Example of Building Research and Information format
Recent searches

Example of Building Research and Information format Example of Building Research and Information format Example of Building Research and Information format Example of Building Research and Information format Example of Building Research and Information format Example of Building Research and Information format Example of Building Research and Information format Example of Building Research and Information format Example of Building Research and Information format Example of Building Research and Information format Example of Building Research and Information format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Building Research and Information format Example of Building Research and Information format Example of Building Research and Information format Example of Building Research and Information format Example of Building Research and Information format Example of Building Research and Information format Example of Building Research and Information format Example of Building Research and Information format Example of Building Research and Information format Example of Building Research and Information format Example of Building Research and Information format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Building Research and Information — Template for authors

Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Civil and Structural Engineering #20 of 318 down down by 3 ranks
Building and Construction #12 of 185 down down by 1 rank
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 233 Published Papers | 1922 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 30/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.4
SJR: 0.95
SNIP: 1.307
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Emerald Publishing

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.6
SJR: 0.455
SNIP: 1.13
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.1
SJR: 1.292
SNIP: 1.67

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

3.887

4% from 2018

Impact factor for Building Research and Information from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 3.887
2018 3.744
2017 3.468
2016 3.136
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

8.2

21% from 2019

CiteRatio for Building Research and Information from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 8.2
2019 6.8
2018 6.1
2017 5.6
2016 5.1
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 4% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 21% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

1.249

6% from 2019

SJR for Building Research and Information from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.249
2019 1.175
2018 1.283
2017 1.141
2016 1.335
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

2.205

2% from 2019

SNIP for Building Research and Information from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.205
2019 2.167
2018 1.651
2017 1.797
2016 1.586
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 6% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 2% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.
Building Research and Information

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Taylor and Francis

Building Research and Information

BUILDING RESEARCH & INFORMATION ( BRI ) focuses on buildings, building stocks and their supporting systems. Unique to BRI is a holistic and transdisciplinary approach to buildings, which acknowledges the complexity of the built environment and other systems over their life.... Read More

Engineering

i
Last updated on
30 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
0961-3218
i
Impact Factor
Very High - 3.136
i
Acceptance Rate
Not provided
i
Frequency
Not provided
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
Taylor and Francis Custom Citation
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder GE, Tinkham M, Klapwijk TM. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys Rev B. 1982; 25(7):4515–4532. Available from: 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/096132198369751
Zephyrs of creative destruction: Understanding the management of innovation in construction

Abstract:

The aim of this paper is to propose a comprehensive framework for the management of innovation in construction, addressing the construction innovation problem in two distinctive ways at the institutional and firm levels. First, an institutional perspective derived from research on complex systems industries is developed which... The aim of this paper is to propose a comprehensive framework for the management of innovation in construction, addressing the construction innovation problem in two distinctive ways at the institutional and firm levels. First, an institutional perspective derived from research on complex systems industries is developed which provides an alternative to the volume production model for construction innovation research. The roles of the innovation infrastructure, innovation superstructure and systems integrator are all identified and applied to construction. The paper then moves on to the firm level where the two key innovation dynamics - the top-down adoption/implementation dynamic and the bottom up problem solving/learning dynamic are identified. The paper ends by calling for more case studies of the trajectories of construction innovations. L'objet de cet article est de proposer un cadre global ou gerer l'innovation dans le secteur de la construction; l'auteur aborde la question de l'innovation sous deux ... read more read less

Topics:

Innovation management (63%)63% related to the paper, Systems integrator (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
551 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/09613218.2011.561948
Barriers and drivers for sustainable building
Tarja Häkkinen1, Kaisa Belloni1

Abstract:

What are the actual barriers and drivers for sustainable building? A literature review, interviews and case studies are presented to address this question. Sustainable building is not hindered by a lack of technologies and assessment methods, but is instead beset with organizational and procedural difficulties entailed by the... What are the actual barriers and drivers for sustainable building? A literature review, interviews and case studies are presented to address this question. Sustainable building is not hindered by a lack of technologies and assessment methods, but is instead beset with organizational and procedural difficulties entailed by the adoption of new methods. New technologies are resisted because they require process changes entailing risks and unforeseen costs. These hindrances can be reduced by learning what kind of decision-making phases, new tasks, actors, roles and ways of networking are needed. The barriers are outlined as steering mechanisms, economics, a lack of client understanding, process (procurement and tendering, timing, cooperation and networking), and underpinning knowledge (knowledge and common language, the availability of methods and tools, innovation). The most important actions to promote sustainable building are the development of the awareness of clients about the benefits of sustainable bui... read more read less

Topics:

