Example of Irrigation Science format
Recent searches

Example of Irrigation Science format Example of Irrigation Science format Example of Irrigation Science format Example of Irrigation Science format Example of Irrigation Science format Example of Irrigation Science format Example of Irrigation Science format Example of Irrigation Science format Example of Irrigation Science format Example of Irrigation Science format Example of Irrigation Science format Example of Irrigation Science format Example of Irrigation Science format Example of Irrigation Science format Example of Irrigation Science format Example of Irrigation Science format Example of Irrigation Science format Example of Irrigation Science format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Irrigation Science format Example of Irrigation Science format Example of Irrigation Science format Example of Irrigation Science format Example of Irrigation Science format Example of Irrigation Science format Example of Irrigation Science format Example of Irrigation Science format Example of Irrigation Science format Example of Irrigation Science format Example of Irrigation Science format Example of Irrigation Science format Example of Irrigation Science format Example of Irrigation Science format Example of Irrigation Science format Example of Irrigation Science format Example of Irrigation Science format Example of Irrigation Science format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Irrigation Science — Template for authors

Publisher: Springer
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Agronomy and Crop Science #46 of 347 up up by 6 ranks
Water Science and Technology #34 of 225 up up by 4 ranks
Soil Science #24 of 135 up up by 4 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 166 Published Papers | 875 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 17/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 7.6
SJR: 1.493
SNIP: 2.047
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.1
SJR: 0.664
SNIP: 1.002
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 9.2
SJR: 2.106
SNIP: 1.818
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.5
SJR: 0.641
SNIP: 1.11

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

3.014

24% from 2018

Impact factor for Irrigation Science from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 3.014
2018 2.44
2017 1.653
2016 1.822
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

5.3

15% from 2019

CiteRatio for Irrigation Science from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 5.3
2019 4.6
2018 4.3
2017 3.7
2016 5.8
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 24% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 15% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.806

21% from 2019

SJR for Irrigation Science from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.806
2019 1.02
2018 1.174
2017 0.771
2016 0.979
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.556

24% from 2019

SNIP for Irrigation Science from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.556
2019 2.044
2018 2.023
2017 1.521
2016 2.052
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 21% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 24% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Irrigation Science

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Springer

Irrigation Science

Irrigation Science publishes original contributions reporting the results of irrigation related research, including relevant contributions from the plant, soil and atmospheric sciences and the analysis of field experimentation as well as irrigation water management modeling. S...... Read More

Water Science and Technology

Agronomy and Crop Science

Soil Science

Environmental Science

i
Last updated on
17 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
0342-7188
i
Impact Factor
High - 2.251
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
SPBASIC
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al, 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker CWJ (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 97(6):067,007, URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/BF00296704
Measurement of plant water status by the pressure chamber technique
Neil C. Turner1
03 Jun 1988 - Irrigation Science

Abstract:

The pressure chamber has been widely used in the measurement of total water potential and pressure-volume relations of leaves, twigs and, to a lesser extent, roots. Some of the benefits and precautions in its use in these studies are reviewed and discussed. The pressure chamber has also been used to determine hydraulic resist... The pressure chamber has been widely used in the measurement of total water potential and pressure-volume relations of leaves, twigs and, to a lesser extent, roots. Some of the benefits and precautions in its use in these studies are reviewed and discussed. The pressure chamber has also been used to determine hydraulic resistances of plants, to collect xylem sap, to determine the water potential at various points in the xylem and to establish membrane damage of plants. Developments in this field are reviewed and discussed. read more read less

Topics:

Xylem (52%)52% related to the paper
706 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S00271-007-0064-1
On the conservative behavior of biomass water productivity
Pasquale Steduto1, Theodore C. Hsiao2, Elias Fereres3
02 Feb 2007 - Irrigation Science

Abstract:

