Example of Voice and Speech Review format
Recent searches

Example of Voice and Speech Review format Example of Voice and Speech Review format Example of Voice and Speech Review format Example of Voice and Speech Review format Example of Voice and Speech Review format Example of Voice and Speech Review format Example of Voice and Speech Review format Example of Voice and Speech Review format Example of Voice and Speech Review format Example of Voice and Speech Review format Example of Voice and Speech Review format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Voice and Speech Review format Example of Voice and Speech Review format Example of Voice and Speech Review format Example of Voice and Speech Review format Example of Voice and Speech Review format Example of Voice and Speech Review format Example of Voice and Speech Review format Example of Voice and Speech Review format Example of Voice and Speech Review format Example of Voice and Speech Review format Example of Voice and Speech Review format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Voice and Speech Review — Template for authors

Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Visual Arts and Performing Arts #119 of 532 down down by None rank
Music #53 of 147 down down by None rank
Language and Linguistics #411 of 879 down down by None rank
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 65 Published Papers | 29 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 13/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 0.7
SJR: 0.25
SNIP: 1.245
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.1
SJR: 0.832
SNIP: 1.154
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 0.4
SJR: 0.148
SNIP: 0.482
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.5
SJR: 1.614
SNIP: 2.163

Journal Performance & Insights

CiteRatio

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.4

CiteRatio for Voice and Speech Review from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.4
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.781

Year Value
2020 0.781
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.
Voice and Speech Review

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Taylor and Francis

Voice and Speech Review

Approved by publishing and review experts on SciSpace, this template is built as per for Voice and Speech Review formatting guidelines as mentioned in Taylor and Francis author instructions. The current version was created on 13 Jun 2020 and has been used by 935 authors to write and format their manuscripts to this journal.

i
Last updated on
13 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
2326-8263
i
Open Access
Not provided
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
Taylor and Francis Custom Citation
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder GE, Tinkham M, Klapwijk TM. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys Rev B. 1982; 25(7):4515–4532. Available from: 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/23268263.2011.10739551
A Powerful Voice: Investigating Vocality and Identity
01 Jan 2011 - Voice and Speech Review

Abstract:

Though the word has been naturalized to the point that writers rarely offer a working definition, a reexamination of its interrelated uses across studies of cognitive science and acoustics, language, literary criticism, and music reveals its layered significance as a site where the making of sounds and the making of identity ... Though the word has been naturalized to the point that writers rarely offer a working definition, a reexamination of its interrelated uses across studies of cognitive science and acoustics, language, literary criticism, and music reveals its layered significance as a site where the making of sounds and the making of identity intersect. Each approach looks for different meaning, investigating the voice as a vehicle for the variety of communicative, expressive, and ideological processes at the heart of speech and song. This essay surveys the idea of vocality as it has developed across history and disciplines, proposes a holistic model for its study in the context of music, and begins to unpack the heavy sociocultural baggage that accompanies it. It is my hope that these efforts may be of use to voice and speech professionals as they seek to tap the fullest potential of the voice in performance, and to grasp the entirety of what a voice carries, when it carries across a theater or podium—not only lexical meanings and emotion, but also vital information about culture, identity, and the dynamics of power that suffuses human communication. read more read less

Topics:

Identity (social science) (72%)72% related to the paper
25 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/23268263.2016.1318814
The unspoken voice and speech debate [or] the sacred cow in the conservatory
01 Sep 2016 - Voice and Speech Review

Abstract:

The article discusses how the direct instruction versus constructivism debate in educational literature relates to the voice pedagogy field. Outlining three spoken (or well researched) debates in the field, the article traces the history of voice and speech pedagogy and explores how direct instruction versus constructivism ac... The article discusses how the direct instruction versus constructivism debate in educational literature relates to the voice pedagogy field. Outlining three spoken (or well researched) debates in the field, the article traces the history of voice and speech pedagogy and explores how direct instruction versus constructivism acts as a dominant and unspoken dispute within the discipline. The central argument states that all instructors prefer either direct instruction or constructivism teaching methods. The author offers a question-and-answer case study and concludes that voice instructors should teach to a variety of learning styles, incorporating both direct instruction and constructivism practices. Insisting that students only learn in the preferred learning style of the instructor is the sacred cow of the conservatory. read more read less

