Example of Journal of Public Health format
Recent searches

Example of Journal of Public Health format Example of Journal of Public Health format Example of Journal of Public Health format Example of Journal of Public Health format Example of Journal of Public Health format Example of Journal of Public Health format Example of Journal of Public Health format Example of Journal of Public Health format Example of Journal of Public Health format Example of Journal of Public Health format Example of Journal of Public Health format Example of Journal of Public Health format Example of Journal of Public Health format Example of Journal of Public Health format Example of Journal of Public Health format Example of Journal of Public Health format Example of Journal of Public Health format Example of Journal of Public Health format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Journal of Public Health format Example of Journal of Public Health format Example of Journal of Public Health format Example of Journal of Public Health format Example of Journal of Public Health format Example of Journal of Public Health format Example of Journal of Public Health format Example of Journal of Public Health format Example of Journal of Public Health format Example of Journal of Public Health format Example of Journal of Public Health format Example of Journal of Public Health format Example of Journal of Public Health format Example of Journal of Public Health format Example of Journal of Public Health format Example of Journal of Public Health format Example of Journal of Public Health format Example of Journal of Public Health format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Journal of Public Health — Template for authors

Publisher: Springer
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health #178 of 526 down down by 55 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
Good
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 662 Published Papers | 2298 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 24/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 2.9
SJR: 0.575
SNIP: 1.117
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.6
SJR: 0.666
SNIP: 1.867
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.7
SJR: 2.392
SNIP: 2.631
open access Open Access

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.6
SJR: 1.649
SNIP: 2.198

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

1.806

10% from 2018

Impact factor for Journal of Public Health from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 1.806
2018 1.648
2017 1.67
2016 2.125
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

3.5

6% from 2019

CiteRatio for Journal of Public Health from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 3.5
2019 3.3
2018 2.8
2017 3.3
2016 3.1
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 10% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 6% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.916

13% from 2019

SJR for Journal of Public Health from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.916
2019 0.812
2018 0.853
2017 0.719
2016 0.905
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.149

7% from 2019

SNIP for Journal of Public Health from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.149
2019 1.074
2018 0.926
2017 1.009
2016 1.094
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 13% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 7% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Journal of Public Health

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Springer

Journal of Public Health

Approved by publishing and review experts on SciSpace, this template is built as per for Journal of Public Health formatting guidelines as mentioned in Springer author instructions. The current version was created on and has been used by 584 authors to write and format their manuscripts to this journal.

i
Last updated on
24 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
2198-1833
i
Open Access
Hybrid
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
C. W. J. Beenakker. Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett., 97(6):067007, 2006.

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1093/PUBMED/FDI031
Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality
Ann Bowling1
01 Sep 2005 - Journal of Public Health

Abstract:

Background One of the main primary data collection instruments in social, health and epidemiological research is the survey questionnaire. Modes of data collection by questionnaire differ in several ways, including the method of contacting respondents, the medium of delivering the questionnaire to respondents, and the adminis... Background One of the main primary data collection instruments in social, health and epidemiological research is the survey questionnaire. Modes of data collection by questionnaire differ in several ways, including the method of contacting respondents, the medium of delivering the questionnaire to respondents, and the administration of the questions. These are likely to have different effects on the quality of the data collected. Methods This paper is based on a narrative review of systematic and non-systematic searches of the literature on the effects of mode of questionnaire administration on data quality. Results Within different modes of questionnaire administration, there were many documented potential, biasing influences on the responses obtained. These were greatest between different types of mode (e.g. self-administered versus interview modes), rather than within modes. It can be difficult to separate out the effects of the different influences, at different levels. Conclusions The biasing effects of mode of questionnaire administration has important implications for research methodology, the validity of the results of research, and for the soundness of public policy developed from evidence using questionnaire-based research. All users of questionnaires need to be aware of these potential effects on their data. read more read less

Topics:

Questionnaire (61%)61% related to the paper, Data quality (53%)53% related to the paper, Data collection (52%)52% related to the paper, Poison control (51%)51% related to the paper
1,704 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S10389-006-0024-X
Development of the world health organization global physical activity questionnaire (gpaq)
Timothy Armstrong1, Fiona Bull2
02 Mar 2006 - Journal of Public Health

Abstract:

The aim of developing the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) was to have a tool that would produce valid and reliable estimates of physical activity, especially relevant to developing countries where patterns of energy expenditure differ from developed countries because people experi... The aim of developing the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) was to have a tool that would produce valid and reliable estimates of physical activity, especially relevant to developing countries where patterns of energy expenditure differ from developed countries because people experience diverse ways of life. The development of a standardized tool to measure physical activity that enables comparisons across culturally diverse populations is a challenging task. Comparable, valid, and reliable information on physical activity enables countries to follow trends over time, understand regional and global comparisons, and better inform physical activity policy decisions. A WHO expert working group on physical activity measurement provided a draft GPAQ for global consultation. The draft instrument was validated in nine countries. Validation studies and qualitative feedback on GPAQ were presented at an Expert Meeting on Global Physical Activity Surveillance held jointly by WHO and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A second round of global consultation led to minor revisions and preparation of a final GPAQ version 2 instrument (GPAQv2). Around 50 developing countries are now using GPAQ for physical activity data collection. GPAQv2 is a suitable physical activity surveillance instrument for developing countries. read more read less
1,158 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1093/PUBMED/FDQ068
The health benefits of urban green spaces: a review of the evidence
Andrew Lee1, Ravi Maheswaran1
01 Jun 2011 - Journal of Public Health

Abstract:

Background Urban development projects can be costly and have health impacts. An evidence-based approach to urban planning is therefore essential. However, the evidence for physical and non-physical health benefits of urban green space is unclear. Methods A literature search of academic and grey literature was conducted for st... Background Urban development projects can be costly and have health impacts. An evidence-based approach to urban planning is therefore essential. However, the evidence for physical and non-physical health benefits of urban green space is unclear. Methods A literature search of academic and grey literature was conducted for studies and reviews of the health effects of green space. Articles found were appraised for their relevance, critically reviewed and graded accordingly. Their findings were then thematically categorized. Results There is weak evidence for the links between physical, mental health and well-being, and urban green space. Environmental factors such as the quality and accessibility of green space affects its use for physical activity. User determinants, such as age, gender, ethnicity and the perception of safety, are also important. However, many studies were limited by poor study design, failure to exclude confounding, bias or reverse causality and weak statistical associations. Conclusion Most studies reported findings that generally supported the view that green space have a beneficial health effect. Establishing a causal relationship is difficult, as the relationship is complex. Simplistic urban interventions may therefore fail to address the underlying determinants of urban health that are not remediable by landscape redesign. read more read less

Topics:

Urban planning (56%)56% related to the paper, Evidence-based practice (52%)52% related to the paper, Public health (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
1,147 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S10389-007-0101-9
A review of European research on consumer response to nutrition information on food labels
Klaus G. Grunert1, Josephine Wills2
14 Apr 2007 - Journal of Public Health

Abstract:

The aim of this study was to review research conducted in 2003–2006 in the EU-15 countries on how consumers perceive, understand, like and use nutrition information on food labels. Based on a search of databases on academic publications, Google-based search, and enquiries directed to a range of food retailers, food companies,... The aim of this study was to review research conducted in 2003–2006 in the EU-15 countries on how consumers perceive, understand, like and use nutrition information on food labels. Based on a search of databases on academic publications, Google-based search, and enquiries directed to a range of food retailers, food companies, consumer associations and government agencies, a total of 58 studies were identified. These studies were summarised using a standard format guided by a model of consumer information processing, and these summaries were subsequently processed using the MAXqda software in order to identify key findings and common themes across the studies. The studies show widespread consumer interest in nutrition information on food packages, though this interest varies across situations and products. Consumers like the idea of simplified front of pack information but differ in their liking for the various formats. Differences can be related to conflicting preferences for ease of use, being fully informed and not being pressurised into behaving in a particular way. Most consumers understand the most common signposting formats in the sense that they themselves believe that they understand them and they can replay key information presented to them in an experimental situation. There is, however, virtually no insight into how labelling information is, or will be, used in a real-world shopping situation, and how it will affect consumers’ dietary patterns. Results are largely in line with an earlier review by Cowburn and Stockley (Public Health Nutr 8:21–28, 2005), covering research up to 2002, but provide new insights into consumer liking and understanding of simplified front of pack signposting formats. There is an urgent need for more research studying consumer use of nutritional information on food labels in a real-world setting. read more read less

Topics:

Guideline Daily Amount (63%)63% related to the paper, Consumer behaviour (57%)57% related to the paper, Nutrition facts label (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
1,054 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1093/PUBMED/FDR015
Cochrane Update. 'Scoping the scope' of a cochrane review.
Rebecca Armstrong1, Belinda J. Hall1, Jodie Doyle1, Elizabeth Waters1
01 Mar 2011 - Journal of Public Health

Abstract:

Systematic reviews use a transparent and systematic process to define a research question, search for studies, assess their quality and synthesize findings qualitatively or quantitatively. A crucial step in the systematic review process is to thoroughly define the scope of the research question. This requires an understanding... Systematic reviews use a transparent and systematic process to define a research question, search for studies, assess their quality and synthesize findings qualitatively or quantitatively. A crucial step in the systematic review process is to thoroughly define the scope of the research question. This requires an understanding of existing literature, including gaps and uncertainties, clarification of definitions related to the research question and an understanding of the way in which these are conceptualized within existing literature. This information is often acquired in an ad hoc fashion, however a useful and increasingly popular way to collect and organize important background information and develop a picture of the existing evidence base is to conduct a scoping review. Such reviews may be published as a research outcome in their own right and are appealing since they produce a broad map of the evidence that, if sufficiently transparent and widely available via publication, can be used by many and for applications beyond the authors originally intended purpose. Scoping reviews can inform a systematic review, particularly one with a very broad topic scope, such as those edited by the Cochrane Public Health Group. read more read less

Topics:

Systematic review (64%)64% related to the paper, Systematic process (54%)54% related to the paper, Research question (53%)53% related to the paper, Scope (project management) (52%)52% related to the paper
946 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Journal of Public Health.

It automatically formats your research paper to Springer formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Journal of Public Health in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Journal of Public Health guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Journal of Public Health guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Journal of Public Health guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Journal of Public Health?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Journal of Public Health citation style.

4. Can I use the Journal of Public Health templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Journal of Public Health.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Journal of Public Health that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Journal of Public Health that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Journal of Public Health?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Journal of Public Health.

7. Where can I find the template for the Journal of Public Health?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Journal of Public Health's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Journal of Public Health's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Journal of Public Health an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Journal of Public Health is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Journal of Public Health?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Journal of Public Health?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Journal of Public Health?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Journal of Public Health, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Journal of Public Health's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Journal of Public Health?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Journal of Public Health. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Journal of Public Health?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Journal of Public Health are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Journal of Public Health?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Journal of Public Health's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Journal of Public Health in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Journal of Public Health Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Journal of Public Health formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template