Example of Oxford Review of Education format
Recent searches

Example of Oxford Review of Education format Example of Oxford Review of Education format Example of Oxford Review of Education format Example of Oxford Review of Education format Example of Oxford Review of Education format Example of Oxford Review of Education format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Oxford Review of Education format Example of Oxford Review of Education format Example of Oxford Review of Education format Example of Oxford Review of Education format Example of Oxford Review of Education format Example of Oxford Review of Education format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Oxford Review of Education — Template for authors

Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Education #291 of 1319 down down by 76 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 188 Published Papers | 544 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 13/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 2.2
SJR: 1.098
SNIP: 1.835
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.5
SJR: 1.299
SNIP: 1.605
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.2
SJR: 1.218
SNIP: 1.195
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.9
SJR: 2.212
SNIP: 2.09

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

1.421

12% from 2018

Impact factor for Oxford Review of Education from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 1.421
2018 1.274
2017 1.393
2016 0.89
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

2.9

7% from 2019

CiteRatio for Oxford Review of Education from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.9
2019 2.7
2018 2.9
2017 2.5
2016 2.2
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 12% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 7% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.774

18% from 2019

SJR for Oxford Review of Education from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.774
2019 0.945
2018 1.13
2017 1.158
2016 1.163
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.539

7% from 2019

SNIP for Oxford Review of Education from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.539
2019 1.655
2018 1.573
2017 1.556
2016 1.198
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 18% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 7% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.
Oxford Review of Education

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Taylor and Francis

Oxford Review of Education

The Oxford Review of Education is a well established journal with an extensive international readership. It is committed to deploying the resources of a wide range of academic disciplines in the service of educational scholarship, and the Editors welcome articles reporting sig...... Read More

Education

Social Sciences

i
Last updated on
13 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
0305-4985
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.305
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
Taylor and Francis Custom Citation
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder GE, Tinkham M, Klapwijk TM. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys Rev B. 1982; 25(7):4515–4532. Available from: 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/03054980902934563
Positive Education: Positive Psychology and Classroom Interventions.
Martin E. P. Seligman1, Randal M. Ernst, Jane E. Gillham1, Karen Reivich1, Mark Linkins

Abstract:

Positive education is defined as education for both traditional skills and for happiness. The high prevalence worldwide of depression among young people, the small rise in life satisfaction, and the synergy between learning and positive emotion all argue that the skills for happiness should be taught in school. There is subst... Positive education is defined as education for both traditional skills and for happiness. The high prevalence worldwide of depression among young people, the small rise in life satisfaction, and the synergy between learning and positive emotion all argue that the skills for happiness should be taught in school. There is substantial evidence from well controlled studies that skills that increase resilience, positive emotion, engagement and meaning can be taught to schoolchildren. We present the story of teaching these skills to an entire school—Geelong Grammar School—in Australia, and we speculate that positive education will form the basis of a ‘new prosperity’, a politics that values both wealth and well‐being. read more read less

Topics:

Life skills (62%)62% related to the paper, Positive education (61%)61% related to the paper, Happiness (60%)60% related to the paper, Positive psychology (58%)58% related to the paper, Well-being (56%)56% related to the paper
View PDF
1,406 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/0305498780040207
Education and Identity.

Topics:

Identity (social science) (71%)71% related to the paper, Philosophy of education (67%)67% related to the paper, Education theory (65%)65% related to the paper, Higher education (57%)57% related to the paper, Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (57%)57% related to the paper
849 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/03054980701425706
Learning from other people in the workplace
Michael Eraut1

Abstract:

This paper draws primarily on an ESRC‐TLRP longitudinal study of early career professional learning, which focused on the first three years of employment of newly qualified nurses, graduate engineers seeking chartered status and trainee chartered accountants. The first section introduces the theoretical and methodological bas... This paper draws primarily on an ESRC‐TLRP longitudinal study of early career professional learning, which focused on the first three years of employment of newly qualified nurses, graduate engineers seeking chartered status and trainee chartered accountants. The first section introduces the theoretical and methodological base provided by previous projects, then proceeds to explore an epistemology of practice, using three dimensions: (1) four key elements of practice—situational assessment, decision‐making, actions and meta‐cognitive monitoring; (2) the mode of cognition and its dependence on time and prior learning; and (3) the context, its influence on mode of cognition and its affordances for learning. The central section presents the project’s findings on modes of learning through a new framework, which divides learning processes according to whether the object is perceived to be learning or working, then adds a list of shorter learning activities used within both types of process, including various t... read more read less

