Example of Public Management Review format

Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace

This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.

Open Access

Recommended

Public Management Review — Template for authors

Publisher: Taylor and Francis

Your data will always be in your control. Learn more

Get started with a free account

— or sign up using email —

See how it works

Guideline source

Categories	Rank	Trend in last 3 yrs
Public Administration	#6 of 165	down by None rank

Journal quality:

High

Last 4 years overview: 331 Published Papers | 2106 Citations

Indexed in: Scopus

Last updated: 22/06/2020

Related journals

Insights

General info

Related Journals

Open Access

Globalizations

Taylor and Francis

Quality:

High

CiteRatio: 3.2

SJR: 0.798

SNIP: 1.518

Open Access

Recommended

Journal of European Public Policy

Taylor and Francis

Quality:

High

CiteRatio: 8.1

SJR: 2.557

SNIP: 3.354

Open Access

Recommended

Educational Administration Quarterly

SAGE

Quality:

High

CiteRatio: 4.4

SJR: 2.201

SNIP: 2.689

Open Access

Recommended

Administrative Science Quarterly

SAGE

Quality:

High

CiteRatio: 15.3

SJR: 15.098

SNIP: 5.389

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

4.221

33% from 2018

Impact factor for Public Management Review from 2016 - 2019
Year	Value
2019	4.221
2018	3.162
2017	3.152
2016	2.293

Graph view

6.4

2% from 2019

CiteRatio for Public Management Review from 2016 - 2020
Year	Value
2020	6.4
2019	6.3
2018	5.8
2017	5.3
2016	4.3

Graph view

Insights

Impact factor of this journal has increased by 33% in last year.
This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

Insights

CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 2% in last years.
This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

1.622

27% from 2019

SJR for Public Management Review from 2016 - 2020
Year	Value
2020	1.622
2019	2.212
2018	1.756
2017	1.634
2016	1.698

Graph view

2.443

16% from 2019

SNIP for Public Management Review from 2016 - 2020
Year	Value
2020	2.443
2019	2.912
2018	2.24
2017	1.967
2016	1.768

Graph view

Insights

SJR of this journal has decreased by 27% in last years.
This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

Insights

SNIP of this journal has decreased by 16% in last years.
This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Public Management Review

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Taylor and Francis

Public Management Review

Public Management Review seeks to: explore the developing field of public management embrace research both about the strategic and operational management of public services and about social/public policy development and implementation encourage in particular work which either presents new empirical knowledge about public management and/or developed theory encourage questioning both of the legitimacy and hegemony of the ’new public management’ paradigm and its alternatives, and of the developing pluralism in public management which encompasses the governance of inter-sectoral relationships between government, non-profit and for-profit organisations in the provision of public services. The remit of Public Management Review is to promote the dissemination and discussion of such research about public management. Its specific target audience is the academic and research community. Public Management Review is an international journal, seeking to draw together and learn lessons from the development of public management across the world rather than being parochially focused upon one area and encourages cross-national and comparative research papers. The journal promotes inter-disciplinary work. Much of the most important work about public management is coming at the cusp of traditional disciplines. Public Management Review promotes such cross-boundary learning and conceptualisation. This journal is uniquely placed to offer a leading light on the rapidly developing interest in public management across the world, and especially in Europe, North America and the Pacific Rim. It covers such key issues as: social policy making and implementation in the plural state inter-sectoral (government non-profit-for profit) relationships the evaluation and critique of the ’new public management’ paradigm governance institutions and processes globalization and convergence in public management state reform and structural adjustment, and the operational/ strategic management of public service organisations, including such issues as contracting, marketing and strategic management. Read Less

Management Information Systems

Management of Technology and Innovation

Business, Management and Accounting

Last updated on	22 Jun 2020
ISSN	1471-9037
Impact Factor	High - 1.044
Open Access	No
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy	Green
Plagiarism Check	Available via Turnitin
Endnote Style	Download Available
Bibliography Name	Taylor and Francis Custom Citation
Citation Type	Author Year (Blonder, Tinkham, and Klapwijk 1982)
Bibliography Example	Blonder, G. E., M. Tinkham, and T. M. Klapwijk. 1982. “Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion.” Phys. Rev. B 25 (7): 4515–4532. 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article • DOI: 10.1080/14719030600853022 •

The New Public Governance? 1

Stephen P. Osborne¹ •

01 Sep 2006 - Public Management Review

Abstract:

More than a decade has passed since the publication of Christopher Hood's influential piece that codified the nature of the New Public Management (NPM) (Hood 1991). At that time it seemed likely, c... read more

Topics:

New public management (66%)66% related to the paper, Project governance (64%)64% related to the paper, Multi-level governance (62%)62% related to the paper,

View PDF

1,423 Citations

Open access • Journal Article • DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2014.930505 •

A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey

William Voorberg¹, Victor Bekkers¹, •

21 Oct 2015 - Public Management Review

Abstract:

This article presents a systematic review of 122 articles and books (1987–2013) of co-creation/co-production with citizens in public innovation It analyses (a) the objectives of co-creation and co-production, (b) its influential factors and (c) the outcomes of co-creation and co-production processes It shows that most studies... This article presents a systematic review of 122 articles and books (1987–2013) of co-creation/co-production with citizens in public innovation It analyses (a) the objectives of co-creation and co-production, (b) its influential factors and (c) the outcomes of co-creation and co-production processes It shows that most studies focus on the identification of influential factors, while hardly any attention is paid to the outcomes Future studies could focus on outcomes of co-creation/co-production processes Furthermore, more quantitative studies are welcome, given the qualitative, case study, dominance in the field We conclude with a research agenda to tackle methodological, theoretical and empirical lacunas read more

