Example of Memory format
Recent searches

Example of Memory format Example of Memory format Example of Memory format Example of Memory format Example of Memory format Example of Memory format Example of Memory format Example of Memory format Example of Memory format Example of Memory format Example of Memory format Example of Memory format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Memory format Example of Memory format Example of Memory format Example of Memory format Example of Memory format Example of Memory format Example of Memory format Example of Memory format Example of Memory format Example of Memory format Example of Memory format Example of Memory format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Memory — Template for authors

Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) #74 of 306 down down by 10 ranks
Psychology (all) #63 of 203 down down by 9 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 490 Published Papers | 1571 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 19/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.7
SJR: 1.416
SNIP: 1.831
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 8.9
SJR: 3.042
SNIP: 3.075
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 13.8
SJR: 2.108
SNIP: 3.151
open access Open Access

Wiley

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.0
SJR: 1.223
SNIP: 1.305

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

1.895

11% from 2018

Impact factor for Memory from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 1.895
2018 1.713
2017 1.873
2016 2.118
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

3.2

3% from 2019

CiteRatio for Memory from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 3.2
2019 3.3
2018 3.2
2017 3.3
2016 3.3
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 11% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has decreased by 3% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.948

17% from 2019

SJR for Memory from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.948
2019 1.137
2018 1.028
2017 0.925
2016 1.007
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.93

15% from 2019

SNIP for Memory from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.93
2019 1.098
2018 0.957
2017 0.918
2016 1.003
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 17% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 15% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Memory

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Taylor and Francis

Memory

Memory publishes high quality papers in all areas of memory research. This includes experimental studies of memory (including laboratory-based research, everyday memory studies, and applied memory research), developmental, educational, neuropsychological, clinical and social r...... Read More

Arts and Humanities

i
Last updated on
18 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
0965-8211
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.075
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
Taylor and Francis Custom Citation
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder GE, Tinkham M, Klapwijk TM. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys Rev B. 1982; 25(7):4515–4532. Available from: 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/09658219408258940
The children's test of nonword repetition: A test of phonological working memory
Susan E. Gathercole1, Catherine Willis2, Alan D. Baddeley, Hazel Emslie
01 Jun 1994 - Memory

Abstract:

This article presents findings from the Children's Test of Nonword Repetition (CNRep). Normative data based on its administration to over 600 children aged between four and nine years are reported. Close developmental links are established between CNRep scores and vocabulary, reading, and comprehensive skills in children duri... This article presents findings from the Children's Test of Nonword Repetition (CNRep). Normative data based on its administration to over 600 children aged between four and nine years are reported. Close developmental links are established between CNRep scores and vocabulary, reading, and comprehensive skills in children during the early school years. The links between nonword repetition and language skills are shown to be consistently higher and more specific than those obtained between language skills and another simple verbal task with a significant phonological memory component, auditory digit span. The psychological mechanisms underpinning these distinctive developmental relationships between nonword repetition and language development are considered. read more read less

Topics:

Memory span (56%)56% related to the paper, Short-term memory (53%)53% related to the paper, Vocabulary (51%)51% related to the paper, Repetition (rhetorical device) (51%)51% related to the paper, Working memory (50%)50% related to the paper
918 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/09658211003702171
The concurrent validity of the N-back task as a working memory measure
Susanne M. Jaeggi1, Martin Buschkuehl1, Walter J. Perrig2, Beat Meier2
19 Apr 2010 - Memory

Abstract:

The N-back task is used extensively in literature as a working memory (WM) paradigm and it is increasingly used as a measure of individual differences. However, not much is known about the psychometric properties of this task and the current study aims to shed more light on this issue. We first review the current literature o... The N-back task is used extensively in literature as a working memory (WM) paradigm and it is increasingly used as a measure of individual differences. However, not much is known about the psychometric properties of this task and the current study aims to shed more light on this issue. We first review the current literature on the psychometric properties of the N-back task. With three experiments using task variants with different stimuli and load levels, we then investigate the nature of the N-back task by investigating its relationship to WM, and its role as an inter-individual difference measure. Consistent with previous literature, our data suggest that the N-back task is not a useful measure of individual differences in WM, partly because of its insufficient reliability. Nevertheless, the task seems to be useful for experimental research in WM and also well predicts inter-individual differences in other higher cognitive functions, such as fluid intelligence, especially when used at higher levels of load. read more read less

Topics:

Task (project management) (57%)57% related to the paper, n-back (57%)57% related to the paper, Working memory (52%)52% related to the paper, Short-term memory (52%)52% related to the paper, Executive functions (51%)51% related to the paper
688 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/09658210802647009
Metacognitive strategies in student learning: Do students practise retrieval when they study on their own?
Jeffrey D. Karpicke1, Andrew C. Butler, Henry L. Roediger2
08 Apr 2009 - Memory

Abstract:

Basic research on human learning and memory has shown that practising retrieval of information (by testing the information) has powerful effects on learning and long-term retention. Repeated testing enhances learning more than repeated reading, which often confers limited benefit beyond that gained from the initial reading of... Basic research on human learning and memory has shown that practising retrieval of information (by testing the information) has powerful effects on learning and long-term retention. Repeated testing enhances learning more than repeated reading, which often confers limited benefit beyond that gained from the initial reading of the material. Laboratory research also suggests that students lack metacognitive awareness of the mnemonic benefits of testing. The implication is that in real-world educational settings students may not engage in retrieval practise to enhance learning. To investigate students’ real-world study behaviours, we surveyed 177 college students and asked them (1) to list strategies they used when studying (an open-ended, free report question) and (2) to choose whether they would reread or practise recall after studying a textbook chapter (a forced report question). The results of both questions point to the same conclusion: A majority of students repeatedly read their notes or textbook (despite the limited benefits of this strategy), but relatively few engage in self-testing or retrieval practise while studying. We propose that many students experience illusions of competence while studying and that these illusions have significant consequences for the strategies students select when they monitor and regulate their own learning. read more read less

Topics:

Mnemonic (53%)53% related to the paper, Metacognition (52%)52% related to the paper
View PDF
579 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/741938210
The identity function of autobiographical memory: Time is on our side
Anne E. Wilson1, Michael Ross2
01 Mar 2003 - Memory

Abstract:

Autobiographical memory plays an important role in the construction of personal identity. We review evidence of the bi-directional link between memory and identity. Individuals' current self-views, beliefs, and goals influence their recollections and appraisals of former selves. In turn, people's current self-views are influe... Autobiographical memory plays an important role in the construction of personal identity. We review evidence of the bi-directional link between memory and identity. Individuals' current self-views, beliefs, and goals influence their recollections and appraisals of former selves. In turn, people's current self-views are influenced by what they remember about their personal past, as well as how they recall earlier selves and episodes. People's reconstructed evaluations of memories, their perceived distance from past experiences, and the point of view of their recollections have implications for how the past affects the present. We focus on how people's constructions of themselves through time serve the function of creating a coherent--and largely favourable--view of their present selves and circumstances. read more read less

Topics:

Autobiographical memory (59%)59% related to the paper, Personal identity (56%)56% related to the paper, Recall (54%)54% related to the paper, Identity (social science) (53%)53% related to the paper
View PDF
579 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/09658210244000135
Levels of processing: past, present. and future?
01 Sep 2002 - Memory

Abstract:

In this article I first briefly survey some enduring legacies of the Craik and Lockhart (1972) article on levels of processing (LOP) and address some common criticisms In the next section I discuss whether memory can be regarded as ‘‘pure processing’’, the role of short-term memory in an LOP framework, measurement of ‘‘depth’... In this article I first briefly survey some enduring legacies of the Craik and Lockhart (1972) article on levels of processing (LOP) and address some common criticisms In the next section I discuss whether memory can be regarded as ‘‘pure processing’’, the role of short-term memory in an LOP framework, measurement of ‘‘depth’’ in LOP, encoding‐retrieval interactions, the concept of consolidation, and the reality of ‘‘levels’’ of processing In the final section I offer some speculations on future directions, discussing the notion of levels of representation and a possible continuing role for LOP in memory research To start with some personal history, I spent a stimulating and productive year (1968‐69) in the Psychology Department at the University of Toronto, imbibing the wisdom dispensed by Ben Murdock and Endel Tulving, and interacting with a lively group of graduate students and post-docs The focus of my research was short-term memory, and this broadened out during the year to a consideration of encoding and retrieval processes in long-term or secondary memory When I returned to Birkbeck College in London, I was intrigued and influenced by the work on selective attention being carried out by Donald Broadbent, Anne Treisman, and Neville Moray In particular, Treisman’s (1964) theory of selective attention combined aspects of previous knowledge with perception and attention; it was an exciting possibility that memory encoding and retrieval processes could also be brought into the mix, in the spirit of Neisser’s (1967) call for an integrated theory of cognitive functions Treisman (1964, 1979) proposed that perceptual processing could be envisaged as a hierarchy of ‘‘levels of analysis’’ running from early sensory analyses to later analyses concerned with object properties and identification of words, pictures, and objects In this scheme, identification and meaning may be regarded as occurring later (and thus in some sense ‘‘deeper’’) in the sequence of analyses than the analysis of sensory and surface features From contemporary work on dichotic listening it also seemed that such deeper analysis of meaning required more attention than did the analysis of sensory features Subjects were able to identify a speaker’s voice as male or female on the unattended channel, but were unable to understand the meaning of the utterance It also seemed reasonable to assume that analysis of a particular feature corresponded to conscious awareness of read more read less

Topics:

Levels-of-processing effect (54%)54% related to the paper, Perception (51%)51% related to the paper
560 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Memory.

It automatically formats your research paper to Taylor and Francis formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Memory format uses Taylor and Francis Custom Citation citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Memory in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Memory guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Memory guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Memory guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Memory?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Memory citation style.

4. Can I use the Memory templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Memory.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Memory that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Memory that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Memory?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Memory.

7. Where can I find the template for the Memory?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Memory's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Memory's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Memory an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Memory is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Memory?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Memory?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Memory?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Memory, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Memory's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Memory?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Memory. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Memory?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Memory are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Memory?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Memory's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Memory in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Memory Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Memory formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template