Topics:

Experiential learning (68%)68% related to the paper, Active learning (65%)65% related to the paper, Educational technology (63%)63% related to the paper, Learning sciences (63%)63% related to the paper, Professional learning community (62%)62% related to the paper
745 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/03054980601094651
The challenges of insider research in educational institutions: wielding a double‐edged sword and resolving delicate dilemmas
Justine Mercer1

Abstract:

This paper explores the challenges faced by educational researchers investigating the places where they work. It reviews the literature on insider research and draws upon the author’s own experience of researching faculty appraisal at two Higher Education institutions where she taught. It argues that the insider/outsider dich... This paper explores the challenges faced by educational researchers investigating the places where they work. It reviews the literature on insider research and draws upon the author’s own experience of researching faculty appraisal at two Higher Education institutions where she taught. It argues that the insider/outsider dichotomy is actually a continuum with multiple dimensions, and that all researchers constantly move back and forth along a number of axes, depending upon time, location, participants and topic. The assumption that one kind of research is better than the other is challenged, and the advantages and disadvantages of insider research are discussed in terms of access, intrusiveness, familiarity and rapport. Finally, three dilemmas relating to informant bias, reciprocity in interviews, and research ethics are examined from an insider researcher’s perspective, and the ways in which the author responded to these dilemmas at different points in her own four‐year two‐site study are critiqued. read more read less

Topics:

Insider (59%)59% related to the paper, Research ethics (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
733 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/03054980500117827
Management as ideology: the case of ‘new managerialism’ in higher education
Rosemary Deem1, Kevin J. Brehony2

Abstract:

The paper explores ideological conceptions of management, especially ‘new managerialism’, with particular reference to their role in the reform of higher education. It is suggested that attempts to reform public services in general are political as well as technical, though there is no single unitary ideology of ‘new manageri... The paper explores ideological conceptions of management, especially ‘new managerialism’, with particular reference to their role in the reform of higher education. It is suggested that attempts to reform public services in general are political as well as technical, though there is no single unitary ideology of ‘new managerialism’. Whilst some argue that managers have become a class and have particular interests, this may not be so for all public services. The arguments presented are illustrated by data taken from a recent research project on the management of UK higher education. It is suggested that managers in public service organisations such as universities do not constitute a class. However, as in the case of manager‐academics, managing a contemporary public service such as higher education may involve taking on the ideologies and values of ‘new managerialism’, and for some, embracing these. So management ideologies do seem to serve the interests of manager‐academics and help cement relations of po... read more read less

Topics:

Managerialism (66%)66% related to the paper, Public service (57%)57% related to the paper, Ideology (53%)53% related to the paper, Higher education (53%)53% related to the paper
View PDF
722 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Oxford Review of Education.

It automatically formats your research paper to Taylor and Francis formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Oxford Review of Education format uses Taylor and Francis Custom Citation citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Oxford Review of Education in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Oxford Review of Education guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Oxford Review of Education guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Oxford Review of Education guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Oxford Review of Education?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Oxford Review of Education citation style.

4. Can I use the Oxford Review of Education templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Oxford Review of Education.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Oxford Review of Education that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Oxford Review of Education that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Oxford Review of Education?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Oxford Review of Education.

7. Where can I find the template for the Oxford Review of Education?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Oxford Review of Education's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Oxford Review of Education's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Oxford Review of Education an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Oxford Review of Education is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Oxford Review of Education?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Oxford Review of Education?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Oxford Review of Education?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Oxford Review of Education, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Oxford Review of Education's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Oxford Review of Education?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Oxford Review of Education. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Oxford Review of Education?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Oxford Review of Education are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Oxford Review of Education?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Oxford Review of Education's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Oxford Review of Education in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Oxford Review of Education Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Oxford Review of Education formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template