Example of Obesity Reviews format
Recent searches

Example of Obesity Reviews format Example of Obesity Reviews format Example of Obesity Reviews format Example of Obesity Reviews format Example of Obesity Reviews format Example of Obesity Reviews format Example of Obesity Reviews format Example of Obesity Reviews format Example of Obesity Reviews format Example of Obesity Reviews format Example of Obesity Reviews format Example of Obesity Reviews format Example of Obesity Reviews format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Obesity Reviews format Example of Obesity Reviews format Example of Obesity Reviews format Example of Obesity Reviews format Example of Obesity Reviews format Example of Obesity Reviews format Example of Obesity Reviews format Example of Obesity Reviews format Example of Obesity Reviews format Example of Obesity Reviews format Example of Obesity Reviews format Example of Obesity Reviews format Example of Obesity Reviews format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Obesity Reviews — Template for authors

Publisher: Wiley
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health #7 of 526 down down by 3 ranks
Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism #8 of 219 -
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 491 Published Papers | 6745 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 07/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 2.9
SJR: 0.575
SNIP: 1.117
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.6
SJR: 0.666
SNIP: 1.867
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.7
SJR: 2.392
SNIP: 2.631
open access Open Access

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.6
SJR: 1.649
SNIP: 2.198

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

7.31

11% from 2018

Impact factor for Obesity Reviews from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 7.31
2018 8.192
2017 8.483
2016 7.883
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

13.7

4% from 2019

CiteRatio for Obesity Reviews from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 13.7
2019 13.2
2018 14.2
2017 14.4
2016 15.2
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has decreased by 11% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 4% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

2.845

9% from 2019

SJR for Obesity Reviews from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.845
2019 3.141
2018 4.216
2017 4.184
2016 4.228
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

3.056

4% from 2019

SNIP for Obesity Reviews from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 3.056
2019 3.175
2018 3.2
2017 2.83
2016 2.729
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 9% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 4% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.
Obesity Reviews

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Wiley

Obesity Reviews

Obesity Reviews is a monthly reviews journal publishing reviews from all disciplines related to obesity. It should, therefore, appeal to all professionals with an interest in obesity, most particularly to endocrinologists, cardiologists, gastroenterologists, obstetricians but ...... Read More

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Medicine

i
Last updated on
07 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
1467-7881
i
Impact Factor
High - 2.904
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Yellow faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
apa
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker, C.W.J. (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene.Phys. Rev. Lett., 97 (6), 067 007. URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007.

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1467-789X.2004.00133.X
Obesity in children and young people: a crisis in public health.
Tim Lobstein, Louise A. Baur, Ricardo Uauy
01 May 2004 - Obesity Reviews

Abstract:

Ten per cent of the world’s school-aged children are estimated to be carrying excess body fat (Fig. 1), with an increased risk for developing chronic disease. Of these overweight children, a quarter are obese, with a significant likelihood of some having multiple risk factors for type 2 diabetes, heart disease and a variety o... Ten per cent of the world’s school-aged children are estimated to be carrying excess body fat (Fig. 1), with an increased risk for developing chronic disease. Of these overweight children, a quarter are obese, with a significant likelihood of some having multiple risk factors for type 2 diabetes, heart disease and a variety of other co-morbidities before or during early adulthood. The prevalence of overweight is dramatically higher in economically developed regions, but is rising significantly in most parts of the world. In many countries the problem of childhood obesity is worsening at a dramatic rate. Surveys during the 1990s show that in Brazil and the USA, an additional 0.5% of the entire child population became overweight each year. In Canada, Australia and parts of Europe the rates were higher, with an additional 1% of all children becoming overweight each year. The burden upon the health services cannot yet be estimated. Although childhood obesity brings a number of additional problems in its train – hyperinsulinaemia, poor glucose tolerance and a raised risk of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, sleep apnoea, social exclusion and depression – the greatest health problems will be seen in the next generation of adults as the present childhood obesity epidemic passes through to adulthood. Greatly increased rates of heart disease, diabetes, certain cancers, gall bladder disease, osteoarthritis, endocrine disorders and other obesityrelated conditions will be found in young adult populations, and their need for medical treatment may last for their remaining life-times. The costs to the health services, the losses to society and the burdens carried by the individuals involved will be great. The present report has been written to focus attention on the issue and to urge policy-makers to consider taking action before it is too late. Specifically, the report: read more read less

