Example of Social Indicators Research format
Recent searches

Example of Social Indicators Research format Example of Social Indicators Research format Example of Social Indicators Research format Example of Social Indicators Research format Example of Social Indicators Research format Example of Social Indicators Research format Example of Social Indicators Research format Example of Social Indicators Research format Example of Social Indicators Research format Example of Social Indicators Research format Example of Social Indicators Research format Example of Social Indicators Research format Example of Social Indicators Research format Example of Social Indicators Research format Example of Social Indicators Research format Example of Social Indicators Research format Example of Social Indicators Research format Example of Social Indicators Research format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Social Indicators Research format Example of Social Indicators Research format Example of Social Indicators Research format Example of Social Indicators Research format Example of Social Indicators Research format Example of Social Indicators Research format Example of Social Indicators Research format Example of Social Indicators Research format Example of Social Indicators Research format Example of Social Indicators Research format Example of Social Indicators Research format Example of Social Indicators Research format Example of Social Indicators Research format Example of Social Indicators Research format Example of Social Indicators Research format Example of Social Indicators Research format Example of Social Indicators Research format Example of Social Indicators Research format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Social Indicators Research — Template for authors

Publisher: Springer
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Sociology and Political Science #145 of 1269 up up by 15 ranks
Social Sciences (all) #31 of 260 down down by 1 rank
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) #57 of 306 up up by 17 ranks
Developmental and Educational Psychology #81 of 332 up up by 18 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 1201 Published Papers | 4600 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 08/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.5
SJR: 0.641
SNIP: 1.243
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.8
SJR: 1.412
SNIP: 1.256
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.7
SJR: 1.416
SNIP: 1.831

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

1.874

10% from 2018

Impact factor for Social Indicators Research from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 1.874
2018 1.703
2017 1.648
2016 1.743
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

3.8

9% from 2019

CiteRatio for Social Indicators Research from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 3.8
2019 3.5
2018 3.0
2017 3.1
2016 3.2
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 10% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 9% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.815

7% from 2019

SJR for Social Indicators Research from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.815
2019 0.875
2018 0.881
2017 0.771
2016 1.02
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.54

3% from 2019

SNIP for Social Indicators Research from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.54
2019 1.587
2018 1.402
2017 1.267
2016 1.484
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 7% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 3% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Social Indicators Research

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Springer

Social Indicators Research

Since its foundation in 1974, Social Indicators Research has become regarded as the leading journal for the publication of the results of research dealing with problems related to the measurement of all aspects of the quality of life. These studies - empirical, philosophical a...... Read More

Social Sciences

i
Last updated on
07 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
0303-8300
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.327
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
SPBASIC
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al, 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker CWJ (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 97(6):067,007, URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1023/A:1006824100041
A measure of subjective happiness: preliminary reliability and construct validation
Sonja Lyubomirsky1, Heidi S. Lepper1

Abstract:

Using a ''subjectivist'' approach to the assessment of happiness, a new 4-item measure of global subjective happiness was developed and validated in 14 studies with a total of 2 732 participants. Data was collected in the United States from students on two college campuses and one high school campus, from community adults in ... Using a ''subjectivist'' approach to the assessment of happiness, a new 4-item measure of global subjective happiness was developed and validated in 14 studies with a total of 2 732 participants. Data was collected in the United States from students on two college campuses and one high school campus, from community adults in two California cities, and from older adults. Students and community adults in Moscow, Russia also participated in this research. Results indicated that the Subjective Happiness Scale has high internal consistency, which was found to be stable across samples. Test-retest and self-peer correlations suggested good to excellent reliability, and construct validation studies of convergent and discriminant validity confirmed the use of this scale to measure the construct of subjective happiness. The rationale for developing a new measure of happiness, as well as advantages of this scale, are discussed. read more read less

Topics:

Happiness (66%)66% related to the paper, Construct validity (53%)53% related to the paper, Discriminant validity (53%)53% related to the paper, Test validity (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
3,126 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S11205-009-9493-Y
New Well-Being Measures: Short Scales to Assess Flourishing and Positive and Negative Feelings.

