Example of Global Ecology and Biogeography format
Recent searches

Example of Global Ecology and Biogeography format Example of Global Ecology and Biogeography format Example of Global Ecology and Biogeography format Example of Global Ecology and Biogeography format Example of Global Ecology and Biogeography format Example of Global Ecology and Biogeography format Example of Global Ecology and Biogeography format Example of Global Ecology and Biogeography format Example of Global Ecology and Biogeography format Example of Global Ecology and Biogeography format Example of Global Ecology and Biogeography format Example of Global Ecology and Biogeography format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Global Ecology and Biogeography format Example of Global Ecology and Biogeography format Example of Global Ecology and Biogeography format Example of Global Ecology and Biogeography format Example of Global Ecology and Biogeography format Example of Global Ecology and Biogeography format Example of Global Ecology and Biogeography format Example of Global Ecology and Biogeography format Example of Global Ecology and Biogeography format Example of Global Ecology and Biogeography format Example of Global Ecology and Biogeography format Example of Global Ecology and Biogeography format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Global Ecology and Biogeography — Template for authors

Publisher: Wiley
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics #21 of 647 down down by 3 ranks
Ecology #17 of 400 down down by 9 ranks
Global and Planetary Change #8 of 93 down down by 4 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 554 Published Papers | 5537 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 24/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
Medium
CiteRatio: 0.8
SJR: 0.293
SNIP: 0.989
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

PLOS

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 7.3
SJR: 2.628
SNIP: 1.713
open access Open Access

Oxford University Press

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.9
SJR: 0.87
SNIP: 0.911
open access Open Access

NRC Research Press

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.6
SJR: 0.677
SNIP: 0.885

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

6.446

14% from 2018

Impact factor for Global Ecology and Biogeography from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 6.446
2018 5.667
2017 5.958
2016 6.045
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

10.0

5% from 2019

CiteRatio for Global Ecology and Biogeography from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 10.0
2019 10.5
2018 10.8
2017 11.1
2016 10.6
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 14% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has decreased by 5% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

3.164

10% from 2019

SJR for Global Ecology and Biogeography from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 3.164
2019 3.535
2018 3.458
2017 3.786
2016 4.068
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

2.0

7% from 2019

SNIP for Global Ecology and Biogeography from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.0
2019 2.146
2018 2.113
2017 1.881
2016 1.894
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 10% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 7% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Global Ecology and Biogeography

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Wiley

Global Ecology and Biogeography

Global Ecology and Biogeography focuses on the emerging field of macroecology: the study of broad, consistent patterns in the ecological characteristics of organisms and ecosystems. The journal emphasizes studies that address general ecological hypotheses, explored and tested ...... Read More

Ecology

Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Global and Planetary Change

Environmental Science

i
Last updated on
24 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
1466-822X
i
Impact Factor
High - 2.47
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Yellow faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
apa
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al., 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder, G. E., Tinkham, M., & Klapwijk, T. M. (1982). Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge im- balance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys. Rev. B, 25(7):4515–4532.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1046/J.1466-822X.2003.00042.X
Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful?
Richard G. Pearson1, Terence P. Dawson1

Abstract:

Modelling strategies for predicting the potential impacts of climate change on the natural distribution of species have often focused on the characterization of a species’ bioclimate envelope. A number of recent critiques have questioned the validity of this approach by pointing to the many factors other than climate that pla... Modelling strategies for predicting the potential impacts of climate change on the natural distribution of species have often focused on the characterization of a species’ bioclimate envelope. A number of recent critiques have questioned the validity of this approach by pointing to the many factors other than climate that play an important part in determining species distributions and the dynamics of distribution changes. Such factors include biotic interactions, evolutionary change and dispersal ability. This paper reviews and evaluates criticisms of bioclimate envelope models and discusses the implications of these criticisms for the different modelling strategies employed. It is proposed that, although the complexity of the natural system presents fundamental limits to predictive modelling, the bioclimate envelope approach can provide a useful first approximation as to the potentially dramatic impact of climate change on biodiversity. However, it is stressed that the spatial scale at which these models are applied is of fundamental importance, and that model results should not be interpreted without due consideration of the limitations involved. A hierarchical modelling framework is proposed through which some of these limitations can be addressed within a broader, scale-dependent read more read less