Procurement (52%)52% related to the paper, Emerging technologies (51%)51% related to the paper
532 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/09613218.2012.690952
Introducing the prebound effect: the gap between performance and actual energy consumption
Minna Sunikka-Blank1, Ray Galvin1

Abstract:

German regulations for the thermal renovation of existing homes demand high thermal standards, which the government claims are technically and economically feasible. This paper examines existing data on 3400 German homes; their calculated energy performance ratings (EPR) are then plotted against the actual measured consumptio... German regulations for the thermal renovation of existing homes demand high thermal standards, which the government claims are technically and economically feasible. This paper examines existing data on 3400 German homes; their calculated energy performance ratings (EPR) are then plotted against the actual measured consumption. The results indicate that occupants consume, on average, 30% less heating energy than the calculated rating. This phenomenon is identified as the ‘prebound’ effect and increases with the calculated rating. The opposite phenomenon, the rebound effect, tends to occur for low-energy dwellings, where occupants consume more than the rating. A similar phenomenon has been recognized in recent Dutch, Belgian, French and UK studies, suggesting policy implications in two directions. Firstly, using a dwelling's energy rating to predict fuel and CO2 savings through retrofits tends to overestimate savings, underestimate the payback time and possibly discourage cost-effective, incremental improv... read more read less

Topics:

Energy accounting (52%)52% related to the paper, Energy consumption (51%)51% related to the paper, Energy policy (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
518 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/09613218.2010.492660
Smart metering: what potential for householder engagement?
Sarah Darby1

Abstract:

The argument for the implementation of ‘smart’ metering, which is an elastic term, varies according to circumstance and place. In some countries, the business case for establishing an advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) relies in part on improving consumption feedback to customers and assisting in the transition to lower-i... The argument for the implementation of ‘smart’ metering, which is an elastic term, varies according to circumstance and place. In some countries, the business case for establishing an advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) relies in part on improving consumption feedback to customers and assisting in the transition to lower-impact energy systems. There is an expectation that AMI will lead to reductions in both the demand and the cost to serve customers through improved communication, but little evidence exists to show overall demand reduction. To what extent might smart meters improve the prospects for customer engagement? To assess this question, end-user perceptions and practices must be considered along with metering hardware and economics. Using the theory of affordances, qualitative research is examined to understand how householders have used consumption feedback, with and without smart meters. Although AMI offers possibilities for household energy management and customer–utility relations, there is... read more read less

Topics:

Customer engagement (54%)54% related to the paper, Business case (52%)52% related to the paper, Demand reduction (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
445 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/09613210903541527
Residential heat comfort practices: understanding users
Kirsten Gram-Hanssen1

Abstract:

The user-centred approach to heat consumption in housing is a highly relevant, but often neglected, aspect of residential energy consumption. The practice–theory approach is presented as a development within the socio-technical approach. A detailed analysis of empirical evidence from different households living in similar bui... The user-centred approach to heat consumption in housing is a highly relevant, but often neglected, aspect of residential energy consumption. The practice–theory approach is presented as a development within the socio-technical approach. A detailed analysis of empirical evidence from different households living in similar buildings in a suburb of Copenhagen, Denmark, shows significant variation in energy consumption due to different usage patterns of both the house and its heating system. An analysis using practice–theory finds that technologies, embodied habits, knowledge, and meanings are the main components in the understanding of both what holds this practice together as a collectively shared practice and the different socio-material configurations of each of the individual households. Un aspect hautement pertinent, mais souvent neglige, de la consommation energetique residentielle consiste en une approche de la consommation de chauffage dans les logements axee sur l'utilisateur. L'approche, basee sur... read more read less

Topics:

Energy consumption (60%)60% related to the paper, Consumption (economics) (53%)53% related to the paper
424 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Building Research and Information.

It automatically formats your research paper to Taylor and Francis formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Building Research and Information format uses Taylor and Francis Custom Citation citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Building Research and Information in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Building Research and Information guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Building Research and Information guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Building Research and Information guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Building Research and Information?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Building Research and Information citation style.

4. Can I use the Building Research and Information templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Building Research and Information.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Building Research and Information that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Building Research and Information that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Building Research and Information?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Building Research and Information.

7. Where can I find the template for the Building Research and Information?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Building Research and Information's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Building Research and Information's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Building Research and Information an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Building Research and Information is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Building Research and Information?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Building Research and Information?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Building Research and Information?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Building Research and Information, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Building Research and Information's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Building Research and Information?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Building Research and Information. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Building Research and Information?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Building Research and Information are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Building Research and Information?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Building Research and Information's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Building Research and Information in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Building Research and Information Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Building Research and Information formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template