Example of Oxford Journal of Archaeology format
Recent searches

Example of Oxford Journal of Archaeology format Example of Oxford Journal of Archaeology format Example of Oxford Journal of Archaeology format Example of Oxford Journal of Archaeology format Example of Oxford Journal of Archaeology format Example of Oxford Journal of Archaeology format Example of Oxford Journal of Archaeology format Example of Oxford Journal of Archaeology format Example of Oxford Journal of Archaeology format Example of Oxford Journal of Archaeology format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Oxford Journal of Archaeology format Example of Oxford Journal of Archaeology format Example of Oxford Journal of Archaeology format Example of Oxford Journal of Archaeology format Example of Oxford Journal of Archaeology format Example of Oxford Journal of Archaeology format Example of Oxford Journal of Archaeology format Example of Oxford Journal of Archaeology format Example of Oxford Journal of Archaeology format Example of Oxford Journal of Archaeology format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Oxford Journal of Archaeology — Template for authors

Publisher: Wiley
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Archeology (arts and humanities) #63 of 295 down down by 24 ranks
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) #155 of 306 down down by 31 ranks
Geography, Planning and Development #366 of 704 down down by 141 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 87 Published Papers | 115 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 08/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 1.2
SJR: 0.347
SNIP: 0.618
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.0
SJR: 0.842
SNIP: 1.635
open access Open Access

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 1.3
SJR: 0.426
SNIP: 0.847
open access Open Access

Cambridge University Press

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 0.9
SJR: 0.331
SNIP: 1.071

Journal Performance & Insights

CiteRatio

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

1.3

CiteRatio for Oxford Journal of Archaeology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.3
2019 1.3
2018 1.8
2017 1.8
2016 1.9
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.382

5% from 2019

SJR for Oxford Journal of Archaeology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.382
2019 0.401
2018 0.539
2017 0.629
2016 0.586
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.721

35% from 2019

SNIP for Oxford Journal of Archaeology from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.721
2019 1.116
2018 1.245
2017 1.05
2016 1.201
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 5% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 35% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Oxford Journal of Archaeology

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Wiley

Oxford Journal of Archaeology

The Journal's geographical scope covers Europe, Mediterranean lands and the classical world from early prehistory to the end of the medieval period. Subject areas include archaeology, art, and art history, architecture, numismatics, the applications of scientific analysis and ...... Read More

Archaeology

Geography, Planning and Development

Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Social Sciences

i
Last updated on
08 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
0262-5253
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.086
i
Acceptance Rate
Not provided
i
Frequency
Not provided
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Yellow faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
apa
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker, C.W.J. (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene.Phys. Rev. Lett., 97 (6), 067 007. URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1468-0092.1985.TB00248.X
The raw materials of early glass production
Julian Henderson1

Abstract:

Summary This paper discusses raw materials used in ancient glasses. Following a consideration of some archaeological reasons for studying glass, the discussion concentrates on the evidence provided by chemical analysis of the glass, and focuses on glass from later prehistoric Western Europe. Consideration of the major, minor... Summary This paper discusses raw materials used in ancient glasses. Following a consideration of some archaeological reasons for studying glass, the discussion concentrates on the evidence provided by chemical analysis of the glass, and focuses on glass from later prehistoric Western Europe. Consideration of the major, minor and trace components of the glass leads to a conclusion that prehistoric glass artisans were able closely to control the addition of small quantities of colorants, opacifiers and clarifiers to the glass melt. Some possible ways of introducing such small quantities of these substances are suggested. A related implication is that glass production in prehistoric Europe was a mainly specialist industry, being part of a ‘high-status’socio-economic sphere. When interpreting technical analyses a full consideration of the socio-economic niche occupied by the glass industry is urged. read more read less

Topics:

Glass production (61%)61% related to the paper
219 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1468-0092.2010.00349.X
Connecting the dots: towards archaeological network analysis
Tom Brughmans1

Abstract:

In recent years network analysis has been applied in archaeological research to examine the structure of archaeological relationships of whatever sort. However, these archaeological applications share a number of issues concerning 1) the role of archaeological data in networks; 2) the diversity of network structures, their co... In recent years network analysis has been applied in archaeological research to examine the structure of archaeological relationships of whatever sort. However, these archaeological applications share a number of issues concerning 1) the role of archaeological data in networks; 2) the diversity of network structures, their consequences and their interpretation; 3) the critical use of quantitative tools; and 4) the influence of other disciplines, especially sociology. This article concerns a deconstruction of past archaeological methods for examining networks. Through a case study of Roman table wares in the eastern Mediterranean, the article highlights a number of issues with network analysis as a method for archaeology. It urges caution regarding the uncritical application of network analysis methods developed in other disciplines and applied to archaeology. However, it stresses the potential benefits of network analysis for the archaeological discipline and acknowledges the need for specifically archaeological network analysis, which should be based on relational thinking and can be expanded with an archaeological toolset for quantitative analysis read more read less

Topics:

Network science (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
156 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/1468-0092.00030
Clearances and Clearings: Deforestation in Mesolithic/Neolithic Britain
Tony Brown1

Abstract:

Clearances, interpreted from pollen records during the Mesolithic and Neolithic of Europe, are generally ascribed to purposive deforestation which is compatible with the transition model, whereby early Neolithic economic strategies are a development of late Mesolithic intensification of wild plant food husbandry. This paper c... Clearances, interpreted from pollen records during the Mesolithic and Neolithic of Europe, are generally ascribed to purposive deforestation which is compatible with the transition model, whereby early Neolithic economic strategies are a development of late Mesolithic intensification of wild plant food husbandry. This paper considers the role of natural processes in creating clearings and the role of inadvertent impact of human activity on forest processes, including woodland regeneration. The role of climate, wind-throw and lightning strikes in creating clearings and forest instability is emphasised and the evidence discussed from sites which may be interpreted as resulting from opportunistic human use of natural clearings. Unfortunately, regional pollen diagrams lack sufficient spatial resolution to detect the size of isolated clearings or establish the spatial variation in forest composition that was intimately related both to forest ecology and the effects of subtle human impacts. This may be the major reason for an apparent contradiction between pollen evidence of Neolithic impact and the archaeological record. Moreover, early Neolithic agricultural activity may have been concentrated in valley bottoms, which is undetectable in regional pollen diagrams. Alternative models need to be considered, which include culturally specific exploitation of the local environment, along with the inadvertent ecological repercussions of pre-agricultural and early-agricultural human activities in naturally dynamic woodlands. read more read less

Topics:

Mesolithic (55%)55% related to the paper, Deforestation (54%)54% related to the paper, Forest ecology (51%)51% related to the paper, Woodland (51%)51% related to the paper
136 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1468-0092.1996.TB00071.X
Wine, oil and the dialectics of power in bronze age crete: a review of the evidence
Yannis Hamilakis1

Abstract:

Summary ‘Mediterranean polyculture’(the systematic exploitation of olives and vines in addition to cereals from the beginning of the Bronze Age) has been considered as one of the main factors which led to the development of palatial institutions in Bronze Age Crete and mainland Greece. This paper reviews all the available,... Summary ‘Mediterranean polyculture’(the systematic exploitation of olives and vines in addition to cereals from the beginning of the Bronze Age) has been considered as one of the main factors which led to the development of palatial institutions in Bronze Age Crete and mainland Greece. This paper reviews all the available, direct archaeological evidence for olive and vine exploitation and oil and wine production and use from Bronze Age Crete (microbotanical, macrobotanical, artefactual, epigraphic), discussing at the same time their taphonomic, analytical and interpretative problems. It is suggested that, at present, there is no reliable direct archaeological evidence to substantiate the ‘Mediterranean polyculture’model. More significantly, research on wine and oil, if disconnected from the discourse of subsistence and the cultural-evolutionary models such as that of subsistence-redistribution and viewed within the framework of the anthropology of consumption, can more fruitfully illuminate important issues related to the dialects of power such as establishment and legitimation of authority, exploitation of labour and factional competition. read more read less

