Example of Death Studies format
Recent searches

Example of Death Studies format Example of Death Studies format Example of Death Studies format Example of Death Studies format Example of Death Studies format Example of Death Studies format Example of Death Studies format Example of Death Studies format Example of Death Studies format Example of Death Studies format Example of Death Studies format Example of Death Studies format Example of Death Studies format Example of Death Studies format Example of Death Studies format Example of Death Studies format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Death Studies format Example of Death Studies format Example of Death Studies format Example of Death Studies format Example of Death Studies format Example of Death Studies format Example of Death Studies format Example of Death Studies format Example of Death Studies format Example of Death Studies format Example of Death Studies format Example of Death Studies format Example of Death Studies format Example of Death Studies format Example of Death Studies format Example of Death Studies format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Death Studies — Template for authors

Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) #86 of 306 -
Clinical Psychology #93 of 283 down down by 2 ranks
Developmental and Educational Psychology #123 of 332 down down by 1 rank
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
Good
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 310 Published Papers | 892 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 28/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.9
SJR: 1.191
SNIP: 2.162
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.5
SJR: 0.641
SNIP: 1.243
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.8
SJR: 1.412
SNIP: 1.256
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 7.8
SJR: 2.036
SNIP: 2.066

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

1.361

13% from 2018

Impact factor for Death Studies from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 1.361
2018 1.2
2017 1.16
2016 1.16
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

2.9

32% from 2019

CiteRatio for Death Studies from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.9
2019 2.2
2018 2.3
2017 2.6
2016 2.2
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 13% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 32% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.555

13% from 2019

SJR for Death Studies from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.555
2019 0.492
2018 0.707
2017 0.573
2016 0.571
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.381

8% from 2019

SNIP for Death Studies from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.381
2019 1.274
2018 1.096
2017 1.036
2016 0.952
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 13% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 8% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.
Death Studies

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Taylor and Francis

Death Studies

Approved by publishing and review experts on SciSpace, this template is built as per for Death Studies formatting guidelines as mentioned in Taylor and Francis author instructions. The current version was created on 28 Jun 2020 and has been used by 654 authors to write and format their manuscripts to this journal.

Psychology

i
Last updated on
28 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
0748-1187
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.004
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
Taylor and Francis Custom Citation
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder GE, Tinkham M, Klapwijk TM. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys Rev B. 1982; 25(7):4515–4532. Available from: 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/074811899201046
The dual process model of coping with bereavement: rationale and description
01 Apr 1999 - Death Studies

Abstract:

There are shortcomings in traditional theorizing about effective ways of coping with bereavement, most notably , with respect to the so - called "grief work hypothesis . " Criticisms include imprecise definition , failure to represent dynamic processing that is characteristic of grieving , lack of empirical evidence and valid... There are shortcomings in traditional theorizing about effective ways of coping with bereavement, most notably , with respect to the so - called "grief work hypothesis . " Criticisms include imprecise definition , failure to represent dynamic processing that is characteristic of grieving , lack of empirical evidence and validation across cultures and historical periods , and a limited focus on intrapersonal processes and on health outcomes . Therefore , a revised model of coping with bereavement , the dual process model , is proposed . This model identifies two types of stressors , loss - and restoration - oriented , and a dynamic , regulatory coping process of oscillation , whereby the grieving individual at times confronts , at other times avoids , the different tasks of grieving . This model proposes that adaptive coping is composed of confrontation avoidance of loss and restoration stressors . It also argues the need for dosage of grieving , that is , the need to take respite from dealing with either ... read more read less

Topics:

Complicated grief (54%)54% related to the paper, Coping (psychology) (53%)53% related to the paper, Grief (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
1,738 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/07481187.2020.1748481
Coronavirus Anxiety Scale: A brief mental health screener for COVID-19 related anxiety.
Sherman A. Lee1
16 Apr 2020 - Death Studies

Abstract:

Mental health concerns of people impacted by the coronavirus pandemic have not been adequately addressed. The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate the properties of the Coronavirus Anxiety Scale (CAS), which is a brief mental health screener to identify probable cases of dysfunctional anxiety associated with th... Mental health concerns of people impacted by the coronavirus pandemic have not been adequately addressed. The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate the properties of the Coronavirus Anxiety Scale (CAS), which is a brief mental health screener to identify probable cases of dysfunctional anxiety associated with the COVID-19 crisis. This 5-item scale, which was based on 775 adults with anxiety over the coronavirus, demonstrated solid reliability and validity. Elevated CAS scores were found to be associated with coronavirus diagnosis, impairment, alcohol/drug coping, negative religious coping, extreme hopelessness, suicidal ideation, as well as attitudes toward President Trump and Chinese products. The CAS discriminates well between persons with and without dysfunctional anxiety using an optimized cut score of ≥ 9 (90% sensitivity and 85% specificity). These results support the CAS as an efficient and valid tool for clinical research and practice. read more read less

Topics:

Anxiety (62%)62% related to the paper, Suicidal ideation (53%)53% related to the paper, Mental health (52%)52% related to the paper, Dysfunctional family (52%)52% related to the paper, Coping (psychology) (50%)50% related to the paper
994 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/07481180050121480
Searching for the meaning of meaning: grief therapy and the process of reconstruction
01 Sep 2000 - Death Studies