Topics:

Assisted colonization (51%)51% related to the paper, Climate change (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
3,847 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1466-8238.2007.00358.X
AUC: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models
Jorge M. Lobo1, Alberto Jiménez-Valverde1, Raimundo Real2

Abstract:

The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, known as the AUC, is currently considered to be the standard method to assess the accuracy of predictive distribution models. It avoids the supposed subjectivity in the threshold selection process, when continuous probability derived scores are converted to a b... The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, known as the AUC, is currently considered to be the standard method to assess the accuracy of predictive distribution models. It avoids the supposed subjectivity in the threshold selection process, when continuous probability derived scores are converted to a binary presence‐absence variable, by summarizing overall model performance over all possible thresholds. In this manuscript we review some of the features of this measure and bring into question its reliability as a comparative measure of accuracy between model results. We do not recommend using AUC for five reasons: (1) it ignores the predicted probability values and the goodness-of-fit of the model; (2) it summarises the test performance over regions of the ROC space in which one would rarely operate; (3) it weights omission and commission errors equally; (4) it does not give information about the spatial distribution of model errors; and, most importantly, (5) the total extent to which models are carried out highly influences the rate of well-predicted absences and the AUC scores. read more read less

Topics:

Receiver operating characteristic (54%)54% related to the paper, Goodness of fit (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
2,711 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1466-8238.2009.00490.X
Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity
Andrés Baselga1

Abstract:

Aim Beta diversity (variation of the species composition of assemblages) may reflect two different phenomena, spatial species turnover and nestedness of assemblages, which result from two antithetic processes, namely species replacement and species loss, respectively. The aim of this paper is to provide a unified framework fo... Aim Beta diversity (variation of the species composition of assemblages) may reflect two different phenomena, spatial species turnover and nestedness of assemblages, which result from two antithetic processes, namely species replacement and species loss, respectively. The aim of this paper is to provide a unified framework for the assessment of beta diversity, disentangling the contribution of spatial turnover and nestedness to beta-diversity patterns. Innovation  I derive an additive partitioning of beta diversity that provides the two separate components of spatial turnover and nestedness underlying the total amount of beta diversity. I propose two families of measures of beta diversity for pairwise and multiple-site situations. Each family comprises one measure accounting for all aspects of beta diversity, which is additively decomposed into two measures accounting for the pure spatial turnover and nestedness components, respectively. Finally, I provide a case study using European longhorn beetles to exemplify the relevance of disentangling spatial turnover and nestedness patterns. Main conclusion  Assigning the different beta-diversity patterns to their respective biological phenomena is essential for analysing the causality of the processes underlying biodiversity. Thus, the differentiation of the spatial turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity is crucial for our understanding of central biogeographic, ecological and conservation issues. read more read less

Topics:

Nestedness (72%)72% related to the paper, Beta diversity (65%)65% related to the paper
View PDF
2,364 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1466-8238.2010.00584.X
Status and distribution of mangrove forests of the world using earth observation satellite data

Abstract:

Aim Our scientific understanding of the extent and distribution of mangrove forests of the world is inadequate. The available global mangrove databases, compiled using disparate geospatial data sources and national statistics, need to be improved.Here,we mapped the status and distributions of global mangroves using recently a... Aim Our scientific understanding of the extent and distribution of mangrove forests of the world is inadequate. The available global mangrove databases, compiled using disparate geospatial data sources and national statistics, need to be improved.Here,we mapped the status and distributions of global mangroves using recently available Global Land Survey (GLS) data and the Landsat archive. Methods We interpreted approximately 1000 Landsat scenes using hybrid supervised and unsupervised digital image classification techniques. Each image was normalized for variation in solar angle and earth‐sun distance by converting the digital number values to the top-of-the-atmosphere reflectance. Ground truth data and existing maps and databases were used to select training samples and also for iterative labelling. Results were validated using existing GIS data and the published literature to map ‘true mangroves’. Results The total area of mangroves in the year 2000 was 137,760 km 2 in 118 countries and territories in the tropical and subtropical regions of the world. Approximately 75% of world’s mangroves are found in just 15 countries, and only 6.9% are protected under the existing protected areas network (IUCN I-IV). Our study confirms earlier findings that the biogeographic distribution of mangroves is generallyconfinedtothetropicalandsubtropicalregionsandthelargestpercentage of mangroves is found between 5° N and 5° S latitude. Main conclusions We report that the remaining area of mangrove forest in the world is less than previously thought. Our estimate is 12.3% smaller than the most recent estimate by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations.We present the most comprehensive, globally consistent and highest resolution (30 m) global mangrove database ever created.We developed and used better mapping techniques and data sources and mapped mangroves with better spatial and thematic details than previous studies. read more read less

Topics:

Mangrove (56%)56% related to the paper, Mangrove restoration (51%)51% related to the paper, Satellite imagery (51%)51% related to the paper, Blue carbon (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
2,261 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1466-8238.2007.00287.X
Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis
Joern Fischer, David B. Lindenmayer1

Abstract:

Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation are key drivers of global species loss. Their effects may be understood by focusing on: (1) individual species and the processes threatening them, and (2) human-perceived landscape patterns and their correlation with species and assemblages. Individual species may decline as a ... Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation are key drivers of global species loss. Their effects may be understood by focusing on: (1) individual species and the processes threatening them, and (2) human-perceived landscape patterns and their correlation with species and assemblages. Individual species may decline as a result of interacting exogenous and endogenous threats, including habitat loss, habitat degradation, habitat isolation, changes in the biology, behaviour, and interactions of species, as well as additional, stochastic threats. Human-perceived landscape patterns that are frequently correlated with species assemblages include the amount and structure of native vegetation, the prevalence of anthropogenic edges, the degree of landscape connectivity, and the structure and heterogeneity of modified areas. Extinction cascades are particularly likely to occur in landscapes with low native vegetation cover, low landscape connectivity, degraded native vegetation and intensive land use in modified areas, especially if keystone species or entire functional groups of species are lost. This review (1) demonstrates that species-oriented and pattern-oriented approaches to understanding the ecology of modified landscapes are highly complementary, (2) clarifies the links between a wide range of interconnected themes, and (3) provides clear and consistent terminology. Tangible research and management priorities are outlined that are likely to benefit the conservation of native species in modified landscapes around the world. read more read less

Topics:

Landscape connectivity (63%)63% related to the paper, Landscape ecology (63%)63% related to the paper, Umbrella species (62%)62% related to the paper, Habitat fragmentation (61%)61% related to the paper, Habitat destruction (58%)58% related to the paper
View PDF
2,068 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Global Ecology and Biogeography.

It automatically formats your research paper to Wiley formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Global Ecology and Biogeography format uses apa citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Global Ecology and Biogeography in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Global Ecology and Biogeography guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Global Ecology and Biogeography guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Global Ecology and Biogeography guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Global Ecology and Biogeography?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Global Ecology and Biogeography citation style.

4. Can I use the Global Ecology and Biogeography templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Global Ecology and Biogeography.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Global Ecology and Biogeography that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Global Ecology and Biogeography that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Global Ecology and Biogeography?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Global Ecology and Biogeography.

7. Where can I find the template for the Global Ecology and Biogeography?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Global Ecology and Biogeography's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Global Ecology and Biogeography's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Global Ecology and Biogeography an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Global Ecology and Biogeography is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Global Ecology and Biogeography?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Global Ecology and Biogeography?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Global Ecology and Biogeography?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Global Ecology and Biogeography, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Global Ecology and Biogeography's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Global Ecology and Biogeography?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Global Ecology and Biogeography. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Global Ecology and Biogeography?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Global Ecology and Biogeography are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Global Ecology and Biogeography?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Global Ecology and Biogeography's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Global Ecology and Biogeography in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Global Ecology and Biogeography Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Global Ecology and Biogeography formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template