Topics:

Childhood obesity (63%)63% related to the paper, Overweight (60%)60% related to the paper, Obesity (56%)56% related to the paper, Public health (54%)54% related to the paper, Depression (differential diagnoses) (52%)52% related to the paper
View PDF
3,953 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1467-789X.2008.00475.X
Tracking of childhood overweight into adulthood: a systematic review of the literature
01 Sep 2008 - Obesity Reviews

Abstract:

Overweight and obesity in youth are important public health concerns and are of particular interest because of possible long-term associations with adult weight status and morbidity. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature and update evidence concerning persistence of childhood overweight. A computer... Overweight and obesity in youth are important public health concerns and are of particular interest because of possible long-term associations with adult weight status and morbidity. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature and update evidence concerning persistence of childhood overweight. A computerized bibliographical search--restricted to studies with a prospective or retrospective longitudinal design--was conducted. Two authors independently extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of the included studies in four dimensions (i) study population and participation rate; (ii) study attrition; (iii) data collection and (iv) data analysis. Conclusions were based on a rating system of three levels of evidence. A total of 25 publications were selected for inclusion in this review. According to a methodological quality assessment, 13 studies were considered to be of high quality. The majority of these high-quality studies were published after 2001, indicating that recently published data, in particular, provide us with reliable information. All included studies consistently report an increased risk of overweight and obese youth becoming overweight adults, suggesting that the likelihood of persistence of overweight into adulthood is moderate for overweight and obese youth. However, predictive values varied considerably. Limiting aspects with respect to generalizability and methodological issues are discussed. read more read less

Topics:

Overweight (61%)61% related to the paper, Meta-analysis (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
2,329 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1467-789X.2007.00347.X
A comparison of direct vs. self-report measures for assessing height, weight and body mass index: a systematic review
S. Connor Gorber1, Mark S. Tremblay1, David Moher2, David Moher3, B. Gorber
01 Jul 2007 - Obesity Reviews

Abstract:

Obesity is a rapidly increasing public health problem, with surveillance most often based on self-reported values of height and weight. We conducted a systematic review to determine what empirical evidence exists regarding the agreement between objective (measured) and subjective (reported) measures in assessing height, weigh... Obesity is a rapidly increasing public health problem, with surveillance most often based on self-reported values of height and weight. We conducted a systematic review to determine what empirical evidence exists regarding the agreement between objective (measured) and subjective (reported) measures in assessing height, weight and body mass index (BMI). Five electronic databases were searched to identify observational and experimental studies on adult populations over the age of 18. Searching identified 64 citations that met the eligibility criteria and examined the relationship between self-reported and directly measured height or weight. Overall, the data show trends of under-reporting for weight and BMI and over-reporting for height, although the degree of the trend varies for men and women and the characteristics of the population being examined. Standard deviations were large indicating that there is a great deal of individual variability in reporting of results. Combining the results quantitatively was not possible because of the poor reporting of outcomes of interest. Accurate estimation of these variables is important as data from population studies such as those included in this review are often used to generate regional and national estimates of overweight and obesity and are in turn used by decision makers to allocate resources and set priorities in health. read more read less

Topics:

Body mass index (55%)55% related to the paper, Population (53%)53% related to the paper, Overweight (50%)50% related to the paper
1,821 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1467-789X.2009.00623.X
Subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue: structural and functional differences
Mohsen Ibrahim1
01 Jan 2010 - Obesity Reviews

Abstract:

Obesity is a heterogeneous disorder. Obese individuals vary in their body fat distribution, their metabolic profile and degree of associated cardiovascular and metabolic risk. Abdominal obesity carries greater risk of developing diabetes and future cardiovascular events than peripheral or gluteofemoral obesity. There are diff... Obesity is a heterogeneous disorder. Obese individuals vary in their body fat distribution, their metabolic profile and degree of associated cardiovascular and metabolic risk. Abdominal obesity carries greater risk of developing diabetes and future cardiovascular events than peripheral or gluteofemoral obesity. There are differences between adipose tissue present in subcutaneous areas (SCAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) present in the abdominal cavity. These include anatomical, cellular, molecular, physiological, clinical and prognostic differences. Anatomically, VAT is present mainly in the mesentery and omentum, and drains directly through the portal circulaion to the liver. VAT compared with SCAT is more cellular, vascular, innervated and contains a larger number of inflammatory and immune cells, lesser preadipocyte differentiating capacity and a greater percentage of large adipocytes. There are more glucocorticoid and androgen receptors in VAT than in SCAT. VAT adipocytes are more metabolically active, more sensitive to lipolysis and more insulin-resistant than SCAT adipocytes. VAT has a greater capacity to generate free fatty acids and to uptake glucose than SCAT and is more sensitive to adrenergic stimulation, while SCAT is more avid in absorption of circulating free fatty acids and triglycerides. VAT carries a greater prediction of mortality than SCAT. read more read less

Topics:

Adipose tissue (59%)59% related to the paper, Abdominal obesity (53%)53% related to the paper, Lipolysis (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
1,447 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1467-789X.2005.00170.X
Who succeeds in maintaining weight loss? A conceptual review of factors associated with weight loss maintenance and weight regain.
K Elfhag1, Stephan Rössner1
01 Feb 2005 - Obesity Reviews

Abstract:

Weight loss is difficult to achieve and maintaining the weight loss is an even greater challenge. The identification of factors associated with weight loss maintenance can enhance our understanding for the behaviours and prerequisites that are crucial in sustaining a lowered body weight. In this paper we have reviewed the lit... Weight loss is difficult to achieve and maintaining the weight loss is an even greater challenge. The identification of factors associated with weight loss maintenance can enhance our understanding for the behaviours and prerequisites that are crucial in sustaining a lowered body weight. In this paper we have reviewed the literature on factors associated with weight loss maintenance and weight regain. We have used a definition of weight maintenance implying intentional weight loss that has subsequently been maintained for at least 6 months. According to our review, successful weight maintenance is associated with more initial weight loss, reaching a self-determined goal weight, having a physically active lifestyle, a regular meal rhythm including breakfast and healthier eating, control of over-eating and self-monitoring of behaviours. Weight maintenance is further associated with an internal motivation to lose weight, social support, better coping strategies and ability to handle life stress, self-efficacy, autonomy, assuming responsibility in life, and overall more psychological strength and stability. Factors that may pose a risk for weight regain include a history of weight cycling, disinhibited eating, binge eating, more hunger, eating in response to negative emotions and stress, and more passive reactions to problems. read more read less

Topics:

Weight loss (62%)62% related to the paper, Weight gain (53%)53% related to the paper, Binge eating (52%)52% related to the paper
1,278 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Obesity Reviews.

It automatically formats your research paper to Wiley formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Obesity Reviews format uses apa citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Obesity Reviews in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Obesity Reviews guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Obesity Reviews guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Obesity Reviews guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Obesity Reviews?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Obesity Reviews citation style.

4. Can I use the Obesity Reviews templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Obesity Reviews.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Obesity Reviews that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Obesity Reviews that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Obesity Reviews?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Obesity Reviews.

7. Where can I find the template for the Obesity Reviews?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Obesity Reviews's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Obesity Reviews's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Obesity Reviews an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Obesity Reviews is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Obesity Reviews?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Obesity Reviews?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Obesity Reviews?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Obesity Reviews, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Obesity Reviews's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Obesity Reviews?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Obesity Reviews. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Obesity Reviews?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Obesity Reviews are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Obesity Reviews?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Obesity Reviews's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Obesity Reviews in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Obesity Reviews Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Obesity Reviews formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template