershed area of 11.3 × 106 km2, have revealed strong seasonal variations in constituent concentrations and fluxes within rivers as well as large differences among the rivers. Specifically, we investigate fluxes of dissolved organic carbon, dissolved organic nitrogen, total dissolved phosphorus, dissolved inorganic nitrogen, nitrate, and silica. This is the first time that seasonal and annual constituent fluxes have been determined using consistent sampling and analytical methods at the pan-Arctic scale and consequently provide the best available estimates for constituent flux from land to the Arctic Ocean and surrounding seas. Given the large inputs of river water to the relatively small Arctic Ocean and the dramatic impacts that climate change is having in the Arctic, it is particularly urgent that we establish the contemporary river fluxes so that we will be able to detect future changes and evaluate the impact of the changes on the biogeochemistry of the receiving coastal and ocean systems. read more read less

Topics:

Arctic (65%)65% related to the paper, Arctic geoengineering (62%)62% related to the paper, Biogeochemistry (55%)55% related to the paper, Dissolved organic carbon (54%)54% related to the paper, Permafrost (54%)54% related to the paper
View PDF
543 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S12237-008-9038-7
The Charisma of Coastal Ecosystems: Addressing the Imbalance
Carlos M. Duarte1, William C. Dennison2, Robert J. Orth3, Tim J. B. Carruthers2
18 Mar 2008 - Estuaries and Coasts

Abstract:

Coastal ecosystems including coral reefs, mangrove forests, seagrass meadows, and salt marshes are being lost at alarming rates, and increased scientific understanding of causes has failed to stem these losses. Coastal habitats receive contrasting research effort, with 60% of all of the published research carried out on coral... Coastal ecosystems including coral reefs, mangrove forests, seagrass meadows, and salt marshes are being lost at alarming rates, and increased scientific understanding of causes has failed to stem these losses. Coastal habitats receive contrasting research effort, with 60% of all of the published research carried out on coral reefs, compared to 11–14% of the records for each of salt marshes, mangrove forests, and seagrass meadows. In addition, these highly connected and interdependent coastal ecosystems receive widely contrasting media attention that is disproportional to their scientific attention. Seagrass ecosystems receive the least attention in the media (1.3% of the media reports) with greater attention on salt marshes (6.5%), considerably more attention on mangroves (20%), and a dominant focus on coral reefs, which are the subject of three in every four media reports on coastal ecosystems (72.5%). There are approximately tenfold lower reports on seagrass meadows in the media for every scientific paper published (ten), than the 130–150 media reports per scientific paper for mangroves and coral reefs. The lack of public awareness of losses of less charismatic ecosystems results in the continuation of detrimental practices and therefore contributes to continued declines of coastal ecosystems. More effective communication of scientific knowledge about these uncharismatic but ecologically important coastal habitats is required. Effective use of formal (e.g., school curricula, media) and informal (e.g., web) education avenues and an effective partnership between scientists and media communicators are essential to raise public awareness of issues, concerns, and solutions within coastal ecosystems. Only increased public understanding can ultimately inform and motivate effective management of these ecologically important coastal ecosystems. read more read less

Topics:

Marine ecosystem (64%)64% related to the paper, Coral reef (52%)52% related to the paper, Salt marsh (51%)51% related to the paper, Seagrass (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
426 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/BF02841332
Hypoxia in the northern Gulf of Mexico: Does the science support the Plan to Reduce, Mitigate, and Control Hypoxia?
Nancy N. Rabalais, R.E. Turner1, B.K. Sen Gupta1, Donald F. Boesch2, Piers Chapman3, Michael C. Murrell4
01 Oct 2007 - Estuaries and Coasts

Abstract:

We update and reevaluate the scientific information on the distribution, history, and causes of continental shelf hypoxia that supports the 2001 Action Plan for Reducing, Mitigating, and Controlling Hypoxia in the Northern Gulf of Mexico (Mississippi River/Gulf of Mexico Watershed Nutrient Task Force 2001), incorporating data... We update and reevaluate the scientific information on the distribution, history, and causes of continental shelf hypoxia that supports the 2001 Action Plan for Reducing, Mitigating, and Controlling Hypoxia in the Northern Gulf of Mexico (Mississippi River/Gulf of Mexico Watershed Nutrient Task Force 2001), incorporating data, publications, and research results produced since the 1999 integrated assessment. The metric of mid-summer hypoxic area on the LouisianaTexas shelf is an adequate and suitable measure for continued efforts to reduce nutrients loads from the Mississippi River and hypoxia in the northern Gulf of Mexico as outlined in the Action Plan. More frequent measurements of simple metrics (e.g., area and volume) from late spring through late summer would ensure that the metric is representative of the system in any given year and useful in a public discourse of conditions and causes. The long-term data on hypoxia, sources of nutrients, associated biological parameters, and paleoindicators continue to verify and strengthen the relationship between the nitratenitrogen load of the Mississippi River, the extent of hypoxia, and changes in the coastal ecosystem (eutrophication and worsening hypoxia). Multiple lines of evidence, some of them representing independent data sources, are consistent with the big picture pattern of increased eutrophication as a result of long-term nutrient increases that result in excess carbon production and accumulation and, ultimately, bottom water hypoxia. The additional findings arising since 1999 strengthen the science supporting the Action Plan that focuses on reducing nutrient loads, primarily nitrogen, through multiple actions to reduce the size of the hypoxic zone in the northern Gulf of Mexico. read more read less

Topics:

Hypoxia (environmental) (57%)57% related to the paper, Eutrophication (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
410 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Estuaries and Coasts.

It automatically formats your research paper to Springer formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Estuaries and Coasts in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Estuaries and Coasts guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Estuaries and Coasts guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Estuaries and Coasts guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Estuaries and Coasts?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Estuaries and Coasts citation style.

4. Can I use the Estuaries and Coasts templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Estuaries and Coasts.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Estuaries and Coasts that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Estuaries and Coasts that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Estuaries and Coasts?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Estuaries and Coasts.

7. Where can I find the template for the Estuaries and Coasts?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Estuaries and Coasts's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Estuaries and Coasts's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Estuaries and Coasts an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Estuaries and Coasts is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Estuaries and Coasts?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Estuaries and Coasts?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Estuaries and Coasts?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Estuaries and Coasts, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Estuaries and Coasts's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Estuaries and Coasts?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Estuaries and Coasts. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Estuaries and Coasts?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Estuaries and Coasts are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Estuaries and Coasts?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Estuaries and Coasts's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Estuaries and Coasts in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Estuaries and Coasts Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Estuaries and Coasts formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template