Example of Conservation Letters format
Recent searches

Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access ISSN: 1755263X
recommended Recommended

Conservation Letters — Template for authors

Publisher: Wiley
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Nature and Landscape Conservation #1 of 177 -
Ecology #5 of 400 up up by 1 rank
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics #9 of 647 up up by 5 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 126 Published Papers | 2232 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 19/07/2020
Insights & related journals
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Journal Performance & Insights

  • Impact Factor
  • CiteRatio
  • SJR
  • SNIP

Impact factor determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

6.766

9% from 2018

Impact factor for Conservation Letters from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 6.766
2018 7.397
2017 7.279
2016 7.02
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has decreased by 9% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

CiteRatio is a measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

17.7

32% from 2019

CiteRatio for Conservation Letters from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 17.7
2019 13.4
2018 11.9
2017 13.6
2016 11.0
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 32% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

3.153

12% from 2019

SJR for Conservation Letters from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 3.153
2019 3.563
2018 3.227
2017 3.828
2016 3.064
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 12% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

2.776

5% from 2019

SNIP for Conservation Letters from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.776
2019 2.639
2018 2.457
2017 2.329
2016 1.852
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 5% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Related Journals

open access Open Access ISSN: 20956355 e-ISSN: 21975620

Springer

CiteRatio: 3.7 | SJR: 1.001 | SNIP: 1.212
open access Open Access ISSN: 10612971 e-ISSN: 1526100X

Wiley

CiteRatio: 4.9 | SJR: 1.214 | SNIP: 1.356
open access Open Access ISSN: 8888892 e-ISSN: 15231739
recommended Recommended

Wiley

CiteRatio: 9.7 | SJR: 2.2 | SNIP: 2.096
open access Open Access ISSN: 1553734X e-ISSN: 15537358
recommended Recommended

PLOS

CiteRatio: 7.3 | SJR: 2.628 | SNIP: 1.713
Conservation Letters

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Wiley

Conservation Letters

FREE ONLINE ACCESS TO ALL IN 2010! Conservation Letters is a rapid communications journal publishing urgent research with the most significant implications for conservation interventions. This vital publication aims to communicate the most novel biological and social science r...... Read More

Nature and Landscape Conservation

Ecology

Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Environmental Science

i
Last updated on
18 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
1755-263X
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.851
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
apa
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al., 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder, G.E., Tinkham, M., Klapwijk, T.M., 1982. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys. Rev. B 25, 4515–4532.

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1755-263X.2010.00158.X
“Sight‐unseen” detection of rare aquatic species using environmental DNA
Christopher L. Jerde1, Andrew R. Mahon1, W. Lindsay Chadderton2, David M. Lodge1
01 Apr 2011 - Conservation Letters

Abstract:

Effective management of rare species, including endangered native species and recently introduced nonindigenous species, requires the detection of populations at low density. For endangered species, detecting the localized distribution makes it possible to identify and protect critical habitat to enhance survival or reproduct... Effective management of rare species, including endangered native species and recently introduced nonindigenous species, requires the detection of populations at low density. For endangered species, detecting the localized distribution makes it possible to identify and protect critical habitat to enhance survival or reproductive success. Similarly, early detection of an incipient invasion by a harmful species increases the feasibility of rapid responses to eradicate the species or contain its spread. Here we demonstrate the efficacy of environmental DNA (eDNA) as a detection tool in freshwater environments. Specifically, we delimit the invasion fronts of two species of Asian carps in Chicago, Illinois, USA area canals and waterways. Quantitative comparisons with traditional fisheries surveillance tools illustrate the greater sensitivity of eDNA and reveal that the risk of invasion to the Laurentian Great Lakes is imminent. read more read less

Topics:

Critical habitat (58%)58% related to the paper, Introduced species (57%)57% related to the paper, Endangered species (57%)57% related to the paper, Conservation reliant species (56%)56% related to the paper, Rare species (54%)54% related to the paper
View PDF
856 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1755-263X.2008.00011.X
Is oil palm agriculture really destroying tropical biodiversity
Lian Pin Koh1, David S. Wilcove1
01 Jun 2008 - Conservation Letters

Abstract:

Oil palm is one of the world’s most rapidly expanding equatorial crops. The two largest oil palm-producing countries—Indonesia and Malaysia—are located in Southeast Asia, a region with numerous endemic, forest-dwelling species. Oil palm producers have asserted that forests are not being cleared to grow oil palm. Our analysis ... Oil palm is one of the world’s most rapidly expanding equatorial crops. The two largest oil palm-producing countries—Indonesia and Malaysia—are located in Southeast Asia, a region with numerous endemic, forest-dwelling species. Oil palm producers have asserted that forests are not being cleared to grow oil palm. Our analysis of land-cover data compiled by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization suggests that during the period 1990–2005, 55%–59% of oil palm expansion in Malaysia, and at least 56% of that in Indonesia occurred at the expense of forests. Using data on bird and butterfly diversity in Malaysia’s forests and croplands, we argue that conversion of either primary or secondary (logged) forests to oil palm may result in significant biodiversity losses, whereas conversion of pre-existing cropland (rubber) to oil palm results in fewer losses. To safeguard the biodiversity in oil palmproducing countries, more fine-scale and spatially explicit data on land-use change need to be collected and analyzed to determine the extent and nature of any further conversion of forests to oil palm; secondary forests should be protected against conversion to oil palm; and any future expansion of oil palm agriculture should be restricted to pre-existing cropland or degraded habitats. read more read less

Topics:

Deforestation (54%)54% related to the paper, Habitat destruction (51%)51% related to the paper, Biodiversity (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
788 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1755-263X.2012.00242.X
Sustaining conservation values in selectively logged tropical forests: the attained and the attainable
01 Aug 2012 - Conservation Letters

Abstract:

Most tropical forests outside protected areas have been or will be selectively logged so it is essential to maximize the conservation values of partially harvested areas. Here we examine the extent to which these forests sustain timber production, retain species, and conserve carbon stocks. We then describe some improvements ... Most tropical forests outside protected areas have been or will be selectively logged so it is essential to maximize the conservation values of partially harvested areas. Here we examine the extent to which these forests sustain timber production, retain species, and conserve carbon stocks. We then describe some improvements in tropical forestry and how their implementation can be promoted. A simple meta-analysis based on >100 publications revealed substantial variability but that: timber yields decline by about 46% after the first harvest but are subsequently sustained at that level; 76% of carbon is retained in once-logged forests; and, 85‐100% of species of mammals, birds, invertebrates, and plants remain after logging. Timber stocks will not regain primary-forest levels within current harvest cycles, but yields increase if collateral damage is reduced and silvicultural treatments are applied. Given that selectively logged forests retain substantial biodiversity, carbon, and timber stocks, this “middle way” between deforestation and total protection deserves more attention from researchers, conservation organizations, and policy-makers. Improvements in forest management are now likely if synergies are enhanced among initiatives to retain forest carbon stocks (REDD+), assure the legality of forest products, certify responsible management, and devolve control over forests to empowered local communities. read more read less

Topics:

Secondary forest (60%)60% related to the paper, Sustainable forest management (59%)59% related to the paper, Forest management (58%)58% related to the paper, Deforestation (56%)56% related to the paper, Logging (54%)54% related to the paper
View PDF
461 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/CONL.12091
Ecosystem Services as a Contested Concept: a Synthesis of Critique and Counter-Arguments
01 Nov 2014 - Conservation Letters

Abstract:

We describe and reflect on seven recurring critiques of the concept of ecosystem services and respective counter-arguments. First, the concept is criticized for being anthropocentric, whereas others argue that it goes beyond instrumental values. Second, some argue that the concept promotes an exploitative human-nature relatio... We describe and reflect on seven recurring critiques of the concept of ecosystem services and respective counter-arguments. First, the concept is criticized for being anthropocentric, whereas others argue that it goes beyond instrumental values. Second, some argue that the concept promotes an exploitative human-nature relationship, whereas others state that it reconnects society to ecosystems, emphasizing humanity's dependence on nature. Third, concerns exist that the concept may conflict with biodiversity conservation objectives, whereas others emphasize complementarity. Fourth, the concept is questioned because of its supposed focus on economic valuation, whereas others argue that ecosystem services science includes many values. Fifth, the concept is criticized for promoting commodification of nature, whereas others point out that most ecosystem services are not connected to market-based instruments. Sixth, vagueness of definitions and classifications are stated to be a weakness, whereas others argue that vagueness enhances transdisciplinary collaboration. Seventh, some criticize the normative nature of the concept, implying that all outcomes of ecosystem processes are desirable. The normative nature is indeed typical for the concept, but should not be problematic when acknowledged. By disentangling and contrasting different arguments we hope to contribute to a more structured debate between opponents and proponents of the ecosystem services concept. read more read less

