Example of Ecohydrology format
Recent searches

Example of Ecohydrology format Example of Ecohydrology format Example of Ecohydrology format Example of Ecohydrology format Example of Ecohydrology format Example of Ecohydrology format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Ecohydrology format Example of Ecohydrology format Example of Ecohydrology format Example of Ecohydrology format Example of Ecohydrology format Example of Ecohydrology format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Ecohydrology — Template for authors

Publisher: Wiley
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Aquatic Science #18 of 224 down down by 2 ranks
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics #78 of 647 down down by 6 ranks
Ecology #51 of 400 down down by 12 ranks
Earth-Surface Processes #22 of 145 down down by 4 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 434 Published Papers | 2347 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 27/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Oxford University Press

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.9
SJR: 0.87
SNIP: 0.911
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.0
SJR: 0.881
SNIP: 0.986
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.6
SJR: 0.944
SNIP: 1.144
open access Open Access

Wiley

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.9
SJR: 0.667
SNIP: 0.937

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

2.767

8% from 2018

Impact factor for Ecohydrology from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 2.767
2018 2.564
2017 2.755
2016 2.852
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

5.4

10% from 2019

CiteRatio for Ecohydrology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 5.4
2019 4.9
2018 5.2
2017 5.4
2016 4.4
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 8% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 10% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.982

8% from 2019

SJR for Ecohydrology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.982
2019 1.067
2018 1.05
2017 1.152
2016 1.024
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.057

0% from 2019

SNIP for Ecohydrology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.057
2019 1.053
2018 1.134
2017 1.155
2016 1.081
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 8% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 0% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Ecohydrology

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Wiley

Ecohydrology

Ecohydrology is an international journal publishing original scientific and review papers that aim to improve understanding of processes at the interface between ecology and hydrology and associated applications related to environmental management. Ecohydrology seeks to increa...... Read More

Aquatic Science

Earth-Surface Processes

Ecology

Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Agricultural and Biological Sciences

i
Last updated on
27 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
1936-0584
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.116
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Yellow faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
apa
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker, C.W.J. (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene.Phys. Rev. Lett., 97 (6), 067 007. URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1002/ECO.1493
Hydrological feedbacks in northern peatlands
01 Jan 2015 - Ecohydrology

Abstract:

Northern peatlands provide important global and regional ecosystem services (carbon storage, water storage, and biodiversity). However, these ecosystems face increases in the severity, areal extent and frequency of climate-mediated (e.g. wildfire and drought) and land-use change (e.g. drainage, flooding and mining) disturbanc... Northern peatlands provide important global and regional ecosystem services (carbon storage, water storage, and biodiversity). However, these ecosystems face increases in the severity, areal extent and frequency of climate-mediated (e.g. wildfire and drought) and land-use change (e.g. drainage, flooding and mining) disturbances that are placing the future security of these critical ecosystem services in doubt. Here, we provide the first detailed synthesis of autogenic hydrological feedbacks that operate within northern peatlands to regulate their response to changes in seasonal water deficit and varying disturbances. We review, synthesize and critique the current process-based understanding and qualitatively assess the relative strengths of these feedbacks for different peatland types within different climate regions. We suggest that understanding the role of hydrological feedbacks in regulating changes in precipitation and temperature are essential for understanding the resistance, resilience and vulnerability of northern peatlands to a changing climate. Finally, we propose that these hydrological feedbacks also represent the foundation of developing an ecohydrological understanding of coupled hydrological, biogeochemical and ecological feedbacks. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. read more read less

Topics:

Ecohydrology (54%)54% related to the paper, Ecosystem services (52%)52% related to the paper
View PDF
368 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1002/ECO.259
A synthetic review of feedbacks and drivers of shrub encroachment in arid grasslands
Paolo D'Odorico1, Paolo D'Odorico2, Gregory S. Okin3, Brandon T. Bestelmeyer4
01 Sep 2012 - Ecohydrology

Abstract:

Many arid grasslands around the world are affected by woody plant encroachment and by the replacement of a relatively continuous grass cover with shrub patches bordered by bare soil. This shift in plant community composition is often abrupt in space and time, suggesting that it is likely sustained by positive feedbacks betwee... Many arid grasslands around the world are affected by woody plant encroachment and by the replacement of a relatively continuous grass cover with shrub patches bordered by bare soil. This shift in plant community composition is often abrupt in space and time, suggesting that it is likely sustained by positive feedbacks between vegetation and environmental conditions (e.g. resource availability) or disturbance regime (e.g. fire or freeze). These feedbacks amplify the effects of drivers of shrub encroachment, i.e. of conditions favouring a shift from grass to shrub dominance (e.g. overgrazing, climate change). Here, we review some major drivers and feedbacks and identify the basic stages in the transition from grassland to shrubland. We discuss some possible scenarios of interactions between drivers and feedbacks that could explain the transition from a stage to the next and the potential irreversibility of the shift from grass to shrub dominance. We introduce a simplistic modelling framework that can integrate the various drivers to explain the emergence of bistability for shrub-encroached grassland systems. Published 2011. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. read more read less

