Example of Open Review of Educational Research format
Recent searches

Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format Example of Open Review of Educational Research format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access e-ISSN: 23265507
recommended Recommended

Open Review of Educational Research — Template for authors

Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
History #29 of 1328 down down by None rank
Philosophy #29 of 644 down down by None rank
Education #345 of 1319 down down by None rank
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 35 Published Papers | 90 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 16/06/2020
Insights & related journals
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Journal Performance & Insights

  • CiteRatio
  • SJR
  • SNIP

CiteRatio is a measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

2.6

37% from 2019

CiteRatio for Open Review of Educational Research from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.6
2019 1.9
2018 0.2
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 37% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

0.453

48% from 2019

SJR for Open Review of Educational Research from 2019 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.453
2019 0.307
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 48% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

2.748

97% from 2019

SNIP for Open Review of Educational Research from 2018 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.748
2019 1.392
2018 0.552
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 97% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Related Journals

open access Open Access ISSN: 17470161 e-ISSN: 20476094
recommended Recommended

SAGE

CiteRatio: 2.3 | SJR: 0.457 | SNIP: 1.306
open access Open Access ISSN: 15679896 e-ISSN: 15700593
recommended Recommended

Brill

CiteRatio: 1.0 | SJR: 0.158 | SNIP: 3.203
open access Open Access ISSN: 309230 e-ISSN: 1477674X

Taylor and Francis

CiteRatio: 0.6 | SJR: 0.124 | SNIP: 0.558
open access Open Access ISSN: 3113248 e-ISSN: 8198691

Emerald Publishing

CiteRatio: 0.5 | SJR: 0.263 | SNIP: 0.841
Open Review of Educational Research

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Taylor and Francis

Open Review of Educational Research

Approved by publishing and review experts on SciSpace, this template is built as per for Open Review of Educational Research formatting guidelines as mentioned in Taylor and Francis author instructions. The current version was created on 16 Jun 2020 and has been used by 459 authors to write and format their manuscripts to this journal.

i
Last updated on
16 Jun 2020
i
Open Access
Not provided
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
Taylor and Francis Custom Citation
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder GE, Tinkham M, Klapwijk TM. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys Rev B. 1982; 25(7):4515–4532. Available from: 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/23265507.2017.1300068
Be(com)ing a reflexive researcher: a developmental approach to research methodology
Mariam Attia1, Julian Edge2

Abstract:

Our purpose in this article is to achieve a shift of focus away from a view of research methods as objectified procedures to be learnt by researchers, and towards the development of researchers who craft procedures integral to the environments in which they operate – environments of which they are also a functioning constitue... Our purpose in this article is to achieve a shift of focus away from a view of research methods as objectified procedures to be learnt by researchers, and towards the development of researchers who craft procedures integral to the environments in which they operate – environments of which they are also a functioning constituent. A key element in such a perspective is the conceptualisation (and practice) of the relationship between development and reflexivity. Reflexivity involves a process of on-going mutual shaping between researcher and research. Development involves an increase in awareness of such processes of interaction between organism and context. Rather than see development only as a welcome side-effect of reflexive research, we treat development of the researcher as central, with reflexivity in an instrumental relationship to this on-going process. With regard to the pragmatic implementation of these concepts, we emphasise the importance of the researcher consciously stepping back from action in order to theorise what is taking place, and also stepping up to be an active part of that contextualised action. We exemplify the processes involved using research data taken from a doctoral study into the role of technology in the teaching of Arabic. The first section of this article explores the idea of a developmental approach. The second unpacks our sense of reflexivity. The third section exemplifies our discussion through the experiences of a researcher in the field. The concluding section summarises and restates our argument regarding the potential usefulness of adopting a developmental approach to the conduct of research. read more read less

Topics:

Reflexivity (58%)58% related to the paper, Action (philosophy) (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
144 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/23265507.2016.1155167
Determinants of education quality: what makes students’ perception different?