Abstract:

Measures of well-being were created to assess psychological flourishing and feelings—positive feelings, negative feelings, and the difference between the two. The scales were evaluated in a sample of 689 college students from six locations. The Flourishing Scale is a brief 8-item summary measure of the respondent’s self-perce... Measures of well-being were created to assess psychological flourishing and feelings—positive feelings, negative feelings, and the difference between the two. The scales were evaluated in a sample of 689 college students from six locations. The Flourishing Scale is a brief 8-item summary measure of the respondent’s self-perceived success in important areas such as relationships, self-esteem, purpose, and optimism. The scale provides a single psychological well-being score. The measure has good psychometric properties, and is strongly associated with other psychological well-being scales. The Scale of Positive and Negative Experience produces a score for positive feelings (6 items), a score for negative feelings (6 items), and the two can be combined to create a balance score. This 12-item brief scale has a number of desirable features compared to earlier measures of positive and negative emotions. In particular, the scale assesses with a few items a broad range of negative and positive experiences and feelings, not just those of a certain type, and is based on the amount of time the feelings were experienced during the past 4 weeks. The scale converges well with measures of emotions and affective well-being. read more read less

Topics:

Subjective well-being (54%)54% related to the paper, Flourishing (53%)53% related to the paper, Feeling (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
2,860 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/BF01207052
Assessing Subjective Well-Being: Progress and Opportunities
Ed Diener1

Abstract:

Subjective well-being (SWB) comprises people's longer-term levels of pleasant affect, lack of unpleasant affect, and life satisfaction. It displays moderately high levels of cross-situational consistency and temporal stability. Self-report measures of SWB show adequate validity, reliability, factor invariance, and sensitivity... Subjective well-being (SWB) comprises people's longer-term levels of pleasant affect, lack of unpleasant affect, and life satisfaction. It displays moderately high levels of cross-situational consistency and temporal stability. Self-report measures of SWB show adequate validity, reliability, factor invariance, and sensitivity to change. Despite the success of the measures to date, more sophisticated approaches to defining and measuring SWB are now possible. Affect includes facial, physiological, motivational, behavioral, and cognitive components. Self-reports assess primarily the cognitive component of affect, and thus are unlikely to yield a complete picture of respondents' emotional lives. For example, denial may influence self-reports of SWB more than other components. Additionally, emotions are responses which vary on a number of dimensions such as intensity, suggesting that mean levels of affect as captured by existing measures do not give a complete account of SWB. Advances in cognitive psychology indicate that differences in memory retrieval, mood as information, and scaling processes can influence self-reports of SWB. Finally, theories of communication alert us to the types of information that are likely to be given in self-reports of SWB. These advances from psychology suggest that a multimethod approach to assessing SWB will create a more comprehensive depiction of the phenomenon. Not only will a multifaceted test battery yield more credible data, but inconsistencies between various measurement methods and between the various components of well-being will both help us better understand SWB indictors and group differences in well-being. Knowledge of cognition, personality, and emotion will also aid in the development of sophisticated theoretical definitions of subjective well-being. For example, life satisfaction is theorized to be a judgment that respondents construct based on currently salient information. Finally, it is concluded that measuring negative reactions such as depression or anxiety give an incomplete picture of people's well-being, and that it is imperative to measure life satisfaction and positive emotions as well. read more read less

Topics:

Subjective well-being (72%)72% related to the paper, Affect (psychology) (54%)54% related to the paper, Life satisfaction (53%)53% related to the paper, Well-being (52%)52% related to the paper, Cognition (51%)51% related to the paper
2,089 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1023/A:1006859511756
Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators
Ed Diener1, Eunkook M. Suh1

Abstract:

Thinkers have discussed the “good life” and the desirable society for millennia. In the last decades, scientists offered several alternative approaches to defining and measuring quality of life: social indicators such as health and levels of crime, subjective well-being measures (assessing people's evaluative reactions to the... Thinkers have discussed the “good life” and the desirable society for millennia. In the last decades, scientists offered several alternative approaches to defining and measuring quality of life: social indicators such as health and levels of crime, subjective well-being measures (assessing people's evaluative reactions to their lives and societies), and economic indices. These alternative indicators assess three philosophical approaches to well-being that are based, respectively, on normative ideals, subjective experiences, and the ability to select goods and services that one desires. The strengths and weaknesses of the various approaches are reviewed. It is argued that social indicators and subjective well-being measures are necessary to evaluate a society, and add substantially to the regnant economic indicators that are now favored by policy makers. Each approach to measuring the quality of life contains information that is not contained in the other measures. read more read less

Topics:

Economic indicator (53%)53% related to the paper, Well-being (52%)52% related to the paper, Strengths and weaknesses (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
1,956 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/BF00292648
Is happiness relative
Ruut Veenhoven1

Abstract:

The theory that happiness is relative is based on three postulates: (1) happiness results from comparison, (2) standards of comparison adjust, (3) standards of comparison are arbitrary constructs. On the basis of these postulates the theory predicts: (a) happiness does not depend on real quality of life, (b) changes in living... The theory that happiness is relative is based on three postulates: (1) happiness results from comparison, (2) standards of comparison adjust, (3) standards of comparison are arbitrary constructs. On the basis of these postulates the theory predicts: (a) happiness does not depend on real quality of life, (b) changes in living-conditions to the good or the bad have only a shortlived effect on happiness, (c) people are happier after hard times, (d) people are typically neutral about their life. Together these inferences imply that happiness is both an evasive and an inconsequential matter, which is at odds with corebeliefs in present-day welfare society. Recent investigations on happiness (in the sense of life-satisfaction) claim support for this old theory. Happiness is reported to be as high in poor countries as it is in rich countries (Easterlin), no less among paralyzed accident victims than it is among lottery winners (Brickman) and unrelated to stable livingconditions (Inglehart and Rabier). These sensational claims are inspected but found to be untrue. It is shown that: (a) people tend to be unhappy under adverse conditions such as poverty, war and isolation, (b) improvement or deterioration of at least some conditions does effect happiness lastingly, (c) earlier hardship does not favour later happiness, (d) people are typically positive about their life rather than neutral. It is argued that the theory happiness-is-relative mixes up ‘overall happiness’ with contentment’. Contentment is indeed largely a matter of comparing life-as-it-is to standards of how-life-should-be. Yet overall hapiness does not entirely depend on comparison. The overall evaluation of life depends also on how one feels affectively and hedonic level of affect draws on its turn on the gratification of basic bio-psychological needs. Contrary to acquired ‘standards’ of comparison these innate ‘needs’ do not adjust to any and all conditions: they mark in fact the limits of human adaptability. To the extend that it depends on need-gratification, happiness is not relative. read more read less

Topics:

Happiness (74%)74% related to the paper, Easterlin paradox (64%)64% related to the paper, Subjective well-being (60%)60% related to the paper, Contentment (57%)57% related to the paper, Gratification (55%)55% related to the paper
View PDF
1,304 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Social Indicators Research.

It automatically formats your research paper to Springer formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Social Indicators Research format uses SPBASIC citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Social Indicators Research in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Social Indicators Research guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Social Indicators Research guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Social Indicators Research guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Social Indicators Research?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Social Indicators Research citation style.

4. Can I use the Social Indicators Research templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Social Indicators Research.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Social Indicators Research that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Social Indicators Research that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Social Indicators Research?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Social Indicators Research.

7. Where can I find the template for the Social Indicators Research?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Social Indicators Research's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Social Indicators Research's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Social Indicators Research an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Social Indicators Research is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Social Indicators Research?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Social Indicators Research?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Social Indicators Research?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Social Indicators Research, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Social Indicators Research's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Social Indicators Research?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Social Indicators Research. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Social Indicators Research?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Social Indicators Research are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Social Indicators Research?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Social Indicators Research's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Social Indicators Research in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Social Indicators Research Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Social Indicators Research formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template