View PDF

1,257 Citations

Journal Article • DOI: 10.1080/14719030410001675722 •

What to do when Stakeholders matter: Stakeholder Identification and Analysis Techniques

John M. Bryson

01 Mar 2004 - Public Management Review

Abstract:

This article focuses specifically on how and why managers might go about using stakeholder identification and analysis techniques in order to help their organizations meet their mandates, fulfill their missions and create public value. A range of stakeholder identification and analysis techniques is reviewed. The techniques c... This article focuses specifically on how and why managers might go about using stakeholder identification and analysis techniques in order to help their organizations meet their mandates, fulfill their missions and create public value. A range of stakeholder identification and analysis techniques is reviewed. The techniques cover: organizing participation; creating ideas for strategic interventions, including problem formulation and solution search; building a winning coalition around proposal development, review and adoption; and implementing, monitoring and evaluating strategic interventions. The article argues that wise use of stakeholder analyses can help frame issues that are solvable in ways that are technically feasible and politically acceptable and that advance the common good. The article concludes with a number of recommendations for management research, education and practice. read more

Topics:

Stakeholder analysis (68%)68% related to the paper, Stakeholder (62%)62% related to the paper, Public value (56%)56% related to the paper,

1,243 Citations

Open access • Journal Article • DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2015.1111927 •

Co-production and the co-creation of value in public services: A suitable case for treatment?

Stephen P. Osborne¹, Zoe Radnor², •

09 Mar 2016 - Public Management Review

Abstract:

Co-production is currently one of cornerstones of public policy reform across the globe. Inter alia, it is articulated as a valuable route to public service reform and to the planning and delivery of effective public services, a response to the democratic deficit and a route to active citizenship and active communities, and a... Co-production is currently one of cornerstones of public policy reform across the globe. Inter alia, it is articulated as a valuable route to public service reform and to the planning and delivery of effective public services, a response to the democratic deficit and a route to active citizenship and active communities, and as a means by which to lever in additional resources to public service delivery. Despite these varied roles, co-production is actually poorly formulated and has become one of a series of ‘woolly-words’ in public policy. This paper presents a conceptualization of co-production that is theoretically rooted in both public management and service management theory. It argues that this is a robust starting point for the evolution of new research and knowledge about co-production and for the development of evidence-based public policymaking and implementation. read more

Topics:

Public service (67%)67% related to the paper, Public policy (63%)63% related to the paper, New public management (62%)62% related to the paper,

View PDF

607 Citations

Journal Article • DOI: 10.1080/14719030601022874 •

Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services : an introduction

Taco Brandsen¹, Victor Pestoff² •

14 Dec 2006 - Public Management Review

Abstract:

In recent years, public management research has paid increasing attention to the third sector, especially to its role in the provision of public services. Evidence of this is the rising number of publications on the topic, as well as a growing number of sessions and papers on the topic in academic conferences of the EGPA and ... In recent years, public management research has paid increasing attention to the third sector, especially to its role in the provision of public services. Evidence of this is the rising number of publications on the topic, as well as a growing number of sessions and papers on the topic in academic conferences of the EGPA and IRSPM. However, much of the discussion on its role is motivated at least as much by ideology as by fact. We still lack a comprehensive empirical understanding of what happens when the third sector is drawn into public service provision. In this collection on Co-Production: The Third Sector and the Delivery of Public Services, we will try to enhance this understanding by presenting several new studies on the subject. We also introduce the concepts of co-production, co-management and co-governance as a conceptual framework that enables us to better understand such developments. read more

Topics:

Public sector (67%)67% related to the paper, New public management (61%)61% related to the paper, Public service (61%)61% related to the paper,

579 Citations

Also popular among researchers

“

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds

Choose a template

Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates

Import a MS-Word file or start fresh

It takes only few seconds to import

View and edit your final output

SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines

Submit directly or Download

Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Public Management Review.

It automatically formats your research paper to Taylor and Francis formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Public Management Review format uses Taylor and Francis Custom Citation citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Public Management Review in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Public Management Review guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Public Management Review guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Public Management Review guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Public Management Review?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Public Management Review citation style.

4. Can I use the Public Management Review templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Public Management Review.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Public Management Review that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Public Management Review that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Public Management Review?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Public Management Review.

7. Where can I find the template for the Public Management Review?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Public Management Review's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Public Management Review's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Public Management Review an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Public Management Review is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Public Management Review?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Public Management Review?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Public Management Review?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Public Management Review, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Public Management Review's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Public Management Review?

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Public Management Review. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour	Archiving policy
Green	Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue	Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow	Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White	Archiving not formally supported

FYI:

Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Public Management Review?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Public Management Review are:.

S. No.	Citation Style Type
1.	Author Year
2.	Numbered
3.	Numbered (Superscripted)
4.	Author Year (Cited Pages)
5.	Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Public Management Review?

16. Can I download Public Management Review in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Public Management Review Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Public Management Review formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

“

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

”

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user

Public Management Review — Template for authors

Related Journals

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

4.221

6.4

Insights

Insights

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

1.622

2.443

Insights

Insights

Public Management Review

Public Management Review

Top papers written in this journal

Abstract:

Topics:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Topics:

Abstract:

Topics:

Abstract:

Topics:

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

Freedom from formatting guidelines

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Frequently asked questions

Fast and reliable, built for complaince.

No word template required

Verifed journal formats

Trusted by academicians

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.