Example of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering format
Recent searches

Example of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering format Example of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering format Example of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering format Example of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering format Example of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering format Example of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering format Example of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering format Example of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering format Example of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering format Example of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering format Example of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering format Example of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering format Example of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering format Example of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering format Example of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering format Example of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering format Example of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering format Example of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering format Example of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering format Example of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering format Example of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering format Example of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering format Example of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering format Example of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering format Example of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering format Example of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering format Example of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering format Example of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering format Example of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering format Example of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering format Example of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering format Example of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering format Example of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering format Example of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering format Example of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Geotechnical and Geological Engineering — Template for authors

Publisher: Springer
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Architecture #23 of 138 down down by 2 ranks
Geology #108 of 251 -
Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology #92 of 195 down down by 23 ranks
Soil Science #67 of 135 down down by 6 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 1348 Published Papers | 3086 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 03/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.5
SJR: 0.945
SNIP: 1.421
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.5
SJR: 0.641
SNIP: 1.11
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 9.0
SJR: 2.14
SNIP: 2.468
open access Open Access

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.7
SJR: 1.444
SNIP: 2.049

Journal Performance & Insights

CiteRatio

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

2.3

15% from 2019

CiteRatio for Geotechnical and Geological Engineering from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.3
2019 2.0
2018 2.0
2017 1.8
2016 1.7
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.512

5% from 2019

SJR for Geotechnical and Geological Engineering from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.512
2019 0.541
2018 0.631
2017 0.611
2016 0.653
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.973

9% from 2019

SNIP for Geotechnical and Geological Engineering from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.973
2019 1.065
2018 1.089
2017 1.007
2016 1.052
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 15% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 5% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 9% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Geotechnical and Geological Engineering

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Springer

Geotechnical and Geological Engineering

Geotechnical and Geological Engineering publishes papers in the areas of soil and rock engineering and also of geology as applied in the civil engineering, mining and petroleum industries. The emphasis is on the engineering aspects of soil and rock mechanics, geology and hydro...... Read More

Engineering

i
Last updated on
03 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
0960-3182
i
Acceptance Rate
Not provided
i
Frequency
Not provided
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
SPBASIC
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al, 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker CWJ (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 97(6):067,007, URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S10706-011-9491-0
The geomechanics of CO2 storage in deep sedimentary formations
Jonny Rutqvist1

Abstract:

This paper provides a review of the geomechanics and modeling of geomechanics associated with geologic carbon storage (GCS), focusing on storage in deep sedimentary formations, in particular saline aquifers. The paper first introduces the concept of storage in deep sedimentary formations, the geomechanical processes and issue... This paper provides a review of the geomechanics and modeling of geomechanics associated with geologic carbon storage (GCS), focusing on storage in deep sedimentary formations, in particular saline aquifers. The paper first introduces the concept of storage in deep sedimentary formations, the geomechanical processes and issues related with such an operation, and the relevant geomechanical modeling tools. This is followed by a more detailed review of geomechanical aspects, including reservoir stress-strain and microseismicity, well integrity, caprock sealing performance, and the potential for fault reactivation and notable (felt) seismic events. Geomechanical observations at current GCS field deployments, mainly at the In Salah CO2 storage project in Algeria, are also integrated into the review. The In Salah project, with its injection into a relatively thin, low-permeability sandstone is an excellent analogue to the saline aquifers that might be used for large scale GCS in parts of Northwest Europe, the U.S. Midwest, and China. Some of the lessons learned at In Salah related to geomechanics are discussed, including how monitoring of geomechanical responses is used for detecting subsurface geomechanical changes and tracking fluid movements, and how such monitoring and geomechanical analyses have led to preventative changes in the injection parameters. Recently, the importance of geomechanics has become more widely recognized among GCS stakeholders, especially with respect to the potential for triggering notable (felt) seismic events and how such events could impact the long-term integrity of a CO2 repository (as well as how it could impact the public perception of GCS). As described in the paper, to date, no notable seismic event has been reported from any of the current CO2 storage projects, although some unfelt microseismic activities have been detected by geophones. However, potential future commercial GCS operations from large power plants will require injection at a much larger scale. For such large-scale injections, a staged, learn-as-you-go approach is recommended, involving a gradual increase of injection rates combined with continuous monitoring of geomechanical changes, as well as siting beneath a multiple layered overburden for multiple flow barrier protection, should an unexpected deep fault reactivation occur. read more read less