Topics:

Constructivism (philosophy of education) (57%)57% related to the paper, Teaching method (51%)51% related to the paper
25 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/23268263.2020.1723359
Second Dialect Acquisition
Benjamin Purser1
31 Jan 2020 - Voice and Speech Review

Abstract:

Second Dialect Acquisition by Jeff Siegel aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the largely understudied field of second dialect acquisition (SDA), as distinct from second language acquisitio... Second Dialect Acquisition by Jeff Siegel aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the largely understudied field of second dialect acquisition (SDA), as distinct from second language acquisitio... read more read less
25 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/23268263.2015.1079773
Dysconscious racism in mainstream British voice pedagogy and its potential effects on students from pluralistic backgrounds in UK Drama Conservatoires
Amy Mihyang Ginther1
12 Sep 2015 - Voice and Speech Review

Abstract:

Given the increasing diversity in UK actor training programs, it is imperative to recontextualize mainstream British voice pedagogy. Such pedagogy generally begins with the supposition that the voice is a representation of the sociocultural self and aims to improve the voice by undoing physical tensions that can impede usage.... Given the increasing diversity in UK actor training programs, it is imperative to recontextualize mainstream British voice pedagogy. Such pedagogy generally begins with the supposition that the voice is a representation of the sociocultural self and aims to improve the voice by undoing physical tensions that can impede usage. These tensions are usually attributed to negative societal influences that may induce feelings of fear, shame, or anger. For students with pluralistic backgrounds, racism may be such an influence that creates somatic tensions. This article will examine potential manifestations of dysconscious racism, an uncritical mindset that fails to challenge the norms of a dominant culture, within UK Drama Conservatoires. This includes: curriculum, liberal humanist assumptions in voice texts, standardized accents like Received Pronunciation, and the teacher-student relationship. By conducting semi-structured interviews and employing such methodological lenses as critical ethnography and embodied ... read more read less

Topics:

Critical ethnography (53%)53% related to the paper, Dominant culture (51%)51% related to the paper, Racism (50%)50% related to the paper, Mindset (50%)50% related to the paper
21 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/23268263.2017.1397254
Vocal traditions: Fitzmaurice Voicework
Jeff Morrison1, Saul Kotzubei, Tyler Seiple
03 Nov 2017 - Voice and Speech Review

Abstract:

Vocal Traditions is a series in the Voice and Speech Review that highlights historically important voice teachers and schools of thought in the world of vocal pedagogy. In this essay, Fitzmaurice V... Vocal Traditions is a series in the Voice and Speech Review that highlights historically important voice teachers and schools of thought in the world of vocal pedagogy. In this essay, Fitzmaurice V... read more read less

Topics:

Vocal pedagogy (71%)71% related to the paper
16 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Voice and Speech Review.

It automatically formats your research paper to Taylor and Francis formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Voice and Speech Review format uses Taylor and Francis Custom Citation citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Voice and Speech Review in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Voice and Speech Review guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Voice and Speech Review guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Voice and Speech Review guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Voice and Speech Review?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Voice and Speech Review citation style.

4. Can I use the Voice and Speech Review templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Voice and Speech Review.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Voice and Speech Review that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Voice and Speech Review that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Voice and Speech Review?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Voice and Speech Review.

7. Where can I find the template for the Voice and Speech Review?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Voice and Speech Review's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Voice and Speech Review's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Voice and Speech Review an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Voice and Speech Review is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Voice and Speech Review?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Voice and Speech Review?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Voice and Speech Review?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Voice and Speech Review, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Voice and Speech Review's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Voice and Speech Review?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Voice and Speech Review. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Voice and Speech Review?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Voice and Speech Review are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Voice and Speech Review?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Voice and Speech Review's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Voice and Speech Review in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Voice and Speech Review Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Voice and Speech Review formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template