Abstract:

In recent decades, the commercialization of education has become more apparent and the need for using marketing tools is greater than before. This study aims to identify the demographic and background information of students that differentiate their perception about quality of higher education. A sample of 432 students was ta... In recent decades, the commercialization of education has become more apparent and the need for using marketing tools is greater than before. This study aims to identify the demographic and background information of students that differentiate their perception about quality of higher education. A sample of 432 students was taken from five top private universities of Bangladesh to evaluate their perception toward dimensions of higher education. Multinomial regression analysis was conducted to identify the characteristics of students which make their perception about quality of higher education dissimilar. The findings show that status of students for scholarship, extracurricular activities, parents’ education, age, previous result, and university they study in have a significant influence on perception about quality of higher education. Part-time job status has moderate influence on the students’ perception. This research carries value to education policy-makers and university authorities. They can... read more read less

Topics:

Education policy (59%)59% related to the paper, Business education (59%)59% related to the paper, Higher education (59%)59% related to the paper, Perception (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
125 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/23265507.2014.998159
Teachers’ Critical Reflective Practice in the Context of Twenty-first Century Learning
Leon Benade1

Abstract:

In the twenty-first century, learning and teaching at school must prepare young people for engaging in a complex and dynamic world deeply influenced by globalisation and the revolution in digital t... In the twenty-first century, learning and teaching at school must prepare young people for engaging in a complex and dynamic world deeply influenced by globalisation and the revolution in digital t... read more read less

Topics:

Reflective practice (58%)58% related to the paper, Education theory (51%)51% related to the paper, Context (language use) (51%)51% related to the paper, Transformative learning (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
69 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/23265507.2014.972439
Social Exclusion/Inclusion: Foucault's analytics of exclusion, the political ecology of social inclusion and the legitimation of inclusive education
Michael A. Peters1, Tina Besley1

Abstract:

This article offers a broad philosophical and historical background to the dyad of social exclusion/inclusion by examining the analytics and politics of exclusion first by reference to Michel Fouca... This article offers a broad philosophical and historical background to the dyad of social exclusion/inclusion by examining the analytics and politics of exclusion first by reference to Michel Fouca... read more read less

Topics:

Social exclusion (56%)56% related to the paper, Analytics (53%)53% related to the paper, Legitimation (52%)52% related to the paper
View PDF
50 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/23265507.2016.1266693
Qatar’s educational reform past and future: challenges in teacher development

Abstract:

Until the late 1990s, Qatar’s educational system used the intrinsic-nationalistic and cultural traditions of Arabic schools. The Qatari leadership and stakeholder was outdated; hence, they approach... Until the late 1990s, Qatar’s educational system used the intrinsic-nationalistic and cultural traditions of Arabic schools. The Qatari leadership and stakeholder was outdated; hence, they approach... read more read less

Topics:

Educational assessment (52%)52% related to the paper, Higher education (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
43 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Open Review of Educational Research.

It automatically formats your research paper to Taylor and Francis formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Open Review of Educational Research format uses Taylor and Francis Custom Citation citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

Absolutely not! With our tool, you can freely write without having to focus on LaTeX. You can write your entire paper as per the Open Review of Educational Research guidelines and autoformat it.

Yes. The template is fully compliant as per the guidelines of this journal. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. Also, if there's any update in the journal format guidelines, we take care of it and include that in our algorithm.

Sure. We support all the top citation styles like APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, Chicago style, etc. For example, in case of this journal, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, it will automatically update your article as per the Open Review of Educational Research citation style.

You can avail our Free Trial for 7 days. I'm sure you'll find our features very helpful. Plus, it's quite inexpensive.

Yup. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word doc and click on auto-format. You'll have a publish-ready paper that you can download at the end.

A matter of seconds. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves a load of your time in writing and formating your manuscript.

One little Google search can get you the Word template for any journal. However, why do you need a Word template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace, autoformat it as per Open Review of Educational Research's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Try us out!.

Absolutely! You can do it using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, you can always contact our support team.

SciSpace is an online tool for now. We'll soon release a desktop version. You can also request (or upvote) any feature that you think might be helpful for you and the research community in the feature request section once you sign-up with us.

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it up and running within a matter of 3 working days. You can find the request box in the Journal Gallery on the right sidebar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for?".

After you have written and autoformatted your paper, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx and LaTeX.

To be honest, the answer is NO. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of those factors the review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, Eigenfactor, etc. You must assess all the factors and then take the final call.

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We have extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help our researchers understand the access level of this journal. The following table indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

Our journal submission experts are skilled in submitting papers to various international journals.

After uploading your paper on SciSpace, you would see a button to request a journal submission service for Open Review of Educational Research.

Each submission service is completed within 4 - 5 working days.

Yes. SciSpace provides this functionality.

After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or .bib file.

SciSpace would allow download of your references in Open Review of Educational Research Endnote style, according to taylor-and-francis guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Open Review of Educational Research formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template