Topics:

Bronze Age (56%)56% related to the paper
123 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1468-0092.2004.00206.X
Pigs for the gods: burnt animal sacrifices as embodied rituals at a mycenaean sanctuary
Yannis Hamilakis1, Eleni Konsolaki

Abstract:

The archaeology of animal sacrifice has attracted considerable attention, although discussions on the meanings and social effects of the practice in different contexts are rather under-developed. In the Aegean, classical antiquity has provided abundant literary, zooarchaeological and iconographic evidence (and has inspired so... The archaeology of animal sacrifice has attracted considerable attention, although discussions on the meanings and social effects of the practice in different contexts are rather under-developed. In the Aegean, classical antiquity has provided abundant literary, zooarchaeological and iconographic evidence (and has inspired some excellent studies) but it has also overshadowed discussion on sacrifice in other periods. Until recently, it was assumed that burnt animal sacrifices (i.e. the ritual burning of bones or parts of the carcass, often taken to be offerings to the deities) were absent from the pre-classical contexts. Recent studies have shown this not to be the case. This article reports and discusses evidence for burnt animal sacrifices from the sanctuary of Ayios Konstantinos at Methana, north-east Peloponnese. It constitutes the first, zooarchaeologically verified such evidence from a sanctuary context. The main sacrificial animals seem to have been juvenile pigs, which were transported as whole carcasses into the main cultic room; non-meaty parts were selected for burning whereas their meaty parts were first consumed by humans and then thrown into the fire (some neonatal pigs may have been thrown into the fire whole). The article integrates zooarchaeological, other contextual, and comparative archaeological evidence and explores the social roles and meanings of sacrifice in the Mycenaean context and more broadly. It is suggested that, rather than focusing on possible continuities of the practice through to the classical period (an issue which remains ambiguous), sacrifice should be meaningfully discussed within the broader framework of the archaeology of feasting, and more generally food consumption, as a socially important, sensory embodied experience. The evidence from Ayios Konstantinos may reveal a hitherto eluding phenomenon: small-scale, sacrificial-feasting ritual in a religious context, conferring cosmological and ideological powers on few individuals, through the participation in an intense, embodied, transcendental experience. read more read less

Topics:

Animal sacrifice (55%)55% related to the paper, Sacrifice (54%)54% related to the paper, Context (language use) (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
110 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Oxford Journal of Archaeology.

It automatically formats your research paper to Wiley formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Oxford Journal of Archaeology format uses apa citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Oxford Journal of Archaeology in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Oxford Journal of Archaeology guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Oxford Journal of Archaeology guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Oxford Journal of Archaeology guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Oxford Journal of Archaeology?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Oxford Journal of Archaeology citation style.

4. Can I use the Oxford Journal of Archaeology templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Oxford Journal of Archaeology.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Oxford Journal of Archaeology that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Oxford Journal of Archaeology that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Oxford Journal of Archaeology?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Oxford Journal of Archaeology.

7. Where can I find the template for the Oxford Journal of Archaeology?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Oxford Journal of Archaeology's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Oxford Journal of Archaeology's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Oxford Journal of Archaeology an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Oxford Journal of Archaeology is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Oxford Journal of Archaeology?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Oxford Journal of Archaeology?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Oxford Journal of Archaeology?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Oxford Journal of Archaeology, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Oxford Journal of Archaeology's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Oxford Journal of Archaeology?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Oxford Journal of Archaeology. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Oxford Journal of Archaeology?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Oxford Journal of Archaeology are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Oxford Journal of Archaeology?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Oxford Journal of Archaeology's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Oxford Journal of Archaeology in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Oxford Journal of Archaeology Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Oxford Journal of Archaeology formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template