Topics:

Shrubland (53%)53% related to the paper, Overgrazing (53%)53% related to the paper, Shrub (52%)52% related to the paper, Plant community (52%)52% related to the paper
View PDF
325 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1002/ECO.6
A review of groundwater–surface water interactions in arid/semi‐arid wetlands and the consequences of salinity for wetland ecology
Ian Jolly1, Kerryn McEwan1, Kate Holland1
01 Jan 2008 - Ecohydrology

Abstract:

In arid/semi-arid environments, where rainfall is seasonal, highly variable and significantly less than the evaporation rate, groundwater discharge can be a major component of the water and salt balance of a wetland, and hence a major determinant of wetland ecology. Under natural conditions, wetlands in arid/semi-arid zones o... In arid/semi-arid environments, where rainfall is seasonal, highly variable and significantly less than the evaporation rate, groundwater discharge can be a major component of the water and salt balance of a wetland, and hence a major determinant of wetland ecology. Under natural conditions, wetlands in arid/semi-arid zones occasionally experience periods of higher salinity as a consequence of the high evaporative conditions and the variability of inflows which provide dilution and flushing of the stored salt. However, due to the impacts of human population pressure and the associated changes in land use, surface water regulation, and water resource depletion, wetlands in arid/semi-arid environments are now often experiencing extended periods of high salinity. This article reviews the current knowledge of the role that groundwater–surface water (GW–SW) interactions play in the ecology of arid/semi-arid wetlands. The key findings of the review are as follows: 1.GW–SW interactions in wetlands are highly dynamic, both temporally and spatially. Groundwater that is low in salinity has a beneficial impact on wetland ecology which can be diminished in dry periods when groundwater levels, and hence, inflows to wetlands are reduced or even cease. Conversely, if groundwater is saline, and inflows increase due to raised groundwater levels caused by factors such as land use change and river regulation, then this may have a detrimental impact on the ecology of a wetland and its surrounding areas. 2.GW–SW interactions in wetlands are mostly controlled by factors such as differences in head between the wetland surface water and groundwater, the local geomorphology of the wetland (in particular, the texture and chemistry of the wetland bed and banks), and the wetland and groundwater flow geometry. The GW–SW regime can be broadly classified into three types of flow regimes: (i) recharge—wetland loses surface water to the underlying aquifer; (ii) discharge—wetland gains water from the underlying aquifer; or (iii) flow-through—wetland gains water from the groundwater in some locations and loses it in others. However, it is important to note that individual wetlands may temporally change from one type to another depending on how the surface water levels in the wetland and the underlying groundwater levels change over time in response to climate, land use, and management. 3.The salinity in wetlands of arid/semi-arid environments will vary naturally due to high evaporative conditions, sporadic rainfall, groundwater inflows, and freshening after rains or floods. However, wetlands are often at particular risk of secondary salinity because their generally lower elevation in the landscape exposes them to increased saline groundwater inflows caused by rising water tables. Terminal wetlands are potentially at higher risk than flow-through systems as there is no salt removal mechanism. 4.Secondary salinity can impact on wetland biota through changes in both salinity and water regime, which result from the hydrological and hydrogeological changes associated with secondary salinity. Whilst there have been some detailed studies of these interactions for some Australian riparian tree species, the combined effects on aquatic biodiversity are only just beginning to be elucidated, and are therefore, a future research need. 5.Rainfall/flow-pulses, which are a well-recognized control on ecological function in arid/semi-arid areas, also play an important, though indirect, role through their impact on wetland salinity. Freshwater pulses can be the primary means by which salt stored in both the water column and the underlying sediments are flushed from wetlands. Conversely, increased runoff is also a commonly observed consequence of secondary salinity, and so, wetlands can experience increased surface water inflows that are higher in salinity than under natural conditions. Moreover, changes in rainfall/flow-pulse regimes can have a significant impact on wetland GW–SW interactions. It is possible that in some instances groundwater inflow to a wetland may become so heavy that it could become a major component of the water balance, and hence, mask the role of natural pulsing regimes. However, if the groundwater is low in salinity, this may provide an ecological benefit in arid/semi-arid areas by assisting in maintaining water in wetlands that become aquatic refugia between flow-pulses. 6.There has been almost no modelling of GW–SW interactions in arid/semi-arid wetlands with respect to water fluxes, let alone salinity or ecology. There is a clear need to develop modelling capabilities for the movement of salt to, from, and within wetlands to provide temporal predictions of wetland salinity which can be used to assess ecosystem outcomes. 7.There has been a concerted effort in Australia to collect and collate data on the salinity tolerance/sensitivity of freshwater aquatic biota and riparian vegetation. There are many shortcomings and knowledge gaps in these data, a fact recognized by many of the authors of this work. Particularly notable is that there is very little time-series data, which is a serious issue because wetland salinities are often highly temporally variable. There is also a concern that many of the data are from very controlled laboratory experiments, which may not represent the highly variable and unpredictable conditions experienced in the field. In light of these, and many other shortcomings identified, our view is that the data currently available are a useful guide but must be used with some caution. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. read more read less

