scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Amazon.com

CompanySeattle, Washington, United States
About: Amazon.com is a company organization based out in Seattle, Washington, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Service (business) & Service provider. The organization has 13363 authors who have published 17317 publications receiving 266589 citations.


Papers
More filters
Patent
07 Jun 2001
TL;DR: In this article, a computer process is disclosed for selecting items to present or recommend to users based on the referring sites accessed by such users, including tracking referrals of users from referring sites to a target site, and recording the item selections of the referred users from an electronic catalog of the target site.
Abstract: A computer process is disclosed for selecting items to present or recommend to users based on the referring sites accessed by such users. The process includes tracking referrals of users from referring sites to a target site, and recording the item selections of the referred users from an electronic catalog of the target site. The process may also include analyzing the recorded item selections of the users to identify, for a particular subset of the referring sites, a set of items that correspond to group preferences of users referred to the target site by the subset of referring sites. These identified items may thereafter be presented to users who access a site that is a member of the subset of referring sites.

122 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
01 Dec 2016
TL;DR: This work proposes a max-pooling based loss function for training Long Short-Term Memory networks for small-footprint keyword spotting (KWS), with low CPU, memory, and latency requirements and results show that LSTM models trained using cross-entropy loss or max- Pooling loss outperform a cross-ENTropy loss trained baseline feed-forward Deep Neural Network (DNN).
Abstract: We propose a max-pooling based loss function for training Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks for small-footprint keyword spotting (KWS), with low CPU, memory, and latency requirements. The max-pooling loss training can be further guided by initializing with a cross-entropy loss trained network. A posterior smoothing based evaluation approach is employed to measure keyword spotting performance. Our experimental results show that LSTM models trained using cross-entropy loss or max-pooling loss outperform a cross-entropy loss trained baseline feed-forward Deep Neural Network (DNN). In addition, max-pooling loss trained LSTM with randomly initialized network performs better compared to cross-entropy loss trained LSTM. Finally, the max-pooling loss trained LSTM initialized with a cross-entropy pre-trained network shows the best performance, which yields 67:6% relative reduction compared to baseline feed-forward DNN in Area Under the Curve (AUC) measure.

122 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is found that many endemic species and ecological systems are lacking national-level protection; a third of endemic species have distributions completely outside of national protected areas; new complementary protected areas are needed to safeguard these endemics and ecosystems.
Abstract: The Andes-Amazon basin of Peru and Bolivia is one of the most data-poor, biologically rich, and rapidly changing areas of the world. Conservation scientists agree that this area hosts extremely high endemism, perhaps the highest in the world, yet we know little about the geographic distributions of these species and ecosystems within country boundaries. To address this need, we have developed conservation data on endemic biodiversity (~800 species of birds, mammals, amphibians, and plants) and terrestrial ecological systems (~90; groups of vegetation communities resulting from the action of ecological processes, substrates, and/or environmental gradients) with which we conduct a fine scale conservation prioritization across the Amazon watershed of Peru and Bolivia. We modelled the geographic distributions of 435 endemic plants and all 347 endemic vertebrate species, from existing museum and herbaria specimens at a regional conservation practitioner's scale (1:250,000-1:1,000,000), based on the best available tools and geographic data. We mapped ecological systems, endemic species concentrations, and irreplaceable areas with respect to national level protected areas. We found that sizes of endemic species distributions ranged widely ( 200,000 km2) across the study area. Bird and mammal endemic species richness was greatest within a narrow 2500-3000 m elevation band along the length of the Andes Mountains. Endemic amphibian richness was highest at 1000-1500 m elevation and concentrated in the southern half of the study area. Geographical distribution of plant endemism was highly taxon-dependent. Irreplaceable areas, defined as locations with the highest number of species with narrow ranges, overlapped slightly with areas of high endemism, yet generally exhibited unique patterns across the study area by species group. We found that many endemic species and ecological systems are lacking national-level protection; a third of endemic species have distributions completely outside of national protected areas. Protected areas cover only 20% of areas of high endemism and 20% of irreplaceable areas. Almost 40% of the 91 ecological systems are in serious need of protection (= < 2% of their ranges protected). We identify for the first time, areas of high endemic species concentrations and high irreplaceability that have only been roughly indicated in the past at the continental scale. We conclude that new complementary protected areas are needed to safeguard these endemics and ecosystems. An expansion in protected areas will be challenged by geographically isolated micro-endemics, varied endemic patterns among taxa, increasing deforestation, resource extraction, and changes in climate. Relying on pre-existing collections, publically accessible datasets and tools, this working framework is exportable to other regions plagued by incomplete conservation data.

122 citations

Patent
29 Sep 2008
TL;DR: A knowledge representation system as mentioned in this paper is a knowledge base in which knowledge is represented in a structured, machine-readable format that encodes meaning, e.g., a knowledge graph.
Abstract: Embodiments of the present invention relate to knowledge representation systems which include a knowledge base in which knowledge is represented in a structured, machine-readable format that encodes meaning.

122 citations

Patent
29 Mar 2016
TL;DR: In this paper, a system that is capable of controlling multiple entertainment systems and/or speakers using voice commands is described, where the system receives voice commands and may determine audio sources and speakers indicated by voice commands.
Abstract: A system that is capable of controlling multiple entertainment systems and/or speakers using voice commands. The system receives voice commands and may determine audio sources and speakers indicated by the voice commands. The system may generate audio data from the audio sources and may send the audio data to the speakers using multiple interfaces. For example, the system may send the audio data directly to the speakers using a network address, may send the audio data to the speakers via a voice-enabled device or may send the audio data to the speakers via a speaker controller. The system may generate output zones including multiple speakers and may associate input devices with speakers within the output zones. For example, the system may receive a voice command from an input device in an output zone and may reduce output audio generated by speakers in the output zone.

121 citations


Authors

Showing all 13498 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Jiawei Han1681233143427
Bernhard Schölkopf1481092149492
Christos Faloutsos12778977746
Alexander J. Smola122434110222
Rama Chellappa120103162865
William F. Laurance11847056464
Andrew McCallum11347278240
Michael J. Black11242951810
David Heckerman10948362668
Larry S. Davis10769349714
Chris M. Wood10279543076
Pietro Perona10241494870
Guido W. Imbens9735264430
W. Bruce Croft9742639918
Chunhua Shen9368137468
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Microsoft
86.9K papers, 4.1M citations

89% related

Google
39.8K papers, 2.1M citations

88% related

Carnegie Mellon University
104.3K papers, 5.9M citations

87% related

ETH Zurich
122.4K papers, 5.1M citations

82% related

University of Maryland, College Park
155.9K papers, 7.2M citations

82% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20234
2022168
20212,015
20202,596
20192,002
20181,189