The ever-increasing demand and competition for the finite water resource worldwide call for more efficient use of water in all sectors, including firstly agricultural food production. One important consideration is the existence of a limit to the amount of biomass a crop can produce per unit of water consumed. This article an... The ever-increasing demand and competition for the finite water resource worldwide call for more efficient use of water in all sectors, including firstly agricultural food production. One important consideration is the existence of a limit to the amount of biomass a crop can produce per unit of water consumed. This article analyzes the theoretical background and the experimental evidence for the conservative behavior of the efficiency in water use by crops to produce biomass, i.e., biomass water productivity (WPb), under variable environmental conditions. Particularly, WPb is approximately constant for a given crop species after normalization for evaporative demand of the atmosphere and air carbon dioxide concentration. A stepwise scaling up approach, from leaf to canopy, is undertaken to underline the processes involved at the different hierarchical levels of biological organization that lead to the conservative behavior of WPb. Starting at the leaf level, the basic gas exchange equations are outlined to demonstrate that the normalized photosynthetic WPb at the leaf scale is proportional to the ambient CO2 concentration. New experimental evidence in support of that conclusion is presented for several C3 and a C4 crops. Additional factors are introduced to assess photosynthetic WPb at the canopy scale, including the extent of radiation capture and the role of respiration. The composition of biomass was then considered in the analysis of WPb over a season. The paper highlights the need to normalize WPb for differences in climate, specifically, in evaporative demand of the atmosphere to extrapolate WPb values between climatic zones, and in atmospheric CO2 concentration to account for changes in CO2 with time, when looking at the past and into the future. Two procedures for normalization for differences in evaporative demand are presented, and a procedure for normalization for changes in CO2 concentration is derived for the leaf scale and shown to be applicable to canopy scale. Some knowledge gaps and research needs are pointed out and the potential offered by the near constancy of normalized WPb in crop simulation modeling is emphasized. read more read less

Topics:

Water use (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
428 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S00271-007-0088-6
ET mapping for agricultural water management: present status and challenges
Prasanna H. Gowda1, José L. Chávez1, Paul D. Colaizzi1, Steven R. Evett1, Terry A. Howell1, Judy A. Tolk1
01 Mar 2008 - Irrigation Science

Abstract:

Evapotranspiration (ET) is an essential com- ponent of the water balance. Remote sensing based agrometeorological models are presently most suited for estimating crop water use at both field and regional scales. Numerous ET algorithms have been developed to make use of remote sensing data acquired by sensors on airborne and s... Evapotranspiration (ET) is an essential com- ponent of the water balance. Remote sensing based agrometeorological models are presently most suited for estimating crop water use at both field and regional scales. Numerous ET algorithms have been developed to make use of remote sensing data acquired by sensors on airborne and satellite platforms. In this paper, a literature review was done to evaluate numerous commonly used remote sensing based algorithms for their ability to estimate regional ET accurately. The reported estimation accuracy varied from 67 to 97% for daily ET and above 94% for seasonal ET indicating that they have the potential to estimate regional ET accurately. However, there are opportunities to further improving these models for accurately estimating all energy balance components. The spatial and temporal remote sensing data from the existing set of earth observing satellite platforms are not sufficient enough to be used in the estimation of spatially distributed ET for on-farm irri- gation management purposes, especially at a field scale level (*10 to 200 ha). This will be constrained further if the thermal sensors on future Landsat satellites are aban- doned. However, research opportunities exist to improve the spatial and temporal resolution of ET by developing algorithms to increase the spatial resolution of reflectance and surface temperature data derived from Landsat/ ASTER/MODIS images using same/other-sensor high resolution multi-spectral images. read more read less
View PDF
352 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/BF00266155
Salt sensitivity of wheat at various growth stages
Eugene V. Maas1, J. A. Poss1
01 Jan 1989 - Irrigation Science

Abstract:

The relative salt tolerance of two wheat species (Triticum aestivum L., cv. Probred and Triticum turgidum L., Durum Group, cv. Aldura) at different stages of growth was determined in a greenhouse experiment. Plants were grown in sand cultures that were irrigated four times daily with modified Hoagland's solution. Salinization... The relative salt tolerance of two wheat species (Triticum aestivum L., cv. Probred and Triticum turgidum L., Durum Group, cv. Aldura) at different stages of growth was determined in a greenhouse experiment. Plants were grown in sand cultures that were irrigated four times daily with modified Hoagland's solution. Salinization with NaCl and CaCl2 (2:1 molar ratio) provided seven treatment solutions with osmotic potentials (Ψ s ) ranging from −0.05 to −1.25 MPa (electrical conductivities of 1.4 to 28 dS/m). Salt stress was imposed for 45 days beginning at either 10, 56, or 101 days after planting. The three 45-day stages are referred to here as the vegetative, reproductive, and maturation stages although the first stage included spikelet differentiation. In a separate experiment, seedling growth was measured after 21 days of salt stress (Ψ s = −0.05 to −0.85 MPa) initiated at 0, 7, 11, and 16 days after planting. Salt stress (Ψ s = −0.65 MPa) delayed germination by 4 days for both wheats but full emergence occurred. Relative growth response curves of the seedlings were alike regardless of whether salt stress was imposed at planting or at the 1st, 2nd, or 3rd-leaf stage of growth. Salt stress also retarded leaf development and tillering but hastened plant maturity. Grain yields from plants stressed during either the vegetative, reproductive, or maturation stages indicated that both species became less sensitive to salinity the later plants were stressed. Grain yield was reduced 50% at Ψ s = −0.76, −1.53, and −1.58 MPa for Probred and −0.65, −1.08, and −1.34 MPa for Aldura when salinized during stages 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Salinity reduced grain yield by reducing seed number more than seed weight indicating that salt stress during stage 1 affected spikelet differentiation. Straw yield was significantly reduced by salt stress only during stage 1. Leaf mineral analyses revealed that Aldura readily accumulated Na whereas Probred did not. Both species accumulated Cl but the concentrations were much higher in Aldura. K uptake was severely inhibited by salt stress imposed during the first stage but not when imposed the second stage. read more read less

Topics:

Salinity (50%)50% related to the paper
346 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S00271-009-0182-Z
Estimating crop coefficients from fraction of ground cover and height
Richard G. Allen1, Luis S. Pereira2
16 Sep 2009 - Irrigation Science

Abstract:

The FAO-56 procedure for estimating the crop coefficient K c as a function of fraction of ground cover and crop height has been formalized in this study using a density coefficient K d. The density coefficient is multiplied by a basal K c representing full cover conditions, K cb full, to produce a basal crop coefficient t... The FAO-56 procedure for estimating the crop coefficient K c as a function of fraction of ground cover and crop height has been formalized in this study using a density coefficient K d. The density coefficient is multiplied by a basal K c representing full cover conditions, K cb full, to produce a basal crop coefficient that represents actual conditions of ET and vegetation coverage when the soil surface is dry. K cb full is estimated primarily as a function of crop height. K cb full can be adjusted for tree crops by multiplying by a reduction factor (F r) estimated using a mean leaf stomatal resistance term. The estimate for basal crop coefficient, K cb, is further modified for tree crops if some type of ground-cover exists understory or between trees. The single (mean) crop coefficient is similarly estimated and is adjusted using a K soil coefficient that represents background evaporation from wet soil. The K c estimation procedure was applied to the development periods for seven vegetable crops grown in California. The average root mean square error between estimated and measured K c was 0.13. The K c estimation procedure was also used to estimate K c during midseason periods of horticultural crops (trees and vines) reported in the literature. Values for mean leaf stomatal resistance and the F r reduction factor were derived that explain the literature K c values and that provide a consistent means to estimate K c over a broad range of fraction of ground cover. read more read less

Topics:

Crop coefficient (59%)59% related to the paper
View PDF
327 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Irrigation Science.

It automatically formats your research paper to Springer formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Irrigation Science format uses SPBASIC citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Irrigation Science in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Irrigation Science guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Irrigation Science guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Irrigation Science guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Irrigation Science?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Irrigation Science citation style.

4. Can I use the Irrigation Science templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Irrigation Science.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Irrigation Science that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Irrigation Science that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Irrigation Science?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Irrigation Science.

7. Where can I find the template for the Irrigation Science?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Irrigation Science's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Irrigation Science's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Irrigation Science an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Irrigation Science is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Irrigation Science?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Irrigation Science?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Irrigation Science?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Irrigation Science, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Irrigation Science's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Irrigation Science?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Irrigation Science. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Irrigation Science?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Irrigation Science are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Irrigation Science?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Irrigation Science's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Irrigation Science in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Irrigation Science Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Irrigation Science formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template