Example of Minds and Machines format
Recent searches

Example of Minds and Machines format Example of Minds and Machines format Example of Minds and Machines format Example of Minds and Machines format Example of Minds and Machines format Example of Minds and Machines format Example of Minds and Machines format Example of Minds and Machines format Example of Minds and Machines format Example of Minds and Machines format Example of Minds and Machines format Example of Minds and Machines format Example of Minds and Machines format Example of Minds and Machines format Example of Minds and Machines format Example of Minds and Machines format Example of Minds and Machines format Example of Minds and Machines format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Minds and Machines format Example of Minds and Machines format Example of Minds and Machines format Example of Minds and Machines format Example of Minds and Machines format Example of Minds and Machines format Example of Minds and Machines format Example of Minds and Machines format Example of Minds and Machines format Example of Minds and Machines format Example of Minds and Machines format Example of Minds and Machines format Example of Minds and Machines format Example of Minds and Machines format Example of Minds and Machines format Example of Minds and Machines format Example of Minds and Machines format Example of Minds and Machines format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Minds and Machines — Template for authors

Publisher: Springer
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Philosophy #14 of 644 up up by 93 ranks
Artificial Intelligence #87 of 227 up up by 48 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 111 Published Papers | 493 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 23/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 2.4
SJR: 0.286
SNIP: 0.689
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 0.9
SJR: 0.302
SNIP: 0.743
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 1.8
SJR: 0.699
SNIP: 1.341
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 1.4
SJR: 0.388
SNIP: 1.091

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

1.855

33% from 2018

Impact factor for Minds and Machines from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 1.855
2018 1.4
2017 0.842
2016 0.514
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

4.4

42% from 2019

CiteRatio for Minds and Machines from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 4.4
2019 3.1
2018 1.9
2017 1.2
2016 1.7
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 33% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 42% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.806

2% from 2019

SJR for Minds and Machines from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.806
2019 0.788
2018 0.474
2017 0.26
2016 0.345
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

2.211

4% from 2019

SNIP for Minds and Machines from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.211
2019 2.295
2018 1.154
2017 0.815
2016 0.874
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 2% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 4% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Minds and Machines

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Springer

Minds and Machines

Minds and Machines affords an international forum for the discussion and debate of important and controversial issues concerning significant developments within its areas of editorial focus. Well-reasoned contributions from diverse theoretical perspectives are welcome and ever...... Read More

Philosophy

Artificial Intelligence

Arts and Humanities

i
Last updated on
22 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
0924-6495
i
Impact Factor
Medium - 0.75
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
SPBASIC
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al, 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker CWJ (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 97(6):067,007, URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S11023-018-9482-5
AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations
01 Dec 2018 - Minds and Machines

Abstract:

This article reports the findings of AI4People, an Atomium—EISMD initiative designed to lay the foundations for a “Good AI Society”. We introduce the core opportunities and risks of AI for society; present a synthesis of five ethical principles that should undergird its development and adoption; and offer 20 concrete recommen... This article reports the findings of AI4People, an Atomium—EISMD initiative designed to lay the foundations for a “Good AI Society”. We introduce the core opportunities and risks of AI for society; present a synthesis of five ethical principles that should undergird its development and adoption; and offer 20 concrete recommendations—to assess, to develop, to incentivise, and to support good AI—which in some cases may be undertaken directly by national or supranational policy makers, while in others may be led by other stakeholders. If adopted, these recommendations would serve as a firm foundation for the establishment of a Good AI Society. read more read less
View PDF
855 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S11023-020-09548-1
GPT-3: Its Nature, Scope, Limits, and Consequences
Luciano Floridi1, Luciano Floridi2, Massimo Chiriatti3
01 Nov 2020 - Minds and Machines

Abstract:

In this commentary, we discuss the nature of reversible and irreversible questions, that is, questions that may enable one to identify the nature of the source of their answers. We then introduce GPT-3, a third-generation, autoregressive language model that uses deep learning to produce human-like texts, and use the previous ... In this commentary, we discuss the nature of reversible and irreversible questions, that is, questions that may enable one to identify the nature of the source of their answers. We then introduce GPT-3, a third-generation, autoregressive language model that uses deep learning to produce human-like texts, and use the previous distinction to analyse it. We expand the analysis to present three tests based on mathematical, semantic (that is, the Turing Test), and ethical questions and show that GPT-3 is not designed to pass any of them. This is a reminder that GPT-3 does not do what it is not supposed to do, and that any interpretation of GPT-3 as the beginning of the emergence of a general form of artificial intelligence is merely uninformed science fiction. We conclude by outlining some of the significant consequences of the industrialisation of automatic and cheap production of good, semantic artefacts. read more read less

Topics:

Turing test (52%)52% related to the paper
View PDF
529 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S11023-007-9079-X
Universal Intelligence: A Definition of Machine Intelligence
Shane Legg1, Marcus Hutter
01 Dec 2007 - Minds and Machines

Abstract:

A fundamental problem in artificial intelligence is that nobody really knows what intelligence is. The problem is especially acute when we need to consider artificial systems which are significantly different to humans. In this paper we approach this problem in the following way: we take a number of well known informal defini... A fundamental problem in artificial intelligence is that nobody really knows what intelligence is. The problem is especially acute when we need to consider artificial systems which are significantly different to humans. In this paper we approach this problem in the following way: we take a number of well known informal definitions of human intelligence that have been given by experts, and extract their essential features. These are then mathematically formalised to produce a general measure of intelligence for arbitrary machines. We believe that this equation formally captures the concept of machine intelligence in the broadest reasonable sense. We then show how this formal definition is related to the theory of universal optimal learning agents. Finally, we survey the many other tests and definitions of intelligence that have been proposed for machines. read more read less

Topics:

Intelligence cycle (target-centric approach) (72%)72% related to the paper, Human intelligence (69%)69% related to the paper, Symbolic artificial intelligence (67%)67% related to the paper, Computational intelligence (65%)65% related to the paper, Marketing and artificial intelligence (64%)64% related to the paper
View PDF
438 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S11023-006-9030-6
In the hands of machines? The future of aged care
01 May 2006 - Minds and Machines

Abstract:

It is remarkable how much robotics research is promoted by appealing to the idea that the only way to deal with a looming demographic crisis is to develop robots to look after older persons. This paper surveys and assesses the claims made on behalf of robots in relation to their capacity to meet the needs of older persons. We... It is remarkable how much robotics research is promoted by appealing to the idea that the only way to deal with a looming demographic crisis is to develop robots to look after older persons. This paper surveys and assesses the claims made on behalf of robots in relation to their capacity to meet the needs of older persons. We consider each of the roles that has been suggested for robots in aged care and attempt to evaluate how successful robots might be in these roles. We do so from the perspective of writers concerned primarily with the quality of aged care, paying particular attention to the social and ethical implications of the introduction of robots, rather than from the perspective of robotics, engineering, or computer science. We emphasis the importance of the social and emotional needs of older persons--which, we argue, robots are incapable of meeting--in almost any task involved in their care. Even if robots were to become capable of filling some service roles in the aged-care sector, economic pressures on the sector would most likely ensure that the result was a decrease in the amount of human contact experienced by older persons being cared for, which itself would be detrimental to their well-being. This means that the prospects for the ethical use of robots in the aged-care sector are far fewer than first appears. More controversially, we believe that it is not only misguided, but actually unethical, to attempt to substitute robot simulacra for genuine social interaction. A subsidiary goal of this paper is to draw attention to the discourse about aged care and robotics and locate it in the context of broader social attitudes towards older persons. We conclude by proposing a deliberative process involving older persons as a test for the ethics of the use of robots in aged care. read more read less

Topics:

Media Lab Europe's social robots (60%)60% related to the paper, Roboethics (58%)58% related to the paper, Social robot (53%)53% related to the paper
428 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1023/A:1011288000451
Turing Test: 50 Years Later
Ayse Pinar Saygin1, Ilyas Cicekli2, Varol Akman2
01 Nov 2000 - Minds and Machines

Abstract:

The Turing Test is one of the most disputed topics in artificial intelligence, philosophy of mind, and cognitive science This paper is a review of the past 50 years of the Turing Test Philosophical debates, practical developments and repercussions in related disciplines are all covered We discuss Turing's ideas in detail and ... The Turing Test is one of the most disputed topics in artificial intelligence, philosophy of mind, and cognitive science This paper is a review of the past 50 years of the Turing Test Philosophical debates, practical developments and repercussions in related disciplines are all covered We discuss Turing's ideas in detail and present the important comments that have been made on them Within this context, behaviorism, consciousness, the `other minds' problem, and similar topics in philosophy of mind are discussed We also cover the sociological and psychological aspects of the Turing Test Finally, we look at the current situation and analyze programs that have been developed with the aim of passing the Turing Test We conclude that the Turing Test has been, and will continue to be, an influential and controversial topic read more read less

Topics:

Turing (73%)73% related to the paper, Chinese room (71%)71% related to the paper, Computational theory of mind (63%)63% related to the paper, Turing test (61%)61% related to the paper, Philosophy of mind (54%)54% related to the paper
View PDF
345 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Minds and Machines.

It automatically formats your research paper to Springer formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Minds and Machines format uses SPBASIC citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Minds and Machines in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Minds and Machines guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Minds and Machines guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Minds and Machines guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Minds and Machines?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Minds and Machines citation style.

4. Can I use the Minds and Machines templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Minds and Machines.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Minds and Machines that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Minds and Machines that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Minds and Machines?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Minds and Machines.

7. Where can I find the template for the Minds and Machines?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Minds and Machines's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Minds and Machines's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Minds and Machines an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Minds and Machines is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Minds and Machines?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Minds and Machines?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Minds and Machines?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Minds and Machines, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Minds and Machines's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Minds and Machines?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Minds and Machines. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Minds and Machines?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Minds and Machines are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Minds and Machines?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Minds and Machines's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Minds and Machines in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Minds and Machines Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Minds and Machines formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template