Topics:

Surface water (61%)61% related to the paper, Wetland (60%)60% related to the paper, Groundwater discharge (58%)58% related to the paper, Groundwater (58%)58% related to the paper, Arid (58%)58% related to the paper
View PDF
278 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1002/ECO.176
Inter-disciplinary perspectives on processes in the hyporheic zone
01 Jul 2011 - Ecohydrology

Abstract:

The interface between groundwater and surface water within riverine/riparian ecosystems--the hyporheic zone (HZ)--is experiencing a rapid growth of research interest from a range of scientific disciplines, often with different perspectives. The majority of the multi-disciplinary research aims to elucidate HZ process dynamics ... The interface between groundwater and surface water within riverine/riparian ecosystems--the hyporheic zone (HZ)--is experiencing a rapid growth of research interest from a range of scientific disciplines, often with different perspectives. The majority of the multi-disciplinary research aims to elucidate HZ process dynamics and their importance for surface water and groundwater ecohydrology and biogeochemical cycling. This paper presents a critical inter-disciplinary review of recent advances of research centred on the HZ and highlights the current state of knowledge regarding hydrological, biogeochemical and ecohydrological process understanding. The spatial and temporal variability of surface water and groundwater exchange (hyporheic exchange flows), biogeochemical cycling and heat exchange (thermal regime) are considered in relation to both experimental measurements and modelling of these phenomena. We explore how this knowledge has helped to increase our understanding of HZ ecohydrology, and particularly its invertebrate community, the processing of organic matter, trophic cascading and ecosystem engineering by macrophytes and other organisms across a range of spatial and temporal scales. In addition to providing a detailed review of HZ functions, we present an inter-disciplinary perspective on how to advance and integrate HZ process understanding across traditional discipline boundaries. We therefore attempt to highlight knowledge gaps and research needs within the individual disciplines and demonstrate how innovations and advances in research, made within traditional subject-specific boundaries (e.g. hydrology, biochemistry and ecology), can be used to enhance inter-disciplinary scientific progress by cross-system comparisons and fostering of greater dialogue between scientific disciplines. read more read less

Topics:

Hyporheic zone (57%)57% related to the paper, Ecohydrology (52%)52% related to the paper
266 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1002/ECO.4
A conceptual framework for understanding semi-arid land degradation: ecohydrological interactions across multiple-space and time scales
Laura Turnbull1, John Wainwright1, Richard E. Brazier2
01 Jan 2008 - Ecohydrology

Abstract:

Land degradation is a problem prolific across semi-arid areas worldwide. Despite being a complex process including both biotic and abiotic elements, previous attempts to understand ecosystem dynamics have largely been carried out within the disparate disciplines of ecology and hydrology, which has led to significant limitatio... Land degradation is a problem prolific across semi-arid areas worldwide. Despite being a complex process including both biotic and abiotic elements, previous attempts to understand ecosystem dynamics have largely been carried out within the disparate disciplines of ecology and hydrology, which has led to significant limitations. Here, an ecohydrological framework is outlined, to provide a new direction for the study of land degradation in semi-arid ecosystems. Unlike other frameworks that draw upon hierarchy theory to provide a broad, non-explicit conceptual framework, this new framework is based upon the explicit linkage of processes operating over the continuum of temporal and spatial scales by perceiving the ecosystem as a series of structural and functional connections, within which interactions between biotic and abiotic components of the landscape occur. It is hypothesized that semi-arid land degradation conforms to a cusp-catastrophe model in which the two controlling variables are abiotic structural connectivity and abiotic functional connectivity, which implicitly account for ecosystem resilience, and biotic structural and function connectivity. It is suggested therefore that future research must (1) evaluate how abiotic and biotic function (i.e. water, sediment and nutrient loss/redistribution) vary over grass–shrub transitions and (2) quantify the biotic/abiotic structure over grass-shrub transitions, to (3) determine the interactions between ecosystem structure and function, and interactions/feedbacks between biotic and abiotic components of the ecosystem. Copyright  2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. read more read less

Topics:

Abiotic component (57%)57% related to the paper, Landscape connectivity (52%)52% related to the paper, Ecosystem (51%)51% related to the paper, Hierarchy theory (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
255 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Ecohydrology.

It automatically formats your research paper to Wiley formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Ecohydrology format uses apa citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Ecohydrology in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Ecohydrology guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Ecohydrology guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Ecohydrology guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Ecohydrology?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Ecohydrology citation style.

4. Can I use the Ecohydrology templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Ecohydrology.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Ecohydrology that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Ecohydrology that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Ecohydrology?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Ecohydrology.

7. Where can I find the template for the Ecohydrology?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Ecohydrology's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Ecohydrology's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Ecohydrology an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Ecohydrology is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Ecohydrology?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Ecohydrology?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Ecohydrology?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Ecohydrology, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Ecohydrology's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Ecohydrology?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Ecohydrology. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Ecohydrology?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Ecohydrology are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Ecohydrology?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Ecohydrology's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Ecohydrology in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Ecohydrology Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Ecohydrology formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template