Abstract:

A comprehensive quantitative review of published randomized controlled outcome studies of grief counseling and therapy suggests that such interventions are typically ineffective, and perhaps even deleterious, at least for persons experiencing a normal bereavement. On the other hand, there is some evidence that grief therapy i... A comprehensive quantitative review of published randomized controlled outcome studies of grief counseling and therapy suggests that such interventions are typically ineffective, and perhaps even deleterious, at least for persons experiencing a normal bereavement. On the other hand, there is some evidence that grief therapy is more beneficial and safer for those who have been traumatically bereaved. Beginning with this sobering appraisal, this article considers the findings of C. G. Davis, C. B. Wortman, D. R. Lehman, and R. C. Silver (this issue) and their implications for a meaning reconstruction approach to grief therapy, arguing that an expanded conception of meaning is necessary to provide a stronger basis for clinical intervention. read more read less

Topics:

Disenfranchised grief (66%)66% related to the paper, Grief (63%)63% related to the paper, Traumatic grief (62%)62% related to the paper, Meaning (existential) (53%)53% related to the paper
553 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/07481187.2010.496686
Predictors of complicated grief: a systematic review of empirical studies.
19 Aug 2010 - Death Studies

Abstract:

A systematic review of the literature on predictors of complicated grief (CG) was undertaken with the aim of clarifying the current knowledge and to inform future planning and work in CG following bereavement. Predictors of CG prior to the death include previous loss, exposure to trauma, a previous psychiatric history, attach... A systematic review of the literature on predictors of complicated grief (CG) was undertaken with the aim of clarifying the current knowledge and to inform future planning and work in CG following bereavement. Predictors of CG prior to the death include previous loss, exposure to trauma, a previous psychiatric history, attachment style, and the relationship to the deceased. Factors associated with the death include violent death, the quality of the caregiving or dying experience, close kinship relationship to the deceased, marital closeness and dependency, and lack of preparation for the death. Perceived social support played a key role after death, along with cognitive appraisals and high distress at the time of the death. Inconsistent definitions of CG and measurement tools were noted in the earlier studies reviewed. Limitations identified in the studies included use of cross-sectional designs, heterogeneous samples, high attrition, demographic differences between cases and controls, differences in length of time since death, and differences in types of death experienced. Notwithstanding these limitations, some consistent findings have emerged. Further research into conceptualizations of CG in terms of attachment theory and constructivist and cognitive-behavioral concepts of finding purpose and meaning after bereavement is warranted. read more read less

Topics:

Complicated grief (59%)59% related to the paper, Grief (54%)54% related to the paper
View PDF
459 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/07481180600848322
Continuing Bonds and Reconstructing Meaning: Mitigating Complications in Bereavement.
Robert A. Neimeyer1, Scott A. Baldwin1, James Gillies1
23 Nov 2006 - Death Studies

Abstract:

Drawing on attachment theory and constructivist conceptualizations of bereavement, the authors assessed the relation between continuing bonds coping and meaning reconstruction following the death of a loved one and complicated grief symptomatology. Five hundred six young adults in the first two years of bereavement from a var... Drawing on attachment theory and constructivist conceptualizations of bereavement, the authors assessed the relation between continuing bonds coping and meaning reconstruction following the death of a loved one and complicated grief symptomatology. Five hundred six young adults in the first two years of bereavement from a variety of losses completed the Inventory of Complicated Grief along with measures of the strength of their ongoing attachment to the deceased and their capacity to make sense of the loss, find benefit in the experience, and reconstruct a progressive sense of identity following the death. Several variables concerning the survivor, his or her relationship to the deceased, and the nature of the death functioned as risk factors for heightened distress, but their role was generally moderated by meaning-making, often to the point of non-significance. In contrast, higher levels of benefit-finding and positive identity change were associated with lower levels of bereavement complication. Finally, an interaction emerged between sense-making and ongoing attachment to the deceased, suggesting that strong continuing bonds predicted greater levels of traumatic and especially separation distress, but only when the survivor was unable to make sense of the loss in personal, practical, existential, or spiritual terms. read more read less

Topics:

Complicated grief (63%)63% related to the paper, Disenfranchised grief (61%)61% related to the paper, Grief (58%)58% related to the paper, Attachment theory (52%)52% related to the paper
428 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Death Studies.

It automatically formats your research paper to Taylor and Francis formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Death Studies format uses Taylor and Francis Custom Citation citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Death Studies in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Death Studies guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Death Studies guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Death Studies guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Death Studies?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Death Studies citation style.

4. Can I use the Death Studies templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Death Studies.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Death Studies that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Death Studies that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Death Studies?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Death Studies.

7. Where can I find the template for the Death Studies?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Death Studies's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Death Studies's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Death Studies an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Death Studies is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Death Studies?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Death Studies?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Death Studies?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Death Studies, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Death Studies's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Death Studies?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Death Studies. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Death Studies?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Death Studies are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Death Studies?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Death Studies's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Death Studies in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Death Studies Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Death Studies formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template