Example of Wildlife Monographs format
Recent searches

Example of Wildlife Monographs format Example of Wildlife Monographs format Example of Wildlife Monographs format Example of Wildlife Monographs format Example of Wildlife Monographs format Example of Wildlife Monographs format Example of Wildlife Monographs format Example of Wildlife Monographs format Example of Wildlife Monographs format Example of Wildlife Monographs format Example of Wildlife Monographs format Example of Wildlife Monographs format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Wildlife Monographs format Example of Wildlife Monographs format Example of Wildlife Monographs format Example of Wildlife Monographs format Example of Wildlife Monographs format Example of Wildlife Monographs format Example of Wildlife Monographs format Example of Wildlife Monographs format Example of Wildlife Monographs format Example of Wildlife Monographs format Example of Wildlife Monographs format Example of Wildlife Monographs format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Wildlife Monographs — Template for authors

Publisher: Wiley
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Nature and Landscape Conservation #20 of 177 down down by 18 ranks
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics #75 of 647 down down by 59 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 10 Published Papers | 55 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 18/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Cambridge University Press

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.2
SJR: 0.785
SNIP: 1.061
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.7
SJR: 1.001
SNIP: 1.212
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 8.9
SJR: 2.227
SNIP: 2.125
open access Open Access

Wiley

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.9
SJR: 1.214
SNIP: 1.356

Journal Performance & Insights

CiteRatio

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

5.5

8% from 2019

CiteRatio for Wildlife Monographs from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 5.5
2019 5.1
2018 8.6
2017 11.3
2016 10.1
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.912

43% from 2019

SJR for Wildlife Monographs from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.912
2019 1.613
2018 2.208
2017 2.666
2016 2.901
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.624

24% from 2019

SNIP for Wildlife Monographs from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.624
2019 2.125
2018 3.044
2017 3.272
2016 3.105
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 8% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 43% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 24% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.
Wildlife Monographs

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Wiley

Wildlife Monographs

Wildlife Monographs supplements The Journal of Wildlife Management with focused investigations in the area of the management and conservation of wildlife.... Read More

i
Last updated on
17 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
0084-0173
i
Impact Factor
High - 2.329
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Yellow faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
apa
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker, C.W.J. (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene.Phys. Rev. Lett., 97 (6), 067 007. URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007.

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article
Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations
01 Jan 1978 - Wildlife Monographs

Topics:

Statistical inference (66%)66% related to the paper
2,265 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article
Effects of Food Supply and Kinship on Social Behavior Movements and Population Growth of Black Bears in Northeastern Minnesota USA
01 Jan 1987 - Wildlife Monographs

Topics:

Kinship (60%)60% related to the paper, Population growth (55%)55% related to the paper
500 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.2193/0084-0173(2004)155[1:EOSNAP]2.0.CO;2
Effects of summer‐autumn nutrition and parturition date on reproduction and survival of elk
01 Jan 2004 - Wildlife Monographs

Abstract:

Recent declines in numbers and juvenile recruitment in many elk (Cervus elaphus) herds in the western U.S. has sparked interest in factors that may cause these declines. Inadequate nutrition or delayed parturition, the latter of which may be caused by inadequate numbers of mature bulls (i.e., highly skewed sex ratios), may ha... Recent declines in numbers and juvenile recruitment in many elk (Cervus elaphus) herds in the western U.S. has sparked interest in factors that may cause these declines. Inadequate nutrition or delayed parturition, the latter of which may be caused by inadequate numbers of mature bulls (i.e., highly skewed sex ratios), may have separate or synergistic effects on population dynamics and productivity. We evaluated the implications of late parturition and summer-autumn nutrition on reproduction and survival of Rocky Mountain elk (C. e. nelsoni) using a captive herd of 57 cow elk. We induced early (Sep) and late breeding (Oct) and 3 levels of summer-autumn nutrition on the cows. Food was offered ad libitum at 3 levels of digestible energy (DE): high = 2.9-3.0 kcal of DE/g of diets, medium = 2.6-3.0 kcal/g, and low = 2.3-3.0 kcal/g. Within these ranges, DE content was gradually reduced from late June through early November to mimic seasonal changes in the wild. During summer and autumn, we measured calf growth; body mass, nutritional condition, and breeding dynamics of cows; and growth and pregnancy of yearlings. We also measured carry-over (i.e., time-lag) responses including over-winter calf and cow survival and parturition date and birth mass, as functions of previous summer-autumn nutrition and previous parturition date. Between autumn 1995 and spring 1998, we conducted 2 years of parturition-date, summer-autumn nutrition experiments, 2 winters of calf survival experiments, and 1 winter of cow survival experiments. Early birth provided calves with more time to grow before onset of winter. This “head-start” advantage was maintained through late autumn, but its magnitude was diluted in some instances due to faster growth of some late-born calves. Body mass, body fat, and timing and probability of conception by cows in autumn were little influenced by parturition date the previous spring. Summer-autumn nutrition significantly affected calves and their mothers. Growth of calves in the low and medium nutrition groups ceased by mid-September and late October. By December, calves in the high nutrition group were 40% and 70% heavier than calves in the medium and low groups, respectively. Cows in the high nutrition group accumulated about 75% and 300% more fat than cows in the medium and low groups by mid-October. Eighty percent of cows in the low nutrition group failed to conceive, and those in the medium group bred 10–14 days later than cows in the high group. Summer-autumn nutrition of calves influenced their probability of becoming pregnant as yearlings. Probability of pregnancy approached 100% for those yearlings that had high summerautumn nutrition as calves and yearlings, despite near starvation their first winter of life. Winter survival of calves was related to their size at the onset of winter. Smaller calves lost more body mass daily than did large calves, and thus they survived fewer days through winter. Summer-autumn nutrition largely determined calf body size at the start of winter and, consequently, determined the proportion of winter survived. Survival of cows over winter was as related to body fat at the onset of winter as it was to nutrition during winter. Carry-over effects of summer-autumn nutrition and parturition date on birth characteristics the following spring were minor. We detected no significant carry-over effect of summer-autumn nutrition or autumn condition on birth mass, although reduced condition in autumn delayed subsequent parturition date. Extent of body fat depletion in cows during the winter-survival experiments in 1998 accounted for 45% of the variation in parturition date. Ninety percent depletion delayed parturition an average of 34 days. Delayed parturition, of a magnitude expected due to highly skewed sex ratios (3 weeks under extreme conditions), probably has only a weak influence on vital rates of free-ranging elk. In contrast, fat accretion and probability of pregnancy of cows, and growth and overwinter survival of calves, were sensitive to small (10–20%) differences in DE content of food. Digestible energy levels of our 2 lower nutrition levels reflect DE ranges reported for large ungulate herds during summer and autumn in western North America. Thus, our data suggest that limiting effects of summer-autumn nutrition on populations may be greater than often assumed, perhaps greater than those during winter in some ecosystems, and consequently indicate a need for greater understanding of nutrition's influence on population dynamics and how this influence varies across space and time. To enhance future research, we present animal- and vegetation-based guidelines for evaluating nutritional influences on elk populations. read more read less

Topics:

Population (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
377 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article
The role of predation in limiting moose at low densities in Alaska and Yukon and implications for conservation
01 Jan 1992 - Wildlife Monographs

Topics:

Limiting factor (55%)55% related to the paper, Predation (51%)51% related to the paper
340 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article
Factors influencing white-tailed deer activity patterns and habitat use.
Paul Beier1, Dale R. McCullough1
01 Jan 1990 - Wildlife Monographs

Topics:

Ecology (disciplines) (58%)58% related to the paper
331 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Wildlife Monographs.

It automatically formats your research paper to Wiley formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Wildlife Monographs format uses apa citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Wildlife Monographs in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Wildlife Monographs guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Wildlife Monographs guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Wildlife Monographs guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Wildlife Monographs?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Wildlife Monographs citation style.

4. Can I use the Wildlife Monographs templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Wildlife Monographs.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Wildlife Monographs that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Wildlife Monographs that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Wildlife Monographs?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Wildlife Monographs.

7. Where can I find the template for the Wildlife Monographs?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Wildlife Monographs's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Wildlife Monographs's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Wildlife Monographs an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Wildlife Monographs is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Wildlife Monographs?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Wildlife Monographs?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Wildlife Monographs?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Wildlife Monographs, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Wildlife Monographs's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Wildlife Monographs?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Wildlife Monographs. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Wildlife Monographs?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Wildlife Monographs are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Wildlife Monographs?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Wildlife Monographs's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Wildlife Monographs in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Wildlife Monographs Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Wildlife Monographs formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template