Example of Packaging Technology and Science format
Recent searches

Example of Packaging Technology and Science format Example of Packaging Technology and Science format Example of Packaging Technology and Science format Example of Packaging Technology and Science format Example of Packaging Technology and Science format Example of Packaging Technology and Science format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Packaging Technology and Science format Example of Packaging Technology and Science format Example of Packaging Technology and Science format Example of Packaging Technology and Science format Example of Packaging Technology and Science format Example of Packaging Technology and Science format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Packaging Technology and Science — Template for authors

Publisher: Wiley
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Mechanical Engineering #212 of 596 down down by 97 ranks
Chemistry (all) #160 of 398 down down by 50 ranks
Materials Science (all) #213 of 455 down down by 81 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
Good
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 218 Published Papers | 703 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 15/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

American Chemical Society

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 19.3
SJR: 4.853
SNIP: 2.079
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 14.3
SJR: 1.794
SNIP: 2.108
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.1
SJR: 0.686
SNIP: 1.835
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.7
SJR: 0.906
SNIP: 1.54

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

1.187

37% from 2018

Impact factor for Packaging Technology and Science from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 1.187
2018 1.881
2017 1.808
2016 1.32
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

3.2

CiteRatio for Packaging Technology and Science from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 3.2
2019 3.2
2018 3.7
2017 3.6
2016 3.2
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has decreased by 37% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.365

3% from 2019

SJR for Packaging Technology and Science from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.365
2019 0.375
2018 0.513
2017 0.783
2016 0.622
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.959

3% from 2019

SNIP for Packaging Technology and Science from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.959
2019 0.929
2018 1.407
2017 1.083
2016 0.922
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 3% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 3% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.
Packaging Technology and Science

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Wiley

Packaging Technology and Science

Packaging Technology & Science provides an international forum for the publication of research papers and review articles about developments in this field. As such, it is aimed at packaging engineers and technologists, food scientists and technologists, polymer scientists, tox...... Read More

Engineering

i
Last updated on
14 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
0894-3214
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.28
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Yellow faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
apa
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker, C.W.J. (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene.Phys. Rev. Lett., 97 (6), 067 007. URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1002/PTS.621
Recent innovations in barrier technologies for plastic packaging—a review
J. Lange1, Yves Wyser1

Abstract:

The barrier solutions presently available on the market all have their drawbacks, e.g. cost, water-sensitivity, opacity or perceived environmental bad-will. At the same time there is a trend to use more plastic-based packaging materials for different applications, e.g. as replacements for metal and glass containers. This situ... The barrier solutions presently available on the market all have their drawbacks, e.g. cost, water-sensitivity, opacity or perceived environmental bad-will. At the same time there is a trend to use more plastic-based packaging materials for different applications, e.g. as replacements for metal and glass containers. This situation has stimulated the industry to provide new, more efficient barrier solutions. The innovations go along five major lines: (a) thin, transparent vacuum-deposited coatings; (b) new barrier polymers as discrete layers; (c) blends of barrier polymers and standard polymers; (d) organic barrier coatings; and (e) nanocomposite materials. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the different approaches, outlining the principle behind each barrier technology, its performance, its potential and the companies developing and producing the materials. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. read more read less
710 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1002/PTS.2770080607
Technology and applications of edible protective films
Stéphane Guilbert1, Nathalie Gontard, Bernard Cuq

Abstract:

Edible films or coatings have provided an interesting and often essential complementary means for controlling the quality and stability of numerous food products. There are many potential uses of edible films (e.g. wrapping various products, individual protection of dried fruits, meat and fish, control of internal moisture tr... Edible films or coatings have provided an interesting and often essential complementary means for controlling the quality and stability of numerous food products. There are many potential uses of edible films (e.g. wrapping various products, individual protection of dried fruits, meat and fish, control of internal moisture transfer in pizzas, pies, etc.) which are based on the films properties (e.g. organoleptic, mechanical, gas and solute barrier). Polysaccharide (cellulose, starch, dextrin, vegetable and other gums, etc) and protein (gelatin, gluten, casein, etc) based films have suitable mechanical and organoleptic properties, while wax (beeswax, carnauba wax, etc) and lipid or lipid derivative films have enhanced water vapour barrier properties. The film-forming technology, solvent characteristics, plasticizing agents, temperature effects, solvent evaporation rate, coating operation and usage conditions of the film (relative humidity, temperature) can also substantially modify the ultimate properties of the film. read more read less

Topics:

Carnauba wax (56%)56% related to the paper, Dried fruit (53%)53% related to the paper, Wax (53%)53% related to the paper, Organoleptic (51%)51% related to the paper
427 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1002/PTS.692
Evaluation of oriented poly(lactide) polymers vs. existing PET and oriented PS for fresh food service containers
Rafael Auras, S. Paul Singh, Jagjit Singh1

Abstract:

Poly(lactide) (PLA) polymers have garnered increasing attention in the last few years as food packaging materials because they can be obtained from renewable resources; their production consumes quantities of carbon dioxide; they can be recycled and composted; and their physical and mechanical properties can be tailored throu... Poly(lactide) (PLA) polymers have garnered increasing attention in the last few years as food packaging materials because they can be obtained from renewable resources; their production consumes quantities of carbon dioxide; they can be recycled and composted; and their physical and mechanical properties can be tailored through polymer architecture. As a consequence, PLA is becoming a growing alternative as a ‘green’ food packaging material. PLA's optical, physical and mechanical properties have been compared to those of polystyrene (PS) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET), although studies comparing and showing the actual performance of PLA, PS and PET plastics containers are scarce. The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the role of PLA in package sustainability for the food service industry. Two of the commonly used materials to make containers to package fresh food, PET and oriented polystyrene (OPS), were compared with oriented PLA (OPLA) and OPLA with 40% recycled content from the industrial trimming process. The recycled OPLA provides an opportunity for full material utilization and lower costs. This study involved a number of tests to quantify the physical, mechanical, barrier and compatibility properties that would affect the selection criteria for containers to be used for food service applications. Based on the data collected, OPLA, OPLA + 40% regrind, OPS and PET performances were evaluated. Exposure of the four materials to vegetable oil and weak and strong acids show a minimal reduction in the performance of these polymers. At ambient temperature, PET has the highest impact resistance, followed by OPLA, OPS and OPLA + 40% regrind. In terms of barrier properties, PET shows the highest oxygen barrier, followed by OPLA, OPLA 40% recycled content, and OPS. Thus, OPLA and OPLA with 40% recycled content can be used for fresh food applications as well as OPS and PET, and in many situations it performs better than OPS and PET. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. read more read less
View PDF
250 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1002/PTS.2127
Packaging's Role in Minimizing Food Loss and Waste Across the Supply Chain
Karli Verghese1, Helen Lewis, Simon Lockrey1, Helén Williams2

Abstract:

This paper presents the results of Australian research that explored the role of packaging in minimizing food waste in the supply chain. The economic, social and environmental costs of food waste h ... This paper presents the results of Australian research that explored the role of packaging in minimizing food waste in the supply chain. The economic, social and environmental costs of food waste h ... read more read less

Topics:

Food waste (61%)61% related to the paper, Supply chain (58%)58% related to the paper
210 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1002/PTS.774
Antimicrobial films for food applications: a quantitative analysis of their effectiveness
Rolf D. Joerger1

Abstract:

A tremendous effort has been made over the last decade to develop and test films with antimicrobial properties to improve food safety and shelf life. This review catalogues and analyses the outcome of these research efforts. The bacteriocin nisin was the antimicrobial most commonly incorporated into films, followed by food-gr... A tremendous effort has been made over the last decade to develop and test films with antimicrobial properties to improve food safety and shelf life. This review catalogues and analyses the outcome of these research efforts. The bacteriocin nisin was the antimicrobial most commonly incorporated into films, followed by food-grade acids and salts, chitosan, plant extracts, and the enzymes lysozyme and lactoperoxidase. The methodologies for measuring antimicrobial activity of both edible and inedible films varied considerably among the studies. Results, defined as the difference in the log10 colony-forming unit (CFU) of a test organism exposed to a control film and the log10 CFU of the organism exposed to the antimicrobial film, ranged from 0 to 9 for many of the antimicrobials tested. Even for antimicrobials such as nisin, chitosan or antimicrobial acids with a ‘long’ history of studying their incorporation into antimicrobial films, the majority of results centred around 2 log10 reductions. The results suggest that antimicrobial films still face limitations and are perhaps still best viewed as part of a hurdle strategy to provide safe foods. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. read more read less

Topics:

Antimicrobial (58%)58% related to the paper
207 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Packaging Technology and Science.

It automatically formats your research paper to Wiley formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Packaging Technology and Science format uses apa citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Packaging Technology and Science in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Packaging Technology and Science guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Packaging Technology and Science guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Packaging Technology and Science guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Packaging Technology and Science?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Packaging Technology and Science citation style.

4. Can I use the Packaging Technology and Science templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Packaging Technology and Science.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Packaging Technology and Science that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Packaging Technology and Science that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Packaging Technology and Science?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Packaging Technology and Science.

7. Where can I find the template for the Packaging Technology and Science?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Packaging Technology and Science's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Packaging Technology and Science's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Packaging Technology and Science an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Packaging Technology and Science is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Packaging Technology and Science?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Packaging Technology and Science?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Packaging Technology and Science?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Packaging Technology and Science, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Packaging Technology and Science's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Packaging Technology and Science?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Packaging Technology and Science. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Packaging Technology and Science?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Packaging Technology and Science are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Packaging Technology and Science?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Packaging Technology and Science's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Packaging Technology and Science in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Packaging Technology and Science Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Packaging Technology and Science formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template