Topics:

Ecosystem services (56%)56% related to the paper, Vagueness (53%)53% related to the paper, Commodification of nature (52%)52% related to the paper, Anthropocentrism (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
438 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1755-263X.2010.00097.X
Correlative and mechanistic models of species distribution provide congruent forecasts under climate change.
Michael R. Kearney1, Brendan A. Wintle1, Warren P. Porter2
01 Jun 2010 - Conservation Letters

Abstract:

Good forecasts of climate change impacts on extinction risks are critical for effective conservation management responses. Species distribution models (SDMs) are central to extinction risk analyses. The reliability of predictions of SDMs has been questioned because models often lack a mechanistic underpinning and rely on assu... Good forecasts of climate change impacts on extinction risks are critical for effective conservation management responses. Species distribution models (SDMs) are central to extinction risk analyses. The reliability of predictions of SDMs has been questioned because models often lack a mechanistic underpinning and rely on assumptions that are untenable under climate change. We show how integrating predictions from fundamentally different modeling strategies produces robust forecasts of climate change impacts on habitat and population parameters. We illustrate the principle by applying mechanistic (Niche Mapper) and correlative (Maxent, Bioclim) SDMs to predict current and future distributions and fertility of an Australian gliding possum. The two approaches make congruent, accurate predictions of current distribution and similar, dire predictions about the impact of a warming scenario, supporting previous correlative-only predictions for similar species. We argue that convergent lines of independent evidence provide a robust basis for predicting and managing extinctions risks under climate change. read more read less

Topics:

Climate change (52%)52% related to the paper, Population (52%)52% related to the paper
View PDF
394 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Conservation Letters.

It automatically formats your research paper to Wiley formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Conservation Letters format uses apa citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

Absolutely not! With our tool, you can freely write without having to focus on LaTeX. You can write your entire paper as per the Conservation Letters guidelines and autoformat it.

Yes. The template is fully compliant as per the guidelines of this journal. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. Also, if there's any update in the journal format guidelines, we take care of it and include that in our algorithm.

Sure. We support all the top citation styles like APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, Chicago style, etc. For example, in case of this journal, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, it will automatically update your article as per the Conservation Letters citation style.

You can avail our Free Trial for 7 days. I'm sure you'll find our features very helpful. Plus, it's quite inexpensive.

Yup. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word doc and click on auto-format. You'll have a publish-ready paper that you can download at the end.

A matter of seconds. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves a load of your time in writing and formating your manuscript.

One little Google search can get you the Word template for any journal. However, why do you need a Word template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace, autoformat it as per Conservation Letters's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Try us out!.

Absolutely! You can do it using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, you can always contact our support team.

SciSpace is an online tool for now. We'll soon release a desktop version. You can also request (or upvote) any feature that you think might be helpful for you and the research community in the feature request section once you sign-up with us.

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it up and running within a matter of 3 working days. You can find the request box in the Journal Gallery on the right sidebar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for?".

After you have written and autoformatted your paper, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx and LaTeX.

To be honest, the answer is NO. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of those factors the review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, Eigenfactor, etc. You must assess all the factors and then take the final call.

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We have extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help our researchers understand the access level of this journal. The following table indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

Our journal submission experts are skilled in submitting papers to various international journals.

After uploading your paper on SciSpace, you would see a button to request a journal submission service for Conservation Letters.

Each submission service is completed within 4 - 5 working days.

Yes. SciSpace provides this functionality.

After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or .bib file.

SciSpace would allow download of your references in Conservation Letters Endnote style, according to wiley guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Conservation Letters formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template