Showing papers by "ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. published in 2001"

5-Hydroxytryptamine2A Receptor Inverse Agonists as Antipsychotics

Abstract: We have used a cell-based functional assay to define the pharmacological profiles of a wide range of central nervous system active compounds as agonists, competitive antagonists, and inverse agonists at almost all known monoaminergic G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) subtypes. Detailed profiling of 40 antipsychotics confirmed that as expected, most of these agents are potent competitive antagonists of the dopamine D2 receptor. Surprisingly, this analysis also revealed that most are potent and fully efficacious 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)2A receptor inverse agonists. No other molecular property was shared as universally by this class of compounds. Furthermore, comparisons of receptor potencies revealed that antipsychotics with the highest extrapyramidal side effects (EPS) liability are significantly more potent at D2 receptors, the EPS-sparing atypical agents had relatively higher potencies at 5-HT2A receptors, while three were significantly more potent at 5-HT2A receptors. Functional high-throughput screening of a diverse chemical library identified 530 ligands with inverse agonist activity at 5-HT2A receptors, including several series of compounds related to known antipsychotics, as well as a number of novel chemistries. An analog of one of the novel chemical series, AC-90179, was pharmacologically profiled against the remaining monoaminergic GPCRs and found to be a highly selective 5-HT2A receptor inverse agonist. The behavioral pharmacology of AC-90179 is characteristic of an atypical antipsychotic agent.

Azacyclic compounds for use in the treatment of serotonin related diseases

Abstract: Compound and methods are provided for the treatment of disease conditions in which modification of serotonergic receptor activity has a beneficial effect. In the method, an effective amount of a compound of formula (II) is administered to a patient in need of such treatment.

Determinants of Agonist Binding Affinity on Neuronal Nicotinic Receptor β Subunits

Abstract: The alpha and beta subunits of heteromeric neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) are thought to contribute "principal" and "complementary" components to the agonist binding site, respectively. At least six loops of amino acid sequence (A, B, and C from alpha; D, E, and F from beta) are involved. We demonstrated previously that receptors containing the beta2 subunit had consistently higher affinities for a variety of agonists than beta4-containing receptors. For example, the affinity of the alpha2beta2 receptor for epibatidine, ACh, nicotine, and dimethylphenylpiperazinium (DMPP) exceeds that of alpha2beta4 by 9-, 61-, 87-, and 120-fold, respectively. Using saturation and competition analysis of receptors formed by chimeric beta subunits coexpressed with alpha2 in Xenopus laevis oocytes, we have now identified sequence segment 54-63 (corresponding to loop D) as a major determinant of affinity for epibatidine, ACh, nicotine, and DMPP. We then analyzed a series of mutant beta2 subunits in which each residue that differs between beta2 and beta4 in this region was changed from what occurs in beta2 to what occurs in beta4. The N55S, V56I, and E63T mutations each resulted in a loss of affinity for ACh and nicotine of 3- to 4-fold, whereas the T59K mutation resulted in a 7-fold loss of ACh and nicotine affinity. These mutations had little or no effect on epibatidine and DMPP affinity. The positive charge introduced by the T59K mutation does not appear to underlie loss of agonist affinity, because a similar loss of affinity was observed when a negative charge (T59D) was introduced at this position.

Discriminative stimulus effects of the type-4 phosphodiesterase inhibitor rolipram in rats.

Abstract: Rationale: Rolipram, an inhibitor of cyclic AMP phosphodiesterase (PDE4) produces discriminative stimulus effects in rats. These effects may be related to a wide range of central nervous system effects described previously. Objective: The purposes of the present study were to: (i) assess the specificity of the discriminative stimulus effects of rolipram; (ii) examine the role of beta adrenergic receptors; (iii) assess the effects of imipramine and nisoxetine; and (iv) determine whether SKF 38393, a compound which also increases cAMP levels, substitutes for rolipram. Methods: Rats were trained to discriminate 0.1 mg/kg rolipram from its vehicle in a two-lever task. Following discrimination training, substitution and antagonism tests were carried out. Results: In generalization tests, the PDE4 inhibitors ICI 63,197 and Ro 20-1724 substituted for rolipram in a dose-dependent manner (substitution at 0.3 mg/kg and 3 mg/kg, respectively). The selective inhibitors of PDE1, PDE2, and PDE5/6 did not substitute for rolipram; however, a dose of 10 mg/kg of the PDE3 inhibitor milrinone did substitute. The beta adrenergic agonists clenbuterol and dobutamine at least partially substituted for rolipram (0.1 mg/kg and 18 mg/kg, respectively). By contrast, the D1 dopaminergic agonist SKF 38393 and the monoamine uptake inhibitors imipramine and nisoxetine were ineffective (at doses up to 3, 10, and 10 mg/kg, respectively). Conclusions: The present results indicate that the discriminative stimulus effects of rolipram are related to the inhibition of the hydrolytic activity of PDE4. Generalized increases in cyclic nucleotides do not appear to be sufficient for producing rolipram-like effects. It appears that a mechanism involving beta adrenergic receptors may contribute to the effects of rolipram, consistent with previous neuropharmacological data. Finally, the discriminative stimulus effects of rolipram appear to be unrelated to its antidepressant-like effect, but may provide a surrogate marker for central nervous system-related side effects of PDE4 inhibitors.

Overview of Receptor Cloning

Abstract: Receptors are generally categorized into four major superfamilies according to their structural and genetic similarities: steroid receptors, growth factor receptors, ionotropic receptors (i.e., ligand-gated ion channels), and metabotropic receptors (i.e., G protein-coupled receptors). This unit describes the methodology and critical issues for cloning receptors by several methods. Although cloning by protein purification was the first major method, it is now less frequently employed. The early, more tedious procedures broadened knowledge about receptors and established a strong foundation that has enabled the utilization of the newer approaches discussed in this unit, including: homology cloning by screening with oligonucleotides, DNA fragments or the products of direct polymerase chain reaction (PCR); expression cloning using function, ligand binding, and antibody recognition; and differential display techniques.