Example of Philosophical Psychology format
Recent searches

Example of Philosophical Psychology format Example of Philosophical Psychology format Example of Philosophical Psychology format Example of Philosophical Psychology format Example of Philosophical Psychology format Example of Philosophical Psychology format Example of Philosophical Psychology format Example of Philosophical Psychology format Example of Philosophical Psychology format Example of Philosophical Psychology format Example of Philosophical Psychology format Example of Philosophical Psychology format Example of Philosophical Psychology format Example of Philosophical Psychology format Example of Philosophical Psychology format Example of Philosophical Psychology format Example of Philosophical Psychology format Example of Philosophical Psychology format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Philosophical Psychology format Example of Philosophical Psychology format Example of Philosophical Psychology format Example of Philosophical Psychology format Example of Philosophical Psychology format Example of Philosophical Psychology format Example of Philosophical Psychology format Example of Philosophical Psychology format Example of Philosophical Psychology format Example of Philosophical Psychology format Example of Philosophical Psychology format Example of Philosophical Psychology format Example of Philosophical Psychology format Example of Philosophical Psychology format Example of Philosophical Psychology format Example of Philosophical Psychology format Example of Philosophical Psychology format Example of Philosophical Psychology format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Philosophical Psychology — Template for authors

Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Philosophy #62 of 644 down down by 30 ranks
Applied Psychology #146 of 227 down down by 34 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 210 Published Papers | 374 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 16/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 0.9
SJR: 0.302
SNIP: 0.743
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.3
SJR: 1.446
SNIP: 1.572
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 1.4
SJR: 0.388
SNIP: 1.091
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 1.2
SJR: 0.288
SNIP: 0.637

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

0.785

32% from 2018

Impact factor for Philosophical Psychology from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 0.785
2018 1.15
2017 1.076
2016 1.029
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.8

10% from 2019

CiteRatio for Philosophical Psychology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.8
2019 2.0
2018 2.2
2017 2.2
2016 1.9
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has decreased by 32% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has decreased by 10% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.699

12% from 2019

SJR for Philosophical Psychology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.699
2019 0.622
2018 0.804
2017 0.707
2016 0.699
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.341

38% from 2019

SNIP for Philosophical Psychology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.341
2019 0.973
2018 1.113
2017 0.944
2016 0.837
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 12% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 38% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Philosophical Psychology

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Taylor and Francis

Philosophical Psychology

Philosophical Psychology is an international journal devoted to developing and strengthening the links between philosophy and the psychological sciences, both as basic sciences and as employed in applied settings, by publishing original, peer-refereed contributions to this exp...... Read More

Philosophy

Applied Psychology

Arts and Humanities

i
Last updated on
16 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
0951-5089
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.222
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
Taylor and Francis Custom Citation
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder GE, Tinkham M, Klapwijk TM. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys Rev B. 1982; 25(7):4515–4532. Available from: 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/09515088808572924
Five kinds of self‐knowledge
Ulric Neisser1
01 Jan 1988 - Philosophical Psychology

Abstract:

Self‐knowledge is based on several different forms of information, so distinct that each one essentially establishes a different ‘self. The ecological self is the self as directly perceived with respect to the immediate physical environment; the interpersonal self, also directly perceived, is established by species‐specific s... Self‐knowledge is based on several different forms of information, so distinct that each one essentially establishes a different ‘self. The ecological self is the self as directly perceived with respect to the immediate physical environment; the interpersonal self, also directly perceived, is established by species‐specific signals of emotional rapport and communication; the extended self is based on memory and anticipation; the private self appears when we discover that our conscious experiences are exclusively our own; the conceptual self or ‘self‐concept’ draws its meaning from a network of socially‐based assumptions and theories about human nature in general and ourselves in particular. Although these selves are rarely experienced as distinct (because they are held together by specific forms of stimulus information), they differ in their developmental histories, in the accuracy with which we can know them, in the pathologies to which they are subject, and generally in what they contribute to ... read more read less

Topics:

Self (60%)60% related to the paper, Ecological self (57%)57% related to the paper, Self-knowledge (51%)51% related to the paper, Interpersonal communication (50%)50% related to the paper
940 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/09515080307771
Intentional Action in Folk Psychology: An Experimental Investigation
Joshua Knobe1
01 Jun 2003 - Philosophical Psychology

Abstract:

Four experiments examined people's folk-psychological concept of intentional action. The chief question was whether or not evaluative considerations--considerations of good and bad, right and wrong, praise and blame--played any role in that concept. The results indicated that the moral qualities of a behavior strongly influen... Four experiments examined people's folk-psychological concept of intentional action. The chief question was whether or not evaluative considerations--considerations of good and bad, right and wrong, praise and blame--played any role in that concept. The results indicated that the moral qualities of a behavior strongly influence people's judgments as to whether or not that behavior should be considered "intentional." After eliminating a number of alternative explanations, the author concludes that this effect is best explained by the hypothesis that evaluative considerations do play some role in people's concept of intentional action. read more read less

Topics:

Folk psychology (68%)68% related to the paper, Action (philosophy) (61%)61% related to the paper, Praise (58%)58% related to the paper, Social psychology (sociology) (54%)54% related to the paper, Philosophy of mind (53%)53% related to the paper
View PDF
329 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/09515080500264180
Surveying Freedom: Folk Intuitions about free will and moral responsibility
Eddy Nahmias1, Stephen G. Morris1, Thomas Nadelhoffer1, Jason Turner1
01 Oct 2005 - Philosophical Psychology

Abstract:

Philosophers working in the nascent field of ‘experimental philosophy’ have begun using methods borrowed from psychology to collect data about folk intuitions concerning debates ranging from action theory to ethics to epistemology. In this paper we present the results of our attempts to apply this approach to the free will de... Philosophers working in the nascent field of ‘experimental philosophy’ have begun using methods borrowed from psychology to collect data about folk intuitions concerning debates ranging from action theory to ethics to epistemology. In this paper we present the results of our attempts to apply this approach to the free will debate, in which philosophers on opposing sides claim that their view best accounts for and accords with folk intuitions. After discussing the motivation for such research, we describe our methodology of surveying people’s prephilosophical judgments about the freedom and responsibility of agents in deterministic scenarios. In two studies, we found that a majority of participants judged that such agents act of their own free will and are morally responsible for their actions. We then discuss the philosophical implications of our results as well as various difficulties inherent in such research. read more read less

Topics:

Experimental philosophy (62%)62% related to the paper, Folk psychology (58%)58% related to the paper, Moral responsibility (57%)57% related to the paper, Determinism (54%)54% related to the paper, Action theory (philosophy) (54%)54% related to the paper
View PDF
312 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/09515089608573181
The earliest sense of self and others: Merleau‐Ponty and recent developmental studies
Shaun Gallagher1, Andrew N. Meltzoff1
01 Mar 1996 - Philosophical Psychology

Abstract:

Recent studies in developmental psychology have found evidence to suggest that there exists an innate system that accounts for the possibilities of early infant imitation and the existence of phantom limbs in cases of congenital absence of limbs. These results challenge traditional assumptions about the status and development... Recent studies in developmental psychology have found evidence to suggest that there exists an innate system that accounts for the possibilities of early infant imitation and the existence of phantom limbs in cases of congenital absence of limbs. These results challenge traditional assumptions about the status and development of the body schema and body image, and about the nature of the translation process between perceptual experience and motor ability. Merleau‐Ponty, who was greatly influenced by his study of developmental psychology, and whose phenomenology of perception was closely tied to the concept of the body schema, accepted these traditional assumptions. They also informed his philosophical conclusions concerning the experience of self and others. We re‐examine issues involved in understanding self and others in light of the more recent research in developmental psychology. More specifically our re‐examination challenges a number of Merleau‐Ponty's conclusions and suggests, in contrast... read more read less

Topics:

Psychology of self (55%)55% related to the paper, Body schema (54%)54% related to the paper, Body awareness (52%)52% related to the paper
289 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/09515089008572999
Discourse: Noun, Verb or Social Practice?
Jonathan Potter1, Margaret Wetherell2, Rosalind Gill1, Derek Edwards1
01 Jan 1990 - Philosophical Psychology

Abstract:

This chapter comments on some of the different senses of the notion of discourse in the various relevant literatures and then overviews the basic features of a coherent discourse analytic programme in Psychology. Parker’s approach is criticized for (a) its tendency to reify discourses as objects, (b) its undeveloped notion of... This chapter comments on some of the different senses of the notion of discourse in the various relevant literatures and then overviews the basic features of a coherent discourse analytic programme in Psychology. Parker’s approach is criticized for (a) its tendency to reify discourses as objects, (b) its undeveloped notion of analytic practice and (c) its vulnerability to common sense assumptions. It ends by exploring the virtues of ‘interpretative repertoires’ over ‘discourses’ as an analytic/theoretical notion. read more read less

Topics:

Discourse analysis (54%)54% related to the paper, Noun (51%)51% related to the paper, Social practice (51%)51% related to the paper, Conversation analysis (50%)50% related to the paper
284 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Philosophical Psychology.

It automatically formats your research paper to Taylor and Francis formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Philosophical Psychology format uses Taylor and Francis Custom Citation citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Philosophical Psychology in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Philosophical Psychology guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Philosophical Psychology guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Philosophical Psychology guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Philosophical Psychology?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Philosophical Psychology citation style.

4. Can I use the Philosophical Psychology templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Philosophical Psychology.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Philosophical Psychology that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Philosophical Psychology that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Philosophical Psychology?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Philosophical Psychology.

7. Where can I find the template for the Philosophical Psychology?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Philosophical Psychology's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Philosophical Psychology's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Philosophical Psychology an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Philosophical Psychology is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Philosophical Psychology?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Philosophical Psychology?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Philosophical Psychology?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Philosophical Psychology, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Philosophical Psychology's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Philosophical Psychology?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Philosophical Psychology. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Philosophical Psychology?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Philosophical Psychology are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Philosophical Psychology?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Philosophical Psychology's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Philosophical Psychology in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Philosophical Psychology Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Philosophical Psychology formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template