Topics:

Geomechanics (56%)56% related to the paper
View PDF
501 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S10706-008-9204-5
Microstructure Investigation in Unsaturated Soils: A Review with Special Attention to Contribution of Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry and Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy
Enrique Romero1, Paul Simms2

Abstract:

With the advent of modern microstructural testing techniques and microstructure based constitutive models the microstructural characterisation of soils is gaining prominence. This paper reviews the history of microstructure investigation in unsaturated soils and discusses the engineering significance of this research to date.... With the advent of modern microstructural testing techniques and microstructure based constitutive models the microstructural characterisation of soils is gaining prominence. This paper reviews the history of microstructure investigation in unsaturated soils and discusses the engineering significance of this research to date. After a brief overview of the main microstructural techniques, the paper focuses on the evaluation of the current state of use and the development of two widely used techniques to study the microstructure of partially saturated soils, namely mercury intrusion porosimetry and the environmental scanning electron microscopy. The details of these techniques, their advantages and limitations, are first covered, followed by the presentation of selected test results. These results highlight the use of these techniques for understanding different hydro-mechanical behavioural features observed at macroscopic scale. Specifically, the paper shows the use of these techniques to explore the fundamental properties of water retention characteristics, water permeability, and micro and macrostructural interactions along different hydro-mechanical paths. read more read less
405 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/BF00880711
Influence of gas production induced volumetric strain on permeability of coal
Satya Harpalani1, Guoliang Chen1

Abstract:

The gas permeability of a coalbed, unlike that of conventional gas reservoirs, is influenced during gas production not only by the simultaneous changes in effective stress and gas slippage, but also by the volumetric strain of the coal matrix that is associated with gas desorption. A technique for conducting laboratory experi... The gas permeability of a coalbed, unlike that of conventional gas reservoirs, is influenced during gas production not only by the simultaneous changes in effective stress and gas slippage, but also by the volumetric strain of the coal matrix that is associated with gas desorption. A technique for conducting laboratory experiments to separate these effects and estimate their individual contribution is presented in this paper. The results show that for a pressure decrease from 6.2 to 0.7 MPa, the total permeability of the coal sample increased by more than 17 times. A factor of 12 is due to the volumetric strain effect, and a factor of 5 due to the gas slippage effect. Changes in permeability and porosity with gas depletion were also estimated using the measured volumetric strain and the matchstick reservoir model geometry for flow of gas in coalbeds. The resulting variations were compared with results obtained experimentally. Furthermore, the results show that when gas pressure is above 1.7 MPa, the effect of volumetric strain due to matrix shrinkage dominates. As gas pressure falls below 1.7 MPa, both the gas slippage and matrix shrinkage effects play important roles in influencing the permeability. Finally, the change in permeability associated with matrix shrinkage was found to be linearly proportional to the volumetric strain. Since volumetric strain is linearly proportional to the amount of gas desorbed, the change in permeability is a linear function of the amount of desorbing gas. read more read less

Topics:

Gas depletion (54%)54% related to the paper, Permeability (earth sciences) (54%)54% related to the paper, Coalbed methane (50%)50% related to the paper
357 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S10706-014-9732-0
A Review of the Tensile Strength of Rock: Concepts and Testing
Matthew A. Perras1, Mark S. Diederichs1

Abstract:

A review of the tensile strength of rock was conducted to determine the relationship between direct tensile strength (DTS) and Brazilian tensile strength (BTS) and to examine the validity of estimating tensile strength from other measured properties, such as the crack initiation (CI) threshold. A data set was gathered from th... A review of the tensile strength of rock was conducted to determine the relationship between direct tensile strength (DTS) and Brazilian tensile strength (BTS) and to examine the validity of estimating tensile strength from other measured properties, such as the crack initiation (CI) threshold. A data set was gathered from the existing literature where tensile values could be reliably correlated with unconfined compressive strength or CI values. It was determined that the BTS obtained in standard testing is generally greater than the equivalent DTS and that this relationship is rock type dependent. CI yields a reasonable estimate of tensile strength and this correlation is improved when the BTS values are reduced to DTS values by rock type specific correlations. The factor f, in DTS = f BTS, can be considered to be approximately 0.9 for metamorphic, 0.8 for igneous and 0.7 for sedimentary rocks. The relationships presented demonstrate that there is wide scatter in the available data for estimating tensile strength likely due to both specimen variability and testing configuration, including platen geometry and relative stiffness. Estimates of tensile strength should only be used for preliminary design purposes and measurements should be made to confirm preliminary assumptions for each design. read more read less

Topics:

Ultimate tensile strength (65%)65% related to the paper, Compressive strength (64%)64% related to the paper, Tensile testing (64%)64% related to the paper
319 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S10706-007-9154-3
Design and Application of Underground Mine Paste Backfill Technology
Tikov Belem1, Mostafa Benzaazoua1

Abstract:

This paper reviews the design and application of paste backfill in underground hard rock mines used as ground support for pillars and walls, to help prevent caving and roof falls, and to enhance pillar recovery for improved productivity. Arching after stope filling reduces vertical stress and increases horizontal stress distr... This paper reviews the design and application of paste backfill in underground hard rock mines used as ground support for pillars and walls, to help prevent caving and roof falls, and to enhance pillar recovery for improved productivity. Arching after stope filling reduces vertical stress and increases horizontal stress distribution within the fill mass. It is therefore important to determine horizontal stress on stope sidewalls using various predictive models in the design of paste backfill. Required uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) for paste backfill depends on the intended function, such as vertical roof support, development opening within the backfill, pillar recovery, ground or pillar support, and working platform. UCS design models for these functions are given. Laboratory and backfill plant scale designs for paste backfill mix design and optimization are presented, with emphasis on initial tailings density control to prevent under-proportioning of binder content. Once prepared, paste backfill is transported (or pumped) and placed underground by pipeline reticulation. The governing elements of paste backfill transport are rheological factors such as shear yield stress, viscosity, and slump height (consistency). Different models (analytical, semi-empirical, and empirical) are given to predict the rheological factors of paste backfill (shear yield stress and viscosity). Following backfill placement underground, self-weight consolidation settlement, internal pressure build-up, the arching effect, shrinkage, stope volume, and wall convergence against backfill affect mechanical integrity. read more read less
265 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Geotechnical and Geological Engineering.

It automatically formats your research paper to Springer formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Geotechnical and Geological Engineering format uses SPBASIC citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Geotechnical and Geological Engineering in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Geotechnical and Geological Engineering guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Geotechnical and Geological Engineering guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Geotechnical and Geological Engineering guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Geotechnical and Geological Engineering?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Geotechnical and Geological Engineering citation style.

4. Can I use the Geotechnical and Geological Engineering templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Geotechnical and Geological Engineering.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Geotechnical and Geological Engineering that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Geotechnical and Geological Engineering that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Geotechnical and Geological Engineering?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Geotechnical and Geological Engineering.

7. Where can I find the template for the Geotechnical and Geological Engineering?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Geotechnical and Geological Engineering's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Geotechnical and Geological Engineering's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Geotechnical and Geological Engineering is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Geotechnical and Geological Engineering?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Geotechnical and Geological Engineering?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Geotechnical and Geological Engineering?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Geotechnical and Geological Engineering's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Geotechnical and Geological Engineering?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Geotechnical and Geological Engineering. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Geotechnical and Geological Engineering?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Geotechnical and Geological Engineering are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Geotechnical and Geological Engineering?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Geotechnical and Geological Engineering's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Geotechnical and Geological Engineering in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Geotechnical and Geological Engineering formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template